1 Opinions on How to Reduce the Decline Rate for SRC Proposals Kenneth K. O December 3 rd, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic vs. Industrial Research Jobs
Advertisements

Advanced Technical Writing Lecture 2 Progress report.
Some thoughts on major challenges ahead for AGIS 27 June 2008 AGIS Collaboration Meeting Rene Ong.
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
Student Research Conference 2011 Submitting a Research Conference Proposal.
Consulting 101 Wednesday, October 6 th. 2 Agenda  Pegging the Scope Down  Developing a Work Plan  Preparing the Deck  Working in a Consulting Team.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester SLC Meeting July 16, 2003 Issues to be discussed: Time table for catalyst.
M.Sc Projects David Wilson M.Sc Projects Coordinator for Computing & Information Systems.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
CCT 355: E-Business Technologies Class 1: Introduction to Course.
Professional Development for Junior Faculty Kenneth L. Roberts, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Mechanical & Chemical Engineering North Carolina.
CS507 Fundamentals of Research Fall About the Course - Topics Graduate School How to read a research paper Planning and conducting research Writing.
Some years ago, CarTech CEO told us: What I want to see in our new hires is:
Update on Current EGNRET Projects APEC EGNRET 23 Meeting Christchurch, New Zealand ~ November 10-12, 2004 Jean Ku National Renewable Energy Lab, USA Cary.
Term Project Description CAP6135 Spring Term Project Two students form a group to do term project together – A research oriented term project.
Hannover 9 February  Important professional, ethical, regulatory, cultural and other factors interact with financial incentives to influence provider.
How to Prepare Your Abstract Lunch and Learn August 18, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Sandra Wiebe.
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
SMART COMPUTING R&D CHALLENGE June 24, OUTLINE Partners & Funding Contributions Project Eligibility Application Process Program Timelines Program.
T 2.3 Follow up to Conferences Leonardo Piccinetti, EFB FORESTA Project Meeting Brasilia, 20 September 2011.
Thesis Format and Submission
S tandards Education in Technology Programs Amin Karim, DeVry University Jennifer McClain, IEEE Educational Activities.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
INFM 737: MIM Capstone Experience Information Session DR. WEAVER UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ISCHOOL TETYANA BEZBABNA UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Ian F. C. Smith Preparing and presenting a poster.
ITRS 2000 Update Work In Progress - Do Not Publish! 1 ITRS/ Design TWG Update 2000 System on Chip, Design Productivity, Low Power, Deep Submicron Design.
Discussion session José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg, Germany March 20 – 22, 2013.
EECS 582 Projects Mosharaf Chowdhury EECS 582 – W1611/8/16.
Foundations of Constraint Processing, CSCE421/821 Guidelines for reports1 Problem Solving with Constraints CSCE421/821, Fall
The City of Da Nang, Vietnam, is launching an open call for proposals to revitalize public space in its city center. Short- listed candidates will be given.
Now what? 1.  I have short-listed projects I am interested in  I know the types of projects I would like to pursue  I have an idea of the resources.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
Time Management and Family Life Bobby CRA Academic Careers Workshop, February, 2016.
INFM 736 and 737: MIM Capstone Experience Information Session DR. WEAVER UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ISCHOOL TETYANA BEZBABNA UNIVERSITY OF.
The Graduate School Experience A.J. Brush, Microsoft Lori Pollock, University of Delaware 2012.
The International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group International Network for Sensor Inter- comparison and Uncertainty assessment for Ocean Color Radiometry.
Les jalons d’une thèse Présentation / Discussion
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
WebQuest: Where you design your own Space Exploration Mission
Defending the Dissertation
Naviance: Do What You Are Personality Survey
EDU 675Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
BUS 475 GENIUS Lessons in Excellence- -bus475genius.com.
HCS 455 TUTORS Lessons in Excellence -- hcs455tutors.com.
EDU 675 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 475 NERD Education for Service-- bus475nerd.com.
EDU 675 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Guidelines for Reports Basic Concepts & Algorithms in CP
Charles Nicholas More on Proposals Charles Nicholas CMSC 601 Revised April 28, 2008.
Group Assignment and Individual Presentation
Guidelines for Reports Problem Solving with Constraints
Welcome to Naviance at Lowell High School
CEOS Virtual Constellations Process Paper
Presentation on CAPSTONE PROJECT presented by Cdr MD Masum-ul-Haque, (E), BN ME DEPT MILITARY INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY (MIST)
Welcome to Naviance at Lowell High School
General recommendations
SMART & CARING GRANT APPLICATION WORKSHOP
Guidelines for Reports Problem Solving with Constraints
Java IDE Dwight Deugo Nesa Matic Portions of the notes for this lecture include excerpts from.
ECSE Advising 10 September /20/2019 Kenneth A. Connor.
Guidelines for Reports Problem Solving with Constraints
Student Research Conference 2019
Guidelines for Reports Advanced Constraint Processing
Term Project Description
Presentation transcript:

1 Opinions on How to Reduce the Decline Rate for SRC Proposals Kenneth K. O December 3 rd, 2012

Outline SRC member benefits Research topics You must have good ideas that you want to pursue no matter what. Campaign and finalizing proposal Most of white papers and proposals are selected before the submission. Conclusions

SRC Member Benefits Research Explore solution space member companies consider too risky Solutions unknown to the member companies Explore new application opportunities. Resulting intellectual properties Students who will eventually work for the SRC member companies

International Road Map for Semiconductors 4 Much of research needs are identified and documented. The leading technologists of industry get together to project the technology needs for 15 years. Technology has been advancing faster than the road map. Recent years, there were slow downs. Started in 1994 and have been updating every one to two years.

International Road Map for Semiconductors 5 Color coded to indicate whether there are known solutions/difficulties for meeting the needs. Red means there are no known solutions. SRC companies like university researchers to work on problems that will need solutions in 3-5 years.

ITRS Grand Challenges 6 Every few years the working group for the international technology road map for semiconductor updates the grand challenges for the industry. SRC proposals require identification of grand challenges being addressed.

Research Needs Document Each call for white papers has a needs document that specifies the problems need to be addressed. Proposed research should address one or multiple needs within the context of ITRS. For instance, you should not propose to research an approach that will be limited by other constraints in the ITRS. This is usually not an exclusive list.

Interaction with Companies Nothing like interacting with member companies to really understand the needs and context. Understand the solutions being considered. Brainstorm with member companies on approaches that the companies are not currently considering. More you do this, better your chances will be.

There are more good ideas than SRC can fund. Find champions for your research in the member companies: anyway you can!! Potential people that can help: Current and former colleagues Collaborators People you have interviewed with when you were looking for a job Visitors from member companies People you meet at conferences or while helping to organize meetings. Friends from graduate school days People you meet during company visits Ph.D. advisor, Ph.D. committee members Former students Supervisors of former students Parents of your children’s classmates Campaign

Have a draft of white paper and a 5 slide presentation ready at least a month before the deadline. Distribute them for suggestions from potential champions. Let them help shape and improve, and own the white paper. You have champions. Don’t be defensive!! They need to talk to their managers and SRC tab members in their company. If selected for proposal, need to repeat the process. Campaign

Proposal and White Paper Format White paper is usually limited to one page. (Context, Rationale, Novelty, Anticipated Results, Company Engagement, Funding, Students) Proposals are limited to five pages. Duration is 3 years. Research catalog page. Funding requirement for each year, Anticipated results (50 words), Background (200 words), Research Description (300 words), Deliverables. This has to be excellent.

Task ID 453: Inter and Intra-Chip Clock Signal Distribution Using Microwave, September 1 st, March 31 st, 2001, Interconnect Science Saw the call for white papers a few days before the deadline. Submitted barely on time but got selected for a full proposal. Got the proposal ready well before the deadline. Sent to three people at three different member companies. HP: instructor for a short course that I help to organize. TI: friend from graduate school. IBM: working on the same contract from the Navy. Timing was the key. Case Study I 12

Task ID 1327: Feasibility of Implementing CMOS RF Front-End Circuits for GHZ Radar Applications, July 1 st 2005 to July 31 st, 2008, Integrated Circuits and Systems Science Got the white paper ready well before the deadline. Sent to three people at three different companies. TI: Manager of former students. IBM: Former student and ICSS Tab member Freescale: Co-worker on the Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting. Got the proposal ready well before the deadline. Sent to the same people for their input. Full proposal was declined for funding. SRC members can direct research using some portion of their contribution. IBM, TI and Freescale agreed to contribute to fund this porject. Having the students at the member company were a key differentiator. Case Study II 13

Compact On ‐ Chip Vector Voltage and Current Measurement Circuits for Digital Assisted Optimization of Microwave and Millimeter wave Circuits Got the white paper ready well before the deadline. Sent to four people at four different companies (TI, Intel, IBM, Freescale) Got the proposal and slides ready well before the deadline. Sent to the same people for their input. Full proposal was declined for funding. Declined. Maybe I have failed to articulate the benefits or context? Perhaps, I have too much SRC funding already. Case Study III 14

Conclusions SRC proposal process is easier. There are a lot of things you can do to improve your chances. Like many funding agencies, once you are funded, it is easier. Having your former students working with you is wonderful. The key to reducing the decline rate is to increase interaction with the member companies. Better proposal Influence selection process The proposal selection process is a human process. Be ready to rebound and figure out different ways to get your research done either through SRC or other agencies.