QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, 2009. QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Advertisements

SAILS Initiatives. Three Student Learning Outcomes Competency to apply effective learning strategies to enhance their success in courses across the curriculum.
March 2007 ULS Information Literacy and Assessment of Learning Program.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
QEP -- What & Why? The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) is part of the Reaffirmation Process for the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association.
Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP): SAILS QEP Director Sarah Thomason Adjunct Faculty Workshop August 28, 2010.
PROFESSIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC DEVELOPMENT Collaborative Assessment of Student Products.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
M I L L I K I N U N I V E R S I T Y Critical Writing, Reading & Research I & II MPSL First-Year Writing Requirement Report for Academic Year
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE CULMINATING PROJECT: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Presented by: Shujaat Ahmed and Kaitlin Fitzsimons.
Yanling Sun, Ph.D Carolyn Masterson, Ed. D. Implementing ePortfolio among Pre-service Teachers and Interns Montclair State University.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning Training Conducted at Campus-Based SLO Summit Spring 2014 How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning.
The Design and Use of a Career Portfolio to Promote Student Career Development Jill Lumsden Katie Meyer Robert Reardon James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
Quality Enhancement Plan Improving Student Learning for Life-long Success Quality Enhancement Plan Improving Student Learning for Life-long Success Tennessee.
INtopFORM Assessment Plan Please sit with other faculty members from your program of study.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Department of English & Foreign Languages B.A. in English CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Nursing.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Five-Year Report on Hybrid Learning in Math Hubs By Bob Indrihovic & Pat Velicky Florence-Darlington Technical College.
INtopFORM Assessment Plan This session is designed for participants in Programs of Study If you are a Faculty Fellow, please meet in room 106 with Amy.
ASSESSING CREATIVE THINKING THROUGH PORTFOLIOS October 30, 2014 MAGGIE KONICH ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST.
MDC Quality Enhancement Plan Mathematics Discipline Meeting Update March 5, 2009.
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
Southern University At New Orleans 6400 Press Drive New Orleans, LA
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Fall 2011: Critical Thinking. General Education Requirements.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
Welcome Aboard! CCC-QEP Carteret Community College Quality Enhancement Plan.
Developmental Education Assessment Workshop for College of the Redwoods.
QEP Update Primary Outcomes improvement of students’ critical thinking skills 1. Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course,
Assessing Progress on the QEP: Status Update Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
UPDATE on the Status of the LSUA QEP Mary Treuting and Cathy Cormier, Co-Chairs.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: Biology students struggle.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Designing a Course for Evaluation:
Mid-Continent University Faculty Workshops
Mathematics/Science/Health Methods for ECE/Elem/MS Teachers
GERT Force October 4, 2018.
General Education Redesign Task Force
Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration
What to do with your data?
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
GMMD Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Presentation transcript:

QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, 2009

QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course, program, and curricular levels 2.Enhanced instructional practices that promote critical thinking and life-long learning 3.Improved strategies for assessing student learning outcomes 4.More effective professional development opportunities for faculty and support staff

QEP Update Mid-Term Report First Outcome: “Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course, program, and curricular levels.”

“Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course, program, and curricular levels.” Targets Progress The level of critical thinking demonstrated by students on the ENG 111 common final will increase every year of this plan. Common Finals at Competent & Advanced Levels: 2006: 24% 2007: 27% 2008: 35% By 2011, 70% of students in randomly selected general education courses will demonstrate critical thinking at a competent level. For 2008, of a sample of 142 assessable non-multiple choice artifacts, 53 scored at 3 (Competent) or above based on CFCC’s CT rubric ( 37% ). The overall CT average for all assessed artifacts from 16 Gen Ed sections was 2.23 (Developing/Competent). Students completing CT- enhanced ACA courses will demonstrate significant gains on common pre and post exam (ongoing assessment beginning in Fall 2007). Pre and Post Common Exam Results from Spring & Summer 2008:  Average Pre-Exam Score (5 points per correct item/100 point scale)= 57.7  Average Final Exam Score (5 points per correct item/100 point scale)= 72.5  Average real score increase per student= 14.8 points

QEP Update Mid-Term Report Second Outcome: “Enhanced instructional practices that promote critical thinking and life-long learning.”

“Enhanced instructional practices that promote critical thinking and life-long learning.” Targets Progress Faculty will document improved instructional strategies that address critical thinking outcomes (ongoing) Every academic department has documented examples of best practices to enhance students’ critical thinking skills (via SPOC 201 / Each One, Teach One)

QEP Update Mid-Term Report Third Outcome: “Improved strategies for assessing student learning outcomes.”

“Improved strategies for assessing student learning outcomes.” Targets Progress CFCC will refine its common critical thinking rubric and the Institutional Portfolio model of assessment Scoring distribution and deviation consistent between assessment years (<0.50 per artifact batch) CFCC will revise its student, faculty, staff, and employer surveys to better assess gains in students’ critical thinking skills (ongoing) Assessing student perceptions of critical thinking emphasis via course evaluations (including DL courses), and CCSSE survey (ongoing)

QEP Update Mid-Term Report Fourth Outcome: “More effective professional development opportunities for faculty and support staff.”

“More effective professional development opportunities for faculty and support staff.” Targets Progress Faculty and support staff will complete surveys describing the impact of professional development activities on their abilities to improve students’ critical thinking skills Professional Development Activity Report database documents application of professional development activities to student learning (ongoing) By 2008, 70% of full-time faculty will have completed at least one self-paced course on critical thinking instruction 85 full-time faculty have completed a CT course (approximately 36%) By 2009, every instructional area will have identified critical thinking student learning outcomes at the course and program level Every instructional area has identified critical thinking learning outcomes at the course and program level

QEP Update Fall 2009/ Spring 2010 Priorities Continue revising/developing critical thinking learning outcomes at the course level Continue documenting CT best practices Continue documenting CT best practices Continue implementing professional development activities for faculty Continue implementing professional development activities for faculty Continue assessment processes Continue assessment processes

QEP Update Thank You!