Highest and Best Use Study Presentation for the November 19, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Artisphere: A Path Forward for Success Task Force Findings, Business Plan Benefits & Assumptions 1.
Advertisements

Avenida La Pata/Avenida Vista Hermosa Park and Development Study Land Use Charette MAY 15, 2004.
Existing Fairgrounds and Airport Property Master Plan Concept Board of County Commissioners August 23, 2011.
July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
The unpopularity of property taxes and the simplicity and perceived fairness of sales taxes have made the Local Option Sales Tax for Education a popular.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Request for Letters of Interest Private Sector Partners for the Development of the County’s New Fairgrounds.
1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
Crockett Park Knights initiate site selection process in early 2000s and identify Center City as preferred location 2010 Center City Vision Plan recommends.
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
Amateur Sports Development at Bojangles Coliseum & Ovens Auditorium June 5, 2014 Economic Development & Global Competitiveness Committee.
Public-Private Partnership. Overview History and Background Palm Coast Arts Foundation – About – Master Site Plan – Phasing – Public Benefits Lease Agreement:
Hood County – Lake Granbury Study Economic Impact Study Overview Study Objective –Establish the baseline economic impact of Lake Granbury-related activity.
Proposal to Town Board March 2,  Background  Concept  Financing  Economic Benefits  Marketing Plan  Fundraising and Sponsorship  Clarence.
FIELD OF DREAMS Hospitality, Tourism, and Sports.
Delaware Community Investment Fund Committee of 100 Economic Roundtable June 26, 2015.
Creating Affordable Housing with the Housing Initiative Fund Elizabeth B. Davison, Director Department of Housing and Community Affairs.
Convention Center Community Coalition 1. Time Line 2008: Feasibility Study by CS&L May 2009: Follow-Up Data April 2010: Appleton Council/Mayor Appoint.
WAYNESBORO BROWNFIELDS ASSESSMENT & REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROJECT May 20 th, 2015 Reuse Planning: Environmental (Prime):
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
The First Palestinian Planned City. First Palestinian Planned City Over 5,000 housing units Over 1,000 deluxe apartments City center and public facilities.
2 Governor’s Principles for Fort Monroe Respect Fort Monroe’s history Maintain Public Access Achieve economic sustainability.
Overview Public Private Partnerships (P3) September 30, 2014.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Land Resource Economics Wednesday, Feb. 15. Characteristics of Land Unique – fixed in location Heterogeneous in topography, geology, hydrology, fertility.
May 24, 2008PalmRidge Park A Mixed-Use Real Estate Property for Sale in McAllen, TX.
Kara Norman, AICP Executive Director. OUR MISSION: Enhance, promote and preserve the vitality and economic viability of Downtown Frederick by implementing.
Palm Coast City Council STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN 2012.
Bae Real Estate Asset Management Strategy Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority March 19, 2009.
9/22/ Village Zoning District for Northfield? Gerald Coogan, AICP Lakes Region Planning Commission.
City of Arlington - Economic / Fiscal Impact - Proposed NFL Stadium Presentation of Economic & Fiscal Impacts Proposed NFL Stadium August 13, 2004.
A BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY PRACTICE GROUP WINTER BASEBALL MEETINGS FORUM December 8, 2013.
Development Projects Construction of residential real estate in Kiev, Ukraine.
The Community Preservation Act Hadley – April 14, 2004 The Community Preservation Coalition What is the CPA and how does it work? What does the CPA mean.
Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education Presentation August 23, Planning for Changing Enrollment 2010 US Census Data What Does It Tell Us.
Development Overview. Project Background In 2000, the High Performance Community Strategy helped define a vision for economic development in our region.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.
Alex Lin Emily Schwartz Sarah Snider Kate Wittels.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
The Community Preservation Act in Kingston. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for:
Regional Recycling Solutions, LLC.   County purchased 103 acres in July of 1993 from Greene Land Company  Elchin Inc purchases 40 acres in April 1998.
Leeds Sustainable Development Group Landowners’ and Developers’ Discussion 11 July 2011.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Cornelius Candidate Projects For Funding Total Candidate Projects$ 22 million –Rail Improvements ($10 million) –Local CIP Projects NC-115 upgrades ($ 1.9.
February 2, 2012 City of Lee’s Summit Cultural Facilities Master Plan 1.
The Community Preservation Act. Open Space Historic Preservation Affordable Housing Allows communities to establish a dedicated fund for: The Community.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
PROTECTING THE PARTNERSHIP. Purpose ■How changing the rules for the Woodlands will impact our community partners.
Goal: Design and Construct a Mixed-Use Parking Facility, with a Minimum of 300 – 400 Public Parking Spaces, in Addition to Required Spaces for any Included.
Presentation Downtown Real Estate Market Analysis Presented to: The City of Concord, North Carolina Presented by: Economics Research Associates April 8,
1. Who are we? “A Time for Change”  Proud to be your state capital since 1864  Over 150 square miles  54,080 residents  Nevada’s only Consolidated.
Fiscal Impact Analysis – City of Norwalk, Connecticut October 5, 2006 Prepared by:RKG Associates, Inc. Economic, Planning and Real Estate Consultants 277.
Council Grove Zoning & Planning Committee Final Plan Presentation March 9, 2016.
Arroyo Seco Music & Arts Festival Presentation City Council Monday, April 4, 2016.
Works of Art: Redeveloping Properties for Cultural Reuse Harvester Artspace Lofts Council Bluffs, Iowa Tina Hochwender – City of Council Bluffs.
South Waterfront Greenway Design Guidelines Portland Design Commission Briefing April 3, 2008.
Voorhees Town Center Vision
Council for Quality Growth North Fulton Advisory Meeting
Draft Indoor Recreation Facilities Master Plan
The Community Preservation Act in Northborough
Valley & Third Streets Redevelopment
The Community Preservation Act in Topsfield – August 31, 2004
Oct. 10, 2011 Community Meeting on the Proposed Relocation of the Alachua County Fairgrounds.
Early Learning Facilities
The Soundside Site Dare County
Presentation transcript:

Highest and Best Use Study Presentation for the November 19, 2008

 Study was conducted in response to request for long-term lease of the racetrack  Study was originally focused on future use of the Fairgrounds, as a Fairgrounds – not moving  Board members posed two questions that refocused the study

 What is the future potential for the annual Tennessee State Fair?  How does the future of the Fair impact site and facility needs?

I. Assessment of Long-Term Viability of the Fair and Identification of Potential Future Uses of the Fairgrounds II. Recommendations of Future Fair and Fairground Use

Potential Future Uses Mission and Operating Realities Interviews Input and Comments Economic And Demographic Factors Competitive Factors Fairground and Event Facility Trends Request for Information Racetrack Lease Historical Events and Activities Current Physical Conditions Viability of the Tennessee State Fair

To be a major venue for agricultural, exhibition, entertainment, cultural, and educational uses to enhance the economic and social benefits to the residents and visitors to the middle Tennessee region. Of primary importance is the staging of the annual Tennessee State Fair that showcases agriculture, commerce, technology, and industry of the region and provides quality educational and entertainment opportunities for its patrons.

 Tennessee State Fair – a county/regional fair  Declines in paid and total attendance  Perceived “static” programming  Perceived safety issues  Decline in 4-H participation

 Tennessee State Fair’s future is very viable – potential to become a true State Fair  Requires changes to operating model, programming, facilities and, perhaps, site location  Potential for strengthened and new partnerships with key organizations

 Public meetings in January, May, August  Neighborhood district visioning session  Comments submitted at websites  Interviews of current users, stakeholders, interested parties and public officials

 Access/Road System, Public Transportation  Site Size and Layout  Surrounding Land Uses  Zoning and Deed Restrictions  Topography and Special Conditions

 Approximately 117 acres  35 acres in floodplain and embankments  About 23 acres for main facilities  About 14 acres related to grandstand, racetrack and pit areas

 Population trends of the Nashville/Davidson County area  Socio-Demographics of area within 15 miles of the Fairgrounds

 In 2007, attendance represented 12.6% of County resident population  True state fair should be able to garner 25% to 35% market penetration  Range of potential attendance – 350,000 to 500,000

Three Principal Business Units  Annual Tennessee State Fair  Monthly Flea Market  Non-Fair Rentals and Leases

Exhibition Space Competition  Nashville Convention Center  Gaylord Opryland Convention Center  Local area hotels

Spectator Event Facility Competition  Municipal Auditorium  Sommet Center  Curb Event Center  Allen Arena

 Current lease provides base rent of $50,000 per year for all facilities plus percentage of concessions revenues  Base rent – less than $140 per day for the facilities included in the agreement  Ten years ago the lease payment exceeded $250,000 per year

 Though car counts are up in recent years, attendance has been unremarkable

 NASCAR’s televising of major races has negatively impacted weekly racing series attendance nationwide  Continued competition from Nashville Superspeedway and Music City Raceway

Review of State and Regional Fairgrounds  100% have livestock and exhibit facilities  92% have horse show facilities  72% have an arena  69% have RV facilities (average of 250 to 300)  53% have a grandstand  14% have amphitheater

 Multi-purpose event facilities  Addition of sports and recreation venues  Partnerships with carnival operators for permanent rides and entertainment areas  Lease of out lots for retail, commercial and hotel developments

 In June, issued RFI to public organizations and private companies  More than 100 – real estate developers, sports and entertainment, racing, economic development  Purpose of the RFI: Solicit interest and ideas for the possible redevelopment of the Fairgrounds

 Nine Responses  Two Did Not Meet Development Criteria  Five Were Similar in Redevelopment Concepts and Impacts  Two Were Unique in Concept and Impact

 Presentation to Fair Board on August 5  Public Presentation on Aug 20 by  Southern Land Company  TEAM 821  Tennessee Motor Sports Conservancy  Wedgewood Partners

Mixed-Use, Town Center Concept  For Sale/Rental Housing (1,000 – 1,100 Units)  Entertainment District (Amphitheater)  Retail/Commercial (350K – 500K sq. ft.)  Park Area (43 acres)

IMAGE Mixed Use Entertainment / Venue District Single-Family Cottage District Residential Overlook District Green District

IMAGE

Film and Entertainment Development  Film and Television Production Studio  Higher Education Film School  Mixed-Use Office and Housing  Arts and Entertainment Venue

Sports and Entertainment District  NASCAR Speed Park  Water Park Hotel  Baseball Stadium  Hall of Fame  Entertainment District (800K sq. ft.)  RV Park  Educare  Amphitheater  Music City Motorplex

Mixed Use Development  Office – 60%/65%  Retail – 15%/20%  Housing – 15%/20%

 All would purchase the site at market value  TN Motor Sports Conservancy proposed the Fair remaining at the site, make substantial improvements to existing buildings  Wedgewood Partners proposed a site specific swap, building program and endowment

 Mixed use development (housing/retail/commercial) investment potential - $275 million to $1.2 billion over 10 years  Benefits to County in form of real estate and sales taxes - $12 million to $42 million per year  Best meets the needs/desires of the surrounding neighborhoods

 Browns Creek Development investment potential of $500 million over 10 years  Benefits to County in form of real estate and sales taxes - $18 million to $20 million per year  Compatible with surrounding neighborhoods  Financially, more risk than mixed-use development

 TN Motor Sports Conservancy investment potential of $150 million to $160 million  Benefits to County in form of real estate taxes – $2.5 million to $3.0 million per year  Least compatible with surrounding neighborhood  Question as to market potential for continued racetrack operation

 Highest and best future use(s) of the Fairground site depends on one of two choices:  Continue as county/regional fair  Re-invent as true State Fair

Required changes to operations and facilities:  Consider taking over racetrack operations  Contract with private management company  Plan and implement landscaping, beautification and building upgrades - $5.5M to 7.5M  Create a foundation for capital projects and educational programs

Initial Options for Site:  Move to another site and construct a new Fairgrounds  Make significant changes to existing site layout, buildings and structures

Initial Options for Site:  Move to another site and construct a new Fairgrounds  Site size ranges between 225 acres and 380 acres

 Wholesale change in governance model  Fair Authority  Division of State Department/Agency  Fair must be more “state” focused in educational programming, competitive exhibits, sponsorships and attendance appeal

Highest and best use for current site is a mixed- use/commercial development Best addresses issues of:  Neighborhood compatibility  Fiscal benefits to local and state government  Catalyst for growth/development of South Nashville area

Motor Sports and Entertainment Development  Historical operations and current market factors do not support projected attendance  Development concept lacks compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods

 Sale of fairground site at highest market value  Dedication of portion of future property taxes or fees  Partnership with State of Tennessee  Major donations/capital drive and naming rights sponsorships

 Decide what the Tennessee State Fair will be in the future  Determine needed facilities for the future Tennessee State Fair

Highest and Best Use Study Presentation for the November 19, 2008