Data Rich, SMART Goals and 21 st Century Learning Joyce Gardner and Becky Pearson Department of Public Instruction Region 8 Professional Development Consultants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Planning Part II: Goal Setting
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Fidelity Support Fall 2012 Continue with Next Steps.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Teacher PDP for the School Year
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Every Student READY. North Carolina Educator Evaluation A process for professional growth.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Becky Pearson Joyce Gardner Region 8 (Western North Carolina) Professional Development.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Teacher’s PDP for the School Year October, 2012.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
The New Educator Evaluation System
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher PDP for the School Year
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Data Rich, SMART Goals and 21st Century Learning Joyce Gardner Department of Public Instruction Region 8 Professional Development Consultant Swain.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Data Rich, SMART Goals and 21 st Century Learning Joyce Gardner and Becky Pearson Department of Public Instruction Region 8 Professional Development Consultants January 14, 2013

Region8wnc.ncdpi.wikispaces.net

Outcomes To fine-tune skills in writing and assessing SMART Goals for 21 st century teaching and learning To reference the NC Educator Evaluation System Teacher Pre-assessment in the development of powerful SMART Goals To build SMART Goals into the Professional Development Plan

21 st Century Classrooms: Dan Meyer After you view the video, respond to the following questions regarding 21st century learning. Which aspects of teaching and learning in your classroom reflect the traditions of education of the past? Which aspects of teaching and learning for the 21st century have you incorporated in your instructional practice? Which components of 21st century teaching and learning are most challenging for you?

Treasure Hunt

Six-Step Partners

PLCs Do PLCs meet to study tools, resources and documents to support the teaching and learning of the new Standard Course of Study? How is the work of PLC’s documented?

Tools and Processes What tools and processes are in place to gauge and support the needs of teachers as they learn and prepare to teach the new Standard Course of Study? (walkthroughs, surveys, conferencing, etc.).

Technology What improvements and advances in technology have been implemented in your schools to transform your classrooms and instructional practices into 21 st century learning environments?

Data Literacy What evidence proves that each of us is data literate? What data do we use to inform instruction, make 21 st century school decisions or determine which programs really impact student learning? How do we move toward distinguished on the evaluation tool in data literacy?

SMART

Elements of an Effective Professional Development Plan SMART Goals (2-3) well- written and supported by data Feedback from administrator Thorough self- assessment

SMART Goal Setting in the Online Tool Rollover Professional Development Plan (Teachers with Summary Rating Form from Previous Year) Preliminary Professional Development Plan (Teachers new to online tool system)

SMART Goals and Professional Development Plans SMART Goals provide a process for effective goal setting Any existing observations and/or artifacts guide the goal setting

SMART Research “Feelings of success in the workplace occur to the extent that people see that they are able to grow and meet job challenges by pursuing and attaining goals that are important and meaningful.” Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New Directions in Goal Setting Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5),

Why SMART Goals? Targeted Professional Growth Increased Student Achievement Greater effort and persistence Motivation to seek new knowledge and information Teacher Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New Directions in Goal Setting Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5),

SMART Goals Focus on results-oriented goals rather than process-oriented goals.

Specific and Strategic Goals are clearly stated, long-term and aligned with data.

Measurable Results can be determined with quantitative or qualitative measures.

Attainable & Achievable The result can be reached, even if it is a stretch goal. The goal is worthy of educator commitment of time and effort.

Results-oriented Goals are data driven. Benchmarks are established for monitoring progress through the year. High expectations are set for teacher and student growth.

Realistic Constraints on time, people, materials and other resources have been identified. There is belief this goal is important and can be accomplished.

Benchmark and completion dates set a sense of urgency and establish momentum Each person involved is accountable for working towards the goal.

Data for Setting Goals Determine greatest area of need Determine the range of improvement Review hard and soft data over time What other data can be referenced when goal setting?

Range of Improvement 75% of Ms. Gardner’s fifth graders scored proficient or above on the End of Grade Mathematics test while her teammates’ students reach 90-95% proficiency. What would be a reasonable range of increase in percentage for one year for Ms. Gardner? 75% to 85%? 95%?

Reasonable? Standard I, Teachers Lead in the Profession: Ms. Baker will assume the lead of 3 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs): Writing, Differentiating Instruction, Revised Bloom’s, AND she will facilitate unit development for the 8 th grade ELA team by mid-year (even though she has never been in a school leadership role).

Reasonable? Standard I, Teachers Lead in the Profession: Ms. Johnson will attend a 4-session regional lesson study seminar during September and October and lead one Professional Learning Community in lesson study beginning in February 2013 (even though she has never led a PLC).

Goal Setting Example To: increase the math achievement of fifth graders so that the percentage of students who score at or above Level III will increase from 75% to 85% by June 2013 as measured by EOG mathematics data. What activities would help this teacher increase students’ success?

SMART Goals are....

Can you make this goal SMART? By the end of first semester, student office referrals will decrease.

Let’s Practice To: Do What? so that Who/What? will increase/decrease by completion date as measured by what data?.

By the end of first semester, student office referrals will decrease. To: Do What? so that Who/What? will increase/decrease by completion date as measured by what data?. Work with a partner to revise this statement and make it a SMART Goal.

Write one of your goals based on your pre-assessment for your Professional Development Plan. Use the SMART Goal Worksheet to refine your goal.

SMART Goals Worksheet

Gallery Walk Post your SMART GoalsVisit each SMART Goal and add your suggestions to make them SMARTer!

Teacher Process for Completing the Self-Assessment in the Online Tool

Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation. Before First Formal Observation STEP 2: Self- Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre- Conference Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric, the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year. Step 2: Self Assessment, Goal Setting, and Pre-conference

Data Points for Teacher Self-Assessment Teacher Summary Rating Form from Previous Year Recent Student Achievement Results Walkthrough Data Differentiated Lesson Plans

Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers Teacher completes the document by selecting ratings along the continuum Teacher saves the document in the online system

Complete a New Self Assessment Log into the system Click on NCEES icon Click on Observe/Report Click on New Self Assessment

Complete a New Self Assessment Use naming convention Click on Next Copy Self Assessment Dropdown Highlighted Text in Green Banner

Completing the Self- Assessment

Process for Closing the Form Review the document Click on Spell CheckClick on SaveClick on DoneClick on Logout

Closing and Reflection How will you use what you learned today? What aha’s did you have?

Contact Information Joyce Gardner Becky Pearson