Sections have moved. Sit with your section & group! Feel free to move down front if it would help you learn. A reminder about Test #1: Full answers and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identifying Written and Oral Communication Skills
Advertisements

ACS102 Week Five With Librarians Diane Granfield, Don Kinder and Sonny Banerjee.
Welcome Back!. “Bad reasoning as well as good reasoning is possible; and this fact is the foundation of the practical side of logic.” - Charles Sanders.
The Rhetorical Triangle © Susan Hagan. Rhetoric Rhetoric is defined in the English 101 textbook Writer Citizen as:  “We define rhetoric as the.
1 LE 4000 ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES STEP 2 Gathering academic information The Internet & Other academic sources.
Evaluate 1. Assessment of value ٠ the act of considering or examining something in order to judge its value, quality, importance, extent, or condition.
Rhetorical Appeals ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS.
The Persuasive Power of Words (Week 1) Colin Neville.
 Most books you find in library nonfiction are credible.  Most large newspapers are credible. ◦ New York Times ◦ Washington Post  Scholarly journals.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Credibility of Sources How can you tell if a source is going to be credible or reliable ?
Writing Articles. Articles take a considered view of events, including opinions and sometimes refer to related issues. Reports are more immediate and.
Evaluating Information The CRAAP Test When you search for information, you’ll easily find a lot of it…but is it good information? That’s up to you to.
Welcome to Unit 3: Persuasive Speaking! Sections have moved. Sit with your section & group! Feel free to move down front if it would help you learn.
Evaluating Web Sites The Internet is a great place to find information. But, has anyone ever told you not to believe everything you read? Web Sites are.
RESEARCHING TIPS & STRATEGIES Summer 2008 Melanie Wilson Academic Success Center MSC 207.
Using Your Sources Evaluating, Blending, and Citing.
1 Internet Detective Searching for Clues Evaluating Web Sites C. Johnson.
Argument Essay The Art of Persuasion Nardelli What is an Argumentative Essay? An argumentative essay, or persuasive essay, is simply a writer’s attempt.
Persuasion Is All Around You
Carmen Genuardi, Librarian R esearch S trategies: From Information Consumers to Information PRODUCERS… YES YOU CAN! WELCOME!
Finding Reliable Research on the Internet. So where do I start? Your essays will be comprised of a variety of information, but because we live in a digital.
RESEARCH Checking Reliable Sources. Why do I need to check if a website is reliable? Unlike most traditional written information, no one has to approve.
The Argumentative Essay RCC 200 Penheiter. What exactly is it? The argumentaive vs. the persuasive  An argument essay is meant to influence the reader.
AELDP ACADEMIC READING. Questions Do you have any questions about academic reading?
Reliable Sources Six questions to ask to determine the trustworthiness of an internet source.
RESEARCHING & EVALUATING Summer 2008 Melanie Wilson Academic Success Center MSC 207.
EVALUATING SOURCES. THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE SOURCES Lend credibility to your arguments Support your points with researched information A source is only.
Methods of Persuasion How do you convince a person or a group of people to feel, think, or do as you ask?
Persuasive Writing. Quickwrite: Why do we write persuasive essays?  How difficult is it to convince someone to act a certain way or do something?  Are.
Annotated Bibliography. The Process 1. Find a topic 2. Compose a research question 3. Find sources 4. Create citations for those sources 5. Create annotations.
QUESTIONS ABOUT WEBSITES. But, how do you know if the information is good, accurate and reliable ? Websites from the Internet can be fast and easy to.
Everything Is an Argument Whenever you read an argument, see an ad or commercial, you must ask yourself:  ” What is the author trying to get me to think.
Introduction to Rhetoric
Prof Communication May 9, 2014 Objective: Use correct grammar, punctuation, and terminology to write a document. Present informal and formal presentations.
Reflection helps you articulate and think about your processes for communication. Reflection gives you an opportunity to consider your use of rhetorical.
Happy Tuesday! Take out your rhetoric notes from last week (the online dating powerpoint we went through) and prepare to add to them!
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet Adopted from a presentation by the Purdue University Writing Lab.
Non-FictionNon-FictionNon-Fiction Lit. & Comp.- Introduction to Non-Fiction Non-Fiction.
CH 42 DEVELOPING A RESEARCH PLAN CH 43 FINDING SOURCES CH 44 EVALUATING SOURCES CH 45 SYNTHESIZING IDEAS Research!
Materials Homework Pen/Pencil Bradded folder Please grab 3 sheet protectors from the front table and put them in your brads Agenda Vocabulary 1 Handout.
Persuasive Appeals How do we persuade people to agree to, believe in, or buy what we want them to?
Answering Questions. Lect 9M 2 The responsibilities of the Persuasive speaker: 1.To say something worth hearing (sound information). 2.To say something.
Expository Speeches.  Make up a short list by studying the expository speech topic ideas below. Judge them with these selection criteria:  Which topics.
Research and the Internet Finding and evaluating the credibility of internet resources.
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.
Hey there! Have you evaluated? Is that site good enough to cite?
SCARAB Substance No depth or written for children. Lacking the depth needed for your purpose. Written for the general public. Depth of coverage.
Evaluating Web Pages Techniques to apply and questions to ask.
Mrs. May LRW January 19, 2016 Take out your yellow sheet and MLK/MX packet. Argumentative Speech.
The Research Paper Finding Valid, Credible, and Accurate Sources.
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
Chapter 7 Researching Your Speech. Researching your speech: Introduction Researching your topic and providing strong evidence for your claims can make.
CMPT 322W: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS Shane Plante Computing Science librarian, SFU Surrey Library Research Workshop.
A Change of Heart About Animals
Persuasive Speech. Everyone quietly think to themselves: WHY? If someone you cared about had only 11 hours and 53 minutes left to live what would tell.
The Big 6 Model for Effective Research While Researching specific topics and how they work you will be using the Big 6 Model for Effective Research to.
What is a scholarly website and what just looks like one…
Lect 5M 1 Test 1 reminders Study the Study Guide!-it tells you exactly what we are looking for. 4 questions (not 5) Please BRING A BLUE BOOK to the test.
Introduction to Rhetoric February 14 th, Defining “Rhetoric” What do you think it means? Have you heard this term? Consider these quotations: “Obama’s.
Ethos, Pathos, Logos.
Are my Sources Reliable?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Persuasive Writing.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them
How often do you get information from the Internet
WHAT’S THE ARGUMENT HERE?...
English 1301 Week 4 – (June 25, 2018) - Monday.
Making a Change.
Presentation transcript:

Sections have moved. Sit with your section & group! Feel free to move down front if it would help you learn. A reminder about Test #1: Full answers and feedback are online-- see "core course documents".

Lect 8W 2 The responsibilities of the Persuasive speaker: 1.To say something worth hearing (sound information). 2.To say something that can be heard (clear organization). 3.To say something that will be heard (audience engagement). 4.To answer all the audience's reasonable doubts & objections.

Lect 8W 3 Persuasion works more like this: Your listeners are your peers: they're going to think for themselves. You can help them by answering their questions.

Lect 8W 4 Consider Perhaps my aim in persuading is not conversion-- it's to get my audience to think. I expect people who think to reach the same, correct conclusion--eventually. Am I too hopeful?

Lect 8W 5 What you're going to need to meet your responsibility: 1.An appropriate topic you care about, passionately. 2.An accurate prediction of the doubts & objections your audience will raise. 3.An inventory of the kinds of replies you can give. next week

Lect 8W 6 I. The 3 Big Questions your audience is always going to ask about a policy. 1.What's the problem? (Lucas calls this: "need") 2.What's your plan? 3.Is it practical?

Lect 8W 7 Problem Issue Change is bad! If it's not broke, don't fix it! Stop interfering! your audience

Lect 8W 8 Problem Issue Why is she making us sit somewhere different??? YOU

Lect 8W 9 Problem Issue What's the problem? Why do we need to change? your audience

Lect 8W 10 Problem Issue Is a car really as expensive as you claim? YOU Is climate change real?

Lect 8W 11 Some doubt global warming

Lect 8W 12 But crude oil prices hit a record high Monday.

Lect 8W 13 Plan Issue What exactly is your plan? Your audience

Lect 8W 14 Practicality Issue Will your plan solve the problem? What are its other disadvantages? Your audience

Lect 8W 15 Practicality Issue How am I going to get home on the weekend? YOU What about nights, when there's no bus?

Lect 8W 16 Question of Policy To persuade my audience that we should do X.

Lect 8W 17 To persuade my audience... that we should carpool more. that we should recycle more. that we should switch to compact flourescent lightbulbs. that each of us should buy a hybrid (or hydrogen, or electric, or bio-diesel) car. that each of us should plant a tree. that we should bring our own shopping bags. that we should buy local. that we should stop buying disposable goods. that we should unplug appliances. that we should stop eating meat. that we should vote. (Note: Clinton, Obama and McCain all have anti-global-warming plans.)

Lect 8W 18 To persuade my audience... that ISU should adopt a mandatory recycling policy. that ISU should purchase alternative energy. that Ames should require all high school students to take a course about global warming. That Des Moines should adopt a zoning law requiring development to be denser & more centralized. that Iowa should not license any new electric plants which burn fossil fuels. that Iowa should give tax breaks to companies that produce or use renewable energy. that the US should raise the minimum mpg for vehicles ("CAFE standards"). that the US should fund more research into global warming. that the US should fund more public transportation.

Lect 8W 19 Do it yourself. What's the Problem? What exactly is your Plan? Is your plan Practical? –Will it work to solve the problem? –What are all its disadvantages (& advantages)? TOPIC:

Lect 8W 20 II. Some of the questions your audience is going to ask about your sources (according to ISU Librarians). Who is the author of the website? What are the author's credentials? Is the author an authority on the subject? Is it another student? A professor? Your next door neighbor? Is the author an organization? What do you know (or what can you find out) about this organization? What is its purpose? Is the site well edited? Are there spelling or grammatical errors? Is it written in a style that you would expect for the topic and audience? How current is the information? What is the purpose of the site? To inform? To sell? To persuade? Who is the intended audience? Advanced researchers in a field? Elementary school students? Members of a particular organization or viewpoint? If there is advertising on the page, does this affect the content? (lots & lots more...)

Lect 8W 21 site 1 Question #1: Expertise? Does the person who wrote this know what he/she is talking about?

Lect 8W 22 site 2 Question #2: Bias? Does the person who wrote this have financial or ideological interests which significantly distort his/her judgment?

Lect 8W 23 site 3 How do you figure out when to trust OK-looking internet sites?

Lect 8W 24

Lect 8W 25

Lect 8W 26 Other instances where we trust outside evaluators Letters of reference for job applicants Second opinions for medical problems Consumer Reports for major appliances Endorsements for presidential candidates Student ratings of professors (when public) The EnergyStar seal of approval for energy- efficient products

Lect 8W 27 "Outside evaluation" of information: Editors of major newspapers & magazines Peer review of articles in scholarly journals Review of medical information on WebMD Librarians' collection of sources on our Instruction Commons website: our "virtual library"

Lect 8W 28 Our "virtual library"

Lect 8W 29 NOTE: Academic OneFile replaces "Expanded Academic ASAP" A REQUIRED resource from the "virtual library"

Lect 8W 30 The three big questions for internet sources: Expertise: Does the person who wrote this know what he/she is talking about? Bias: Does the person who wrote this have financial or ideological interests which significantly distort his/her judgment? Review: Has this information been reviewed by a neutral party?

Lect 8W 31 Try it yourself: Would your audience trust these websites? ARTBA Mankiw Academic OneFile

Lect 8W What specific claim(s) does the speaker make on the Problem (Need) Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim(s)? 10. What specific actions is the speaker calling for in his/her claims on the Plan Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim that the Plan will solve the Problem? 11. What specific claim(s) does the speaker make on the Practicality Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim(s)? Identify one objection to Practicality that the audience is likely to make, which the speaker has not dealt with in the speech. 12. What is the least credible Source cited by the speaker? Why isn't it credible? What have we accomplished today? [1-8. As for the Informative Speech.] 9. What specific claim(s) does the speaker make on the Problem (Need) Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim(s)? 10. What specific actions is the speaker calling for in his/her claims on the Plan Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim that the Plan will solve the Problem? 11. What specific claim(s) does the speaker make on the Practicality Issue? How does the speaker support his/her claim(s)? Identify one objection to Practicality that the audience is likely to make, which the speaker has not dealt with in the speech. 12. What is the least credible Source cited by the speaker? Why isn't it credible? 13. Identify two distinct methods the speaker uses in the body of the speech to enhance his/her credibility appeals (ethos). 14. Identify two distinct methods of reasoning the speaker uses in the body of the speech to enhance his/her logical appeals (logos). 15. Identify two distinct methods the speaker uses in the body of the speech to enhance his/her emotional appeals (pathos). 16. Identify and evaluate one use of expert testimony in the speech. 17. Identify and evaluate one use of statistics in the speech. 18.Identify and evaluate one use of an example in the speech. 19. What is the one positive comment about the speech that this speaker most needs to hear now? (Not including delivery.) 20. What is the one negative comment about the speech that this speaker most needs to hear now? (Not including delivery.) The Persuasion analysis questions.

Lect 8W 33 Immediate tasks: Friday: Lab Monday: Lecture Persuasive Topics & Problem/ Plan/Practicality analysis due Quiz #6

Lect 8W 34