Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Across the Curriculum Programs Keys to Success Beth Secrist, TAC Coordinator Copyright Beth Secrist, This work is the intellectual property.
Advertisements

Copyright Policy Copyright Cathy O’Bryan This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Classroom Integration of a Student Computer Initiative David J. Wright Dir. Curriculum Innovation and E-Learning Karen Bull Dir. Operations, Educational.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
The Technology in Curriculum Initiative: Collaborative Faculty Teams Joel Backon Katie Jewett NERCOMP 2002 March 19, 2002.
TESL Ontario Conference October 28 & 29, Project Team Project Lead - Carolyn Cohen Research Lead - Antonella Valeo Research Consultants - Sheila.
Flexible Information Literacy Alternatives for Independent Learners Suzanne Hayes March 17, 2003 Copyright Suzanne Hayes This work is the intellectual.
Applying Technology to Academic Advising: A Vision Statement Jeff von Munkwitz-Smith University Registrar University of Connecticut.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
Opinions about Distance Education at Pace A New Attitude? Jim Stenerson, Director Center for Teaching, Learning & Technology & Christine Moloughney Coordinator.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
"Cyberspace Education: Challenges and Opportunities" Presented by: Bob Diveley Manager of Administrative Systems Columbus State University Copyright Bob.
INSTITUTE FOR DISTANCE AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services EDUCAUSE 2002 Copyright Bridget Moore and Mark Raby,
Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
Foundations of Excellence: Support Services for Online Learning Midwest Regional Conference, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Presenters: Diane Dates Casey Jan Engle.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services New River Community College College of Health Sciences Virginia Tech Copyright Bridget Moore and.
EDUCAUSE October 20, 2004 James Madison University This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Developing a Successful Model for Online and Tech-Enhanced Learning Mamie How Janet Willett Patricia Delich Presented April 27, 2005 Copyright Patricia.
Five Berkeley Campuses Three in NJ; Two in NY Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Degree Online Online Courses Hybrid Courses Web Enhanced Courses.
Information Technology Career Ladder Clayton College & State University Larry Booth, IT Department Head Copyright Larry Booth,
Copyright Marilyn Drury, Darrell Fremont, Doreen Hayek, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
Mellon Fellowship for Undergraduate Research: Ideas, Innovations & Impacts Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California,
Migrating Courses to an Online Format Lee Allen, Ed.D Assistant Professor, Instructional Design & Technology Special Assistant to the Instruction & Curriculum.
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Faculty and Student Expectations for Students’ Information Technology and Information Literacy Knowledge & Skills: One Institution’s Assessment Linfield.
Center for Instructional Technology James Madison University Strategies for Transitioning to the Age of Digital Media Sarah E. Cheverton James Madison.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.
Collaborative Course Development Educause Southeast Regional Conference 2002 Libby V. Morris, Associate Professor, UGA Wendy Bedwell, Project Coordinator,
1 A Change Model for Building and Maintaining a Successful Campus DE Strategy A. Darryl Davis  January 28, 2003 This work is the intellectual property.
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
Lynette Olson, Assessment & Effectiveness Director & Gary Langer, Associate Vice Chancellor, Office of the Chancellor, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
Herding CATS: the Community of Academic Technology Staff Lou Zweier, Director CSU Center for Distributed Learning The California State University NLII,
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
HumaniTech®: Educause, Seattle October 24, 2007 Bridging Divides, Building Collaborations
February 22, Southwest Educause Conference 1 Copyright Rebecca Frost Davis, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
ASK ME The ASK ME Program Putting Support at the Center: A New Model for Help Desk Staffing Presented By: Ann Genovese and Kathy Gillette George Mason.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
An Online Learning Case Study Board of Governors Distance Learning Workshop March 23, 2011 Dr. Joel L. Hartman, Vice Provost & CIO University of Central.
Value & Excitement University Technology Services Oakland University Information Technology Strategic Planning Theresa Rowe October 2004 Copyright Theresa.
Megan Adams, Swarthmore College Mark Colvson, Bryn Mawr College January 17, 2003 Collaborative Virtual Reference Services: The Tri-College Libraries’ Experience.
ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE: EDUCATOR OPINIONS ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELIVERY METHODS BY TERESA SCRUGGS THOMAS Tamar AvineriEMS 792x.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
DISTANCE EDUCATION UPDATE November 9, 2006 Responding to Student Needs.
Not Just Making Waves: Making a Difference with Intensive Multi-Campus Workshops Alex Wirth-Cauchon Associate Director, Midwest Instructional Technology.
Learning and Engagement in Library Spaces Suzanne E. Thorin Ruth Lilly University Dean of University Libraries and Associate Vice President for Digital.
A Tale of Two Collaborators: Successful Collaboration Between IT and Library Services Pat Kohrman, Deena Morganti, John Shank Copyright Pat Kohrman, Deena.
Practice What You Preach: A Hybrid Orientation to Online Pedagogy Catherine Kelley, Ph.D. Fairleigh Dickinson University.
An Assessment of the TA Web Certification Program: Four Years of Supporting the Use of Instructional Technology at the University of Minnesota Brad Cohen,
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
NLII05 Annual Meeting Professional Development of Faculty and Instructional Technology Staff through Communities of Practice University of Memphis: Technology.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
A Strategy for Moving from Commercial to an Open Source Environment Jeshua Pacifici, GEDI Assistant Director and Learning Systems Consultant.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Authors: Victoria F. Sarkisian, Linguistic Coordinator at the Academic Learning Center Austin C. Schilling, Senior Consultant at IBM In collaboration with:
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Instructional Technologist Justification for a permanent fulltime classified position Presented by: Lale Yurtseven Business Department Seasoned Online.
Southeast Missouri State University
Online Teaching Conference
Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)
Presentation transcript:

Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston Massachusetts March 18, 2003 Copyright Center for Instructional Technology, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

NERCOMP March, Who we are  Sarah Cheverton Manager of Faculty Development Services  Jim Mazoué Distance Learning Coordinator

NERCOMP March, JMU Institutional Profile  Primarily residential, rural campus  Total Enrollment: 15K  Undergraduate Enrollment: 14K  Grad enrollment: 1K  Undergraduates  Full-time: 94%  25 yrs. or older: 2%

NERCOMP March, Distance Learning Profile  30 online courses  600 students  85% graduate level, continuing education, off-campus  Online graduate degree programs:  MBA in Information Security  CS in Information Security  Online Certificate program:  Workforce Development

NERCOMP March, Rationale for 2002 Pilot  Determine the need for and feasibility of offering summer online courses  Provide flexible and convenient course options  Serve strategic institutional goals  Alleviate enrollment pressures  Encourage faculty development and technology integration  Provide professional development opportunities

NERCOMP March, Project Planning  Staffed and funded by the Center for Instructional Technology (Educational Technologies)  Selection process focused on GenEd courses  Faculty stipends: $2,500  Pre/Post-Course Assessment Surveys  Faculty Course Evaluation

NERCOMP March, Course Description  Selected 2 sections of GWRIT 102 (general writing)  4-week course (usually 15 weeks)  2 different instructors  24 students  All returning students

NERCOMP March, Project Planning  Instructional Technologist consultation with instructors  Assist instructor in creating detailed instructions for assignments  Create online discussion forums  Provide guidelines for general communication strategies

NERCOMP March,  Student Orientation  Characteristics of Online Learning  Technical Support  Using Blackboard  Using Centra Symposium Project Planning

NERCOMP March, Findings: Pre-Course Survey of Students  Student demographics  Most in-state but not in Harrisonburg  Half used modem connection  Reasons for taking the course  Flexible “class time”  Prefer JMU courses  Avoid transfer credit  Perception of preparedness  Most felt prepared

NERCOMP March, Findings: Post-Course Survey of Students Student satisfaction  Flexible “class time”  Opportunity to complete coursework during summer  Well-defined weekly schedule  Detailed instructions  Ability to submit assignments online  Ability to contribute through a discussion board

N=24

NERCOMP March,  Time management/fast paced course  Lack of immediate feedback and clarification  Scheduling conflicts for group work  Difficulty coordinating group work  Requires more self-discipline Findings: Post-Course Survey of Students Student Concerns

NERCOMP March, Findings: Post-Course Instructor Evaluation (N=1) Instructor satisfaction  Well-defined weekly schedules  Using technology in a new way  Formalizing the instructional process

NERCOMP March,  Students not meeting deadlines  Lack of immediate feedback and contact/feeling of detachment  Lack of face-to-face interaction Findings: Post-Course Instructor Evaluation Instructor concerns

N=24

NERCOMP March,  Time management/fast paced course  Lack of immediate feedback and clarification  Scheduling conflicts for group work  Difficulty coordinating group work  Requires more self-discipline Findings: Post-Course Survey of Students Student Concerns

NERCOMP March, Conclusions  Students found this to be valuable learning experience  Technology not a barrier to learning, but, as used, challenged effective communication  Course Design significant contribution to time- management and communication issues  Too short for type of course  Group-work approach presented challenges in coordination

NERCOMP March, Recommendations  Link compensation to a structured process of instructional design and faculty development  Provide faculty development opportunities  Improve planning  Extend course duration  Limit Add and Drop activity  Provide a student orientation  Improve communication

NERCOMP March, Faculty Summer Online Course Development Institute  Planning  Academic Council  Funding for cohort of 10 faculty  $2000 stipend  Applications solicited through RFP process  Selection committee  Proposal selection criteria

NERCOMP March, Proposal Selection Criteria  Quality of the proposal  Impact on students’ curricular needs  Applicant’s interest in and commitment to online teaching  Support from the applicant’s department  Sustainability of the proposal  Potential to benefit teaching and learning

NERCOMP March, Administrative Issues  Competing with enrollments in Fall and Spring courses  Tuition rates  Set at in-state/out-of-state rates  Course size  Left to the discretion of individual departments and instructors

NERCOMP March, Institute Participants required to:  Participate in a structured series of workshops, project work and discussions  Receive approval from their academic unit and college to teach during the summer  Develop and teach an online course twice  Participate in an evaluation of the course  Showcase their work in a peer workshop

NERCOMP March, Workshop Topics  Preparing and planning to teach an online course  Course management  Learner characteristics  Teaching and learning strategies  Assessment strategies  Interactive learning  Creating learning objects and modules  Streaming audio and video  Accessing digital library resources  Copyright and ADA compliance

NERCOMP March, Talking Points  Identify needs  Student needs  Faculty needs  Institutional Needs  Transitioning to online course delivery  Flexibility versus structure  Costs

NERCOMP March, Contact Information  Jim Mazoué 

Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston Massachusetts March 18, 2003 Copyright Center for Instructional Technology, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.