FINAL REPORT: OUTLINE & OVERVIEW OF SURVEY ERRORS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey design. What is a survey?? Asking questions – questionnaires Finding out things about people Simple things – lots of people What things? What people?
Advertisements

Cross Cultural Research
SAMPLE DESIGN: HOW MANY WILL BE IN THE SAMPLE—DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES ?
The Research Consumer Evaluates Measurement Reliability and Validity
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day and Leone Tenth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides 1.
CHAPTER 21 Inferential Statistical Analysis. Understanding probability The idea of probability is central to inferential statistics. It means the chance.
Economics 105: Statistics Review #1 due next Tuesday in class Go over GH 8 No GH’s due until next Thur! GH 9 and 10 due next Thur. Do go to lab this week.
Quantitative Research Design Backdrop to Multivariate Analysis.
Estimation of Sample Size
Factors: Situational Characteristics9-10a Factors and Characteristics Important Issues and Questions Situational Characteristics Budget of available resources.
1. Estimation ESTIMATION.
Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Spring 2012
Concept of Measurement
Measurement Validity and Reliability. Reliability: The degree to which measures are free from random error and therefore yield consistent results.
Beginning the Research Design
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
S S (5.1) RTI, JAIPUR1 STATISTICAL SAMPLING Presented By RTI, JAIPUR.
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day Seventh Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 14.
Measurement and Data Quality
Sample Design.
Arun Srivastava. Types of Non-sampling Errors Specification errors, Coverage errors, Measurement or response errors, Non-response errors and Processing.
Scales and Indices While trying to capture the complexity of a phenomenon We try to seek multiple indicators, regardless of the methodology we use: Qualitative.
Sampling UAPP 702 Research Methods for Urban & Public Policy
Chapter 24 Survey Methods and Sampling Techniques
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section A 1.
COLLECTING QUANTITATIVE DATA: Sampling and Data collection
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم * this presentation about :- “experimental design “ * Induced to :- Dr Aidah Abu Elsoud Alkaissi * Prepared by :- 1)-Hamsa karof.
Sampling. Concerns 1)Representativeness of the Sample: Does the sample accurately portray the population from which it is drawn 2)Time and Change: Was.
Modeling errors in physical activity data Sarah Nusser Department of Statistics and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology Iowa State University.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Research Design Explained 6th edition ; ©2007 Mark Mitchell & Janina Jolley Chapter 7 Introduction to Descriptive.
Final Study Guide Research Design. Experimental Research.
Quantitative Research 1: Sampling and Surveys Dr N L Reynolds.
Chapter Nine Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sampling: Theory, Designs and Issues in Marketing Research.
Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Inferential Statistics.
Chap 20-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 20 Sampling: Additional Topics in Sampling Statistics for Business.
Estimation Bias, Standard Error and Sampling Distribution Estimation Bias, Standard Error and Sampling Distribution Topic 9.
Scot Exec Course Nov/Dec 04 Survey design overview Gillian Raab Professor of Applied Statistics Napier University.
SAMPLE DESIGN: WHO WILL BE IN THE SAMPLE? Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health.
Chapter 7: Data for Decisions Lesson Plan Sampling Bad Sampling Methods Simple Random Samples Cautions About Sample Surveys Experiments Thinking About.
Validity RMS – May 28, Measurement Reliability The extent to which a measurement gives results that are consistent.
Need estimates of prevalence? Objective answers by asking? Yes SURVEY Good Poor EXPLORATORY or SECONDARY RESEARCH FOCUS GROUPS Understanding of problem.
Lecture # 6:Designing samples or sample survey Important vocabulary Experimental Unit: An individual person,animal object on which the variables of interest.
SAMPLE DESIGN: WHO WILL BE IN THE SAMPLE ? (CONTINUED) Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health.
MEASUREMENT: SCALE DEVELOPMENT Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health.
DATA PREPARATION: PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Section 7-1 Review and Preview.
Chapter Twelve Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Data Processing, Fundamental Data Analysis, and Statistical Testing of Differences.
Academic Research Academic Research Dr Kishor Bhanushali M
Question paper 1997.
Data Collection: Enhancing Response Rates & Limiting Errors Chapter 10.
1 Data Collection and Sampling Chapter Methods of Collecting Data The reliability and accuracy of the data affect the validity of the results.
SAMPLE DESIGN: HOW MANY WILL BE IN THE SAMPLE—SAMPLE SIZE ADJUSTMENTS?
Methods of Data Collection Survey Methods Self-Administered Questionnaires Interviews Methods of Observation Non-Participant Observation Participant Observation.
Surveys. What do Surveys Tell You?  Attitudes  How well do you think this learning community has accomplished it’s objectives?  Factual information.
CEM – 599 GRADUATE SEMINAR 1 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT DEPT. CEM 599 RESEARCH METHODS IN CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH METHODS IN CONSTRUCTIONBY RIZWAN.
1 Data Collection and Sampling ST Methods of Collecting Data The reliability and accuracy of the data affect the validity of the results of a statistical.
Research Methodology Lecture No :32 (Revision Chapters 8,9,10,11,SPSS)
MATH Section 6.1. Sampling: Terms: Population – each element (or person) from the set of observations that can be made Sample – a subset of the.
Chapter 3 Research Design.
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
AC 1.2 present the survey methodology and sampling frame used
Selecting the Best Measure for Your Study
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
Understanding Results
SAMPLE DESIGN: HOW MANY WILL BE IN THE SAMPLE—DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES ?
Lecture 1: Descriptive Statistics and Exploratory
Presentation transcript:

FINAL REPORT: OUTLINE & OVERVIEW OF SURVEY ERRORS Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health

STEPS IN DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING HEALTH SURVEYS

TYPES OF SURVEY ERRORS Systematic Error (bias): Difference (positive or negative) between survey estimate and actual population value Variable (random) Error: Range or variation (variance) in values of an estimate across observations (or cases)

EFFECTS OF SURVEY ERRORS ON SURVEY ESTIMATES

OVERVIEW OF SURVEY ERRORS SURVEY PROCEDURE SYSTEMATIC ERROR VARIABLE ERROR Study Design Poor internal validity Poor external validity Design specification ambiguity Sample Design Noncoverage bias Weighting errors Standard errors Design effects Data Collection Unit nonresponse bias Item nonresponse bias Interviewer variability Mode effects Questionnaire Design Under/over-reporting Yea-saying Order & context effects Measurement Low or poor validity Low or poor reliability Data Preparation Imputation/Estimation errors Data coding, editing, or data entry errors Analysis Plan Poor statistical conclusion validity Low statistical precision or power

SURVEY ERRORS: Study Design Systematic Poor internal validity. The study design does not adequately and accurately address the study’s hypotheses, particularly with respect to demonstrating a causal relationship between the independent (predictor) and dependent (outcome) variables. Poor external validity. Findings based on the study design cannot be widely or universally applied to related populations or subgroups. Variable Design specification ambiguity. The statement of the study objectives and related concepts to be measured in the survey are not clearly and unambiguously stated, particularly in relationship to the underlying study design and data analysis plan for the study.

SURVEY ERRORS: Sample Design Systematic Noncoverage bias. All units of the target population (e.g., households, individuals) are not included in the sampling frame (frame bias) or the respondent is not selected randomly (respondent selection bias). Weighting errors. Respondents are disproportionately represented in the survey sample by failing to weight each of the cases by the disproportionate probability of their falling into the sample (sampling fraction). Variable Standard errors. The standard error measures random sampling variation in an estimate (e.g., mean or proportion) across all possible random samples of a certain size that could theoretically be drawn from the target population. Design effects. The design effect, computed as the ratio of the variance of a complex sample to that of a simple random sample, measures the increase in random sampling variation in an estimate due to the complex nature of a sample design.

SURVEY ERRORS: Data Collection Systematic Unit nonresponse bias. Selected units of the study sample (e.g., households, individuals) are not included in the final study due to respondent refusals or unavailability during the data collection process. Item nonresponse bias. Selected questions on the survey questionnaire are not answered due to respondent refusals or interviewer or respondent errors or omissions during the data collection process. Variable Interviewer variability. Survey interviewers or data collectors vary in how they ask or record answers to the survey questions. Mode effects. The responses to comparable questions by respondents vary across different data collection methods (e.g., personal interview, telephone interview, mail self-administered questionnaire, web survey, etc.). [Note: If these effects differ in a particular direction across mode, they become systematic errors.]

SURVEY ERRORS: Questionnaire Design Systematic Under/over-reporting. An estimate (e.g., mean or proportion) across samples differs in a particular (negative or negative) direction from the underlying actual (or true) population value for the estimate, i.e., is lower (underreporting) or higher (overreporting). Yea-saying. Respondents tend to agree rather than disagree with statements as a whole (acquiescent response set) or with what are perceived to be socially desirable responses (social desirability bias). Variable Order & context effects. Answers to selected survey questions vary depending on whether they are asked before or after other questions and/or appear at the beginning or the end of the survey questionnaire.

SURVEY ERRORS: Measurement Systematic Low or poor validity. Systematic departures exist in answers to the content of a survey question from the meaning of the concept itself (content validity), a criterion for what constitutes an accurate answer based on another data source (criterion validity), and/or hypothesized relationships of the concept being measured with other measures or concepts (construct validity). Variable Low or poor reliability. Random variation exists in answers to a survey question due to when it is asked (test-retest reliability), who asked it (inter-rater reliability), and/or that it is simply one of a number of questions that could have been asked to obtain the information (internal consistency reliability).

SURVEY ERRORS: Data Preparation Systematic Imputation/Estimation errors. Procedures for assigning values to survey questions for which answers are not available (missing values due to item nonresponse) either from data internal or external to the survey (imputation or estimation, respectively) introduce systematic errors (biases) in estimating or examining relationships between variables. Variable Data coding, editing, or data entry errors. Data coding, editing, or data entry personnel or procedures introduce random errors in producing data files based on the survey questionnaires.

SURVEY ERRORS: Analysis Plan Systematic Poor statistical conclusion validity. The accuracy of statistical conclusions is compromised due to the application of statistical procedures that do not meet underlying assumptions related to the study design and objectives, level of measurement of study variables, and/or the underlying population distribution. Variable Low statistical precision or power. There are insufficient cases in the study sample to estimate population parameters with a reasonable level of precision or to have enough statistical power to detect statistically (and substantively) significant relationships between variables if they do exist.