Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0053r0 Submission Jan. 2014 Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0335r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Instantaneous SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Methodology of Calibrating System Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0059r1 Submission Jan Luo Jun, et. al. (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Integrated System Level Simulation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Submission Considerations on evaluation methodology for candidate HEW PHY&MAC techniques Date: March 2014 Le Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE /0386r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on MCS selection for SLS calibration Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek March.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation Results for Box5
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results for Box5
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Further Discussions on PHY Abstraction
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Marvell Semiconductor
Simulation results for
Simulation Results for Box5
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI
Box 5 Calibration Result
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Results for SS6 calibration case for single BSS and OBSS
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Zhang Jiayin Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd No. 2222, Xin Jinqiao Rd. Pudong, Shanghai, China Luo JunNo. 2222, Xin Jinqiao Rd. Pudong, Shanghai, China Ma ChixiangNo. 2222, Xin Jinqiao Rd. Pudong, Shanghai, China Kong xueliF1-17, Bantian Huawei Base, Shenzhen, China Pang JiyongNo. 2222, Xin Jinqiao Rd. Pudong, Shanghai, China Edward AuKanata, ON Yakun Sun Marvell Semiconductor 5488 Marvell Ln, Santa clara, CA Hongyuan Zhang

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Further considerations on the calibration of an integrated system level simulation are presented Jan Slide 2Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Abstract

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Three types of simulation methodologies are presented in [1], including PER Simulation, PHY System simulation and MAC System simulation. An Integrated System Level Simulation, which can take into account both PHY and MAC features for performance evaluation, is proposed in [2]. There are also a number of presentations, e.g., [3], that details a step-by-step calibration. Jan Slide 3Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Background (1/2)

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission In this presentation, we aim at providing further consideration on the following topics: –Select an appropriate scenario for calibration –Recommend metric and methodology for long term SNR/SINR calibration Instantaneous SNR/SINR calibration PHY SLS calibration Integrated SLS calibration Jan Slide 4Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Background (2/2)

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission To validate the modeling methodology of all building blocks of a system level simulator. To provide a common baseline for all companies to develop their simulators and align their system simulation results. Jan Slide 5Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Why Calibration?

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Calibration Scenario Selection The scenario should be –able to test all building blocks; –clearly defined; –run efficiently. Since the simulation scenarios for HEW [4] are yet to be finalized, a simple and fixed deployment can be considered. –e.g. 11ac OBSS enterprise scenario [5] or one of the simulation scenarios currently discussed. Jan Slide 6Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Metric: –CDF of long term SNR/SINR of each potential communication link Method: –Signal power: received signal power from the transmitting node to the receiving node within a BSS. –Interference power: the sum of average effective received power from all interfering BSS (all BSSes other than the BSS of target STA/AP). Average effective received power: total received power at the target node averaged by the total number of AP and STA in one interfering BSS assuming all these nodes in this interfering BSS are transmitting. Jan Slide 7Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Step 1: Long Term SNR/SINR Calibration

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Slide 8Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Step 1: Long Term SNR/SINR Calibration Illustrative example by considering 11ac OBSS enterprise scenario [5]

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Metric: –CDF of instantaneous SNR/SINR of each potential communication link Method: –Signal power: received signal power from the transmitting STA to the receiving STA within a BSS. –Interference power: sum of all interfering STAs/APs based on PHY system simulation. Simple MAC assumption can be assumed, such as CCA-only mechanism mentioned in [1]. Jan Slide 9Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Step 2: Instantaneous SNR/SINR Calibration

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Metric: –Area throughput/throughput per BSS and CDF of per STA throughput Method: –Full buffer traffic is assumed; –Simple MAC mechanism, which is the same as Step 2, should be used; –PHY abstraction should be used; –PHY features, such as MIMO scheme, need to be clarified. Jan Slide 10Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Step 3: PHY SLS Calibration

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Metric: –The same as Step 3, i.e., area throughput/throughput per BSS and CDF of per STA throughput. Method: –The same as Step 3 except a more detailed MAC mechanism, e.g., CSMA/CA, should be included. Remarks: –Additional calibration of the baseline for each scenario is required, which can be merged with step 4. Jan Slide 11Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Step 4: Integrated SLS Calibration

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Several interim calibration can be carried on in parallel if necessary: –Traffic model; –Small-scale fading channel; –PHY abstraction. Network deployment of HEW simulation scenarios can also be calibrated prior to baseline calibrations. Jan Slide 12Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Further Consideration on SLS Calibration

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission A step by step calibration is recommended for system level simulation, including long term /instantaneous SNR/SINR calibration, PHY SLS calibration and integrated SLS calibration. Jan Slide 13Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Summary

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission [1] hew-evaluation-methodology [2] hew-Integrated-System-Level- Simualtion [3] hew-methodology-of-calibrating- system-simulation-results [4] hew-simulation-scenarios-document- template [5] ac-tgac-functional-requirements-and- evaluation-methodology Jan Slide 14Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Reference

doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission ParameterValue Central frequency 5.57GHz Bandwidth 20MHz Transmission power AP: 15dBm STA: 15dBm Antenna configuration Antenna type: omni-directional antenna Antenna gain: 0dB AP antenna number:1 STA antenna number: 1 Implementation loss 0dB Noise floor-174 dBm/Hz Noise figure AP: 10dB STA: 10dB Channel model TGac channel model D (LOS/NLOS) Shadow fading std. dev. (dB): 3 (before d BP ); 5 (after d BP ) d BP : 10m Jan Slide 15Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies) Appendix: Parameters for Calibration in Step 1