ERIKA BARRETT TECHNICIAN, BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY 520-626-5869 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Botulinum in the Research Laboratory - EHS Controls Presented by: Lisa Wisser, CIH AIHCE - June 6, 2001.
Advertisements

UC Davis Safety Services Monthly Safety Spotlight April 2010: Chemical and Laboratory Safety Safety Discussion Topics Critical Questions to Ask Laboratory.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE PROGRAM WORKSHOP OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT.
Satellite Notification and Acceptance Program (SNAP)
1 Recent Bioterrorism Legislation Madelyn Miller August 2003.
BJH-WU Research Transition Washington University Environmental Health & Safety.
Laboratory Safety Implementation of the Recommendations of the Faculty Senate Working Group September 11, 2013.
SUKESHI MEHTA COORDINATOR, CHEMICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY FRIDAY OCTOBER 3 RD,
Biosafety Program Development Presented by: Lisa Wisser, CIH AIHCE - June 6, 2001.
CSHEMA 2007, BOSTON, MA CLIP AT UNC CHAPEL HILL-TEN YEARS LATER Collaborative Laboratory Inspection Program at UNC Chapel Hill-Ten Years Later Jonathan.
Public and Private Interests in Animal Research LAT Chapter 1.
Office of the Vice President for Research
Principles and Practices of Biosafety Environmental Health and Safety San Diego State University.
School Safety Training
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) DEPARTMENTAL SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE (DSR) EXPECTATIONS Information For Tulane Employees.
Collaborative Laboratory Safety Inspections (CLIP) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jonathan Moore, Associate Radiation Safety Officer.
Institutional Biosafety Committee and Biological Use Authorization.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
LAUSD INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES As required by California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 3203.
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
WELCOME New Safety Coordinators! New Safety Coordinator Spring Orientation January 24, 2012.
Research and Biological Safety Office Environmental Health and Safety
O PERATING A BSL-3 F ACILITY IN K OREA T HE IVI E XPERIENCE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ANTICIPATING BIOSECURITY CHALLENGES OF THE GLOBAL EXPANSION OF HIGH.
Safety Review and Approval Process for Research Proposals Robert Emery, DrPH, CHP, CIH, CBSP, CSP, CHMM, CPP, ARM Vice President for Safety, Health, Environment.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
RESEARCH SUPPORT RUTGERS ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH & SAFETY (REHS)
LABORATORY BIOSAFETY FOCUS FORUM (LBFF). Delia Wolf Office of Regulatory Affairs & Research Compliance Dana Burns Leslie Howes Stanley Estime Jennifer.
Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard CWA 15793:2008
Research Protocol Registration at WUStL Institutional Biological and Chemical Safety Committee/ Environmental Health and Safety Joe Kanabrocki Biological.
IACUC and IBC PROCESS. Office of Research Services Resource Center Building Room Kenneth Kratz, PhD –Director Staff: Nicole Barron – Pre-award.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
SUKESHI MEHTA COORDINATOR, CHEMICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY FRIDAY OCTOBER 3 RD,
Risk Assessment. Risk As defined by Kaplan and Garrick, risk analysis consists of answering three specific questions: what can happen? what is the chance.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF BIOSAFETY RESEARCH Review of Institutional Biosafety Committee Application Form Robert J. Hashimoto The University of Kentucky.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
1 KRA Research Compliance Kuali Days VI Presenters: Lori Schultz, University of Arizona E. Ray Stinson, Ph.D., Cornell University May 14, 2008.
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) SOURCES OF CHEMICAL SAFETY INFORMATION FOR TULANE LABORATORY EMPLOYEES WHO WANT TO FIND.
Research Compliance: An Overview of the Players and Issues Involved in Emory’s Research Compliance Programs.
Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
Deona Willes, Basic Steps for New LabsBasic Steps for New Labs  Complete forms for protocol review and submit chemical inventory.
Safety Management System Implementation Michael Niels Thorsen Moscow 15 September 2005.
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) Environmental Health & Safety Compliance Management System & Departmental Safety Representative.
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) SOURCES OF CHEMICAL SAFETY INFORMATION FOR TULANE LABORATORY EMPLOYEES WHO WANT TO FIND.
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER NEW ORLEANS.
Laboratory Safety Deona Willes, MPH Deputy Director Office of Environmental Health and Safety I Environmental.
HunterDouglas VPP TRAINING.
R EGULATORY A GENCIES What are regulatory issues? Types of agencies How they affect you Top 10 regulatory issues.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Understanding Workwell Workplace Health & Safety Audit Adapted from TMG Connections Forum March 1, 2007 Wanda McKenna, Manager Employee Work-Life Support.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving rDNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines) and Institutional Biosafety Committees.
The IBC is: The Institutional Biosafety Committee (aka Biohazards Committee)
BMS4667 Laboratory Leadership and Management Dr. David Ricketts.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Meet your Regulator Workshop with FANR licensees October 2011 Dr. John Loy Director, Radiation Safety Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation.
OSHE 111 Lecture #6 Federal Agencies, Laws and regulations for Occupational Safety and Health (Based on Chapter 4-5) Presented by Dr. Ephraim Massawe.
Laboratory Safety 1 Navigating the University: Laboratory Safety James Gibson, PhD, MPH Executive Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety Descanso.
Regulatory Agencies What are regulatory issues? Types of agencies How they affect you Top 10 regulatory issues.
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
ROLE OF THE INSTITUTIONAL BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE
Care of Research Animals
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) OVERVIEW
Laboratory Departure - OVERVIEW
CHemical Inventory Management and
Presentation transcript:

ERIKA BARRETT TECHNICIAN, BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 3 RD, 2014 Implementation of an Audit Program

Requirements for an Audit Program Good laboratory practice Several federal agencies require an audit program such as:  Occupational Safety & Health Administration  National Institute of Health  United States Department of Agriculture

Evaluation Planning (determining needs, meetings) Development (creating manuals, developing guides) Implementing (audits, visits) Report & Analysis (data analysis, drafting reports) Audit Program Process

Process Acceptance Obtain responsible individuals approval  Integrate them in the planning stages  Request comments on developed forms, documents and guidelines  Create a culture of collaboration Getting everyone to buy- in to the program will increase safety culture Senior Vice President for Research ORCBS = Office of Radiation, Chemical & Biological Safety ORCBS & Committees Principal Investigators Laboratory Workers

Self-Assessment Self-assessment guides for the researchers  “Audit Check Guides” Rooms Agent Inventory Workers Training Requirements Storage Work Practices PPE PPE = Personal Protective Equipment

Guidelines Publish forms, guidelines and reference documents in an accessible space  Tailor the documents to the community  Establish the priority of development (i.e. audit program 2.0)  Publish prior to beginning the audit program if possible

Implementing the Audit Program Once you have developed the program  Start with the highest risk laboratories first (e.g. Biosafety Level 3)  Then move down the levels Multi-auditor visits to create continuity Change the auditor for each lab each year Complete follow-up BSL3BSL2 BSL1 & Plant BSL = Biological Safety Level

History of the ORCBS Biological Safety Program Support staff of the Institutional Biosafety Committee was responsible for UA biological safety The University of Arizona was inspected by the NIH in April 2011 The Radiation Control Office became ORCBS The CDC inspected the Select Agent/Toxin Program in November 2011 Requirements of ORCBS after inspection  Develop a complete audit program  Provide training to every laboratory worker  Obtain knowledge of current research community NIH = National Institutes of Health, CDC = Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

History of the ORCBS Chemical Safety Program Risk Management was responsible for UA chemical safety ORCBS started laboratory chemical safety in Fall 2011  Staffed the new program  Evaluated and updated forms  Created an inspection checklist  “Compliance checks” for granting authorities The scope of registered laboratories expanded Currently developing database for full program use

Registration of a Laboratory ORCBS is notified of a research laboratory ORCBS communicates with the researchers  Protocol forms  Invitations to training Forms sent to committee and workers complete training Initial visit  Follow-up Annual audit  Follow-up Total Biological Safety Registrations: 273 Total Chemical Safety Registrations: 186 (Expected 500+)

Annual Audit Program Annual audit for all laboratories  Follow-up with any corrective measures Unannounced laboratory visit 6 months from annual audit  Follow-up with any corrective measures A summary report of every visit and a previous inspection history is provided to the Principal Investigator

Perceived Difficulties Real Difficulties Obtaining acceptance of the audit program Compliance Building relationships Transfer of responsibility to ORCBS Differences in prior safety training Departmental rules vary Clarity of regulations  MSDSs and inventory requirements are up to the individual programs Gaining compliance Difficulties for Implementation of Audit Program

Successes for Implementing an Audit Program Overall programs current to standard Increased safety culture Decrease in number of findings per audit  Mostly new findings with updates, not reoccurring problems Utilization of proactive communication Compliance increased

Time Requirement For a new laboratory from start to finish for the first year, our office spends  10 hours for biological safety  8 hours for chemical safety For biological safety, this amounts to  300 Approvals: 3,000 hours / 3 years About 16% of our time each year was dedicated to new approvals, 15% for established approvals

Top Findings of Micropipette Tips 2. Biohazard Labeling (Rooms & Equipment) 3. Centrifuge Cups

Biological Safety Chemical Safety 1. Standard Operating Procedures 2. Spill Kit 3. Autoclave 4. Centrifuge Cups 5. Micropipette Tips 1. Laboratory-specific training 2. General safety training 3. (Material) Safety Data Sheets 4. Inventory 5. Secondary containment for acids and bases Top Findings of 2012

Biological Safety Chemical Safety 1. Standard Operating Procedures 2. Training 3. Spill Kit 4. Centrifuge Cups 1. Laboratory-specific training 2. General safety training 3. (Material) Safety Data Sheets 4. Inventory 5. Particularly hazardous chemical storage Top Findings of 2013

Updates to the Audit Program When there is an update to regulations, the audit program should reflect the change  Raise awareness  Begin to recommend the update  Add requirement  Finalize expectations and evaluate effectiveness “Sharp-like” micropipette tip rule (non-federal) The Globally Harmonized System Training (federal)

Sharp-like Micropipettes Case Study The radioactive material program at the UA designated pipette tips of 1 mL or less as sharp-like Biological safety adopted this requirement Research  BMBL  Surveyed other campuses  IBC voted Integrated the change into training and audit program 12% 3.5% 3%

GHS: Case Study OSHA adopted the Globally Harmonized System in 2012 Required training for all laboratory workers by December 1 st, 2013 ORCBS created a web-based 15 minute training and quiz for laboratory workers to take Initial and 3 reminder s

Total Trained by 12/1/2013: 1840

The Future of ORCBS Program Both programs expect to be inspected by an outside agency within the next year  NIH for biosafety, OSHA for chemical safety  Freezer inventory Chemical safety plans to deploy the full program in 2015 Future Goals  Updated database  Going paperless  iPad program

Questions?