1 Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems NHTSA Final Rule George J. Soodoo U.S.DOT/NHTSA 51 st GRRF Geneva, Switzerland February 4-8, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) Standards
Advertisements

Nebraska Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) Commercial Motor Vehicle Crashes in Nebraska, Dan Christensen Ming Qu Prabhakar Dhungana.
1 ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL March 2007 Status Report on Comments to NHTSA’s Proposed Rule and Next Steps for WP.29 Informal document No. WP ,
A seminar on SELF INFLATINING TIRE SYSTEM
Penn Liberty Motors Safety Features  Seat Belts  Rear Seat Head Restraints  Head Injury Protection  Seat Belt Reminder System  Traction Control.
Decrease gasoline consumption: Standard pressure help to decrease the running resistance; Gasoline consumption for common vehicles will reduce 3—6 % while.
Light Vehicle Rollover Background on NHTSA’s Activities in this Area.
WHEELS & TIRES.
UNECE-Regulation No. 64 Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) Informal document No. GRRF (60th GRRF, September 2006 agenda item 5.3.)
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle CAFE and GHG Standards Joint Briefing for WP29 June 2010 Informal document No. WP ,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Applicability Each standard of this part applies to all motor vehicles or items of motor vehicle equipment manufactured.
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
TIRE APPLICATIONS & USE
1 U.S. TIRE STANDARDS RULEMAKING George J. Soodoo U.S. DOT/NHTSA 51 st GRRF February 4-8, 2002 Geneva, Switzerland.
TIRE SAFETY Tyre Safety.
1 Informal Document No nd GRRF,16-18 September 2002 Agenda Item 6. Submission by the United States of America for information on the status of rulemaking.
Extending the Lifespan of Tires By Shmuel L. Weissman and Jerome L. Sackman Symplectic Engineering Corporation and David Gillen and Carl L. Monismith Institute.
1 Informal Document No th GRRF, 6-8 October 2003 Agenda Item 6. Status of tire rulemaking actions Submission by the United States of America for.
1 Overview  TPMS Motivations  Principles of tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS)  Impact Factors for Direct TPMS  Impact Factors for Indirect TPMS.
TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS
1 Light Truck Tyres (C Tyre types and LT Tyre types) Roadmap for Harmonization March 2009 Informal document No. WP (147th WP.29, March.
Vinai Hudda.  What we know so far  Who can contribute to Reduce Rolling Resistance  Tyre Industry’s Role  Pneumatic Tyre – Awareness Level  Effect.
1. Please Pay Attentions  Research studies show that under-inflated tires are a major issue today. In the USA  27% of passenger cars and 32% of light.
1 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Rulemaking National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Informal Document No. WP th session, June.
1 Informal Document No. GRRF th GRRF,31 January – February 4, 2005 Agenda Item 5.9. Submission by the United States of America for information.
TYRE SAFETY. 2 1 Most of us operate motor vehicle on a daily basis and hardly ever pay any attention to one of the most vital part of the vehicle which.
May 5, 2004Slide 2 Team Organization May 5, 2004Slide 3 Overview Define Goals, Objectives, Risks Product Components Prototype Components Testing Budget.
Presented to the California Energy Commission by Tim J. LaClair, Ph.D.
04 September September September Drive Safe Driving Safely ‘’LTS GZ’’
Chevy Volt. Volt Overview Extended-Range Electric Vehicle Available for mass purchase in 2010 as a 2011 model year Designed to meet the needs of 75% of.
1 TIRE SAFETY SAFETY is the number 1 value of the company!!!
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,
T HE C OMMUNITY E LIGIBILITY P ROVISION (CEP) Notification & Data Requirements.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
OmnAuto (“All Car”). October 20, Members October 20, OmnAuto 1.Define the Problem 2.US Government Issues 3.Define the Solution 4.Market Identified.
ESP Electronic Stability Programs
Managing Effective Seat Belt Programs Phil Haseltine Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety September 14, 2004.
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL NHTSA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Briefing for WP.29 November, 2006 Informal document No. WP (140th WP.29,
Slide 1 Drug Pricing Considerations Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 ___________ Copyright 2005 Arnold & Porter July.
IIHS 2 nd Annual Regional Safety Conference Emerging Vehicle Safety Technology October 18, 2007 Stephen Oesch.
Done By Ong Ka-Shing Huang Zhang Shengxi Cao Wei In Cars.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 9 1 MER301:Engineering Reliability LECTURE 9: Chapter 4: Decision Making for a Single.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
A Tire Industry Perspective on Tire Rolling Resistance Tracey Norberg Rubber Manufacturers Association Presentation to the California Energy Commission.
Proposed Amendments to Heavy-Duty On-Board Diagnostic Requirements August 23, 2012 Heavy-Duty OBD.
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
Safety Features.  Seat Belts  Rear Seat Head Restraints  Head Injury Protection  Seat Belt Reminder System  Traction Control.
The US Vehicle Safety Regulatory Process Martin Koubek Office of International Policy and Harmonization National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
CAC Training Run-Flat tires & TPMS Basics Noah Yanowitz, Service Engineering, December 9, 2008.
Contestability in Connections Contestability Working Group Meeting NIE/SONI Joint Presentation 9 September
Informal Document No. GRRF th GRRF, September 2004 Agenda Item 6
TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS
Document TYREGTR (Geneva, 23 January 2017)
ESP Electronic Stability Programs
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
Things to Consider While Choosing an Electric Fuel Pump
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
RIA Case Study from the United States FMVSS No
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
ETRTO proposal for UN R30 & 64 amendments Extended Mobility Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Electronic Stability Control Systems
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Inflation Pressure Markings
Presentation transcript:

1 Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems NHTSA Final Rule George J. Soodoo U.S.DOT/NHTSA 51 st GRRF Geneva, Switzerland February 4-8, 2002

2 Background Congress mandated a final rule to require a warning system “in motor vehicles to indicate to the operator when a tire is significantly under- inflated” be completed by November 1, 2001 Congress mandated that this rule must take effect by November 1, 2003

3 NHTSA Tire Pressure Survey February 2001 nationwide survey of more than 11,000 vehicles at gas stations Purpose was to learn about real-world inflation pressure levels –Learned that trucks are typically more under-inflated than cars –More than one-third of vehicles were at least 20% under for one tire –More than one-fourth of vehicles were at least 25% under for one tire

4 Under-inflated tires on cars DP<= -10 psi # of tires -10<DP<= -6 # of tires -6<DP<= -3 # of tires -3<DP<= 0 # of tires 1 or more: 17.4%1 or more: 24.5%1 or more: 39.7%1 or more : 46.7% 2 or more: 5.8%2 or more: 10.7%2 or more: 20.6%2 or more: 26.7% 3 or more: 2.5%3 or more: 5.8%3 or more: 9.0%3 or more: 12.6% All 4 tires: 1.8%All 4 tires: 2.8%All 4 tires: 4.1%All 4 tires: 5.0%

5 Under-inflated tires on LTVs DP<= -10 psi # of tires -10<DP<= -6 # of tires -6<DP<= -3 # of tires -3<DP<= 0 # of tires 1 or more: 19.7%1 or more: 30.1%1 or more: 43.7%1 or more : 44.2% 2 or more: 8.4%2 or more: 13.7%2 or more: 25.7%2 or more: 25.0% 3 or more: 3.2%3 or more: 7.8%3 or more: 12.5%3 or more: 12.7% All 4 tires: 2.0%All 4 tires: 4.8%All 4 tires: 5.1%All 4 tires: 6.1%

6 NHTSA Tire Pressure Research Met with all known suppliers of tire pressure monitoring systems Met with vehicle and tire manufacturers to learn of their experience with these systems Evaluated our data to identify crashes and injuries that could be addressed by these monitoring systems

7 Types of TPMS Indirect Systems –Work with ABS wheel speed sensors; as inflation pressure drops, radius of tire decreases and rotational speed of wheel increases –As relative rotational speed increases above programmed level, system warns driver of under-inflation –Currently offered on a few cars (e.g., Oldsmobile Alero) and some vans (Toyota Sienna and Ford Windstar)

8 Types of TPMS Direct Systems –Use a pressure sensor in each wheel to directly measure pressure in each tire –Transmit data via a wireless radio frequency transmitter to a central receiver that monitors the data and connects to a display mounted inside the vehicle –Currently offered on a few high-end cars (Chevrolet Corvette and BMW and Mercedes models)

9 Definition of Significantly Under- inflated There is no “bright line” divide where a tire is “significantly under-inflated” –As tire becomes more under-inflated, stress on tire increases and risk of failure increases Proposed two alternative definitions of “significantly under-inflated” to reflect different possible views of that term

10 Alternative 1 in NPRM Require driver to be notified when 1 to 4 tires are 20% under recommended inflation pressure or at 20 psi, whichever is greater –Essentially requires direct systems in the near term –This choice requires the most-capable current system, so it both ensures the greatest safety benefits and costs more

11 Alternative 2 in NPRM Require driver to be notified when 1 to 3 tires are 25% under recommended inflation pressure or at 20 psi, whichever is greater –Permits both direct systems and improved indirect systems –This choice permits continued use of indirect systems, so it results in lower costs, but the lesser performance results in lesser safety benefits

12 Low Tire Pressure Activation Tire TypeMax. Inflation Pressure (kPa) Min. Activation Pressure (kPa) P-metric - Standard P-metric – Extra Load LT load range C LT load range D LT load range E550320

13 Benefits and Costs Estimate NHTSA estimates that Alternative 1 would prevent 79 deaths and 10,635 injuries, annually, at an average cost of $66 per vehicle. Alternative 2 would prevent 49 deaths and 6,585 injuries, annually, at an average cost of $31 per vehicle. When fuel and tread-wear costs factored in, net costs per vehicle are $23 and $9 respectively

14 Comments on NPRM Comment period closed September 6, 2001 Received 153 comments from private citizens, vehicle manufacturers, tire manufacturers, TPMS manufacturers, consumer advocacy groups No surprises – advocacy groups and tire mfrs want better-performing system, vehicle mfrs want least- expensive system, TPMS mfrs want whatever they produce to be specified, and the public is split Four major issues

15 Major Issue 1 – Benefits and Costs Vehicle manufacturers and one TPMS manufacturer commented that the agency has understated the costs of both direct and indirect systems and dramatically overstated the safety benefits Agency has revised Benefits and Costs estimates for the final rule

16 Major Issue 2 – TPMS Reliability Ford and a manufacturer of indirect TPMS commented that NHTSA’s assumption that direct TPMS is highly reliable is not consistent with their experience TRW makes both direct and indirect systems, says reliability is unknown, but doesn’t believe it will be a problem Agency acknowledges that these systems are new technology that are not widely used now and reliability is unknown – Proposed phase-in (Issue 5) allows gradual introduction so we can monitor real-world reliability

17 Major Issue 3 – Choice of Alternatives Alternative 1 – Requires Direct Systems (20% underinflation of 1 to 4 tires) Comments –Strongly endorsed by consumer advocacy groups, tire manufacturers, and manufacturers of direct TPMS – best system that gives driver best information –Vehicle mfrs generally say it’s too early in development of tire sensing technology to rule out a technology at this time + benefits of this are not substantially greater than allowing indirect systems as well

18 Major Issue 3 – Alternative 2 Alternative 2 – Permits either Direct Systems or Improved Indirect Systems (25% under-inflation of 1 to 3 tires) Comments –Vehicle manufacturers prefer flexibility to use both types of systems, but argue that this alternative is too stringent to permit continued use of current indirect systems –They asked agency to consider an alternative that requires system to detect 30% underinflation of 1 tire only

19 Major Issue 3 – Alternative 2 (Cont’d) Comments –Indirect TPMS mfr (Sumitomo) supports Alternative 2 and supports 1 to 3 tires –TRW says indirect can be improved to detect 25% below placard, but not by Nov – modifications will make system cost 60% of direct system –Toyota noted Congressional sponsor of this provision cited Toyota’s indirect system as what mfrs should provide on all vehicles – suggests Congress didn’t want indirect systems to be excluded

20 Major Issue 3 – Alternative 3 Alternative 3 – In response to comments, establish a requirement that permits the performance achievable by currently-offered indirect TPMS on Toyota Sienna, etc. (30% underinflation on any 1 tire) Comments –Supported by by vehicle manufacturer associations, based on legislative intent and belief benefits are equivalent to Alternative 1 –Continental Teves (indirect TPMS supplier) also favors this option

21 Major Issue 4 – Phase-in NPRM proposed to make this effective for all vehicles under 10,000 lbs GVWR in 2 years (Nov 2003), asked for comments on need for phase-in Comments – Most vehicle manufacturers proposed a 4-year phase-in: 15%, 35%, 70% and 100% of production – Honda proposed a 4-year phase-in at 10%, 40%, 70% and 100% – Subaru and TRW supported the agency’s NPRM suggested 3-year phase-in of 35%, 65% and 100%

22 Vehicle Applicability NPRM Proposed applicability for light vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 10,000 lbs or less Comments – Limit to vehicles under 8500 lbs – Exempt vehicles built in more than one stage

23 Replacement Tires/Rims NPRM Proposed –TPMS must meet requirements with all optional and replacement tire/rim sizes recommended by vehicle manufacturer for that vehicle Comments –Vehicle manufacturers want to limit applicability to tires (brands and sizes) and rims specified by the vehicle manufacturer –Aftermarket firms/Consumer groups want TPMS to work with all replacement tires and rims

24 Summary – Decision Issues Agency to decide on the following in Final Rule: – Warning activation threshold – Number of tires monitored; include spare tire?? – Duration of warning – Telltale symbol: ISO or other symbol – TPMS operation with replacement tires and rims – Vehicle application – Effective date by production volume; duration of phase- in