UNIT 5 The Hierarchy of the Courts The Doctrine of Precedent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil Law and Criminal Law. By John Johnston AIIRSM Health and Safety for Beginners - HSfB.
Advertisements

Common Law Why is it called “common”? Its main features and maxims.
Unit 3 AOS 3 The Role of the Courts in law-making
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 15:30-16:30 Session 6, 21 Nov 2014.
By Vikash kumar, Yashvardhan Singh & group 1 ST YEAR (B.B.A LLb.)
University of Hertfordshire
Unit 1 – The South African Legal System Advocate Samuels BUSINESS LAW.
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Doctrine of Precedent
Sources of Law Precedent
THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
Overview, Binding and Persuasive predent
UNWRITTEN LAW JUDICIAL DECISION.
UNIT 3 LEGAL STUDIES AO3- THE ROLE OF THE COURTS
Judicial Precedent by Lisa Incledon.
English Legal System Judicial Precedent
Business Law 1 Case Law The hierarchy of the courts.
Doctrine of Precedent.
Doctrine Of Precedent Group Members Saumya kaushik Samridhi Sikha Das Sana Jahan Satyam Kharbanda Rumani Dutta.
Precedent Topic 7.
Civil and criminal courts
The Civil Courts and other forms of Dispute Resolution
Judicial Precedent.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
A bit of revision.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Produced by Dr Peter Jepson applying ‘The English Legal System’ by J Martin (5th edition). Précis Notes will be checked.
COMMON LAW, CASE LAW AND PRECEDENT
Sources of law Judicial Precedent.
British Judicial System
Copyright Guy Harley 2004 Introductory & Contract Law Week 3.
4.2 – Role of Judges in Common Law 1. The main role of courts  decide the facts of the case (that is, what happened)  decide what law applies  apply.
Sources of law Judicial Precedent. What you need to know Stare decisis – stand by what has been decided Stare decisis – stand by what has been decided.
Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Précis Notes will be checked Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised chapter 3 of “The English Legal System”
B.A BUSINESS STUDIES BUS361 BUSINESS LAW. Lecture 2 The Court Structure.
The Doctrine of Precedent. Common law Common law is also known as judge-made law, case, law or precedent law.
Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 4 How courts make laws.
TOPIC 4 UNDERSTANDING CASE LAW Mr. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws, CFSIIUM.
Lesson Objective: To revise some, and become familiar with other, necessary terminology for judicial precedent.
YR 12 LEGAL STUDIES How courts make law. Chapter overview This chapter looks at the concepts of Common law Doctrine of precedent Judgments and precedents.
Unit 2 Sources and Varieties of English Law. English law  Which country does “English” refer to? England + Wales + Scotland = Great Britain England +
Law LA1: Precedent Precedent Unit 2 AS. Law LA1: Precedent Objectives What You Need to Know: What is meant by a system of binding precedent The court.
Judicial Precedent The Doctrine of Precedent: the hierarchy of the courts; stare decisis, ratio decidendi and obiter dicta; law reporting. The operation.
Common Law. * Before the time of Henry II (1154 – 1189) local customs AND local laws varied from place to place * There was no record of what decisions.
Judicial Precedent As Law. Judicial Precedent Judicial precedent refers to sources of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges.
THE ABILITY OF JUDGES TO MAKE LAW. INTRODUCTION: COMMON LAW  Common law – founded in England, adopted by Australia  It is law developed through the.
The Role of the Courts. What is Common Law? Common Law is law developed through the courts. Also known as Judge-made law and case law. It is created when.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Essential elements of the legal system A1. Court structure.
English for Lawyers 1 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
Judicial Precedent.
The court hierarchy:.
The Doctrine of Precedent
Week 6 – How legal rules are created by precedent
Understanding Law making
JUDICIAL PRECEDENT.
UNIT 8 THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
The Hierarchy of Courts and the Doctrine of Precedent
The Hierarchy of English Courts and the Doctrine of Precedent
Sources of Law 1 The common law
Hierarchy of courts Exercises.
English for Lawyers 2 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
Precedent Key points.
Unit 8 The Hierarchy of English Courts and the Doctrine of Precedent
Judicial Precedent – Hierarchy of the courts
English for Lawyers 2 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
ROYAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW AND ECONOMIC
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Precedent.
Unit 8 The Hierarchy of English Courts and the Doctrine of Precedent
Precedent….
Presentation transcript:

UNIT 5 The Hierarchy of the Courts The Doctrine of Precedent

The Hierarchy of the Courts European Court of Justice S U P E R I O COURTS CIVIL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Supreme Court of the UK Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) High Court (Family, Chancery, and Queen’s Bench Divisions) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Crown Court County courts Magistrates’ courts

Hierarchy of Civil Courts The Supreme Court of the UK – the highest court of appeal The Court of Appeal – appeals from the High court and county courts The High Court of Justice – first instance court for complex cases, defamation; second-instance court for appeals from magistrates’ courts Magistrates’ courts – first-instance court for family cases

Hierarchy of Criminal Courts The Supreme Court of the UK – the highest court of appeal The Court of Appeal – appeals from the Crown court and the Hight Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division) The High Court of Justice – Queen’s Bench Division – appeals from the Crown Court or magistrates’ courts Crown Court – first-instance court for serious criminal cases (indictable offences) Magistrates’ courts – first-instance court for summary offences

Courts of England and Wales Use the diagram to answer these question. What are the two main areas of jurisdiction of English courts? Which courts exercise jurisdiction in both areas? Which are the superior courts in England and Wales? Which court is the last resort court? Which division of the High Court exercises the criminal jurisdiction? Do county courts hear all civil cases? Which court is superior to the Supreme Court of the UK?

Courts of England and Wales Match the courts and their definitions: Court of Appeal main civil court in England and Wales County Court court 0f both civil and criminal jurisdiction to which a person may go to ask for an award or a sentence to be changed Magistrates’ Court highest court of appeal in both civil and criminal cases Crown Court court which hears local civil cases High Court court, formed of a circuit judge and a jury, which hears criminal cases Supreme Court of the UK court presided over by magistrates

Courts of England and Wales - Key Court of Appeal = court of both civil and criminal jurisdiction to which a person may go to ask for an award or a sentence to be changed County Court = court which hears local civil cases Magistrates’ Court = first instance criminal and civil court presided over by magistrates Crown Court = court, formed of a circuit judge and a jury, which hears criminal cases High Court = main civil court in England and Wales Supreme Court of the UK = highest court of appeal in both civil and criminal cases

Royal Courts of Justice It houses a) The Court of Appeal of England and Wales b) The High Court of Justice of England and Wales

How do courts contribute to the development of English law? A – The development of common law (many principal doctrines have been established through cases determined in the higher courts - case law) B – Statutory interpretation (courts play a crucial role in the interpretation of the statutes enacted by the Parliament) C – Procedural law (courts make important contributions to the development of the procedures which the courts follow)

The Doctrine of Precedent THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT = STARE DECISIS (Latin – stand by the decision) - policy of courts to abide by or adhere to principles established by decisions in earlier cases consistency and fairness plays a crucial role in the English legal system because common law is an important source of law in the English legal system distinguishes common law from civil-law systems under stare decisis, once a court has answered a question, the same question in other cases must elicit the same response from the same court or lower courts in that jurisdiction - The crucial thing – HIERARCHY OF COURTS

Judicial Precedent Binding on - all courts of inferior jurisdiction a judicial decision that serves as a rule for future determinations in similar or analogous cases - an authority to be followed in courts of justice can be made only by superior courts the source of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow = CASE-LAW or JUDGE MADE LAW – a major source of law both historically and today some areas of law (such as the law of torts) are found mainly in cases Binding on - all courts of inferior jurisdiction + frequently followed by courts of equal status (Court of Appeal has to follow its past decisions) -criminal courts are traditionally more relaxed on stare decisis, especially where an individual’s liberty is at stake – concerned more with points of fact

Major problem – to divide ratio decidendi from the obiter dicta Judicial precedent A judgement consists of A Ratio decidendi = ‘the reasons for deciding’ - principle of law on which the decision is based - precedent can only operate if the legal reasons for past decisions are known (at the end of the case – a judgement –a speech of the judge giving the decisions and explaining the reasons for the decision) – BINDING B Obiter dicta – ‘other things said’ - the remainder of the judgement – remarks or observations made by the judge – NON-BINDING Major problem – to divide ratio decidendi from the obiter dicta

Judicial precedent A) Original precedent – when there are no past cases for the judge to base his decision on, he will look at cases which are the closest in principle and he may decide to use similar rules – this way of arriving at judgments is called reasoning by analogy B) Binding Precedent – a precedent from an earlier case which must be followed (even if the judge in the later case does not agree with the legal principle) The facts must be sufficiently similar. The court must be more senior or on the same level C) Persuasive Precedent – a precedent that is not binding on the court, but the judge may consider it and decide that it is a correct principle to follow Sources: Ratio of courts lower in the hierarchy        - Privy Council decisions         Obiter Dicta Statements          - Dissenting Judgments           Decisions of courts in other countries (eg. Scotland, Ireland)

Point of law vs. Point of fact An issue that is within the province of the judge, as opposed to the jury, because it involves the application or interpretation of legal principles or statute ( that are potentially applicable to other cases) – a legal matter involving primarily proof of evidence (the rules of precedent apply only to rulings on point of law) POINT OF FACT An issue that involves the resolution of a factual dispute or controversy and is within the sphere of the decisions to be made by a jury point of fact requires an interpretation of circumstances surrounding the case at hand

Distinguishing, overruling and reversing (ways of avoiding precedents) I DISTINGUISHING – a method which can be used by a judge to avoid following a past precedent – facts are sufficiently different – not bound by the previous case II OVERRULING – when a higher court decides not to follow a previous decision of a lower court because it thinks it was wrongly decided (a higher court overturns and changes a precedent) III REVERSING – a higher court overturns the DECISION of a lower court on appeal (in the same case) because it disagrees with it (and then it reverses it)

Advantages and disadvantages of precedents Think about different advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent. Discuss your ideas in pairs.

Advantages of precedent A) Certainty (since courts follow past decisions, people know what the law is and how it is likely to be applied on their case) Consistency and fairness in the law (it is just and fair that similar cases are decided in the same way) Precision (principles of law are set in actual cases – the law becomes very precise) D) Flexibility (Supreme Court can change the law by overruling cases) E) Time-saving (where a principle has been established, cases with similar facts are unlikely to go through the lenghty process of litigation)

Disadvantages of precedent A) Rigidity (in time fixed principles may not correspond to changing circumstances - inflexible law, bad decisions may be perpetuated) B) Complexity (nearly half a million cases – not easy to find the relevant case law; long judgments with no clear distinction between comments and the reasons for decision) Illogical distinctions (differences between some cases may be very small and appear illogical) D) Slowness of growth (some areas of law are unclear or in need of reform – few cases appealed as far as the House of Lords/Supreme Court)

Law reporting LAW REPORTS – an accurate record of the past court decisions (published volumes) has existed in England and Wales since 13th century accuracy of reports - one of the factors in the development of the strict doctrine of precedent nowadays newspapers and journals also publish law reports – often abbreviated Internet law reports – High Court, Court of Appeal and House of Lords cases www.lawreports.co.uk (summaries of important cases) www.parliament.uk (House of Lords cases) www.bailii.org (cases from the Court of Appeal and below)

Essential terms to abide by = poštivati, pridržavati se to bind / to be binding / non-binding on to be bound by binding precedent = obvezujući presedan persuasive precedent = neobvezujući presedan to follow / accept / apply a precedent = slijediti presedan to distinguish = razlikovati; to overrule = odbaciti; to reverse = poništiti, preinačiti to give / pass judgement = donijeti presudu point of law = pravno pitanje point of fact = činjenično pitanje law reports = zbirke sudskih presuda to hear a case = održati raspravu, suditi first-instance court = prvostupanjski sud second-instance court = drugostupanjski sud court of last resort = najviši sud, zadnja sudska instanca superior=higher = / inferior=lower courts= viši / niži sudovi courts of civil jurisdiction= građanski sudovi criminal jurisdiction = kazneni sudovi stare decisis = pridržavati se ranijih odluka viših sudova to establish a precedent = stvoriti presedan ratio decidendi / obiter dicta = dijelovi presude to adhere to = pridržavati se

Vocabulary practice – Word formation Turn the following verbs into nouns. to precede precedent to depart to apply to emphasize to rule to adhere to establish

Supply the correct preposition. Judicial precedents are binding ____ lower courts. According to the doctrine of precedent the Court of Appeal is bound ______ the judgments of the Supreme Court of the UK. The Supreme Court can depart _____ a previous decision when it appears right to do so. The English and Welsh courts must abide ______ the principles established by decisions in earlier cases. In practice, the doctrine of precedent means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases ______ similar cases.