Approach to the Patient with Elevated Creatinine By: George Tsimiklis 2004 Revised previous edition by: Lianne Tile MD FRCPC Med

Objectives To identify appropriate strategies for investigation of the patient with increased creatinine To discuss interventions that may alter the course of disease To discuss indications for referral to a nephrologist

Stages of Renal Failure GFR (cc/min) Mild60-90 Moderate30-60 Severe10-30 End-stage<10

Creatinine is an estimate of GFR Cockcroft-Gault: (140-age) x wt x 100 = GFR (cc/min) 72 x serum Cr GFR (females) = GFR (males) x 0.85

CASES: What is Considered an ELEVATED Creatinine? 55 yo 70 kg male with Cr of 220: 75 yo 45kg female with Cr of 220: 75 yo 45kg female with Cr of 85: 75 yo 45kg female with Cr of 45: GFR =37 moderate GFR =40 moderate GFR = 16 severe GFR =76 mild

Workup of the patient with high Cr Approach –1. Identify chronicity (Acute vs chronic) –2. Identify the cause, especially reversible causes –3. Identify Indications for Referral to a Nephrologist –4. Initiate a cause specific management plan in a multidisciplinary team.

Acute vs Chronic Renal Failure ACUTE -Fever/ hematuria -Hypovolemia -Hydroureter -Sepsis -New hypertension -Recent nephrotoxins -No hypocalcemia -No hyperphosphatemia -No anemia CHRONIC -previous confirmed nephropathy -Already diminished CrCl -Atrophic kidneys (<10cm on U/S) -Normochromic normocytic anemia -Hypocalcemia -Hyperphosphatemia

Major Causes of Renal Failure Prerenal: decreased glomerular perfusion –volume depletion: diuretics, poor intake –decreased effective circulating volume: forward heart failure, cirrhosis, sepsis Renal –Vascular disease: acute (vasculitis, thromboembolic, HUS/TTP, malignant hypertension) vs. chronic (renal artery stenosis, HTN/nephrosclerosis) –Glomerular disease: nephritic vs. nephrotic –Tubular/interstitial disease: acute (ATN, AIN, myeloma) vs. chronic (PCKD, pyelo, autoimmune, analgesic abuse) Post-Renal/ Obstructive Nephropathy –Malignancy, prostate hyperplasia/ cancer

History and Physical Exam signs or symptoms of –underlying disorder: i.e. volume status, flank pain, obstruction, diabetes, hypertension, vasculitis –altered kidney function: urine output, urine discoloration, edema –renal failure: anorexia, vomiting, altered mental status, HTN medications: NSAID, ACEI, analgesics, aminoglycosides, contrast, Chinese herbs

Initial Laboratory Investigations Urinalysis: hematuria, pyuria, proteinuria Urinary Sediment: casts, GN Urine Volume: oliguric, obstruction 24-hour Urine protein and CrCl Urea: Electrolytes CBC: thrombocytopenia: TTP, HUS; Anemia: cause or effect of renal disease; Leukocytosis: ?pyelo, infection Glucose: DM? Bicarbonate: metabolic acidosis Calcium and Phosphate Protein and albumin Serum protein electrophoresis

UptoDate

Subsequent Laboratory Investigations Blood Tests Immunity Studies: ANA, anti-DNA, RF, ANCA, C3, C4 Inflammatory Studies: ESR, CRP Serology: Hep B, HIV, Bence-Jones Urinary Eosinophilia: AIN, embolic disease CK Liver enzymes, hepatitis: secondary GN

Imaging Ultrasound –rule out obstruction, stones, mass –small kidneys suggest chronic process –normal sized kidneys do not exclude chronic disease (amyloid, DM,myleoma, PCKD). –Doppler may be used to assess blood flow of arteries (RAS) or veins (thrombosis) CT Scan - useful for stones and masses If suspected renal artery stenosis: MR angiography (no nephrotoxic dye), renal angiogram

Renal Biopsy Should be considered: –if noninvasive tests have failed to establish a diagnosis in a patient with: nephrotic syndrome (except in DM) Certain cases of non-nephrotic proteinuria if associated with renal dysfunction Lupus nephritis (for dx and staging) acute nephritic syndrome unexplained acute/ subacute renal failure to differentiate GN from vasculitis –to direct and evaluate effectiveness of therapy

Management of Renal Disease Treatment of Reversible Causes Preventing or Slowing Progression –Hypertension Control (<130/80) –Control Proteinuria (< mg/day or 60% from baseline values) Treating and Preventing the Complications Identifying Individuals Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy

Hypertension Controlling BP slows progression of disease target <125/80, lower if normotensive at baseline or with more proteinuria Slowing of disease is related to decreased systemic BP, decreased glomerular hypertension, and decreased urine protein excretion Microalbuminuria is a major cardiovascular risk factor!

AII Inhibition ACEI/ ARBS are more effective than other medications in slowing progression: –Also benefit normotensive diabetics –Secondary actions include decrease glomerular remodelling preferential antiproteinuric effect decreases AII effects slows the progression of renal disease in type 1 and 2 DM independent of the effect on BP in nondiabetics, most convincing effect is in patients with greater proteinuria

Other Antihypertensives ARB: –benefit similar to ACEI seen in DM-2 –may be additive benefit with ACEI Verapamil, Diltiazem or beta-blocker –antiproteinuric effect in diabetics Other medications to achieve BP goals

Diet: Protein Restriction Dietary protein restriction ( g/kg/day) reduced the risk for renal failure or death in nondiabetic renal disease and slowed nephropathy in type I DM beneficial effects were unrelated to change in blood pressure or glycemic control. NNT 5 to 50 realistic to restrict to 0.8-1g/kg/day Ann Intern Med April 1;124:

Dyslipidemia Abnormal lipid metabolism is common in RF Primary problem is hypertriglyceridemia –LDL, HDL, chol may also be deranged CRF is considered a high cardiovascular risk and therefore target lipid levels are as those with CAD Some suggest that statins may benefit the kidney independent of lipid lowering effects

Erythropoietin Indicated for Hgb <110 Chk iron stores, folate, and B12 In patients with ferritin <100 and sat <20%, must supplement prior to commencement of therapy and continue supplement while on EPO Follow response to EPO and ensure adequate residual stores

Case Your patient returns for follow-up after 6 months. He has no new symptoms. You repeat his serum creatinine. It is now 185 (from 155). At what creatinine level would you refer him to a nephrologist? a) Now (185) b) 250 C) 310

Referral to Nephrologist Late referral (< 12 months pre dialysis) is common Survey of Ontario Family MDs: –84% would not refer with creat (>50% loss of GFR) –28% would not refer with creat –almost all would refer with creat>300 Consequences of referral shortly before dialysis: more complications longer hospitalization to initiate dialysis more difficulty with initiation of dialysis worse survival! Better outcomes with early multidisciplinary care CMAJ 1999: 161:413-17

Canadian Guidelines Renal replacement therapy is NOT rationed (i.e. everyone should be considered) Reversible causes should be sought at diagnosis At least 1 year is required to prepare for dialysis Refer, at the latest, at Cr clearance of 30 ml/min, or Cr of 300 But…there are probably not enough nephrologists/ clinics to meet this demand –Adequate communication with the Nephrologist will allow proper stratification of patients CMAJ 1999: 161:413-17

For AIMGP Clinic It is reasonable to follow stable renal failure patients, and work up and manage appropriately Refer to nephrology when: –Cr >300 or Cr clearance <30 ml/min –Renal biopsy indicated –Indicators of aggressive disease are present: Rapid decline in creatinine homeostatic derangement i.e. acidosis, volume overload, high K high protein excretion Difficult to control BP low HDL black race

In Summary

Conclusions When evaluating a patient with increased creatinine, internists should: –Identify and treat reversible causes of renal failure –Initiate management to slow the decline in renal function –Manage coexisting conditions –Have clear indications for when to refer to nephrology subspecialists

References Elevated Serum creatinine: recommendations for management and referral. CMAJ 1999: 161: Approach to managing elevated creatinine. Can Fam Physician. 2004;50: UptoDate