Siblings and Permanence CPYP 2006 Annual Conference November 2, 2006 Oakland, CA Wendy Piccus, California Children’s Services Archive Center for Social.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Family Engagement State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services Staff Development & Appreciation Day.
Advertisements

Building futures for our most vulnerable children What do we need to change in law, policy and practice? Professor Gillian Schofield School of Social Work,
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
“Yes We Will”: From Placements to Permanency – The 2020 Vision Catalyst for CARE 9 th Annual Child Placement Conference November 12-14, 2008 Dr. Page Walley,
Supporting School Proximity: Requirements, Strategies and State Examples NAEHCY National Conference November 6, 2011.
Linking administrative data sets for self- evaluation: Preliminary results from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Family to Family Initiative in California.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
An overview of basic California foster care data Joe Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California.
Team Decision Making and Self- Evaluation: Getting the Most Out of Your Database Anne K. Abramson & William C. Dawson Center for Social Services Research.
Self Evaluation and Reporting using TDM CA Anne Abramson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley Jana Rickerson Technical Assistant (TDM) Annie.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Kansas Communities Helping Find Forever Families A presentation to support adoption and foster care services of the Kansas Department for Children and.
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Family Search & Engagement Creating Lifetime Connections Linda Librizzi, LCSW Mardi Louisell, MA, MSW.
Care planning 1. Key research messages Four issues to address in all plans: 1. Providing a sense of permanence for the child 2. Overriding importance.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
A New Vision Of Permanency April 2006 Jeff Griffin Will Ortiz.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1. We Continually Examine our Use (Misuse) of Power, Use of Self and Personal Biases 1.We must be aware of and recognize how we use the power of the position.
Partnership Plan Agreement Together – Making a Difference Respected Partners Nurturing Children Supporting Families Strengthening Communities Respected.
An Infopeople Webinar Wednesday, December 3, 2014 Youth Development in Action Patty Wong, Yolo County Library.
Meaningful Family Engagement: Nuts and Bolts Together We Can 8 th Annual Conference Lafayette Hilton Lafayette, LA October 6, 2010.
1 Future of CPS Audrey Deckinga, Assistant Commissioner of CPS June 4 th, 2013.
Using an Institutional Analysis to Identify Systemic Barriers to Racial Equity in the Child Welfare System Fresno County DSS Howard Himes & Wendy Osikafo.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Other Parent Home Assessment 1.Complete a modified home study of the other parent’s household to include: Verification of legal parental relationship Household.
Presentation originally created by William C Dawson & Amy C Nuñez The Performance Indicators Project & the Administrative Office of the Courts: Toward.
+ Stefanie Sprow, Children’s Defense Fund Ana Beltran, Generations United and ChildFocus Rebecca Robuck, ChildFocus Child Welfare Peer Kinship Network.
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Family, Friend and Neighbor Care: An Opportunity Ruth W. Mayden The Annie E. Casey Foundation December 2,
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
The significance of transition planning for placement change Barbara Dirienzo, Managing Attorney-Children’s Legal Services James Carlson, Chief Operations.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Privacy Panel: Information Sharing Between Education and Child Welfare Agencies and Access to Records CIP Conference July 2010.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
Healthy Family Relationships (1:23) Click here to launch video Click here to download print activity.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.
What goes on in and around the Phoenix Office ?. Programs: Six programs (Three Statewide) Budget: $5,445,565. Staff: 87 Staff and 17 Sub-contractors (plus.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Data Trends & Child Outcomes Center for Social.
Presented by: Degale Cooper, MSW Director of Family Programs.
New York State Office of Children and Family Services. Meeting 6: Helping Children with Birth Family Connections.
Safe Families Intro Personal Introduction Tangentyere Council Safe Families Model Strengths Weaknesses Lessons learned.
CONTINUUM OF CARE REFORM (AB403) Alexis Barries Project Associate Youth Engagement Project Alyssum Maguire Project Coordinator Youth Engagement Project.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
 The Kinship Center’s mission is to provide holistic support to families who are the primary caregiver of their relative’s child or children. Culturally.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
PUTTING PARENTING FIRST
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Butte County Overview December 2016 ~ Cathi Grams, Director Department of Employment and Social.
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ October 25, 2016
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Placement Stability & Permanence
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Placement Stability & Permanence
Relationships / Attachments
Presentation transcript:

Siblings and Permanence CPYP 2006 Annual Conference November 2, 2006 Oakland, CA Wendy Piccus, California Children’s Services Archive Center for Social Services Research – UC Berkeley Erric Garris California State Senate Office of Research Funding for this work is provided by the California Department of Social Services, the Stuart Foundation, and the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

What do we know? On April 1, 2006, there were 78,960 children in CA child welfare supervised foster care. Of these children, 52,191 (66%) had at least one sibling in out- of-home care. Of these children: 23,897 (46%) children were placed with all of their siblings. 35,493 (68%) were placed with all or some of their siblings. 16,698 (32%) were placed with none of their siblings.

What do we know?

Who gets placed with their siblings? Children placed in kinship homes were more likely to be placed with all of their siblings than were children in other placement types. Children placed with a Guardian were also more likely to be placed with all of their siblings than were children in other placement types. Black children were less likely than were children of any other ethnicity to be placed with all of their siblings.

Why Might Siblings Be Important to Children in Care? What do siblings mean to each other? What could placement away from siblings mean to some children? What could placement with siblings provide for children in care?

Youth in care need feelings of identity, connection, belonging and unconditional love.

What about Permanency?

Physical Emotional Legal What is permanency?

Can we balance the different types of permanency? How do we maximize permanency for youth in care while also maintaining sibling connections? What types of permanency can placement with siblings provide? What difficulties to permanency can placement with siblings create?

Family to Family Goals with Implications for Sibling Connections Family to Family Goals: Develop a network of family foster care that is: neighborhood-based culturally sensitive located primarily in communities in which children currently live. Ensure that all children who come into foster care, including teens and brother-and-sister groups, are routinely placed with families.

Family to Family Goals with Implications for Sibling Connections (con’t) Family to Family Goals: Increase the number and quality of foster and kinship families to meet projected needs. Involve birth parents, foster parents, and kinship families as team members. Invest in the capacity of communities where large numbers of families involved in the child welfare system live.

How can we employ Family to Family Strategies in attaining those goals? Family to Family Strategies: Recruiting, Training, and Supporting Resource Families Building community Partnerships Making Decisions as a Team Evaluating Results

Where do we go from here? Put more resources into creating and supporting sibling placements Explore the concept of siblings as caregivers Support kinship care Support foster families that can provide for large family groups Be creative

For More Information: Visit UC Berkeley website: For sibling reports on UC Berkeley website: re/childwel/siblings.asp Wendy at: Erric at: