Health Impact Assessment: A Collaborative Approach to Good Policy Solutions Kara Vonasek, M.P.H. Project Manager Health Impact Project www.healthimpactproject.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

The Affordable Care Act's Health Insurance Marketplaces: What's the Experience So Far? January 22, 2014.
Health Impact Assessment: A health lens for public policy Aaron Wernham, M.D., M.S. Director | The Health Impact Project 901 E Street, NW, Washington,
SACIM Paul E. Jarris, MD, MBA July11, Infant Mortality 2008 Preterm Births 2008.
Health Impact Assessment: NACCHO July, 2010 Memphis, TN Health Impact Assessment: Helping health agencies reach across sectors to solve today’s public.
Reforming State Long-Term Care Services and Supports Through Participant Direction NASHP State Health Policy Conference October 2010 Suzanne Crisp Director.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Made Possible by the Broadband.
The Research Behind Strengthening Families. Building protective and promotive factors, not just reducing risk An approach – not a model, a program or.
Health Impact Assessment: Incorporating Health into Community Development Kara Vonasek, M.P.H. Project Manager Health Impact Project
Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.
THE HEALTH IMPACT PROJECT: Promoting the use of Health Impact Assessment in the U.S. HIA in the Americas March, 2010 Aaron Wernham, M.D., M.S. Director.
1 Health Impact Assessment: Bringing Health into “non-health” discussions.
SHSP Progress and Future Federal Perspective Beth Alicandri Office of Safety 2011 SHSP Peer Exchange June 14 – 15, 2011 Crown Plaza Hotel, Austin, Texas.
The Research Behind Strengthening Families. Implementation w/ Fidelity Implementation w/ Fidelity Results Model Tested by RCT Model Tested by RCT Traditional.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS CHILDREN’S DENTAL CAMPAIGN Dental Access Project Moving forward for those in need of dental care Amy Zaagman.
State and Local Health Department Governance Classification System
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Health Impact Assessment in Michigan
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
PRACTICA & ONLINE ED AUTHORIZATION STATUS
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

Health Impact Assessment: A Collaborative Approach to Good Policy Solutions Kara Vonasek, M.P.H. Project Manager Health Impact Project

County Health Rankings RWJF and University of Wisconsin Madison: ut-project/background ut-project/background

The Problem So many daily policy decisions made outside of the health sector have significant health implications that go unrecognized because health is just not on the radar screens of decision makers. 3

1996 Olympic Games, Atlanta 24 hour public transportation Addition of public buses Reduction of auto travel and congestion Public announcements Was shown to decrease acute childhood asthma events 4 Decisions Have Unintended Health Benefits Too Introduction of EZ Pass, Northeastern U.S. Reduced traffic congestion Reduced motor vehicle emissions Reduce disparities Resulted in reduction of low birth-weight infants in surrounding neighborhoods Slide courtesy of Human Impact Partners

What is HIA? A framework or process that predicts anticipated health outcomes of a decision/project Translates that information into recommendations for well-informed policies Helps folks outside the heath field understand the direct health impacts of their work HIA’s purpose is to improve health, track unintended consequences and mitigate risk 5

HIA Addresses Determinants of Health Slide courtesy of Human Impact Partners Housing Air quality Noise Safety Social networks Nutrition Parks and natural space Private goods and services Public services Transportation Livelihood Water quality Education Inequities How might the proposed project, plan, policy affect And potentially lead to predicted health outcomes?

The HIA Process Screening: Is HIA feasible and likely to add value? Scoping: What are the important health effects? Who are the affected populations? What is available evidence? Assessment: What are the baseline conditions and likely health impacts? Recommendations: Develop health-based recommendations and a feasible plan for implementing them Reporting: Disseminate the report to the public, stakeholders Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitors results of HIA, monitors health outcomes; evaluates the HIA process

What HIA is not... What HIA is It’s not used to make the case for why a policy, program or project should be proposed. It’s not an assessment to understand the impacts of a program or policy once it has been implemented. The Sweet Spot – It’s proactive! It’s meant to inform a proposed policy, program or project currently under active consideration by a decision-making body. It’s not a community assessment tool (i.e., MAPP & CHA), but those are used during assessment stage of HIA. HIA is the framework that translates that data into well- informed policies.

HIA Ex: Jack London Gateway Development Authors: Human Impact Partners & SFDPH Decision: Plan for 61 new senior housing units close to 2 freeways & Port of Oakland Impacts : Air quality; noise; safety; retail access Recommendations : Noise-insulating windows; pedestrian protection medians; traffic calming measures; air quality monitoring; installation of ventilation systems; and many others Outcomes : Many recommendations adopted Additional HIA projects were funded Healthy Development Checklist adopted by the development committee

Texas Examples of HIA 1.Transit Oriented Development – Houston (Texas Southern University) In-progress HIA of possible development patterns that could occur in neighborhoods near planned light-rail expansion Will examine potential outcomes such as access to public transportation and services, mixed-use land development and affordable housing 2.Habitat Conservation Plan – San Antonio (Health Department) In-progress HIA to examine the health impacts of the Southern Edwards Plateau Habitat Conservation Plan, as part of local implementation efforts of the federal Endangered Species Act Will examine issues such as air quality, park space and conservation of endangered species

Texas Examples of HIA (Continued) 3.Public Housing Redevelopment – Galveston (GA Health Policy Center & University of Texas Medical Branch) In-progress HIA of the Galveston Housing Authority Board’s decision on the location and upgrading of public housing units destroyed in Hurricane Ike Will examine potential outcomes such as injury and asthma rates, exposure to toxins and air pollution, access to green space, goods and services, health care facilities 4.School Siting Policies – Austin (University of Texas) In-progress HIA that will address the health implications of choices regarding where to site and build schools

The Benefits of HIA 1.Involves a broad-range of impacted people Community capacity building/empowerment 2.It’s an effective tool for meaningful cross-sector collaboration Relationships/trust is built among partners through HIA process Increases likelihood of routine consideration of health 3.There is a strong business case for HIA Corporate social responsibility – address community concerns early in the planning process Lower business costs – can actually help speed approval of a project/decision Know your “Health ROI” – HIA as a form of risk management

Who Does HIA? Non-profit organizations Community groups affected by a decision Local and State government agencies  Public Health, Environmental Health, Planning Departments, Transportation Departments Universities & research institutions Industry/business community

AK 3 CA 15 CO 1 FL 1 MA 2 NJ 1 Completed HIAs 2007 (N = 27) MN 1 GA 3 Map Courtesy of A. Dannenberg, A. Wendel, CDC NCEH

AK 3 CA 25 CO 2 FL 1 MA 2 NJ 1 Completed HIAs 2009 (N = 54) Health Impact Project Founded MN 5 GA 4 WA 4 OR 2 OH 1 PA 1 MD 1 MT 1 MI 1

AK 7 CA 33 CO 3 MA 3 NJ 1 Completed HIAs 2012 (N = 91) MN 7 GA 5 WA 3 OR 9 OH 2 PA 1 MD 3 MT 1 17 TN 2 ME 1 NM 2 Federal HIAs: 3 MO 1 NY 1 DC 1 WI 2 KY 1 AZ 1

AK 15 CA 53 CO 4 MA 5 NJ 1 Completed HIA and In Progress HIAs 2012 (N = 173) MN 13 GA 7 WA 6 OR 20 OH 4 PA 1 MD 3 MT 2 Federal HIAs: 3 NM 2 TN 2 HI 1 IL 3 KY 2 MO 2 NH 1 TX 4 ME 1 WI 7 DC 1 KS 1 MI 1 NY 2 SC 1 VA 1 NE 1 AZ 2

Key Points About HIA 1.The best way to learn HIA is just to do one! Legacy of HIA: Relationships/trust is built among partners Increased stakeholder understanding of value of HIA Increases likelihood of doing another HIA in future or routine consideration of health in decision making 2.Most HIAs aren’t all that expensive—primarily staff time 3.Takes a champion willing to spearhead effort

How Does HIA Typically Come About? 1.A decision/policy/program/plan is on the table and potentially impacted populations are concerned about it HIA identified as a tool for effective engagement and informing the decision-making process 2.Folks see the value of HIA and want to develop capacity to carry it out First Step: need to identify an appropriate HIA decision target How? – Meet with folks outside health sectors to learn about upcoming decisions that may be important to health Screening step is KEY! – screening worksheet available

Once You Have An Appropriate HIA Decision Target... 1.Apply for grant opportunities 3rd CFP from Health Impact Project released today Grants up to $75,000 for 18 months, tailored 2-day HIA training, ongoing mentoring and technical assistance Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) released RFP today, up to 15,000 for 9 months 2.Or, seek out wealth of resources online Plenty of people have taken up HIA without official training HIA is a common sense approach It’s really about structuring public health input in a way that is relevant for decision makers in other sectors

Helpful HIA Websites & Resources Health Impact Project: Interactive Map of HIA in U.S. National Network of Public Health Institutes: Training Materials site.pdf Human Impact Partners: HIA Training Materials & Worksheets UCLA’s HIA-CLIC: HIA Clearing House for Practitioners American Planning Association: Online HIA Training CDC’s “phConnect”: Online HIA Community

Discussion Kara Vonasek Phone: