Integration of URSCA in Economics General Education Courses Zamira Simkins, Rubana Mahjabeen and Sakib Mahmud University of Wisconsin-Superior.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IB Economics & General Economics Course Outlines Mrs. K.Balan.
Advertisements

Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations Kevin Yee Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Central Florida Research Question For oral presentations,
Helping L2 writers respond to writing assignments across the curriculum Part 2 Zuzana Tomaš Eastern Michigan University
AP Economics Mr. Bernstein Class Outline September 4, 2014.
URECA ! Undergrad Research Experience and Creative Activity.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
Stony Brook Model for General Education Assessment Pilot Report November 13, 2003 GEAR as a Catalyst for Change Beginning to Build a Campus- Wide Culture.
© 2009 South-Western, Cengage LearningMARKETING 1 Chapter 3 MARKETING BEGINS WITH ECONOMICS 3-1Scarcity and Private Enterprise 3-2Observing the Law of.
Learning Outcome Management System This is a Windows application that interacts with a database to manage learning outcomes for College of Business courses.
MARKETING BEGINS WITH ECONOMICS
October 22, 2009 Report to the Faculty Senate Professor John Stevenson Senator Sandy Jean Hicks UCGE-Subcommittee on Assessment of General Education (SAGE)
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
UNA’S QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN RESEARCH LITERACY IMAGINE... INVESTIGATE... COMMUNICATE Building Success through Discovery.
+ Teaching psychological research methods through a pragmatic and programmatic approach. Patrick Rosenkranz, Amy Fielden, Efstathia Tzemou.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Turning a Disciplinary Lens to Teaching and Learning Preparing Tomorrow’s Professionals for a Complex World The integrity of the discipline leads to a.
Diane Holtzman Evonne Kruger.  Required for management concentration juniors and seniors and is an elective for all Business majors  Contextualizes.
Managerial Economics Prof. M. El-Sakka CBA. Kuwait University Managerial Economics in a Global Economy Chapter 1 B.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Chapter 31 MARKETING AND ECONOMICS 1Scarcity and Private Enterprise 2Observing the Law of Supply and Demand 3Types of Economic Competition 4Enhancing Economic.
Chapter 31 MARKETING AND ECONOMICS 1Scarcity and Private Enterprise 2Observing the Law of Supply and Demand 3Types of Economic Competition 4Enhancing Economic.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Business Core Assessment (ACC/BA Core Classes) LSB Assembly 1 December 2005.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
ScholarSHIP “Undergraduate Research at Shippensburg University”
Investing in Human Capital: The Experiences of Keio with JJ/WBGSP Masatoshi KURATANI Keio University.
4 The Market Forces of Supply and Demand. MARKETS AND COMPETITION Buyers determine demand. Sellers determine supply.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
FACULTY ROLES & STUDENT SUCCESS. Faculty Roles in: Program level learning outcomes Curriculum mapping Assessment of student learning Student success.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
“Learn It! Live It!” Ensuring the Workforce Readiness Skills and Behaviors of Today’s and Tomorrow’s Workers Fall Convocation 2015 Presentation Quality.
WS1 Introduction to Problem Based Learning: The AAU Way. Assessment/Examination of projects, why and how The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
The Level-2 Projects for Course Clusters Haojun Sun College of Engineering Shantou University.
Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) Pilot Project At VSU Prepared by the PLA Assessors Group.
Applying Principles of Learning Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University Assessment.
Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.
Reading and Literacy M.Ed. Program.  Graduate programs across the university require some sort of exit option that shows that the student has mastered.
Writing Assignments in Mechanical Engineering Anne Parker University of Manitoba A. Parker, CASDW, UVic,
1 Capstone design and curriculum renewal Margot McNeill Learning and Teaching Centre Thursday, 2 July 2009.
Lecture 2 Part I: Introduction to Business economics Part II: Market forces of supply and demand Instructor: Prof.Dr.Qaisar Abbas Course code: ECO 400.
Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum. Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
PowerPoint 5 Unit 2 Economics
Mr. Bernstein Class Outline September 2017
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
RCOB Core Review Update
Principles of Microeconomics Shomu Banerjee
Introducing Supply and Demand
Bell Work: Wednesday May 18th
EOCT Review Microeconomics.
Course Overview meeting February 8, 2018
Part I: Introduction to Business economics
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Spring and Fall 2017 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Edouard Mafoua Date.
Microeconomics ECON 2302 Spring 2011
Presentation transcript:

Integration of URSCA in Economics General Education Courses Zamira Simkins, Rubana Mahjabeen and Sakib Mahmud University of Wisconsin-Superior

Introduction Undergraduate Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity (URSCA): An inquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student with a faculty mentor that makes an original intellectual or creative contribution to the discipline URSCA at UW-Superior: URSCA committee & activities Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship program UW-System Growth Agenda Grant & URSCA Center URSCA program grants Partnership with McNair Scholars program

URSCA in Economics URSCA taxonomy (DeLoach, Perry-Sizemore and Borg, 2010): Course activities Course projects Capstone experience Collaborative research ExamplesShort assignments, experiments Research papers, surveys Thesis, SYE papers Grant-funded studies Course level All 4 th year3 rd or 4 th year Time required Days, weeksWeeks, months Semester(s)Summer, semester(s) Prereqs.Content knowledge & basic research skills Integrated content knowledge & research skills Integrated content knowledge, research and teamwork skills

URSCA in Economics (cont.) URSCA taxonomy (DeLoach, Perry-Sizemore and Borg, 2010): Course activities Course projects Capstone experience Collaborative research Goals & objectives Application of concepts and theories Integration of concepts and theories Student learning & program assessment Advanced learning & grad. school preparation Research type & student decision- making Highly structured, common instructions, few decisions Structured, students make some research decisions Unstructured, students make most research decisions Varied structure, high degree of faculty oversight, joint decisions Mentoring focus Individual or group, simple Individual or group, complex Individual, highly complex

UW-S URSCA in ECON Gen. Ed’s Project objectives: Integrate URSCA in all Economics Gen. Ed. courses Increase the number of students exposed to experiential/active student learning Introduce students to research methods and practices Implementation: Courses: Economics in Society, Principles of Microeconomics, Principles of Macroeconomics Products: 3 sets of course-based assignments, grading rubrics, assessment rubrics and feedback forms Frequency: every semester

UW-S URSCA in Microeconomics Economics Student Learning Outcomes: Master economics terms, concepts and theories: Demand, supply, law of demand and law of supply Apply knowledge to understand how the economy works: Market forces of S & D, equilibrium P & Q Develop undergraduate research KSAs: Data collection, processing and interpretation Demonstrate critical thinking and problem solving skills: Data analysis Demonstrate effective communication skills: Written answers, group discussions

Project Description Market: Online homework access code (e.g., Aplia access code) Assignment details: Introduced after S & D Market assumption: perfectly competitive market Ideal class size: students, buyers-sellers Two+ class periods: (1+) simulation, (2) analysis Simulation: 10 rounds, 2-3 minutes per round Student instruction sheets: Buyers – product valuation and behavior rules Sellers - production cost and behavior rules

Buyer & Seller’s Record Forms Round #Seller’s Name Price You Paid for the Access Code Your Access Code Valuation Your Consumer Surplus Round #Buyer’s Name Price You Received for the Access Code Your Production Cost of Access Code Your Producer Surplus

Analysis of Simulated Data Initial analysis: Cleaning the data set Analysis of sellers' behavior Analysis of buyers' behavior

Analysis of Simulated Data Subsequent analysis: Revealing of buyer valuations & production costs Analysis of simulated data in graph and table format: Table: market Qs & Qd at each price level Graph: market S&D curves; equilibrium P&Q Application of economic theory to simulated behavior Discussion on findings

URSCA Project Grade 5% of class grade: Participation in the simulation Data collection Data analysis Group discussion

Student Survey Results This assignment…Strongly Agree & Agree Strongly Disagree & Disagree Helped you master knowledge of economics terms, concepts, and theories 58.49%11.32% Improved your knowledge and abilities to understand how the economy works 81.13%3.77% Taught you undergraduate research methods and developed your research skills 60.38%11.32% Enhanced your critical thinking and problem-solving skills 58.49%7.55% Developed your KSAs in data collection, processing, and interpretation 83.02%7.55% Enhanced your oral & written communication skills 60.38%7.58% Helped you learn how to work effectively as an independent researcher or a member of a group 64.15%5.67%

Conclusion Positive student feedback about the assignment Areas for improvement and extensions: Revise instructions to provide step-by-step guidance for every phase of the assignment Vary product costs and valuations across rounds Extend the simulation across different market structures: Perfect competition Monopolistic competition Oligopoly Monopoly