Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (F&A) Understanding Indirect Costs.
Advertisements

Indirect Costs CALS RESEARCH DIVISION April 24, 2008 Website: Meredith Luschen,
Understanding F&A Rates Caroline Beeman February 28, 2007.
The Mysteries of Indirect Costs Revealed Lee Williams Vice-President for Research Faculty Brown-Bag Seminar November 14, 2006.
DIRECT BENEFITS OF AN INDIRECT COST RATE
Costs of Research and Research VERA Timothy J. O’Leary Adapted from a talk presented by Tony DeCrappeo, Council on Governmental Relations.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Research Administration 101 Beth Ridenour Office of the Comptroller Facilities & Administrative Cost Rate Proposal.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
1.  Office of Management and Budget (OMB) – Circular A-87  US Department of Education ◦ Delegates authority for indirect cost rate determination to.
KUMC Research Institute How to Think Through a Grant Budget Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA) Presented by.
Budget 101 Overview of a typical grant budget Erin Scott, CRA.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
Presented by Ginger Baker Eileen Campbell. Cost Principles for Educational Institutions found in 2 CFR Part 220  The Federal Government guidelines for.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Facilities and Administrative Rates- What does this really mean? Louis Guin, Manager, Bearing Point Anne Feuerborn, Manager, Arizona State University April.
Facilities & Administrative Cost Space Survey. Agenda  Discuss why a sponsored program space survey is required.  Terminology and Examples of Facilities.
Overview of Rate Calculation TWO COST GROUPS: DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSTS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION.
Facilities & Administrative Costs (F&A) F&A Rate Process and Timeline F&A Definitions: Direct, Indirect, and Unallowable Costs FY2011 F&A Rate Proposal.
Facilities & Administrative Costs and Sponsored Programs at Chico State March 27, 2012.
INDIRECT COSTS Aka: General Operating Funds, Administrative Overhead, F&A (Facilities and Administrative), Overhead Costs.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
1 Facilities and Administrative (Indirect) Costs at The Ohio State University Administrative Research Council April 15, 2008 Tom Ewing, Associate University.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Short-Form Proposals A Review Primer
AUDIT HIGHLIGHTS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, Audit Opinion- “Unqualified Opinion” audit report Pages 2-3 District’s Financial Position Improving!
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
© Huron Consulting Services LLC. All rights reserved. © Huron Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Huron Consulting Group Inc. nor any of.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
FY2008 Service Center Billing Rate Proposal Training Dates:Monday, February 26, 2007 Friday, March 2, 2007 Presented by: Rick Keller, Director – Cost Accounting.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Understanding F&A Costs Facilities and Administrative Costs 1 Revised April 2015.
 The Facilities and Administrative Rate (F&A Rate) is the mechanism used to reimburse the University for the infrastructure support costs associated.
Current Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Distribution Faculty Senate January 19, 2011 Jim Rankin.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Facilities and Administrative Costs Presentation by Grants & Contracts Accounting.
Lunch & Learn Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs Presented by: Roberta McManus.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
1 February 23, 2015 Teresa A. Costantinidis Budget and Resource Management UCSF Facilities & Administration Presentation.
What’s MTDC Mean To Me? Alexia Lewis Office of Research & Sponsored Programs September, 2006.
Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs Cost Allocation/Indirect Costs November 2 nd 2009.
Cost Allocation & Indirect Costs Requirements, Steps & Administrative Costs.
Office of Academic Grants and Sponsored Research Phone: Fax:
Presented by: Freddie Isaac March 28,  Direct costs are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project. 
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Research Service Center Business Plan September 2013.
1 Federal Cost Recoveries Georgia Fiscal Management Council October 3, :30pm – 3:30pm.
Understanding Facilities and Administration Charges in NIH Grants
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Understanding Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs
Project Budgeting.
Fiscal Management.
UIC 2008 Bringing Administrators Together Conference
Sponsored Programs at Penn
F&A Rate Practices, Concepts and Calculations
Overview of a typical grant budget
Overview of a typical grant budget
The U.S. System for Paying Facilities and Administrative Costs of Research The Basics - What are F&A Costs and How are Rates Calculated and Negotiated?
Presentation transcript:

Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009

What is F&A?   OMB Circular A-21 term for what was formerly referred to as indirect cost recovery.   Also known as “overhead”   Cost recovery mechanism – not a “tax”   OMB Circular A-21 term for what was formerly referred to as indirect cost recovery.   Also known as “overhead”   Cost recovery mechanism – not a “tax”

What is F&A?   Facilities & Administrative (F&A) costs are   “Costs incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity.”   Not Direct Costs – direct costs are specifically identified to individual research projects, instructional programs or other major functions.   Examples: Salaries, fringe benefits, travel related to project, lab supplies, subcontracts, etc.   Facilities & Administrative (F&A) costs are   “Costs incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity.”   Not Direct Costs – direct costs are specifically identified to individual research projects, instructional programs or other major functions.   Examples: Salaries, fringe benefits, travel related to project, lab supplies, subcontracts, etc.

F&A Cost Basis   Universities that receive $10M+ from federal sources must use a modified total direct cost (MTDC) basis for calculating F&A.   MTDC includes all project costs except equipment, renovations and subcontract costs in excess of the first $25,000.   F&A is recovered as the sponsor’s funds are expended (and billed) for direct cost items allowed per the project budget.   Universities that receive $10M+ from federal sources must use a modified total direct cost (MTDC) basis for calculating F&A.   MTDC includes all project costs except equipment, renovations and subcontract costs in excess of the first $25,000.   F&A is recovered as the sponsor’s funds are expended (and billed) for direct cost items allowed per the project budget.

How are F&A Rates Calculated? Calculation is a ratio of: F&A costs allocated to Organized Research divided by Organized Research Modified Total Direct Costs Calculation is a ratio of: F&A costs allocated to Organized Research divided by Organized Research Modified Total Direct Costs

F&A Rate Calculation   Rate Calculation Process   Each indirect cost pool is allocated to major functions (Instruction, Research, etc.) based on Cost Allocation methods   Amount allocated to each major function is divided by a ‘base’ – direct operations of the function   Resulting % is the indirect cost rate for that function   Rate Calculation Process   Each indirect cost pool is allocated to major functions (Instruction, Research, etc.) based on Cost Allocation methods   Amount allocated to each major function is divided by a ‘base’ – direct operations of the function   Resulting % is the indirect cost rate for that function

F&A Rate ComponentExamples General Administrative CostsCentral administrative offices (Payroll, accounting, disbursements, purchasing) Department Administration Academic Departments/Colleges Sponsored AdministrationVPR / Grants & Contracts Financial Services Operation & MaintenanceRepair & maintenance, utilities, custodial, grounds, police Building and Equipment DepreciationStandardized asset classifications and lives Interest Costs on Building & EquipmentDebt Service on certain buildings Libraries Administrative Facilities F&A Cost Pools Capped at 26%

F&A Rates   F&A Costs are recovered based on F&A Rates   Rates are developed based on cost studies.   UTSA contracted with Huron Consulting Group to develop our most recent cost study.   Significant effort.   Proposals are submitted to cognizant federal agency for review, audit, negotiation & approval.   Once approved, rates are applied to each grant & contract to determine the amount of indirect costs to be charged/recovered.   F&A Costs are recovered based on F&A Rates   Rates are developed based on cost studies.   UTSA contracted with Huron Consulting Group to develop our most recent cost study.   Significant effort.   Proposals are submitted to cognizant federal agency for review, audit, negotiation & approval.   Once approved, rates are applied to each grant & contract to determine the amount of indirect costs to be charged/recovered.

F&A Cost Rate Agreement

Recent COGR survey: F&A rates have held relatively constant at ~51% for the past 6 yrs! F&A payments as a % of total NIH awards was stable at 28.5% for FY accdg to GAO Rand study estimated that universities were subsidizing between $700M and $1.5B of F&A FY06 NSF survey showed that universities contribute more than $9B of their own funds to support R&D activities or nearly 20% of total R&D expenditures.

Comparison of Cost Study to the negotiated rate Administrative Costs are capped at 26%; the Facility rate component is negotiated down to less than half the computed ‘actual’ costs.

Why is F&A Recovery Important?   Supports the cost of conducting research   If sponsors don’t pay, someone else must   Important new revenue source to UTSA   Supports the cost of conducting research   If sponsors don’t pay, someone else must   Important new revenue source to UTSA $2,978,543 $3,933,801 $5,201,496 $5,703,051 $6,055,402 $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 FY 04FY 05FY 06FY 07FY 08 UTSA F&A Revenue - 5 Year History F&A revenue grew by $3.1M over the last 5 years, an increase of 103%

Net Effective F&A Rate The net effective F&A rate is computed as follows: TOTAL F&A Recovery Revenue divided by Restricted Sponsored Program Expenditures (Net of F&A) The net effective F&A rate is computed as follows: TOTAL F&A Recovery Revenue divided by Restricted Sponsored Program Expenditures (Net of F&A)

F&A Net Effective Rate Includes all NACUBO Programs FY 07 Basis Net Effective Rate FY 08 Basis Net Effective Rate All Restricted $5,703,051 / $31,442, % $6,055,402 / $34,035, % Restricted Federal $5,404,985 / $26,194, % $5,753,973 / $27,725, % Restricted Non- Federal $298,066 / $5,247, % $301,429 / $6,310, % Restricted Research Only $4,973,465 / $20,283,600 $4,973,465 / $20,283, % $5,188,035/ $21,908,637 $5,188,035/ $21,908, % We are subsidizing ~50% of the negotiated cost of overhead for restricted research (69% of cost study developed costs)

F&A Revenue Recovery by Source FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY07FY08 Federal$2,872,068$3,781,347$5,032,063$5,404,985$5,753,973 State 31,627 31,627 68,132 68,132 52,261 52,261 65,799 65,799 65,992 65,992 Local16,32117,80530,17522,84237,325 Private58,52766,51786,997209,425198,112 TOTALS $2,978,543$3,933,801$5,201,496$5,703,051$6,055,402 95% of F&A is from federally sponsored activities.

Sources of F&A FY07 Revenue Federal94.8% State1.2% Local0.4% Private3.7% TOTAL100%

Sources of F&A FY08 Revenue Federal95% State1.1% Local0.6% Private3.3% TOTAL100%

FY08 F&A (Federal) Sources

F&A Recovery by College, Institute, Center, Program

How is F&A Allocated?   In FY07, the VPs for Research, Business Affairs and Academic Affairs entered into a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to document the allocation of F&A.   The MOU is:  Flexible - has been amended twice with another pending.  Transparent   In FY07, the VPs for Research, Business Affairs and Academic Affairs entered into a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to document the allocation of F&A.   The MOU is:  Flexible - has been amended twice with another pending.  Transparent

Allocations to Principle Investigators, Colleges, Centers and Institutes   The MOU allocates 10% of actual F&A recovery to PI’s, Colleges, Centers and Institutes based on prior year actual earnings.   These funds are allocated on a one-time basis   Not part of the recipient’s base budget due to year-to-year fluctuations in earnings.   Funds are currently treated as discretionary incentive.   The MOU allocates 10% of actual F&A recovery to PI’s, Colleges, Centers and Institutes based on prior year actual earnings.   These funds are allocated on a one-time basis   Not part of the recipient’s base budget due to year-to-year fluctuations in earnings.   Funds are currently treated as discretionary incentive.

Debt Service 29% of FY08 F&A recovery is pledged to debt service:   Renovations to West Campus (Margaret Tobin) Lab Facility financed through bond series 2006B   will be retired August 15, 2036: FY07 debt service paid $665,350 FY08 debt service paid $667,600 FY09 payment due $666,000 29% of FY08 F&A recovery is pledged to debt service:   Renovations to West Campus (Margaret Tobin) Lab Facility financed through bond series 2006B   will be retired August 15, 2036: FY07 debt service paid $665,350 FY08 debt service paid $667,600 FY09 payment due $666,000

Debt Service Faculty Start-Up Costs   Beginning FY04, faculty start-up costs were financed with F&A to service the debt.   All debt under this program will be retired August 31,   Remaining payments are: FY09 $1,383,495 FY10 1,251,908 FY11 924,722 FY12 34,795 Faculty Start-Up Costs   Beginning FY04, faculty start-up costs were financed with F&A to service the debt.   All debt under this program will be retired August 31,   Remaining payments are: FY09 $1,383,495 FY10 1,251,908 FY11 924,722 FY12 34,795

Building Maintenance & Capital Improvements   $300,000 set aside as a reserve for capital requirements and building maintenance for research related facilities.  In FY08, funds were used for previously pledged faculty start-up costs to forego incurring additional debt.   Unused balances roll forward to reserves.   $300,000 set aside as a reserve for capital requirements and building maintenance for research related facilities.  In FY08, funds were used for previously pledged faculty start-up costs to forego incurring additional debt.   Unused balances roll forward to reserves.

Center for Infrastructure Assurance & Security Lease Costs   During FY09, up to $222,000 of the annual lease costs will be paid from F&A to allow CIAS to move off campus (near Main campus).   Allocation is subject to annual escalation of 3%.  Allows TRIO to move to ITC  Allows Business Affairs staff to move from JPL to University Heights   Funds are not allocated directly to CIAS.  Lease term is 5 years.   During FY09, up to $222,000 of the annual lease costs will be paid from F&A to allow CIAS to move off campus (near Main campus).   Allocation is subject to annual escalation of 3%.  Allows TRIO to move to ITC  Allows Business Affairs staff to move from JPL to University Heights   Funds are not allocated directly to CIAS.  Lease term is 5 years.

VP Administrative Overhead   The following VP areas receive a base budget allocation to support salaries & related administrative overhead:  Academic Affairs  Academic Affairs $875,000 (14% of FY08 Actual)  Research$855,580  Research$855,580 (14% of FY08 Actual)  Business Affairs $522,200  Business Affairs $522,200 (9% of FY08 Actual)   The following VP areas receive a base budget allocation to support salaries & related administrative overhead:  Academic Affairs  Academic Affairs $875,000 (14% of FY08 Actual)  Research$855,580  Research$855,580 (14% of FY08 Actual)  Business Affairs $522,200  Business Affairs $522,200 (9% of FY08 Actual)

FY 10 Budget Outlook   FY10 Budget will be set 2.5% higher than FY09 (1.6% higher than FY08 actual recovery)