Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 December 11th, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Composite Filament Winding Machine: P09226 Shijo George Christofer Brayton Alex Sandy Tiago Santos Daniel Weimann Project Manager Electrical Engineer Chief.
Advertisements

The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
Final Report Topic Class 11. Agenda 3:00-3:05 Announcements 3:05-3:20 Final Project Overview 3:20-3:50 Selecting a Final Project Topic.
Project Review. Current State Currently on track to meet our mission objectives and cover all customer needs – Unpredictable to know whether or not sensors.
MSD-I Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
ELM4701/02: ELM Projects I & II The mini-project has served as a practice project. It has given us the opportunity to explain our expectations and you.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
Robotic Football Group E1 Jesse Brawer Zach Eberbach Rob Mineo Laura Peveler Susan Sinclair.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
MSD-II Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
P07007: Adapted Home Entry Sponsor: National Science Foundation Wenbo Chen Project Manager, EE Tanvir Rasel EE Meklet Kidane EE Faculty Mentors: Dr. Elizabeth.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan P09701 – Corning Tropel LightGage™ Metrology System Matthew Bradley (ME) Images Courtesy of Corning Tropel.
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Development Processes and Organizations
Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 Presented by: Daniel Sui, Ian Morency, Kevin Labourdette, Kyle Burden, Thomas Casero, Quang Huynh December 4 th, 2014.
Phase II Review MSD II P Size is too big and not comparable with original testing Hinge is not possible with rapid prototyping, metal hinge would.
Project Management Chapter 5, PG 92. Introduction Why is software management particularly difficult?  The product is intangible Cannot be seen or touched.
Software Engineering Chapter 15 Construction Leads to Initial Operational Capability Fall 2001.
RUP Fundamentals - Instructor Notes
Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 Presented by: Daniel Sui, Ian Morency, Kevin Labourdette, Kyle Burden, Quang Huynh, Tommy Casero September 10 th, 2014.
CS 360 Lecture 3.  The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software system.  Fundamental Assumption:  Good software.
Boston University Project Management Association Website Development Group 3 Team3 CS632 Dr. Vijay Kanabar Team Members Mario Soto Emily Ziegler Kevin.
Automatic Shift Controls for ATV Sponsored by: Joel Notaro Polaris Industries Advised by : Professor George Slack Project Family: Modular, Scalable, Open.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Senior Design John Peeples, Ph. D., P.E. Professor and Department Head.
Project Plan. Project Plan Components Project Overview – Description and Strategy Business Case Summary Key Deliverables and Scope Critical Success Factors.
Ben Roberts – BME Nicole Riddle – BME Daniel Pierre – EE Kevin Kirby – EE Zac Wingard – ME Jordan Smith – CS/HOD.
IT Purchase Request Tool ITPR Capital Planning & Investment Control (CPIC) Financial Systems Office (FSO), 153 & Business & Investment Management Office.
Project Active Vibration Cancellation. The Team NameDisciplineRole Kaitlin PeranskiIndustrial and SystemsProject Leader/ Edge Updating Jeremy BerkeElectricalScribe.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
through Introduction  Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) uses a sheet laser beam to illuminate particles that cross the sheet.  The particles.
MSD Total Supplier Performance and Inventory Control Keleigh Bicknell, William Darlington, Alex Resnick, Brian Woodard.
Daniel Bressan David Tran Robbie Banks Amit Kapoor MACH 1/7.
ECE477 Midterm Design Review: Team #
SHAPE RECOGNITION November Program Review Team Tillamook.
MSD 1 WEEK 6 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P /2/
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review Group P16228: Mike, Zach, Joe, Elijah & Bernie.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
 Mechanical Components have been ordered and should arrive by Week 1 of winter quarter  Outstanding electrical components dependent on varying mechanical.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P09001 – RFID Reader & Active Tag Philip Davenport (Industrial and Systems Engineering)
Information Systems Development Model, An Introduction for the Non-Technical 2005 National Immunization Conference March 22, 2005 Washington, DC.
P10041 Managerial Review. MSD I Primary Objectives Determine and Refine Customer Needs Map Customer Needs To Engineering Specs Develop Project Plan Thoroughly.
Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.
1 Disk Sectors Integrated support and cooling for disk modules. Each sector has 6 modules Number of sectors is 2x9+4x8=50. Fabrication of all sectors in.
Successfully Managing Customer Expectations Change is expected to occur during the life of any project, but this change must be controlled and managed.
Detailed Design Review Friday, February 20 th, 2009 Customer: FSNM, contact: Debbie Conway Guide: Brian Thorn P09453.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Joseph Ferrara Team Lead (ME) Joseph ChurchDesign Engineer (ME) Joshua Van Hook LabView Engineer (EE) Jamie Jackson Electronics (EE) Joelle Kirsch Project.
Vulnerability Assessment Sequoia Voting Systems October 10, 2006.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Control Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
Introduction MARS II Design Review.
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Business System Development
AUTOMATIC SHIFT CONTROLS FOR ATV SPONSOR: POLARIS INDUSTRIES
UNIFIED PROCESS.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Low-Cost Fundus Camera
Low-Cost Fundus Camera
Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 October 28th, 2014
P09045: Membrane Characteristic Test Stand
Mechanical Bioreactor
P11017 Tactile Navigation Interface
Team P16228: Magnetically Levitated Propeller
S.T.E.P.S. Bridget Avery, John Bushman, Jeremiah Eyster,
Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001
Presentation transcript:

Low Cost Fundus Camera P15590 December 11th, 2014 Presented by: Daniel Sui, Ian Morency, Kevin Labourdette, Kyle Burden, Thomas Casero, Quang Huynh December 11th, 2014 Presenter: Kyle Individually introduce ourselves!

Overview Status Review Requirement Status and Action-Items Risk Assessment Comparison MSD I Plan Review and MSD II Plan Key Action Items Presenter:

Status Review Current State: Most requirements ready to move to MSD II Some re-evaluated as out of scope Major scope change Proof of concept prototype High level product design Stretch goal for this project iteration Presenter: Tom

Req. Status: Industrial Design Can be Completed Separate from camera module Beta Project Presenter:

Action Items: Industrial Design Create two mockups Analysis of stability and portability Dependant on Optics Talking to healthcare professionals Presenter:

Req. Status: Optical Design Optical Subsystem still “black box” All subsystems dependent on black box High level design in place Feasibility must be tested Can use borrowed components Presenter:K daddy labs

Action Items: Optical Design Preliminary testing Use borrowed components Alter/iterate design Budget finalization Depends on optics, large cost Current needs: ~$2000 + borrowed components Presenter:

Req. Status: Camera Camera/adaptive optics must be selected Allow Pedro to move forward Control systems can then be evaluated Motor controls, speed etc. Alignment system can move forward Presenter:

Action Items: Camera Initial testing with RPi Review what can be used from RPi camera library Presenter: Kyle

Req. Status: Electrical Components Preliminary design has been completed Some parts already purchased Will be doing initial testing of RPi, camera module, and motors over break and first few weeks of MSD II Presenter:

Action Items: Electrical Components Stepper Motors Design mechanism to control stepper motor Ensure precision System Power Ensure RPi can support attached systems Presenter:

Action Items: Electrical Components Items to be Purchased 7” Touch screen w/ power supply: Need to order Stepper Motors: Order after optical system finalized Begin software development and testing of RPi microcontroller Presenter:

Req. Status: Other These requirements are currently out of scope for MSD II On our minds during design/build/testing Finalize requirements in beta project Presenter:

Risk Assessment Comparison System Design Phase Risk Assessment Presenter: Dan Short

Risk Assessment Comparison Current Risk Assessment Presenter: Dan

Risk Assessment Comparison Presenter: Dan

MSD I Plan Review Presenter: Kyle

MSD I Deliverables All MSD I deliverables met Some deliverable expectations moved to MSD II Passed off of re-evaluation of final goals Edge fully updated by Friday 12 Dec. 2014 Presenter:

MSD II Plan Presenter: Kyle

Key Action Items Optical Systems Secondary Subsystems Complete Design Pedro returns 19th Jan Order Parts Worst lead time Secondary Subsystems Preliminary testing over break RPi, camera module, motors Parts Ordered or Ready to Order Develop/Test to be ready to integrate with Optics Presenter:

Summary Status Review Requirement Status and Action-Items Risk Assessment Comparison MSD I Plan Review and MSD II Plan Key Action Items Presenter:

Questions