Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Pilot Implementation Data: What We’ve Learned So Far Gretchen Weber Director of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-Teaching as a Methodology in Teacher Preparation
Advertisements

DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District CASE Presentation July 2014.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
TELL Colorado Post-Survey Webinar Andrew Sioberg New Teacher Center.
District Insight on What We Are Learning SCEE webinar, June 12, 2012 Principal Effectiveness.
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Real World Experiences in a Principalship Preparation Program Sarah Grose, M.Ed., Doctoral Student, Marshall University Louis Watts, Ed.D., Associate Professor,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
1 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 1 Report September 22, 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Research and Policy Support Group FOR PRESS OFFICE.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
Road To Success Florida School Leader Assessment (FSLA)
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Alicia Currin-Moore Executive Director, TLE Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY Campus Systems and Calendar Systems: a self assessment Sarah Noell, ITD, Project Coordinator Harry Nicholos, ITD, Technical co-chair.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program School Improvement Plan Process.
Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.
Presentation by Dr. Doug Bower. Always in motion is the future -Master Yoda.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Staff Council 27 January 2011 Joeann Humbert Organizational Development, HR Sarah Pillittere Center For Professional Development, HR 1 Leadership Academy.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Revision of Initial and Continued Approval Standard Guidelines for Educational Leadership Programs Presentation to FAPEL Winter Meeting Tallahassee, FL.
Office of the State Minister of Reforms Coordination of Georgia /GORBI Monitoring Governance Reforms Pilot Survey in Tbilisi Schools.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
1 Teacher Performance Assessment Lynn Sawyer Director of Professional Development P.O. Box Reno, NV December.
Building Collaborative Teams Susan Rasicot. Examine: The Statistics  Number of students on grade level  Number of students by grade below grade level.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
A Presentation to the USDOE January 13, 2010 Mary Ann Snider Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness Race to the Top- Assessment Programs.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Background CPRE brings together education experts from renowned research institutions to contribute new knowledge that informs K- 16 education policy &
Better Writers Statement of Purpose I am investigating techniques used in teaching writing skills as it relates to variations among teachers so that.
Professional Learning Project Update: Winter 2011.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Introduction to the Road to Quality Process using the Missouri Afterschool Program Self- Assessment.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Principal Observation May 2014 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Growing Leadership to Provide Teacher Feedback Matthew.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Ann Robinson Project Director: Ms. Kristy Kidd Evaluator: Dr. Jill Adelson In collaboration with: Museum of Science, Boston.
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Pilot Implementation Data: What We’ve Learned So Far Gretchen Weber Director of Educator Effectiveness Initiatives January 24, 2012

2 Teacher Evaluation Hopes and Worries: September % of teachers, 83.9% of principals, and 100% of administrators were moderately to very excited about the new system. The top aspects of excitement:  Professional growth/development  Discussions with administrators  Clearly defined, evidence-based standards 23.9% of teachers, 47.6% of principals, and 50% of administrators were moderately to very worried about the new system. The top worries:  Time  Fidelity  Buy-in

3 Principal Evaluation Hopes and Worries: September % of principals and 85.7% of administrators were moderately to very excited about the new system. Top aspects of excitement:  Professional growth/development  Clearly defined, evidence-based standards 26.9% of principals and 38.5% of administrators were moderately to very worried about the new system. Top worry:  Time

4 TPEP Case Studies: Methodology Self-Report Data  Professional Development Resources Surveys  Teachers  Principals  Administrators Interviews  Teachers  Principals  Pilot leads  Union/association representative

5 TPEP Case Studies: Constructs The new evaluation framework and goals Performance measures Professional development Communication Time and resources for implementation District and school culture changes

6 TPEP Case Studies: Cross-Case Analysis Each of the site-specific case study reports was reviewed. Major themes across sites were recorded. Survey responses from teachers, principals, and administrators across sites were produced to indicate areas of strength and weakness. The report represents the total sample.

7 TPEP Case Studies: Overall Findings on Teacher Evaluation The vast majority of teacher respondents in the pilot reported understanding the new system—its goals, measures, and how to achieve a high rating. They reported that the system is useful and helpful to professional growth. They see the new teacher evaluation system as better than the previous system in helping them improve their practice. Simultaneously teacher respondents raised concerns about the new system, particularly the time involved in evaluation activities but also communication with non-pilot teachers and the extent to which the system can account for differences in teachers’ content areas or student populations.

8 TPEP Case Studies: Overall Findings on Principal Evaluation The development of principal evaluation systems is at various stages in the pilots. While interviewees in a couple districts described a well-specified principal evaluation system, many interviewees in other districts suggest that the development of the system is just beginning. The vast majority of principals report understanding the goals and measures of the new principal evaluation system. A strong majority report that it is better than the previous system in terms of helping to improve their practice. Similarly to the new teacher evaluation system, principals raised concerns about the amount of time involved and communication with non-pilot principals.

9 TPEP Case Studies: General Findings The new evaluation system takes more time and money to understand and implement than the previous one.  Over 760 total session hours have been spent formally training educators on the new system thus far (through September 30, 2011).  64.4% of teachers reported spending a much greater amount of time on evaluation activities than previously.  65.8% of principals spent more than 10 hours on evaluation activities per teacher in the new evaluation system thus far.  In total, 57.9% of administrators reported spending 21 or more hours on evaluation activities for principals.  Only 47.8% of administrators believe there are adequate monetary resources to support the implementation of the new evaluation systems.

10 TPEP Case Studies: General Findings The investment may be worth it. The practice of educators, already of high quality in Washington, appears to be improving even more.  The measures being used in the new teacher evaluation system provide feedback for improving instructional practice. More than 88% of teachers and principals agree.  The system supports professional growth. 75.4% of teachers consult the instructional framework to inform their professional practice. 45.8% of principals who report having a leadership framework consult the framework to inform their practice.  Over 84% of teachers and principals agree that the measures in the teacher evaluation system are fair, incorporate the most important aspects, and provide a comprehensive picture of teacher performance.  84.7% of principals indicate that their system provides useful feedback to improve their practice as a leader.

11 TPEP Case Studies: General Findings Over the long-term the investment should continue to pay off. A shift in the culture across schools and districts appears to be happening and the work of the pilots is just the start.  74.6% of teachers agree that the teacher evaluation system is more objective than before.  Almost 90% of teachers and principals indicate that that the new systems specifies how to improve, identifies areas of strength, and encourages better teaching.  70.8% of principals and 90.9% of administrators agree that the new principal evaluation system is better than the old one to improve leadership practice.  78.3% of principals and 100.0% of administrators report more productive conversations due to new principal evaluation system.

12 TPEP Case Studies: Next Steps Spring data collection  Self-report data (time and resources)  Surveys  Document review Final case studies and cross-case analysis

13 Gretchen Weber P: East Diehl Road, Suite 200 Naperville, IL General Information: Website: