EE 369 Power Systems Engineering

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems Prof. Hao Zhu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Recovery Act Smart Grid Funds: $4.5 Billion Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability$ Millions Smart Grid Investment Grant Program; ≤3 years.
1 Practicing What We Preach Dr. James Fenton, Director A Research Institute of the University of Central Florida Creating Energy Independence Since 1975.
A Research Institute of the University of Central Florida The Cost of Doing Nothing (the video) Energy Efficiency Retrofits For Your Home! (the webinar)
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 2: Power Industry History, Review of Phasors Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Lecture 2 Complex Power, Reactive Compensation, Three Phase Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM.
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems Prof. Hao Zhu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Department of Energy’s Energy and Employment Report Breakdown of Industrial Sub-Sector Employment, Job Growth Trends, Geographic Spread and More April.
Lecture 1 Introduction Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Power System Analysis and Design, 6e Glover, Overbye, Sarma Chapter 1: Introduction 0 © 2017 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated,
Connecting the Dots: Policy, Markets and the Clean Energy Future New England Restructuring Roundtable Boston, MA September 30, 2016.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
About Me Professional Received BSEE, MSEE, and Ph.D. all from University of Wisconsin at Madison (83, 88, 91) Worked for eight years as engineer for an.
About Prof. Tom Overbye Professional
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
House Price
Deregulation Status – U.S. Power
House price index for AK
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Recovery Act Smart Grid Funds: $4.5 Billion
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

EE 369 Power Systems Engineering Lecture 1 Introduction Slides by: Tom Overbye, University of Illinois With additions by Ross Baldick, University of Texas

Simple Power System Every power system has three major components: generation: source of power, ideally with a specified voltage and frequency load or demand: consumes power; ideally with a constant resistive value transmission system: transmits power; ideally as a perfect conductor Additional components include: distribution system: local reticulation of power, control equipment: coordinate supply with load.

Complications No ideal voltage sources exist. Loads are seldom constant and are typically not entirely resistive. Transmission system has resistance, inductance, capacitance and flow limitations. Simple system has no redundancy so power system will not work if any component fails.

Power Power = voltage x current for dc Power: Instantaneous rate of consumption of energy, How hard you work! Power = voltage x current for dc Power Units: Watts = amps times volts (W) kW – 1 x 103 Watt MW – 1 x 106 Watt GW – 1 x 109 Watt Installed U.S. generation capacity is about 1000 GW ( about 3 kW per person) Maximum load of Austin about 2500 MW. Maximum load of UT campus about 50 MW.

Energy Energy: Integration of power over time, Energy is what people really want from a power system, How much work you accomplish over time. Energy Units: Joule = 1 watt-second (J) kWh – kilowatthour (3.6 x 106 J) Btu – 1055 J; 1 MBtu=0.292 MWh U.S. annual electric energy consumption is about 3600 billion kWh (about 13,333 kWh per person, which means on average we each use 1.5 kW of power continuously).

Power System Examples Interconnection: can range from quite small, such as an island, to one covering half the continent: there are four major interconnected ac power systems in North America (five, if you count Alaska), each operating at 60 Hz ac; 50 Hz is used in some other countries. Airplanes and Spaceships: reduction in weight is primary consideration; frequency is 400 Hz. Ships and submarines. Automobiles: dc with 12 volts standard and higher voltages used in electric vehicles. Battery operated portable systems.

North America Interconnections

Electric Systems in Energy Context Class focuses on electric power systems, but we first need to put the electric system in context of the total energy delivery system. Electricity is used primarily as a means for energy transportation: Use other (“primary”) sources of energy to create electricity, and electricity is usually converted into another form of energy when used. Electricity is used by transforming into another form of energy. About 40% of US energy is transported in electric form.

Energy sources in US Total primary energy in 2014: About 81% Fossil Fuels About 40% of our total energy is consumed in the form of electricity, a percentage that is gradually increasing. The vast majority of the non-fossil fuel energy is electric! In 2013 we got about 3% of our electric energy from wind and < 1% from solar (PV and solar thermal): increasing over time, but still small. Source: EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014

Electricity Generation Sources in US 2012 by energy Wind Hydroelectric Coal Nuclear Natural gas Source: EIA 2013

Generation Sources in California 2010

Generation Sources in Texas 2010: (wind grown to around 10% by 2014)

Generation Sources in Illinois 2010

Energy Economics Electric generating technologies involve a tradeoff between fixed costs (primarily capital costs to build them) and operating costs: Nuclear, wind, and solar high fixed costs, but low operating costs, Natural gas has low fixed costs but relatively high operating costs (dependent upon fuel prices) Coal in between (although recent low natural gas prices has meant that some coal plants have higher operating costs than some natural gas). Total average costs depend on fixed costs, operating costs, and capacity factor (ratio of average power production to capacity).

Ball park operating Costs Nuclear: $10/MWh Coal: $40/MWh (some coal considerably lower) Wind: couple $/MWh (maintenance and operating) Hydro: few $/MWh (maintenance and operating) Solar: $0/MWh Natural Gas: cost in $/MWh is 7 to 20 times fuel cost in $/MBtu; for example, with $8/MBtu gas, cost is $56/MWh to $160/MWh; with $5/Mbtu gas, cost is $35/MWh to $100/MWh. Note, to get price in cents/kWh take price in $/MWh and divide by 10.

Natural Gas Prices – to 2013

Natural Gas Prices Source: Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=7710

Future mix of sources. Likely long-term low costs of gas and advent of greatly increased renewables has already changed the mix in Texas away from coal and towards gas and wind: Wind already around 10% of electrical energy in Texas, Coal traditionally in service throughout year, but Texas asset owners may only run some coal in Summer. Expect the trend to continue, especially if the US (eventually) enacts climate change legislation.

Goals of Power System Operation Supply load (users) with electricity at specified voltage (110 ac volts common for residential), specified frequency, at minimum cost consistent with operating constraints, safety, etc.

Major Impediments Load is constantly changing: Electricity is not storable (stored by conversion to other forms of energy), Power system is subject to disturbances, such as lightning strikes. Engineering tradeoffs between reliability and cost.

Example Yearly Electric Load

Course Syllabus (chapters 1 to 7 and 11) Introduction and review of complex power, phasors & three phase (chapter 2), Transformers and per-unit system (chapter 3), Transmission line parameters (chapter 4), Power flow analysis (chapter 6), Symmetrical faults (chapter 7), Power system controls (chapter 11), Economic system operation (chapter 11), Optimal power flow (chapter 11), Deregulation and restructuring (throughout semester).

Brief History of Electric Power Early 1880’s – Edison introduced Pearl Street dc system in Manhattan supplying 59 customers. 1884 – Sprague produces practical dc motor. 1885 – invention of transformer. Mid 1880’s – Westinghouse/Tesla introduce rival ac system. Late 1880’s – Tesla invents ac induction motor. 1893 – First 3 phase transmission line operating at 2.3 kV.

History, cont’d 1896 – ac lines deliver electricity from hydro generation at Niagara Falls to Buffalo, 20 miles away. Early 1900’s – Private utilities supply all customers in area (city); recognized as a “natural monopoly” (cheapest for one firm to produce everything because of “economies of scale”); states step in to begin regulation. By 1920’s – Large interstate holding companies control most electricity systems.

History, cont’d 1935 – Congress passes Public Utility Holding Company Act to establish national regulation, breaking up large interstate utilities (repealed 2005). 1935/6 – Rural Electrification Act brought electricity to rural areas. 1930’s – Electric utilities established as vertical monopolies.

Vertical Monopolies Within a particular geographic market, the electric utility had an exclusive franchise Generation Transmission Distribution Customer Service In return for this exclusive franchise, the utility had the obligation to serve all existing and future customers at rates determined jointly by utility and regulators It was a “cost plus” business: Charge to retail customers set by regulatory authority to be cost of investment and operations plus regulated return on investment.

Vertical Monopolies Within its service territory each utility was the only game in town. Neighboring utilities functioned more as colleagues than competitors. Utilities gradually interconnected their systems so by 1970 transmission lines crisscrossed North America, with voltages up to 765 kV. Economies of scale (bigger is cheaper per unit capacity) coupled with growth in demand resulted in decreasing average costs. Decreasing average costs together with strongly increasing demand implied decreasing real prices to end-use customers over time.

History, cont’d -- 1970’s 1970’s brought inflation, stagnation of demand growth, increased fossil-fuel prices, calls for conservation and growing environmental concerns. Increasing prices replaced decreasing ones. In that context, U.S. Congress passed Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) in 1978, which mandated utilities must purchase power from independent generators located in their service territory (modified 2005). PURPA introduced some competition.

History, cont’d – 1990’s & 2000’s Major opening of industry to competition occurred as a result of National Energy Policy Act of 1992. This act mandated that utilities provide “nondiscriminatory” access to the high voltage transmission. Goal was to set up true competition in generation. Texas followed suit in 1996 and 1999. Result over the last few years has been a dramatic restructuring of electric utility industry (for better or worse!) Energy Bill 2005 repealed PUHCA; modified PURPA.

Utility Restructuring Driven by significant regional variations in electric rates, reflecting variations in generation stock and endowments of natural resources. Goal of competition is to reduce prices and increase efficiency: (in short term) through the introduction of competition, and (in long term) competition’s incentives for technological innovation. Allow consumers to choose their electricity supplier.

State Variation in Retail Electricity Prices

Customer Choice

The Result for California in 2000/1 OFF

The California-Enron Effect Source : http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_str/regmap.html RI AK electricity restructuring delayed no activity suspended WA OR NV CA ID MT WY UT AZ CO NM TX OK KS NE SD ND MN IA WI MO IL IN OH KY TN MS LA AL GA FL SC NC W VA PA NY VT ME MI NH MA CT NJ DE MD AR HI DC

August 14th, 2003 Blackout