Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Curriculum Maps Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Great Lakes Council of Business Schools and Programs Regional Conference October 6 – 7, Dr. Reginald J. Gardner Campus College Chair – School of.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
By Michael Morris Samika Thompson Integrating and Implementing Technology Fall 2009.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Facilitating Curriculum Development: Principles, Practices and Tools Peter Wolf April 2013.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Developing and Assessing Program-Level Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf April 17, 2013.
Graduate Attributes Jackie Campbell, Laura Dean, Mark de Groot, David Killick, Jill Taylor.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Technology Integration Lesson Planning. A Virtual Field Trip By: Paula Smith, Patty Deering, Vicki Matchett & Renata Sorel.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Assessment Taskforce Update College Council November 6, 2009.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
COUNSELOR EDUCATION PEDAGOGY TRAINING Session One: Significant Learning and Counselor Education.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Mission All students become powerful thinkers, effective collaborators, and compassionate contributors in preparation for success in a dynamic, interdependent.
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Colorado State Academic Standards Focus on Political Geography
The General Education Core in CLAS
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Project Category Grade Level
Curriculum & Instruction
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph

Geography Majors 1. Geography (BA Honours) 2. Environmental Governance (BA Honours) 3. Environmental Geoscience and Geomatics (BSc Honours) 4. Environment and Resource Management (BSc [Env.] Honours) 5. Earth Surface Science (BSc Honours program) 6. Environmental Geography (BSc [Env.] Honours program) April 12, 20122

Geography Program Assessment  Mapping structure and intentions  focus groups with entering students  focus groups with graduating students  alumni survey  past reviews  programs of high regard elsewhere  faculty perspectives  retreat

Geography Learning Outcomes 1. Analyze the earth as an integrated human-environment system by examining dynamic flows, interactions and exchanges at different spatial and temporal scales. 2. Reflect critically upon the scope and evolution of the diverse discipline of geography. 3. Recognize, synthesize and evaluate diverse sources of knowledge, arguments and approaches pertinent to exploring human- environment problems. 4. Collect and analyze geographical data and interpret its significance within the context of human-environment relations. 5. Communicate geographical concepts and data effectively using oral, written and visual forms. 6. Collaborate effectively as a team leader and member to pursue innovative solutions to human-environment problems. 7. Work independently to prioritize tasks and manage time effectively while maintaining academic and professional integrity. 8. Identify and address geographical questions using creativity and critical thought in diverse settings (e.g. classroom, lab, field, community). 9. Investigate complex real world challenges using appropriate concepts, methods, and tools from one or more geographical sub-disciplines. 10. Appreciate and reflect critically on the importance of holistic, integrative human-environment perspectives. 11. Explain societal relevance of geographical knowledge and apply it to real world human-environment issues. 12. Value respectful, responsible, and just community engagement and demonstrate active citizenship when addressing human- environment issues.

Geography Program Assessment Priority Findings  Students reported being confused on what geography is; didn’t know other geography students  No field trips – key signature pedagogy

Geography

Plant Agriculture  Priority Issue: Outcome – communication skills (writing)

Plant Ag - Assessment Plan Taught/Assessed - 2 Taught/Not assessed - 2 Not Taught/Assessed - 4 Not Taught/Not Assessed - 22 Curriculum Mapping - Writing Faculty Focus Group Student Focus Group

Plant Ag - Impact Actions: Common rubric that can be used for providing feedback on writing in all 3/4 th year courses Workshops for faculty on how to incorporate and assess writing in- course Common resource for students on disciplinary writing

Areas of Specialization / Foundational Content Content-driven Curriculum Programme Structure Course A Content Course C Content Course B Content Course D Content

Programme Outcomes Educational Experiences Areas of Specialization / Foundational Content Outcomes-driven Curriculum University Learning Objectives Programme Structure Course A Objectives Course C Objectives Course B Objectives Course D Objectives

Key Questions 1. What are the programme outcomes that we want to foster in our students? 2. Where in the curriculum are students encouraged to develop the programme outcomes? 3. How do we know whether our programmes are successful?

Curriculum Continuous Improvement Review/Develop Program outcomes Assessment / Evidencing / Mapping interpretationAction

Data-informed Faculty-driven Student-engaged Stakeholder-informed Culture- & context-specific Rigorous & authentic Continuous improvement of sustainable practices Resourced & recognized Recommended Practices

Globalization Technology Accountability & funding changes Learning-centredness Learning Outcomes – Why Now?

Embedding Outcomes Autonomy & Professional Capacity Professional & Ethical Behaviour An ethical practitioner who values diversity of opinions & perspectives Will utilize Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedom in determining resolution to case studies OCAV DLE University Outcome Degree Outcome Course Outcome

Programme Assessment Programme Outcomes Content Assessment Learning methods Effective? Efficient? Appropriate? Effective? Efficient? Appropriate? Effective? Efficient? Appropriate? Effective? Efficient? Appropriate? Effective? Efficient? Appropriate? Effective? Efficient? Appropriate?

Programme Assessment Student work – Tests, assignments, etc. 360° consultations Curriculum mapping External reviews, accreditations, etc. Benchmarks, research, literature, etc. Student reflection – (e)Portfolios, journals, etc. Analytics

Intentions Map Survey Questions : Which instructional methods do you use in this course? Which assessment approaches do students engage in for this course? For each listed Knowledge, Skill and Value, please indicate which, if any, you intentionally foster in this course? At what level of sophistication? For those indicated, please specify how /whether each KSV is taught and/or assessed in this course? How are the total marks available to students distributed over the course of the semester? Comments? Course-by-course info: Outcomes Assessment Learning methods Course-by-course info: Outcomes Assessment Learning methods April 12, 2012

Outcome Focus Civic engagement & advocacy Taught & Assessed: 4 courses Taught; Not Assessed: 1 course Not Taught; Not Assessed: 25 courses Taught & Assessed Taught; Not Assessed Not Taught; Not AssessedNot Taught; Assessed 21

Application of theory in the world Taught & Assessed: 25 courses Not Taught; Assessed: 1 course Not Taught; Not Assessed: 4 courses Taught & Assessed Taught; Not Assessed Not Taught; Not AssessedNot Taught; Assessed 22 Outcome Focus

Research Methods Test/Quiz/Exams – 14 Projects/Assignments – 13 Presentations – 5 Participation - 1 Test/Quiz/Exams – 14 Projects/Assignments – 13 Presentations – 5 Participation - 1

Grades Allocated by Week

Semester 1 Semester 2 Semester 3 Semester 4 Semester 5 Semester 6 Semester 7 Semester 8 Semester1Semester 2 Semester 3 Semester 4 Semester 5 Semester 6 Semester 7 Semester 8 Semester Maps