Criteria for water quality assessment between countries: how to proceed in the next few years ? F. László Water Resources Research Centre Budapest, Hungary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EU-LIST OF PRIORITY SUBSTANCES A NEW STRATEGY AGAINST WATER POLLUTION Bernd Mehlhorn, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
Advertisements

SISTEM PENGOLAHAN AIR, UDARA & LIMBAH PADAT
Water Quality & Testing
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Division of Water Quality
The Danube Basin ICPDR Philip Weller Danube Leaders Conference, Novi Sad, July 9, 2010 The Ecological Foundations for Development.
ECOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT QUALITY DEVELOPED BY: Research Organization “Ukrainian Scientific Centre of the Ecology of Sea” (RO UkrSCES)
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Surface.
Post-Katrina Water Quality Assessment: Lake Pontchartrain and Surrounding Water Bodies Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Assessment.
WASTEWATER. Wastewater -used water (from human activity) -contains pollutants.
International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Danube River Basin Joachim Bendow, ICPDR Executive Secretary 1.
State of the Niagara River Brad Hill Environment Canada Burlington, Ontario CANADA.
Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University.
AUTHORS: THE STUDENTS IX-a E - MARTIN ADRIAN, X-a A – RADU IOANA, PASCU FLORINA, ZINCĂ CRISTINA, MAZILU COSMIN, XI-a H – GHIŢĂ LILIANA This project has.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
Status of the State of Environment (SoE) monitoring and reporting Republic of Macedonia Katerina Nikolovska Ljupka Dimovska Zajkov Macedonian Envirnmental.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
CHEMICAL-PHYSICO MONITORING SUPPORTING ECOLOGICAL STATUS FOR THE EU WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE BY MICHAEL JACKMAN CHEMISTRY EXPERT.
BIOENGINEER ANALYSIS WATER. GOALS Students learn how to collect water samples. Then, they will aseptically collect a water sample and use a microscope.
Water Quality and Testing. Water Quality Water quality is the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of water The vast majority of surface.
The River Taff is formed when the Taff Fechan meets the Taff Fawr. The river then runs south and to Cardiff Bay. 'Photolibrary Wales photo library'
Thuli and Mzingwane catchments’ hydrochemistry Implications for risks Thuli and Mzingwane catchments’ hydrochemistry Implications for risks 6/16/2009.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Assessing The Microbiological and Heavy Metal Burden in Some Fresh Water and Marine Fishes in a Segment of the Bight of Bonny, Niger Delta Area of Nigeria.
1 AMPS 5 Expert Group on Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances Georg Hanke, Jan Wollgast JRC IES IMW.
Water.europa.eu Questionnaire on existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(a) Helen Clayton WFD Team.
Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay Non-Tidal Network Water Quality Stations 2011 Monitoring Update.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
1 New policies in environmental quality strategies within the EU Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Fulvio Ferrara Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Rome, Italy.
Methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on monitoring programmes (Article 11) Milieu Ltd Consortium WG DIKE, September 2014.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN HUNGARY Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry of Transport and Water Management Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry.
Alexander KORSHENKO STATE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE (SOI) Kropotkinsky Lane 6, Moscow BLACK and AZOV Hydrochemistry.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan
AMPS 2 Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants Second Meeting Ispra Review of Actions.
Development of WFD compliant Transnational Monitoring Network in the Danube River Basin Dr. Igor Liška ICPDR Secretariat.
19 June 2003, Athens, Greece INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT THE RIVER BASIN PERSPECTIVE The Jucar River Basin - First results Teodoro Estrela Júcar PRB Coordinator.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
BUG SURVEYS : An Initiation of Transboundary Co- operation Małgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in Szczecin.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Potential of ozone for the removal of hazardous micropollutants and related changes in dissolved organic matter composition in a municipal biotreated effluent.
1 Current Analytical Challenges in Water Policy Philippe QUEVAUVILLER Joint NORMA-EAQCWISE-CMA Workshop, Paris 21 October 2008.
Priority Substances - Source Screening and Measures Sheets Tenth Meeting of Working Group E on Chemical Aspects 24 June 2010.
Chp 7 Eastern Europe. What is one of Poland’s most important industries?  Coal Mining 204.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs PRIORITY SUBSTANCES AND EQS’s IN THE PROYECT INCEPTION WORKSHOP Istanbul February -
Monitoring Water Quality. Water quality is determined by its use. Governments set the guidelines for water quality based on the following 5 categories:
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL VARIABLES Overview.
1 SoE content review - Maintenance and content development of data flows (SoE and WFD) Freshwater Eionet Workshop, June 2015 Ursula Schmedtje, Federal.
1 Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-1 Lecture -4 & 5.
ESTIMATED COMPOSITION Of Solid WASTES
Lynas Advanced Materials Plant
Lecture (6): Water pollution
OBJECTIVES a. To evaluate the impact of continuing schemes
Alexander Petrovich Dalimayev,
4th Expert E-PRTR Group Meeting Brussels, 4 February 2011
Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template
Chemical state in lakes and rivers
Naming compounds 30 November 2018.
CIS WORKSHOP ON SURFACE WATERS MONITORING NETWORKS
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
WG C Groundwater Threshold Values
Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants
Data collection and dedicated maps on contaminants
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire
Sediment & biota standards Monitoring for prioritisation & emerging pollutants National EQSs for specific substances.
WGGW Bratislava – 26 October 2016
Presentation transcript:

Criteria for water quality assessment between countries: how to proceed in the next few years ? F. László Water Resources Research Centre Budapest, Hungary

Water quality assessment systems were developed traditionally at national level in the past. The differences are significant between the national water quality assessment systems.

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries River Danube length: 2857 km river basin: sq.km countries: Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Hungary, Croatia, Slovenia, Republic of Yugoslavia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine population: 82 million mean water discharge at the Danube Delta: 6550 m3/s

Orientation map of Danube river basin

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries Basic characters of the national systems

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries Similarities and differences in limit/target values Limit/target values of oxygen regime parameters are similar in the national assessment/classification systems

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries Similarities and differences in limit/target values Big differences in the limits for nutrients, heavy metals, organic micropollutants

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries Biological aspects of water quality assessment in the Danube countries

Comparison of water quality assessment systems of the Danube countries Assessment of sediment pollution

Harmonization of water quality assessment in the scope of Danube River Protection Convention Operation of TransNational Monitoring Network (TNMN) Objectives of TNMN: support the assessment of water quality; support the estimation of pollutant loads; assist in the identification of major pollution sources Sampling sites: stations at or near to state border; stations upstream of confluences of tributaries; stations upstream of major abstraction sites for drinking water supply

Operation of TransNational Monitoring Network List of determinands in water: suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, alkalinity, ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, organic nitrogen, ortho-phosphate, total phosphorus, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, sulphate, iron, manganese, zinc, copper, chromium, lead, cadmium, mercury, nickel, arsenic, aluminium, BOD, COD, DOC, phenol index, anion active surfactants, petroleum hydrocarbons, AOX, lindane, pp’-DDT, atrazine, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, total coliforms, faecal coliforms, faecal streptococci, salmonella, chlorophyll-a, saprobity index

Operation of TransNational Monitoring Network List of determinands in sediment: organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, iron, magnesium, zinc, copper, chromium, lead, cadmium, mercury, nickel, arsenic, aluminium, TOC, petroleum hydrocarbons, total extractable matter, PAHs lindane, pp’-DDT, PCBs

Water Framework Directive Biological, chemical and physico-chemical elements for the classification of ecological status composition and abundance of aquatic flora; composition and abundance of benthic invertebrate fauna; composition, abundance and age of structure of fish fauna; thermal conditions; oxygenation conditions; salinity; acidification status; nutrient conditions; specific pollutants

Water Framework Directive Priority pollutants alachlor, anthracene, atrazine, benzene, brominated diphenylether, cadmium and its compounds, C chloralkanes, chlorfenvinphos, chlorpyrifos, 1,2- dichlormethane,dichlorethane, di(2-ethylhexyl)phtalate, diuron, endosulfan, fluoranthene, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, hexachlorocyclohexane, isoproturon, lead and its compounds,mercury and its compounds, naphtalene, nickel and its compounds, nonylphenols, octylphenols, pentachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, simazine, tributyltin ompounds, trichlorobenzenes, trichloromethane, trifluralin

How to proceed in the near future ? Involve additional hydrobiological parameters (adaption or development of methods) Focus on priority pollutants (surveys) Continue checking compliance of water quality criteria of different water uses