E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Statewide 3D Community Fault Model (SCFM) A statewide community-based, object-oriented, 3-D representation of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Database of Potential Sources for Earthquakes larger than M 5.5 in Italy, and surrounding areas, version.
Advertisements

Review of Catalogs and Rate Determination in UCERF2 and Plans for UCERF3 Andy Michael.
The SCEC Community Stress Model (CSM) Project Jeanne Hardebeck USGS, Menlo Park, CA.
Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation.
Slip Rate Studies Along the Sierra Madre-Cucamonga Fault System Using Geomorphic and 10 Be Cosmogenic Surface Exposure Age Constraints.
Recent Modifications to UCERF2 Fault Sources for Seismic Hazard Evaluation of LADWP Van Norman Complex San Fernando Valley and Transverse Ranges UCERF3.
Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Improvements in SCEC Community Fault Model for Version 4.0 Craig Nicholson, Andreas Plesch, John Shaw, Egill Hauksson and Peter Shearer MSI UCSB Marine.
Active folding within LA Basin Readings: Shaw, J., and P. Shearer, An elusive blind-thrust fault beneath Metropolitan Los Angeles, Science, 283, 1516-
Magnitude 8.9 (9.0) earthquake near Sendai, east coast of Honshu, Japan Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC Japan was struck by a magnitude 8.9 (9.0)
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
Earthquake Probabilities for the San Francisco Bay Region Working Group 2002: Chapter 6 Ved Lekic EQW, April 6, 2007 Working Group 2002: Chapter.
Lecture-11 1 Lecture #11- Faults and Faulting. Lecture-11 2 Faults Bound the Major Plates.
Using Geodetic Rates in Seismic Hazard Mapping March 30, Geodetic and Geologic slip rate estimates for earthquake hazard assessment in Southern California.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Digital Elevation Models And Relief Models 1DEM. Part 1: The Underlying Elevation Data 2DEM.
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration High-definition Images Reveal Changes on Many Scales NASA radar reveals local surprises......and troubling.
Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Pasadena, California Southern California Earthquake Center --- Workshop on Tectonophysics of Southern California.
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
The Empirical Model Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena. A low modern/historical seismicity rate has long been recognized in the San Francisco Bay Area Stein 1999.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
But they are clustered along the Pacific Coast. Why?
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Themes by Tom Henyey.
Heat Flow and the Seismogenic Zone in Southern California Colin F. Williams USGS, Menlo Park, CA U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Data collection, synthesis, and products Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey SCEC 2000 Meeting SCEC Highlights.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
8. Geographic Data Modeling. Outline Definitions Data models / modeling GIS data models – Topology.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Plans Paul Somerville URS SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Progress Workshop Sept 9, 2012.
National Seismic Hazard Maps and Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast 1.0 National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project (Golden, CO) California Geological.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
NE Caribbean and Hispaniola = major plate boundary, 2 cm/yr relative motion Strike-slip + convergence partitioned between 3 major fault systems Apparent.
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.
Compilation to date Much of the deformation at the Wrightwood site is distributed across complicated small faults and folds that, in the.
Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
Yuehua Zeng & Wayne Thatcher U. S. Geological Survey
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
1 Overview Importing data from generic raster files Creating surfaces from point samples Mapping contours Calculating summary attributes for polygon features.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
R I T Rochester Institute of Technology Geometric Scene Reconstruction Using 3-D Point Cloud Data Feng Li and Steve Lach Advanced Digital Image Processing.
Chris Andronicos Institute for the Study of the Continents, Cornell University and Aaron A. Velasco, Jose M. Hurtado Department of Geological Sciences.
112/16/2010AGU Annual Fall Meeting - NG44a-08 Terry Tullis Michael Barall Steve Ward John Rundle Don Turcotte Louise Kellogg Burak Yikilmaz Eric Heien.
Unified Structural Representation (USR) The primary mission of the USR Focus Area has been the development of a unified, object-oriented 3-D representation.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
A Use Case for GEON 1 A user request of the form: “For a given region (i.e. lat/long extent, plus depth), return a 3D structural model with accompanying.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update November 3, 2014 – 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
SF Bay Regional Area and the CA Coast. Satellite Image of SF Bay.
Applying Statistical Seismology to Image the Physical Properties of the Crust Egill Hauksson, Caltech, Pasadena, CA Presented at Statsei9 in Potsdam,
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
Shoreline and Hosgri Faults, Central Coast
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Principal Stress rotates to EW direction
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Southern California Earthquake Center
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. Spatial distribution of earthquake.
by Julian C. Lozos Science Volume 2(3):e March 11, 2016
Presentation transcript:

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Statewide 3D Community Fault Model (SCFM) A statewide community-based, object-oriented, 3-D representation of active faults in California. Presentation Outline 1) Model overview 2) Model components 3) Fault construction 4) Model updates … for use in: Fault systems analysis Seismic hazard assessment...

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA SCFM Overview consists of SoCal and NoCal CFMs community models Includes alternative representations > 270 faults represented variable detail consistent base of model (base of seismicity) Distributed through website: derived models: CFM-R, trace maps

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA SCEC Community Fault Model, NoCal Version 1.5 available > 110 faults represented Includes alternative representations iterated through workshop available for review via SCEC-VDO

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA SCEC Community Fault Model, SoCal Version 4.0 preview available > 150 faults represented Includes alternative representations Virtual Workshop evaluated model & ranked alternative fault representations (via LA3D) Widely used in fault system, strong ground motion, & seismic hazards studies in SCEC.

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA CFM components and architecture Triangulated surface fault representations flexible representation simple ASCII format Regional topographic surface USGS DEM (1:250,000 – 60m) SoCal SRTM DEM (90m) NoCal Seismogenic thickness surface Nazareth & Hauksson (2004) SoCal based on Waldhauser (2009) DD catalog NoCal

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Seismic profiles (1), wells (2), geologic data (3), and cross sections (4) are assembled and geo-referenced, as well as hypocenters (5) and focal mechanism (5). Fault surfaces are interpolated (a) and extrapolated (b) to define CFM representations. Extrapolated extents can be classified as connectors. Fault surfaces are extrapolated Plesch et al., 2005 Generating fault surfaces

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Generating fault surfaces, from a trace and a dip estimate A trace is digitized from a geo- referenced map or assembled from Qfaults and projected to the topographic/bathymetric level. A length (eg. 2000m) filtered trace is shifted along the dip to a first depth level (eg. 3km), and a coarser trace to a deep level (eg. 10km). All traces are then connected to a continuous fault surface. View from below filtered trace Digitized trace filtered trace

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Alternatives represent substantially different geometric definitions of a fault surface Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Newport-Inglewood fault Whittier & Chino faults Varying degrees of detail … Different styles of fault interaction at depth …

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Each version of CFM represents a set of specific alternative representations for each fault Unique fault name and number Alternative 1Alternative 2 Interpolated 1 Interpolated 2 Extrapolated 1 Interpolated 1 Interpolated 2 Extrapolated 1 Extrapolated 2 … preferred … Alt. 1Alt. 2 Ext. 1 Ext. 2 Ext. 3 N

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA CFM Fault Attributes In the database, each alternative representation will have a unique set of attributes assigned to it, including: fault type (rl or ll strike-slip, thrust,normal, oblique …) surface or blind designation, connector average spatial uncertainty qualitative assessment of representation (1-5) slip rate range (CGS/SCFAD) primary reference list date generated The database can be queried using these attributes.

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Model updates Southern San Andreas: - seismicity based updates - compliance with Qfaults improved Borderlands: - alternative representations of thrusts which allow for all modes of interaction with strike- slip faults.

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Model updates in progress Revision of naming and numbering system: - hierarchical: Peninsular Ranges – San Jacinto fault – San Bernardino section – San Jacinto-Claremont fault – vertical - meaningful numbers: two digits for each level - reflects system behaviour

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Model updates, UCERF3 relevance Southern San Andreas: - additional sources Blind Palm Springs fault North Palm Springs fault Mecca Hills - Hidden Springs fault - modified sources that allow multiple paths for SAF rupture Banning Garnet Hill San Gorgonio Pass Mission Creek Borderlands: - discussed in dedicated presentation

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview SF Bay area

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview S. Coast Ranges/S Joaquin Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview S. Coast Ranges/S Joaquin Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview Sierra Nevada/Mammoth/Long Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview Sierra Nevada/Mammoth/Long Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview N. Coast Ranges/Sacramento Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview N. Coast Ranges/Sacramento Valley

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview Cascadia/Klamath Mountains/Modoc

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Regional overview Cascadia/Klamath Mountains/Modoc

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Nazareth & Hauksson (2004) use the depth where 99.9% of the total moment in a vertical column was released Steps: Selection of events Gridding and computation Filtering of low quality cells Smooth interpolation Seismogenic thickness surface for NoCal

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Seismogenic thickness surface for NoCal Central Valley has little seismicity in some places. Mask nodes in depth surface which are more than 30 km away from closest grid point used in interpolation.

E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA Generating fault surfaces, from the USGS Bay area model and Qfaults Bay area model fault is extracted and compared to Qfault representation. The top of the fault is adjusted to conform to topography, and its length adjusted to conform to Qfaults. Hayward representation in SCFM Qfault trace Calaveras representation in SCFM Rogers Creek representation in SCFM Hayward representation in Bay area model