Using museum specimens to identify MOTUs in larval scarab beetles Andrew Mitchell, NSW DPI Kelly Rigg, Charles Sturt University Gus Campbell, NSW DPI Tom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Bugs to Barcodes: Using Molecular Tools to Study Biodiversity Mandy Butler, Heather Henter, Stephanie Mel University of California, San Diego.
Advertisements

Success of DNA barcoding in distinguishing sister species of diverse clades of birds Allan Baker, Erika Tavares, Rebecca Elbourne Department of Natural.
Policies and best practices for molecular analysis of museum specimens Peter T Oboyski Essig Museum of Entomology UC Berkeley.
INVERTEBRATE SAMPLING METHODS INVERTEBRATE SAMPLING METHODS Therese A. Catanach Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation 1816 South Oak Street,
Barcoding Type Specimens Goals, Obstacles, and Current Progress.
DNA barcoding and evolutionary relationships in Accipiter Brisson,1760 (Aves, Falconiformes: Accipitridae) with a focus on African and Eurasian representatives.
Aims to establish a catalogue of all organisms (10-30 million species) Ultimately a small portable hand held device will be used to identify samples using.
 DNA barcoding using the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene will allow species identification within the genus Agrilus. This will allow the positive identification.
Lichens and Ascomycota broadly Alternative markers to COI ITS.
Efficiency of the DNA-barcode expertise and its relationships with the practice of alpha-taxonomy illustrated by the study of the genus Eumunida (Decapoda).
DNA-barcoding on a different scale: challenges within Coccoidea Lyn Cook, The University of Queensland, Australia.
DNA Fingerprinting and Forensic Analysis
Reliability of ITS in Species Identification by Surachit Waengsothorn.
Identification of molecular markers for selection of supermale (YY) asparagus plants Gebler et al
Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes Fulgerator Paul Hebert, Erin Penton, John Burns,
PCR based Requiring sequence knowledge
OBJECTIVES OF INSECT DEFOLIATORS At the end of this section students should be able to: 1) Know the difference among polyphagous, oligophagous and monophagous.
Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research
Majid Sajeel M.Sc. Zoology Semester_iv R# University of Gujrat TAXONOMICAL COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION Systematics.
Using the Thermo lignum heat process for treatment of natural history specimens - Research and practical experience David Pinniger.
BioBarcode: a general DNA barcoding database and server platform for Asian biodiversity resources Jeongheui Lim Korean BioInformation Center Korea Research.
Finding relationships and differences by bar-coding jellyfish species Dr. David Pontin.
PCR optimization. Primers – design must be good but influenced by template sequence Quality of template DNA/impurities Components of PCR may need to be.
DNA Barcoding Dolan DNA Learning Center
Ch. 13.4: DNA Technology Applications
Multiple Sequence Alignment May 12, 2009 Announcements Quiz #2 return (average 30) Hand in homework #7 Learning objectives-Understand ClustalW Homework#8-Due.
Character-based DNA barcoding for identifying conservation units in Odonates J. Rach 1, R. DeSalle 2, I.N. Sarkar 2, B. Schierwater 1,2 & H. Hadrys 1,
Phylogeography of the Seastar Linckia laevigata and its obligate parasite Thyca crystallina Bolanle Akinronbi, Marta Muñoz, Paul Barber.
DNA barcoding of soldierless termites from South America: the Anoplotermes group (Termitidae) Genetic investigations were carried out by JEMU - Joint Experimental.
발표자 석사 2 년 김태형 Vol. 11, Issue 3, , March 2001 Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Mouse and Human Protocadherin Gene Clusters 인간과 마우스의 PCDH 유전자.
Amplifying DNA. The Power of PCR View the animation at
Automated Barcoding Using the Characteristic Attribute Organization System Indra Neil Sarkar, PhD Divisions of Invertebrate Zoology & Library Services.
DNA barcoding: bane or boon (or both) for taxonomy? Donal A. Hickey, Concordia University, Montreal. Collaborators: Mehrdad Hajibabaei and Gregory Singer.
FISH SPECIES IDENTIFICATION AND BIODIVERSIFICATION IN ENUGU METROPOLIS RIVER BY DNA BACODING PRESENTED BY Chioma Nwakanma (PhD) Michael Okpara University.
Flora in our wetlands.. Kamalpreet Kaur Shivanthi Opatha Mona Lau Jessica Jimenez Maria Panayi Alex Marshall.
Chapter 8 Molecular Phylogenetics: Measuring Evolution.
Chapter 11 (Plant Taxonomy, pp ) Species Concepts.
Phylogenomics “The intersection of phylogenetics and genomics”
Tephritid Barcoding Initiative
Coccidiosis in captive northern bobwhites
DNA barcoding and evolutionary relationships in Accipiter Brisson,1760 (Aves, Falconiformes: Accipitridae) with a focus on African and Eurasian representatives.
Rapid biodiversity discovery in megadiverse tropical systems using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) barcodes Darren YEO 1, ​Amrita Srivathsan 1, Wendy.
Fish -Nearly half of all vertebrates species : marine, freshwater species (Fish base) FISH-BOL(Fish Barcode of Life Initiative) -Establish.
Northern Star Coral (Astrangia poculata) Populations from the New Jersey Coast. Abstract- This project investigated the distribution and molecular evolution.
40 th Coccidosis Conference and Workshop “Taxonomy (α and β) and Systematics of the Coccidia” John R. Barta and R. Scott Seville University of Guelph,
Molecular analysis and barcoding Ryuji Machida, Rob Jennings.
Phylogenetic analysis of flatfish species (Teleostei, Pleuronectiformes) based on cytochrome oxidase 1 (Co-1) and cytochrome b (Cyt-b) genes Sharina S.N.,
SLIDE MOUNTING INSECT SETTING INSECT COLLECTION LABELING MATERIALS FOR INSECT COLLECTION -ethyl acetate -pinning block -killing jar.
INTRODUCTION Use of DNA data in determining phylogenetic relationships is well established. DNA barcode approach to use.
UPDATE ACTIVITIES IN THE ASIA REGION NOCOURSE/ WORKSHOP/ MEETING VENUEDATE START DATE END DURATIONS (DAYS) SPONSORED 1 APPPC Workshop on System.
Honors Project May 2, 2013 By: Alyssa Rogers Mentor: Dr. Christopher Lane BROWN ALGAL DIVERSITY IN BERMUDA REVEALED USING MOLECULAR TOOLS.
Biomonitoring, but not as we know it: meeting the challenge of DNA-based observation in bioassessment Donald Baird Environment & Climate Change Canada.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Pipeline for culture-independent studies of a microbiota. (A)
CNR ITB, Bari Section - BioInformatics and Genomics MOLECULAR BIODIVERSITY Barcode: A new challenge for Bioinformatics Cecilia Saccone Meeting FIRB 2005.
16S rRNA Experimental Design
Number of Sample Sequenced and analyzed
Metagenomics: From Bench to Data Analysis 19-23rd September S rRNA-based surveys for Community Analysis: How Quantitative are they? Dr.
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Introduction Conclusion References Aim of the work
Tyler Eaton, Dan Horton, Ann Amis, Ted Cottrell, Tracie Jenkins
Prof . Farkhanda Manzoor
Tracie M. Jenkins, Brian T. Forschler, Dan R. Suiter, Tyler D. Eaton
Molecular Identification of Unknown Yellowstone Shrews
Gene-sequence analysis reveals at least three species hidden in Zausodes arenicolus Erin Easton November 13, 2008.
Rosie Coates-Brown Final year Bioinformatics trainee
PRACTICAL 1 SLIDE MOUNTING INSECT SETTING INSECT COLLECTION LABELING
Are Those Beetles Eating Our Trees?
Barcode analysis using mini-amplicons strategy for museum samples of neotropical primates Callithrix spp.  S. Loiola, R.S. Carvalho, H.G. Bergallo, M.
Jenna Marcotte1, Emily Picchiello1, John Halloran1
. . Using DNA Barcoding To Measure The Biodiversity in Ants in Residential Areas And Park Areas Authors: Emily Augulis1, Paige Dreher1, Sarah Hussain1.
Presentation transcript:

Using museum specimens to identify MOTUs in larval scarab beetles Andrew Mitchell, NSW DPI Kelly Rigg, Charles Sturt University Gus Campbell, NSW DPI Tom Weir, CSIRO Entomology A. Raman, Charles Sturt University

NSW DPI The barcoding bottleneck...  What is the most time-consuming part of the DNA barcoding process?  Most expensive?  Most difficult (requiring specialist knowledge?)  Acquiring expertly identified specimens

NSW DPI...and how to squeeze through it  Go collecting in a collection  Constraints:  Museum policies on “destructive” sampling  DNA preservation?  Can one routinely recover DNA barcodes from year old insect material?  If yes...

NSW DPI The study group – scarab beetles  Scarab larvae are pests of sugarcane, pastures...  Conserved morphology  Long life cycles (1-2 years)  Different spp. need diff. management strategies  Identification of larvae is crucial  Adults generally do not cause direct damage  Anoplognathus adults feed on eucalypts  Rural tree decline in Australia

NSW DPI Our Grand Plan 1.Collect larvae 2.Collect adults 3.Barcode both Ahrens et al. (2007) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3’-half of COI gene (Jerry – Pat)  X X

NSW DPI PCR primer development Folmer primers not very successful A few rounds of primer design needed –Degenerate (Folmer) primers, with M13 tails Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, various other insects Redesigned the downstream primer 3 codons further downstream –Bark beetles & others Considerable time & effort

NSW DPI Plan B 1.Collect larvae 2.Barcode larvae

Larvae only ~100 sequences 667 bp COI Results: Highly variable: p-distance = 32% within a family (vs. half that between insect orders) Base composition bias minimal (60% AT versus 70-80% in other insects) Identified 30 MOTUs Best strategy for identifying the MOTUs? Focus on one genus at a time Youngest specimens

NSW DPI PCR strategy Aim: Determine the effects of age and amplicon size on PCR success Designed sets of degenerate, M13-tailed primers to target a range of sizes of amplicons: 667, 340, 327, 238, 140, 92 bp each

NSW DPI Museum specimens n = 240 Mean age = 37 years

NSW DPI Effect of amplicon length on PCR “PCR success” = DNA band (of expected size) (not the same as sequencing success!)

NSW DPI Current data set Added short sequences ( bp) for ~70 adults

p-distances within 0.4% between % within 0.8% NJ tree, K2P +bootstrap Anoplognathus only 2.6% Summary With exceptions to be noted, max p-distance within = 1.3% min p-distance between = 3.0% max p-distance = 19.1%

92 bp alignments 5’-section 3’-section

NSW DPI Conclusions 1.DNA barcoding “works” in scarabs 2.COI is variable enough that mini-barcodes also will distinguish among species 3.Use of yr old museum specimens is a feasible option in this group 1.Will this hold true for specimens from museums in the tropics? 4.The barcode standard should allow registration of short sequences as reference barcode

NSW DPI Acknowledgements Funding: