Vapor-Liquid Separator Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distillation Tower Design As computer technology advances, the fundamental aspects of plant design are becoming a lost art. … N.P. Lieberman, Refinery.
Advertisements

Combustion Design Considerations
Two Phase Pipeline Part II
Where We Go Wrong In Line Sizing Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Choking Due To Friction The theory here predicts that for adiabatic frictional flow in a constant area duct, no matter what the inlet Mach number M1 is,
PETE 411 Drilling Engineering
Motion of particles trough fluids part 1
INTRODUCTION TO RELIEF CHAPTER 7
Design Of Vertical Knock-Out Vessel With No Internals Favorable Inlet 2 phase flow regime Particle Dynamics – Separation of Liquid Droplets in Vapor Stream.
اسکرابرهای تر اساس کار این روش شستشوی گاز به کمک یک حلال می باشد.
Drums, Vessels, & Storage Tanks Design Considerations.
Culvert Hydraulics using the Culvert Design Form
Step 1: Set the desired flow rate for each pipe. Step 2: Click on the stream which you wish to size the pipe. Select Sizing from the menu, then select.
:By GROUP : Abdul-Majeed et.al
School of Electrical Engineering Systems
The Centrifugal Pump.
Lesson 26 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
Where We Go Wrong In Heat Exchangers
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Unit Operations Lecture 19
Fixed and Fluidized Beds
Valves In Industry (Part 3).
SEPARATOR Design of Equipments Process Chemical Engineering 2012 – B Class Second Group 1. Winda Rahma Tiara( ) 2. Ana Barika( ) 3.
P&ID Design and Equipment Selection
College of Engineering & Petroleum Depatment of Chemical Engineering
Pump Design & Selection n Dick Hawrelak n Presented to UWO CBE 497 n 16 Oct 01.
Practise questions Answers later.
Pressure drop during fluid flow
Heat Transfer Equations For “thin walled” tubes, A i = A o.
Lecture slides by Mehmet Kanoglu
Things to grab for this session (in priority order)  Pencil  Henderson, Perry, and Young text (Principles of Process Engineering)  Calculator  Eraser.
Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 9b Station Keeping.
Separation of Phases Vapor + Liquid. Vapor-Liquid Separation Vapor and liquid volumes from thermodynamics Remove liquid drops from vapor, vapor bubbles.
Turbocharger matching While the operating engineer will not normally be involved in turbo-charger matching, a familiarity with the procedure will lead.
Motion of particles trough fluids part 1
Production of ethanol From syngas Design presentation Done by: SARA BADER AL- SAFI Supervised by: Prof. M. fahim.
Process Design CEN 574 Spring 2004
Objectives Calculate heat transfer by all three modes Phase change Next class Apply Bernoulli equation to flow in a duct.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 29.
ANDERSON SEPARATOR™ ENGINEERED PRODUCTS Product Overview.
Table of content 1- Heat exchanger design (cooler ) 2- Distillation column design. 3- Valve.
Design of Heat Exchangers
Done by: Zainab Al-fadhli Supervised by: Prof: M.Fahim Eng : Yusuf Ismail Kuwait university Engineering and Petroleum college Chemical Engineering Department.
FLUID FLOW FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Dr Mohd Azmier Ahmad Tel: +60 (4) EKC 212 CHAPTER 8 (Part 5) TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
Production Engineering II
Chapter 10: Flows, Pumps, and Piping Design
Carbon Dioxide System Design
1 Chapter 5 Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes.
CHE441 Lecture: Tank & Vessel. Introduction of Vessel Applications of Vessels:  (1) as a liquid surge drum for liquid storage  (2) as a vapor/liquid.
CHEMCAD Process Safety Emergency Relief John Edwards, P&I Design Ltd
CHEMCAD Seminar Transport and Storage John Edwards, P&I Design Ltd
First Law of Thermodynamics applied to Flow processes
CYCLONE SEPARATOR.
Advisor: Dr. Shangchao Lin
1. Relative motion between a fluid and a single particle
Review of Separation Unit Ops
TUTORIAL 3.
Natural Gas Processing I Chapter 2 In-feed System
Chemical Engineering Explained
Process Equipment Design and Heuristics – Process Vessels
Chapter 5 The First Law of Thermodynamics for Opened Systems
Sedimentation Text book, Chapter 3 Reading Materials:
Chapter 18 ChEN 4253 Terry A. Ring
Heat-transfer Equipment
Mechanical Separation
2/22/2019 Pump Design Dick Hawrelak Presented to UWO CBE Oct 00.
Culvert Hydraulics using the Culvert Design Form
Pumps and pumping station
Fixed and Fluidized Beds
Chapter 6 Cyclones.
Presentation transcript:

Vapor-Liquid Separator Design Presented to CBE 497 15 Jan., 2002. By R. A. Hawrelak

The Equation of State Composition, temperature and pressure define the Equation Of State (EOS) for process streams in a chemical plant. The EOS often shows a particular stream to be a two-phase mixture of vapor and liquid. Chemical processes often require separation of the vapor stream from the liquid stream. The separation usually takes place in a vapor-liquid separator called a knock-out pot.

There are 3 Basic Design Zones in any Knock-out Pot The vapor-liquid inlet line. The vapor zone. The liquid zone.

Design Basis – Inlet Line Inlet line: Baker Two Phase Flow in Perry VI, CEHB, Page 5-41. Avoid high, two phase velocity which may atomize liquid into particles too small for fluid dynamic separation. Avoid “Slug Flow” regime where vibrations may be damaging to inlet pipe.

Baker Chart – Horizontal Flow

Design Basis – Vapor Zone The Vapor Zone: Perry VI, CEHB, Eq 5-263, page 5-66. Establish a design basis for liquid entrainment in the vapor stream. Select a design liquid particle diameter for liquid entrainment in the vapor stream. Select a vessel diameter to establish a terminal velocity that will entrain particles smaller than the design particle diameter.

Design Basis – Liquid Zone The Liquid Zone: Based on Liquid retention time. Establish liquid residence times for normal liquid level variation. Establish liquid residence times for alarming and shut-downs beyond normal liquid level variation.

Design Basis – Vessel Economics Combine the three design zones with Pressure Vessel Economics to obtain the most cost effective KO Pot.

Types of KO Vessels Vertical – No Internals

Vertical KO – With Demister Mesh

Peerless KO Pots With Horizontal Flow Chevrons

FWG – Vertical Flow Chevron Vanes

Cyclone KO Pot With Tangential Entry

Porta-Test Centrifugal Separator

Horizontal KO Pots API-521 Horizontal KO Pot With No Internals

API-521 Horizontal KO Pot With Mesh Pad

Wu – Horizontal With Extended Inlet

Kettle Refrigeration Exchanger

This Presentation Considers Vertical KO Vessel With No Internals Vertical KO With Mesh Pad As CBE 497 does not get to Phase III Engineering where line sizing is a factor, Inlet Line design is not part of this presentation.

Problem Statement Design a KO Pot to separate 49,423 lb/hr of vapor from 382,290 lb/hr of liquid. Working Range liquid level holdup shall be +/- 2 minutes on normal liquid level. Provide 2 minutes liquid holdup from high opg LL to Max LL. Provide 2 minutes liquid holdup from low opg LL to Min. LL. Total Liquid Retention time = 8 minutes.

First Design Consideration As the liquid rate is high (382,290 lb/hr), liquid volume will probably be the controlling design factor. Consider using a Standard Vertical KO Pot with No Internals.

Problem Statement Cont’d Vapor Destination – centrifugal compressor. Liquid Destination – C2 Splitter reflux. Compressor Spec – To prevent damage to the compressor, the liquid droplet size in the inlet vapor stream shall not exceed a particle diameter, Dp, of 150 to 300 microns. Design Spec – To achieve a goal of 150 microns, design the KO Pot for a particle diameter, Dp = 100 microns. Rate a 10 ft. dia. x 31 ft. t-t KO Pot.

Summary Of All Req’d Input

Step (1): Calc CFS Of Vapor CFS = Vapor cubic feet per second. CFS Vapor = Wv / 3600 / Dv. CFS Vapor = 16.29 cubic ft. per sec.

Step (2): Calc ( C )( Re^2 ) CRe^2 from Perry VI - Eq 5-263 CRe^2 = (A)( Constant) A = (Dp/304800)^3 (DL - Dv)(Dv) / cP^2 Constant = (4*32.2/3/0.00067197^2) CRe^2 = 1,411.49 Where C = Drag Coefficient Re = Particle Reynolds Number

Step (3): Calc Drag Coefficient, C Table 5-22, Perry VI, Page 5-67, gives C values versus CRe^2. These values have been curve fitted to a polynomial for the Re range 0.1 to 2,000 as follows: C = EXP(6.496-1.1478*LN(CRe^2) +0.058065*LN(CRe^2)^2 -0.00097081*LN(CRe^2)^3) C = 2.35 for the example presented

Step (4): Calc Particle Reynolds Number, Re Re = (CRe^2 / C)^0.5 Re = 24.5 Re falls within range 0.1 < Re < 2,000 OK to proceed to Step (5)

Step (5): Calc Drop Out Velocity Drop Out velocity, ut, from Perry VI - Eq 5-264. Ut = [Re / C*4*32.2 *cP* 0.00067197 *(DL-Dv) / 3 / Dv^2]^0.333333. Ut = 0.4659 ft./sec.

Step (6): Calc Vessel Diameter Area = (CFS / ut) = (3.14 / 4 )(D)^2. KO Dia = (CFS / ut /0.785)^0.5. KO Dia = 6.67 ft. Round Diameter to Nearest 3.” Rounded Diameter = 7’ 0.”

Step (7): Calc Ht. Above C.L. Of Inlet Nozzle, L1 L1 Vapor ht. Referenced to C.L. Of inlet nozzle. L1 Vapor ht. = 3 ft. + 0.5(Noz Diam.). L1 Vapor ht. = 3.83 ft. (C.L. to top t-L). See Design Uncertainty at end of this report for future addition of a demister pad, if required.

Step (8): Calc Liquid Vol, L3, For Specified Retention Time Cubic Ft. Of Liquid = Vol L3. Vol L3 = (WL)(Ø min.) / DL / 60 cu. ft. Vol L3 = 1,629.02 cu. Ft.

Step (9): Calc Liq Vol for minimum of 2 ft. Liquid. Liq Vol For 2 Ft. Minimum Liq Vol = Vol L2 ft. = (p)(2)(Dia)^2 / 4. Vol L2 ft. = 76.97 cu. Ft.

Step (10): Select Maximum of L3 Vol or L2 ft. Vol. Vol L3 = 1,629.02 cu. Ft. Vol L2 = 76.97 ft. cu. Ft. = cu. Ft. Max Liquid Vol = 1,629.02 cu. Ft.

Step (11): calculate L3, ft. L3 = (Vol L3)(4) / (p)(Vessel Dia)^2. This makes the vessel roughly 7 ft. in diam with an unusually high liquid level (L3).

Step (12): Document Liquid Retention Time Stated Liquid Retention Time Required from Max to Min Liquid Level = 8 minutes.

Step (13): Calculate L2 L2 is the height from the C.L. of the inlet nozzle to the max Liquid level. L2 = 0.25(L3) + 0.5(Inlet Nozzle dia.). L2 = (0.25)(42.33) + (0.5)(20/12) =11.42 ft.

Step (14): Calculate t-t Length L total t-t = L1 + L2 + L3. L total t-t = 3.83 + 11.42 + 42.33. L total t-t = 57.58. L/D = 57.58 / 6.67 = 8.63. Economic L/D range between 3 to 4. Repeat Process with lower Dp to increase dia and lower t-t length. Second Pass. Try Dp = 50 microns.

Other Design Steps Step (15): Check L/D ratio (Goal 4-6) Step 16: Old Schieman Sizing Method. Step (17):Calculate Liquid Entrainment (HTRI). Step (18): Determine Flow Regime for Inlet Pipe using Baker Chart for Horizontal Flow.

Summary

Vertical KO Pot with Demister Pad

Design Basis Design is vapor liquid systems with lower liquid rates. The particl size is usually set at a default value of 500 microns, which is rain drop sized particles. The wire mesh demister pad is usually 6 to 12 inches thick. The vapor stream will exit with liquid drops no greater than 3 microns.

Design Procedure The design procedure is exactly the same as for KO Pots without internals. Set the particle size at 500 microns and proceed as before till an economic vessel with and L/D range of 3 to 4 is found.

Design Uncertainty If the design is based on a vertical vessel with no internals and there is some uncertainty that the KO Pot will achieve the desired liquid particle size, provision can be made to add a wire mesh demister pad at a later date.

Future Demister Pad Make L1 a minimum of 3 ft. + 0.5(inlet nozzle dia.) for vessel diameters 4 ft. and smaller. For vessels larger than 4 ft. in dia., make L 1 = 0.75(Vessel dia.). This will allow room to add a demister at a later date, if needed.