Changing Agricultural Trade Patterns in North America Changing Agricultural Trade Patterns in North America AAEA-CAES Workshop North American Free Trade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Balance of trade: Mexican behaviour.. Concept It is the difference between the monetary value of exports and imports of output in an economy over a certain.
Advertisements

North American Free Trade Agreement
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
FY 2014 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2014 Forecasts Exports $6.9 billion to $149.5 billion Imports $0.5 billion to $110.5 billion Surplus.
Doing Business in Korea October 22, 2008 Ken Nye, Commodity Specialist Michigan Farm Bureau.
1 The Benefits of NAFTA for U.S. Agriculture A. Ellen Terpstra, Administrator Foreign Agricultural Service U.S. Department of Agriculture April 20, 2004.
Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University Food Price Outlook Corinne Alexander Purdue University August 19,
Agriculture and International Trade
Economic and Policy Analysis Directorate A Canadian Perspective on North American Agricultural Trade Flows ( ) San Diego, California February 2000.
Government Payments Support Farm Income U.S. Harvested Area for Crops.
Farm Facts.
Agriculture and International Trade Chapter 16. Discussion Topics Growth and instability in agricultural trade The importance of agricultural trade The.
Does the U.S. Feed the World?
1 Food commodity prices: History & prospects Ron Trostle Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture ? USDA Outlook Forum February 20, 2014.
Overview of the Global Oilseed Markets Annual Meeting National Cottonseed Products Association Santa Fe, New Mexico May 4, 2009 John Baize.
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
FY 2015 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2015 Forecasts Exports $2.0 billion to $141.5 billion Imports $3.0 billion to $119.0 billion Surplus.
FY 2015 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2015 Forecasts Exports $1.0 billion to $140.5 billion Imports $2.0 billion to $117.0 billion Surplus.
IMPACTS OF NAFTA ON AGRI-FOOD TRADE FLOWS: A MEXICAN PERSPECTIVE ASERCA-SAGARPA August, 2001.
FY 2015 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2015 Forecasts Exports $1.0 billion to $143.5 billion Imports $1.0 billion to $116.0 billion Surplus.
20 March 2009 USDA Foreign Agricultural Service USDA Foreign Agricultural Service Office of Trade Programs GSM-102 Credit Guarantee Program.
Trade Programs, Policies, and Outlook 2014 Farm Bill Education Conference Luis A. Ribera Associate Professor and Extension Economist.
BRAZIL’S AGRIBUSINESS: MORE OPPORTUNITIES FROM NAFTA EXPANSION? Third Workshop of the North American Agri-food Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC),
South Africa Agricultural Situation Economic Highlights Five year average real GDP growth of 3.7%, higher then the world average of 3.3% but lower.
Structural Changes in China’s Hog and Feed Production Francis C. Tuan and John Dyck ERS/USDA.
Developing a Research Agenda for the Caribbean Food System to Respond to Global Changes. Agro Processing By Prof. J. O. Akingbala.
1 The Benefits of NAFTA for U.S. Agriculture May 2005.
Lesson Identifying Plant Types and Uses. Student Learning Objectives Describe plant science and its three major areas. Identify common field crops and.
International Policy Live in a global economy where: –Interdependence means that any policy decisions made by one country has a impact on the U.S. –Many.
NAFTA Agricultural Trade Relationships By Patricia Sheikh Deputy Administrator International Trade Policy Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department.
The International Food Market
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
Niagara Falls, October 2009 WORLD AGRICULTURAL SITUATION Niagara Falls, October 2009.
Workshop on Medium Term Outlook for India’s Food Sector Overview of the Issues by by Shashanka Bhide NCAER Project Supported by Food and Agriculture Organisation.
Overview of Turkish Agricultural Sector
Does the U.S. Feed the World? Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The 2002 Farm Bill: Implications for North American Trade Relationships North American Trade Relationships:Policy Challenges for 2002 and Beyond Chicago.
FY 2015 & 2016 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Initial FY 2016 Forecasts Exports = $138.5 billion Imports = $122.5 billion Surplus = $16.0 billion Changes.
FY 2014 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2014 Forecasts Exports $2.0 billion to $137.0 billion Imports $3.5 billion to $109.5 billion Surplus.
Economic and Policy Analysis Directorate 1 Canada’s Agricultural Trade with FTAA Countries Organized Symposium at the Meeting of the American Agricultural.
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN NEEDS. BASIC HUMAN NEEDS & SOURCES Agriculture is the source for the three basic things humans need to survive:  Food: meat, milk,
Food Processing AG BM 102. Introduction Adds value to farm production Creates products consumers want Employs lots of people ~ 90,000 in PA.
Prosperity Through Trade North American Agri-Food Integration Session II - The European Perspective Discussant Liam McCreery, President Canadian Agri-Food.
Agriculture and the Global Economy Model Agricultural Core Curriculum: Supplement University of California, Davis 113.T 1 Top Five Ag Export Commodities.
Objective Name agriscience products and their impact on national and international economic growth.
NAFTA Trade Flows General Agriculture and the Food Industry.
Does the U.S. Feed the World? Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture.
“The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead”, November15 – 17, 2009, Orlando, Florida Impacts of future energy price.
Texas Trade Issues Parr Rosson Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics Texas Cooperative Extension.
FY 2014 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2014 Forecasts Exports $5.6 billion to $142.6 billion Imports $0.5 billion to $110.0 billion Surplus.
Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings Orlando, FL, February 7, 2006 The Economic Impacts of CAFTA-DR on the Southern U.S. Beef, Rice.
United States Horticultural Imports and Exports. Objectives I can compare and contrast imports and exports. I can identify top U.S. horticultural imports.
Mexican Agriculture after NAFTA: Are New Policies Needed?
FY 2016 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY2016 Forecasts Exports $7.0 billion to $131.5 billion Imports $0.5 billion to $122.0 billion Surplus.
Steven Zahniser U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Agricultural Dialogue for Mesoamerica and the Dominican Republic Inter-American.
OILSEED & WHEAT OUTLOOK: 2015/16 Scott Sindelar Minister-Counselor United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service
Xinshen Diao, Agapi Somwaru and Terry Roe The objective was to provide the “ big picture ” A Global Analysis Of Agricultural Reform In WTO Member Countries.
FY 2014 & 2015 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Initial FY 2015 Forecasts Exports = $144.5 billion Imports = $117 billion Surplus = $27.5 billion Changes.
FY 2016 U.S. Agricultural Trade Forecasts Changes to FY 2016 Forecasts Exports $6.5 billion to $125 billion Imports $3.5 billion to $118.5 billion Surplus.
World Grain Situation Trends, Conditions and Outlook Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
General Facts About Agriculture in US. Farm and ranch families comprise just 2 percent of the U.S. population. More than 21 million American workers (15.
U.S. exports. What is trade The exchange of goods between one party and another. Import – when a country buys goods from another. Export – When a country.
OILSEED, CORN & WHEAT OUTLOOK: 2016/17 Jonn Slette Senior Attache United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service
1 U.S. Trade Agreements with Chile and Andean Countries: Implications for FTAA? Jaime Malaga, Texas Tech University Flynn Adcock, Texas A&M University.
Jim Hansen, Syd Cochrane, Getachew Nigatu Agricultural Economist
TRENDS in CALIFORNIA ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
Agriculture and Human Needs
Texas Vegetable Assn. Mid-Year Meeting McAllen, Texas June 17, 2004
Overview of Turkish Agricultural Sector
Learning the Importance of Field Crops
Presentation transcript:

Changing Agricultural Trade Patterns in North America Changing Agricultural Trade Patterns in North America AAEA-CAES Workshop North American Free Trade Agreements: Policy Challenges for 2002 Farm Bill and Beyond Session I, August 8, 2001 The Impacts of NAFTA and CUSTA on Agricultural Trade Flows Thomas L. Vollrath Economic Research Service USDA

Chart 1: Intra-NAFTA agricultural trade grew faster than NAFTA trade with the rest of the world NAFTA CUSTA

Total agriculture (USDA-defined) and the 4 subsectors Bulk commodities –unmilled grain, oilseeds, raw fiber Processed intermediates –flour, feed, vegetable oils, spun fiber, live animals Fresh produce & horticultural products –fruits, vegetables, nuts, flower, horticultural products High-value-processed products –fresh & frozen meats, pasta, breakfast cereals, wine, beer, food preparations

Chart 2:The dominance of bulk exports has declined considerably since

Chart 3: Mexico now exports more fresh produce and horticultural products than bulk commodities

Chart 4: U.S. processed food exports to Canada and Mexico & U.S. FDI in food manufacturing move in tandem CUSTA NAFTA

Chart 5: The U.S. is a more important market to Canada and Mexico than either of these countries are to the United States NAFTA CUACUA CUSTA

Chart 6: The U.S. captures a much larger share of the Mexican market than exporters in Mexico secure in the U.S. NAFTA

Chart 7: The U.S. also captures a much larger share of the Canadian market than exporters in Canada achieve in the U.S. CUSTA

Chart 8: U.S. agricultural exports to Canada (Mexico) were 3.6 (6.3) times greater than would have been predicted in the absence of special inducements and impediments NAFTA CUSTA

Chart 9: The farm economies in all three NAFTA have undergone substantial structural change NAFTA CUSTA

Chart 10: NAFTA countries have developed or strengthened comparative advantages in HVPP post-CUSTA/NAFTA NAFTA CUSTA

Chart 11: The United States is a big winner exporting meats across the board NAFTA CUSTA

Field crops and high-value products Field crops –rice, wheat, corn, and other cereals –soybeans, rapeseed, and other oilseeds –cotton and other plant fiber –fresh fruits, vegetables, and nuts –legumes and tubers –other crops High-value products (HVP) –pasta, bakery products, and breakfast cereals –meat and meat products –processed fruits and vegetables –beer, wine, soft drinks, distilled alcoholic beverages –other food preparations

Chart 12: Pre-NAFTA downward trends in U.S.-to-Mexico complementarities reversed themselves during NAFTA NAFANAFA

Chart 13: Increased complementarities characterize U.S.-Canadian trade post-CUSTA CUSTA

Summary of key findings Explosive growth in intra-NAFTA trade Changes in the composition of ag trade Changes in the geographical distribution of member-country trade Increased competitiveness within NAFTA “Neighborly” trade more important most everywhere, except for Mexican exporters Some evidence that structural changes are beneficial