May 20, 10-11 am May 21, 1:30-2:30 pm Logic Models in MYAP: Web-based teleconference Instructors: Ellen Taylor-Powell and Jennifer Leahy University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This presentation demonstrates how to use tables within MSWord. A table is made up of rows and columns of cells that you can fill with text and graphics.
Advertisements

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Logic modeling.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Board Goals. Goals for Presentation Restate Board Goals (short) Why Long-Range Planning is Essential Nancy et al on details of planning (processes, resources,
Definition: A program logic model is a systematic, visual way to present a program It is a picture of why and how you believe a program will work.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Texas Tobacco Laws. Senate Bill Texas Legislature Tobacco-Free Schools Sec TOBACCO ON SCHOOL PROPERTY The Board of Trustees of a school.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Developing a Logic Model
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
Key Terms for Monitoring and Evaluation. Objectives Explain the difference between monitoring and evaluation. Introduce the most common M&E terms. Review.
Global Tobacco Surveillance System Accomplishments and Opportunities Samira Asma Associate Director Global Tobacco Control Office on Smoking and Health.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INTERIM TRAINING Marlene Mason MCPP Healthcare Consulting, Inc. October 28, 2010.
1 Your Health Matters: Growing Active Communities Partners.
Quittin’ Time: Helping Employees Become Tobacco-free June 2005.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Strategies for Success.  Implementing tobacco control programs locally is a process that requires community members’ time and effort. 1.Engage stakeholders.
TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM Mike Maples, Assistant Commissioner Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,
Campaign Success: Focus on Employees and their Health Dawn Berney, MPA Wisconsin Public Health and Health Policy Institute Teresa Ryan, BS Tobacco-Free.
Model mod·el noun \mä-d ə l\ 1:Structural design. 2:A usually miniature representation of something; a pattern of something to be made. 3:An example for.
Governor Pat Quinn B UDGETING FOR R ESULTS Budgeting for Results Funding Priorities, Improving Outcomes March
The Logic Model An Introduction. Slide 2 Innovation Network, Inc. Who We Are National nonprofit organization Committed to evaluation as a tool for empowerment.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Logical Logic Models Youth Emphasis Wisline Web October 3, :00 am Rene Mehlberg and Ellen Taylor-Powell.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Why Indicators Matter Using Outcome Indicators to Plan and Evaluate Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Todd Rogers, PhD California Tobacco Control.
Equity Impact Review Guide American Public Health Association November 5, 2013.
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention.
Multi-Year Action Planning Using a Logic Model: A structured interview approach Bonita Westover Regional Evaluation Specialist University of Wisconsin-Extension.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.
The Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium What is TTAC? What Does It Do?
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Smoke-Free Families National Dissemination Office University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North.
School Tobacco-Use & Addiction Prevention Toolkit Funded by ITPC Indiana Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Indiana Tobacco Prevention and Cessation.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Building an Organizational Evaluation Infrastructure / Culture to Improve the Management and Outcomes of Health Programs Judith Hager, MA, MPH Molly Bradshaw,
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
Logic modeling. “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?” “That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.” said the Cat.
Tobacco Disparities: Issues of Inequity & Social Injustice
Identifying strategies and tactics for reducing risks.
Workplace Health and Wellness Consulting Assess Plan Implement Evaluate March 11, x3x3 Wellness Strategy We’re committed to the development of an.
Draft, Washington Prediabetes Advocacy Plan.
Tobacco Free Florida Coalition Training Day 2. Welcome to Day 2 Source:
Logic Models Performance Framework for Evaluating Programs in Extension.
ADRCs Do What? Using Logic Models to Document and Improve ADRC Outcomes Glenn M. Landers.
Paul Hunting, MPH Health Education Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health TM Session #: EVAL 111 National Conference.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Evaluation
Public Health Interventions
Goal Area 2: Eliminating Nonsmokers’ Exposure to Secondhand Smoke
Goal Area 1: Preventing Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Young People
Presentation transcript:

May 20, am May 21, 1:30-2:30 pm Logic Models in MYAP: Web-based teleconference Instructors: Ellen Taylor-Powell and Jennifer Leahy University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative Extension

Learning objectives Increased understanding of logic models Increased ability to create a logic model for your MYAP How we will proceed today Discuss slides Questions and interaction Examples

Description of a program Graphic representation of what is expected to be achieved and how it is expected to work  Called “program theory” or “program action” Sequence of steps; a logical chain of if-then relationships that link investments to activities to results. What is a logic model? It’s your roadmap

HEADACHEHEADACHE Feel betterGet pillsTake pills Everyday Logic Model

Logic model of this web training My time Jenny’s time Your time Wisline web Regional UWEX evaluation specialists Develop learning materials Conduct two 1 hour web- based trainings Technical assistance follow-up Coalition coordinators, members involved in MYAP Increased understanding of logic models Increased ability to create a logic model for your MYAP Completed logic model submitted with MYAP Better programs and results INPUTSOUTPUTS OUTCOMES Short MediumLong-term

Whether we realize it or not we are logic modeling all the time. Logic models can be applied to almost anything we do or are engaged in. It is just putting ‘structure’ to a way of thinking…a graphic representation of our mental processes that focus on achieving outcomes.

What does a logic model look like?

State Health Department and Partners Reduced initiation among youth Increased knowledge, awareness, and skills, and changes in attitudes Decreased access Smoking is de-normalized Youth are exposed to anti-tobacco/pro-health messages and fewer pro-tobacco messages Students receive tobacco prevention education in school Tobacco sales to minors are restricted and enforced Increased price on cigarettes through tax Youth advocacy groups are formed; youth are mobilized CDC: Logic Model for Reducing Youth Initiation Counter marketing* School-based prevention* Community mobilization* Policy and regulatory action* Reduced tobacco- related morbidity and mortality Decreased tobacco- related disparity InputsLong-termActivitiesOutputsInitial Intermediate Outcomes *Targeted to disparate populations

DPH Logic model: Coalition-Based Tobacco Control A ctivitiesReach Short-Term Intermediate Long-Term Conduct Clean Indoor Air Campaigns Coalition Members Community Policymakers Business Owners Employers Heads of Household Disparately Affected Populations Increased awareness in coalitions and community of dangers of secondhand smoke and effective strategies for eliminating exposure Increased public support for clean indoor air Increased policymaker support for clean indoor air Implementation of clean indoor air ordinances Increased smoke free homes/vehicles Promote Cessation General Public Policy Makers Health Care Providers Employers Medicaid Recipients Youth Disparately Affected Populations Increased awareness of tobacco dependence as a chronic disease Increased number of providers and networks committed to implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines Increased awareness of available cessation resources Increased knowledge of Medicaid cessation benefits among health care providers provider networks and recipients Increased number of health care providers who routinely screen, counsel and provide referrals (I.e., implement Clinical Practice Guidelines) Increased number of employers who cover tobacco use cessation in their health care plans Increased use of Quit Line and other cessation services Prevent Youth Initiation Youth Parents School Administrators Teachers Disparately Affected Youth Increased number of youth involved in educating peers and public Increased coordination between coalition, schools and parents on tobacco control activity Increased number of advocacy efforts planned and led by youth Increase in negative attitudes toward tobacco among youth Increased policy changes due to youth advocacy efforts Increased number of schools implementing appropriate tobacco control curricula and enforcing smoke-free policies Increased number of schools that refer smoking students to Quit Line Decreased youth intention to smoke Increased number of quit attempts among youth Decreased exposure to secondhand smoke “Denormalization” of tobacco use Build and Maintain Broad and Effective Coalitions Coalition Members Community Formation of broad based coalition with resource sharing Increased knowledge and support of TC strategies among coalition members Creation of long and short-term tobacco control plan Increased subcommittee and coalition activity on priority TC objectives Increased knowledge and support of TC strategies among community members Implementation of priority tobacco control policies and interventions (see above)

Regardless of format, what do logic models have in common?  They show activities that lead to outcomes  They show a chain of outcomes: short, medium, long-term  They show relationships/connections that make sense (are logical). Arrows are used to show the connections (the if-then relationships)  They are understandable – communicate easily A picture is worth a thousand words

Seems like a lot of work…why do these logic models? Let’s hear from coalition coordinators:

Logic models in MYAP Start at the end How will tobacco use look different in 2006? = Long Term Outcome (s) Then, fill in the steps – lay out the logical connections - that will achieve the long-term outcome(s) What are the shorter term outcomes that must be achieved to order to reach your ultimate goal? = Year 1 Objective(s) and Year 2 objectives What do you need to do in order to achieve those outcomes? = Strategies/Activities

Creating your MYAP logic model What resources do you need? What will you do? List major strategies/ activities Who needs to be reached/ involved/ participate in order for the desired changes to occur? What changes need to occur in Year 1 in order to achieve the Year 2 objectives? What changes need to occur in Year 2 in order to achieve your Year 3 objectives? What is your desired long- term outcome(s) by the end of 2006? What will be different in your community? INPUTSOUTPUTS OUTCOMES Year 1 objectivesYear 2 Year 3 START AT THE END

Examples of short-term outcomes: Examples of medium-term outcomes: Examples of long-term outcomes: Changes in people – the community

Coalition Time Dollars Partners Including youth Assess workplace tobacco policies and practices Organize and implement strategy for targeted worksites Workplace owners Identify workplaces to target Workers; union members Build community support for smoke-free worksites Public Changes in knowledge and attitudes about ETS Increased support for smoke-free worksites # worksites that go smokefree Community ordinance/ standard Change in support of smoke-free workplace standards Unions WTCB Goal: By 2005, 90% of workplaces will establish smoke- free environments Adherence to smoke-free policies Logic Model: Smoke Free Workplaces in My County (from your planning workbook) Short-term Intermediate Long-term Inputs Activities ReachOutcomes Single priority area

Coalition Time Dollars Partners including youth Organize and implement CIA campaign Organize and implement strategy for promoting cessation Elected officials Youth smokers Organize and implement strategy to prevent youth smoking Other youth Increased youth advocacy Increased policy maker support Increased smoking cessation Change in knowledge and attitudes Health care providers, WIC providers CIA ordinances implemented, enforced Reduction in youth smoking Increased awareness about cessation services Increased referrals and counseling Increased use of services Increased public support Public Smokers; tobacco users Employees, employers, unions Parents, schools, etc. Increased knowledge and skills to screen and refer Change in policies Adherence to policy Changes in knowledge and attitudes about tobacco and ETS Inputs Activities Reach Outcomes Short Medium Long-term Logic Model: Multi-Year Tobacco-Free PlanMultiple priority areas

Logic model: Youth prevention Priority area: Youth InputsOutputsOutcomes ActivitiesReachShortMediumLong-term Funding (public, private, in- kind) Coordinator Members T and TA Best practices Partners Assess current tobacco curricula, policies, enforcement, cessation services Education Work with school districts School administra- tion School Board Teachers Parents Increased knowledge, awareness, skills Increased # of schools implementing research-based curriculum Increased enforcement of school tobacco policies Increased cessation services for youth (inc. as alternative to suspension or fines) Reduction in tobacco use by middle and high school students

TIPS Create a single logic model that shows all priority areas OR create separate logic models for each priority area Keep logic model simple  clearly communicates what you hope to accomplish and how you will accomplish it Show all major linkages – connections Check: Does your logic model make sense? Does it show a meaningful initiative?

Assumptions You’ve done your homework: logic model is based on situational analysis and involvement of key stakeholders in identification of desired outcomes Logic model, if not created by the coalition, is understood and has commitment of the coalition

How to create a logic model on your computer: In MSWord 1. Using the “Draw Table” function  Draw one box and use columns and rows as necessary  Table options (such as borders, merge cells) can be found under “Table” in the menu bar  Can also use the table button at the top of the page. This will automatically create a table of the size you want  Can use Drawing Toolbar at the bottom of the page to draw arrows

How to create a logic model on your computer Create a table in Word…  Use the “Draw Table” function in Word

How to create a logic model on your computer: In MSWord 2. Using text boxes  Use text box button in the drawing toolbar  Add arrows using the arrow button in the drawing toolbar  Auto Shapes also provide valuable tools for designing your logic model

How to create a logic model on your computer: In PowerPoint 3. In Powerpoint; under format  Choose ‘Slide Layout ‘  Apply Table layout  Double click to add table on slide  Follow menu; functions much like table function in MSWord or add text boxes within the table

www1.uwex.edu/ces/lmcourse