CSA and Roadside Inspections Trooper John Sova Motor Carrier Operations Division North Dakota Highway Patrol.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highway / Office of Traffic Safety or Web Request 5% Report County or City Specific Reports.
Advertisements

Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
Gary Nichols Director of International Sales US Xpress, Inc. September 16, 2010.
Potential SMS Improvements for MCSAC CSA Subcommittee April 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Industry Briefing, August 2010 FMC-CSA Comprehensive Safety Analysis.
Carrier Oversight National Transportation Safety Board Truck and Bus Safety: A Decade of Progress May 10-11, 2011.
October Agenda  CSA Overview  Commercial Enforcement Program  Upcoming HOS Changes  MAP-21 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 2.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
 No new CSA driver regulations  No new CSA vehicle regulations  NO new CSA recordkeeping regulations  Not a system to “throw” 250,000 drivers off.
OPERATING SAFELY AND IN COMPLIANCE James Daulerio CDS CDT Senior Risk Consultant.
Employee Transportation Defining and reducing the risks.
1 Compliance Last update: 1/2013 CSA Compliance, Safety, Accountability  Safety Measurement System (SMS) focusing on unsafe behaviors to reduce CMV.
1 Successful Compliance Reviews for Industry - First-hand perspective from a Safety Investigator Keith Kerns Member of CVSA International Safety Team Safety.
Texas Division NTEPS Presentation September 24, 2009.
Transportation Safety Assessments Commodor E. Hall, CDS ISRI Transportation Safety Manager
Driver Briefing | December 2012 FMC-CSA CSA: A Way to Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Driver Briefing December 2012.
National Safety Code in April 22, What is NSC? The National Safety Code (NSC) is a set of safety standards for motor carriers, drivers and vehicles.
1 FSWG Compliance Safety Accountability 1 FMCSA Duluth Superior Transportation Association March 21, 2012 Dan Drexler.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety April 2010 Joe Darby Doug Dickinson.
Thomas Bray Senior Editor, Transportation Management J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
Dial-in: , Pass Code: #; Tech Support: , Webinar ID: Comprehensive Safety Analysis Regulatory Changes,
U.S. Department of Transportation Airport Ground Transportation Association Conference Henderson, Nevada October 8, 2012a Loretta G. Bitner, Chief Commercial.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Industry Briefing, October 2009 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and Hazardous Materials Regulations : How they apply to You the Roofing Contractor Todd Olney, CDS, ARM.
What to Expect at a Compliance Review CTMA Conference July 2015.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration CMV Driver Briefing, December 2010 FMC-CSA CSA  Compliance, Safety,
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Rail Division Overview.
1 Comprehensive Safety Analysis CSA 2010 January 28, 2009.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Update Arkansas Trucking Association Safety Management Council Don Holman, Tyson Foods, Inc. Corporate Director of Transportation.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration & DOT Safety Regulations Updates.
CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010.
1 Violation to Crash Risk Relationship Dave Madsen, Volpe Center Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC) for Compliance, Safety, Accountability.
 Why Change?  What is CSA?  Field Test & National Rollout  Summary.
Indiana Motor Transport Association September 8, 2009 Indianapolis, IN Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
CVEO 3 Larry Pasco Spokane Washington State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Division District Supervisor 1.
Compliance, Safety, Accountability Update to MCSAC October 28, 2014.
Transportation & Logistics Anthony P. Gallo, CFA(410) office, (410) mobile Michael R. Busche(704)
Overview of the Evaluation of CSA 2010 Operational Model Test Daniel Blower December 5, 2012.
1 Commercial Vehicle Safety Data Quality and Uniformity.
Jeff Davis, C.D.S. Fleet Safety Services, LLC. Anonymous Polling Question #1 1 Does your Company currently have any “deficient” or “monitored” CSA BASIC’s?
U.S. Department of Transportation Airport Ground Transportation Association March 12, 2012 Orlando, Florida Peter Chandler, Team Leader Commercial Passenger.
Click to edit Master title style 1. 2 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is part of the.
“Put Some Science in Your Game with Leading and Trailing Indicators” Safety Performance Metrics Tom Lott Senior Vice President Wachovia Insurance Services.
June 2009 | U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Overview and Oversize/Overweight.
CSA Driver Training. Who is subject?  Carriers and their drivers are subject if the carrier:  has a U.S. DOT Number; and  operates commercial motor.
CSA 2010 Update:. FMCSA’s Challenge: Industry Volume Significantly more carriers than federal/state investigators –FMCSA regulates ~725,000 interstate.
Intro to SMS | March FMC-CSA CSA: Introduction to the Safety Measurement System Version 3.0 March 2013.
What It Means for Great Dane Customers Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
Training & Trends Jay Wommack Peter Charboneau. Current Economic Environment Impact on Transportation/ Trucking Impact on Transportation/ School Bus Do.
CSA 2010 DRIVER INFORMATION 11/27/ WHAT IS CSA 2010? CSA 2010 is a government initiative to make roads safer by contacting motor carriers sooner.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Listening Session #2 12/10/2009 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
CSA 2010 Overview Presented by Brandon Putz Loss Control & Safety Representative.
Company: Viewing Company Information CSA Phase II Release x, Month Year vx.x FMCSA Portal.
FMCSA ANALYSIS DIVISIONData Quality Program August 2005 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration What Programs are Available to the States to Improve.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration – Agency Overview
FMCSA Update TTA Middle Tennessee ELD and SFD Update
MCSAC| February Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Council February 12, 2014.
SBA Roundtable| February 14, Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Small Business Administration February 2012.
CSA 2010: The Driver Impact. The Impact. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is in the process of implementing a revised safety inspection.
COMPLIANCE SAFETY ACCOUNTABILTY FMCSA ANALYSIS & INFORMATION ONLINE.
Office of Research and Information Technology CVSA and FMCSA SSDQ Performance Measures: Crash Timeliness Inspection Timeliness April , 2013 CVSA.
FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders| December FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders.
CSA 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety.
Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) and Drivers Winter 2016.
“We are not a trucking company”
CSA 2010 A Compendium for Shippers April 14, 2010.
CSA 2010 The New Approach.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Supplemental Slides to discuss Data Preview with Motor Carriers U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 for CMV Drivers July 2010
Drug Testing Requirements
Presentation transcript:

CSA and Roadside Inspections Trooper John Sova Motor Carrier Operations Division North Dakota Highway Patrol

Roadside Inspections  Where does the inspection report go?  How are we affecting CMV safety by doing a roadside inspection?  Is the inspection simply a warning or is it something more?  Who does the inspection report affect?  What does a clean inspection report do?  Why is it so important to properly fill out the inspection report?

Objectives  CSA – What is it?  7 CSA Basics  Inspections – beyond roadside enforcement  Safety Investigations - Who receives one?  Safety Investigations - How are they influenced by roadside inspections  Future concerns

CSA What is CSA?

CSA  Compliance, Safety, and Accountability –Started as CSA2010 –Used to track safety performance of carriers and drivers (CSMS and DSMS) –Replaced Safestat 7 Basics vs. 4 Safety Evaluation areas All violations counted vs. only OOS violations –Increased importance of high quality roadside inspections

CSA  Compliance, Safety, and Accountability –Being implemented in stages Nothing changes on surface (roadside inspection) All changes behind the scenes (investigations) –Increased types of interventions available Goal was to contact more carriers and earlier Compliance Review changed to Safety Investigation NOV, NOC, Warning letter, Off Site Focused, On Site Focused, Full

CSA  Seven Basics –Unsafe Driving –Hours of Service Compliance –Driver Fitness –Controlled Substances/Alcohol –Vehicle Maintenance –Hazardous Material Compliance –Crash Indicator

CSA  Intervention Thresholds –Unsafe Driving, HOS and Crash Indicator Passenger carriers (50%) HM carriers (60%) All other carriers (65%) –Driver Fitness, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Vehicle Passenger carriers (65%) HM carriers (75%) All other carriers (80%) –HM Compliance All carriers (80%)

CSA  Carriers subject to HM threshold –Min. 2 Placardable HM inspections in previous 24 months –Min. 1 of the 2 inspections in the last 12 months –At least 5% of total inspections are HM Placardable inspections –Level 3 inspections are not counted

CSA Questions?

Inspections  What does all this have to do with my job doing roadside inspections? –The carrier and driver scores are calculated by what is or is not listed on the roadside inspection report and the accuracy of the information –Alerts appear due to violations on roadside inspections and/or investigation history –You are determining who gets interventions including who gets safety investigations

Inspections  How do roadside inspections determine who gets interventions? –Every violation has a severity weight assigned to it Using wrong code gets wrong weight assigned 392.9a1 (1 pt) vs b (7 pts) (1 pt) vs c (7 pts) 393.9a (2 pts) vs TS (6 pts) Generic descriptions always 1 pt Extra 2 pts assessed when OOS Miss a violation (0 pts) Invalid Violation (Improper points assigned)

Inspections  Issues –Points only assessed if violation is in SMS Methodology Basic (0 points) Excessive weight violations (0 points) –Speeding violations 392.2S (1 point) (no longer available) SLLS2, 6-10 mph over limit (4 points) SLLS3, mph over limit (7 points) SLLS4, 15 or more over limit (10 points) Only violations assess points –Traffic violations

Inspections –Every violation will have a time weight 0-6 months = 3X 6-12 months = 2X months = 1X –Example- Turn signal inoperative on trailer (6 + 2) X 3 = 24 pts (0-6 months) (6 + 2) X 2 = 16 pts (6-12 months) (6 + 2) X 1 = 8 pts (12-24 months)

Inspections –Example of wrong coding on new inspection –(1 + 2) X 3 = 9 pts c on new inspection –(7 + 2) X 3 = 27 pts –Coding 50% inflated tire under wrong code a – Flat tire –(8 + 2) X 3 = 30 pts h – Underinflated tire –(3 + 2) X 3 = 15 pts

Inspections  Coding of violations –Always choose the best option for the violation Most descriptive Stay away from generic descriptions, if possible –Taking the time to do the inspection, might just as well have it counted appropriately

Inspections –Every inspection is counted Level 1,2,3 inspections count towards driver Basics Level 1,2,5 inspections count toward vehicle and HM Basics –This is why Vehicle violations and HM violations on Level 3 inspections don’t count. –Violation points are put into the corresponding Basics (max of 30 pts in any 1 Basic/inspection) –Only 1 violation code given weight (ex. Flat tires) –Total points of all violations from all inspections in a Basic are divided by the sum of time weighted inspections related to that Basic to get a Basic measure

Inspections –The carrier is then placed into a peer group based on number of relevant inspections in that Basic in the previous 24 months. –The last step is to rank that carrier by comparing its Basic measure to other carriers Basic measure in that peer group –The percentage is where the carrier falls in the peer group

Inspections  Clean inspections raise the number of inspections in a Basic, helping the carrier’s score  If only inspections with violations go on the carrier profile, it skews the data and we cannot get an accurate picture of which carriers are having a problem because according to the data, they all are  Causes Safety Investigations to be conducted on the wrong carriers

Inspections  Improper clean inspections have the opposite affect.  When clean inspections are done to get a number, we are reducing the percentages and can bring a carrier out of alert status that belongs in alert status  The scores are getting watered down and the system, once again, is giving us invalid data  Driver/Carrier Requested inspections –USDOT Memo SP RR

Inspections Garbage In = Garbage Out

Inspections Questions?

Safety Investigations  How is an investigation initiated? –Alert in Basic (Percentage or prior investigation) –Request by carrier (upgrade in safety rating) –Complaint –Fatal crash –Enforcement follow-up

Safety Investigations  How does a roadside inspection influence an investigation? –Red Flag Violations/Drivers –Sampling criteria DSMS, crashes, High violation rates

Safety Investigations  Outcome of investigation is a direct result of the quality of information put into system by roadside inspections –Exceptions Violations found as expected but didn’t rise to the level of critical (no pattern) Violations on intrastate carriers with DOT #’s –Jurisdiction only on interstate commerce

Safety Investigations Questions?

Future Concerns  Safety Rating calculated by Basic scores –Currently only from an investigation –Shippers-won’t use carrier with poor rating –Insurance companies –Carriers will scrutinize inspection reports –DataQ challenges will/may increase What can inspector do to limit these? –DataQ decisions must be correct

Summary  Roadside Inspections are the backbone of CMV safety and enforcement –Determine who gets investigations –Determine which Basics get investigated Focused or Comprehensive –Determine Red Flag investigations –Determine which drivers are selected during investigation

Summary  Safety Investigations are critical to CMV safety –allow us to bring the carrier and all its drivers into compliance Further investigation of what you found on the road Holds the carrier accountable Holds the drivers accountable Impacts many drivers with one encounter –Allows for progressive enforcement if violations are not remedied –Gives inspections the power to bring about compliance long after releasing the driver roadside

Roadside Inspections  Where does the inspection report go?  How are we affecting CMV safety by doing a roadside inspection?  Is the inspection simply a warning or is it something more?  Who does the inspection report affect?  What does a clean inspection report do?  Why is it so important to properly fill out the inspection report?

Questions?