Antennas and open-frame structures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoils and wings
Advertisements

AS/NZS Wind actions Standard
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 28: Drag Analysis on Flat Plates and Cross-Flow Cylinders (2/17/2003)
WIND FORCES ON STRUCTURES
Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II
Wind loading and structural response Lecture 19 Dr. J.D. Holmes
Basic bluff-body aerodynamics I
Effect of Different Nose Profiles on Subsonic Pressure Coefficients
Large roofs and sports stadiums
PREPARED BY: JANAK GAJJAR SD1909.  Introduction  Wind calculation  Pressure distribution on Antenna  Conclusion  References.
Atmospheric boundary layers and turbulence II Wind loading and structural response Lecture 7 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #8. We have looked at.. Airfoil Nomenclature Lift and Drag forces Lift, Drag and Pressure Coefficients The Three Sources of Drag:
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 17 – INTERNAL FORCED CONVECTION FUNDAMENTALS.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics
Lesson 13 Airfoils Part II
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 30: Lift and Drag Wrap-Up (2/20/2003)
A single-span aeroelastic model of an overhead electrical power transmission line with guyed lattice towers A study by W.E. Lin, E. Savory, R.P. McIntyre,
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics
1 Short Summary of the Mechanics of Wind Turbine Korn Saran-Yasoontorn Department of Civil Engineering University of Texas at Austin 8/7/02.
Two-Dimensional Conduction: Flux Plots and Shape Factors
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Wind loading and structural response Lecture 18 Dr. J.D. Holmes
DESIGN FOR TORSION Reinforced Concrete Structures
Basic structural dynamics II
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast Turbulent Wind Flow over a High Speed Train R K Cooper School of Aeronautical Engineering.
Advisor Martin Wosnik Graduate Co-Advisor Kyle Charmanski Characterize blade design/turbine performance in free stream in student wind tunnel (and validate.
Towers, chimneys and masts
Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators Sosa Roberto Artana Guillermo Laboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Universidad.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008
Prediction of wind load acting on telecommunication masts Márton BALCZÓ Ph.D. Student, István GORICSÁN Ph.D., Ass. Professor Tamás LAJOS Ph.D., Dr.Sc.
Pharos University ME 253 Fluid Mechanics II
MEASUREMENT OF THE AERODYNAMIC DRAG OF TEXTILES WITH A NOVEL DEVICE Schindelwig, K. 1, Hasler, M. 2, Nachbauer, W. 1, van Putten, J. 2, Knoflach, C. 2.
Basic bluff-body aerodynamics II
Boundary Layer Laminar Flow Re ‹ 2000 Turbulent Flow Re › 4000.
CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving.
© Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras1 SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS.
Lecture #22: Low Reynolds number Re = u L / Forces linearly proportional to velocity Flow reversible Boundary layers large.
Section 12.3 Surface Areas of Pyramids and Cones.
Internal pressures Wind loading and structural response Lecture 16 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Along-wind dynamic response
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
Chapter 6 Introduction to Forced Convection:
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag.
Atmospheric boundary layers and turbulence I Wind loading and structural response Lecture 6 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Aeroelastic effects Wind loading and structural response Lecture 14 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Free walls, roofs and billboards
대한토목학회 2001 년도 학술발표대회 풍하중을 받는 구조물의 3 차원 유한요소해석 Three-dimensional Finite Element Analyses of Structures under Wind Loads 김병완 1), 김운학 2), 이인원 3) 1) 한국과학기술원.
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.
Aerodynamic forces on the blade, COP, Optimum blade profiles
Effective static loading distributions Wind loading and structural response Lecture 13 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Pipe flow analysis.
FLUID FOW FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Physical Modeling of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in the UNH Flow Physics Facility Stephanie Gilooly and Gregory Taylor-Power Advisors: Dr. Joseph Klewicki,
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Noise
CGS Ground School Principles Of Flight Drag © Crown Copyright 2012
Energy Loss in Valves Function of valve type and valve position
Lecture Objectives: Discus HW 1 Finish with Solar Radiation Components
Control of Boundary Layer Structure for Low Re Blades
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Prediction of wind load acting on telecommunication masts
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Prepared By S.S.Pon Sudhir Sajan AP/ Aeronautical Engineering/NIU
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Chapter 7 Transverse Shear.
Fundamentals of TRANSPORT MECHANISMs
Presentation transcript:

Antennas and open-frame structures Wind loading and structural response Lecture 23 Dr. J.D. Holmes Antennas and open-frame structures

Antennas and open-frame structures Antennas - isolated structures - radio telescopes and microwave antennas Antennas - attached to towers - aerodynamic interference Single frames Multiple frames Lattice towers Common feature : aerodynamic interference between various elements - e.g. antennas and supporting tower or other antennas, members of a frame

Antennas and open-frame structures Radio telescope Paraboloid dish f Focus

Antennas and open-frame structures Radio telescope 2f Paraboloid dish Normal to dish surface intersects axis at 2  focal length Approximate center of aerodynamic forces e d C

Antennas and open-frame structures Radio telescope Paraboloid dish Wind FX FY e b  d Fy force generates significant moments about dish supports

Antennas and open-frame structures Radio telescope Paraboloid dish Total moment Azimuth angle, 135o Altitude moment Azimuth moment Effect of boundary layer profile 0 20 40 60 80 90 Zenith angle, degrees 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 CM Zenith angle b Focus a Azimuth angle Wind Altitude axis PLAN VIEW

Antennas and open-frame structures Microwave dish antenna Impermeable dish 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 1% turbulence 10% turbulence  (degrees) b  A = (b2/4) (projected area) Small effect of turbulence

Antennas and open-frame structures Microwave dish antenna WIND Da Dt De Interference factor

Antennas and open-frame structures Microwave dish antenna Interference factor 0.5 1 1.5 45 90 135 180 Wind direction (degrees) Interference factor Experimental data Equation with t=0.5  Ki = exp [-k(CD  )2]. [(1+t) + t cos 2( - d - 90)]

Antennas and open-frame structures Cell-phone antenna isolated panels 120O Cd (ref.b)  0.8 b Cd 1.1

Antennas and open-frame structures Cell-phone antenna grouped panels ~2b combined Cd (ref.b)  1.1 combined Cd (ref.b)  0.9 grouping gives large reduction in total drag

Antennas and open-frame structures Cell-phone antenna grouped panels 0o 60o total drag of group : about 30% less than sum of individual elements

Antennas and open-frame structures Single frame. Two-dimensional. Normal wind sharp-edged members 2.0 1.0 0.5 Solidity ratio,  CD solidity = ‘solid’ area of frame/total enclosed area reference area for drag coefficient = ‘solid’ area of frame drag coefficient relatively independent of details of member arrangement

Antennas and open-frame structures Single frame. Two-dimensional. Normal wind 2.0 1.0 0.5 Solidity ratio,  CD at low solidity, members act as individual elements at high solidity, frame acts as a solid plate (Lecture 8) intermediate solidity : aerodynamic interference between members CD  1.6

Antennas and open-frame structures Pairs of frames. Two-dimensional. Normal wind s b CD(2) = CD(1) [ 1 + 2] 1 CD(1) is drag coefficient of upstream frame (downstream frame influences upstream frame) 2 CD(1) is drag coefficient of downstream frame approximately, 1  1, 0 <  < 0.5 For circular members, equivalent solidity to calculate 2 , e  1.2 1.75

Antennas and open-frame structures angle of attack,  spacing/width = 1.0 spacing/width = 0.1 15 75 3 frames in series. Solidity = 0.1 X() = force normal to frame A = projected area of one frame at 0o angle of attack

Antennas and open-frame structures angle of attack,  spacing/width = 1.0 spacing/width = 0.1 15 75 3 frames in series. Solidity = 0.5 A = projected area of one frame at 0o angle of attack Maximum CXN at 30o to 45o

Antennas and open-frame structures angle of attack,  spacing/width = 1.0 spacing/width = 0.1 15 75 10 frames in series. Solidity = 0.1 A = projected area of one frame at 0o angle of attack

Antennas and open-frame structures angle of attack,  spacing/width = 1.0 spacing/width = 0.1 15 75 Open frames 10 frames in series. Solidity = 0.5 A = projected area of one frame at 0o angle of attack Maximum CXN at 30o to 45o

Antennas and open-frame structures Design method : ‘Wind loads and anchor bolt design for petrochemical facilities’ (ASCE) Needs more wind tunnel studies for pipe racks etc.

Antennas and open-frame structures Drag coefficients for lattice tower (Lecture 21) Square cross section with flat-sided members (wind normal to face) Australian Standards 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Solidity Ratio d 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 Drag coefficient CD (q=0O) CD = 4.2 - 7 (for 0.1< < 0.2) CD = 3.5 - 3.5 (for 0.2< < 0.5) (ASCE-7 : CD = 4.02 – 5.9 +4.0 )  = solidity of one face = area of members  total enclosed area includes interference and shielding effects between members

Antennas and open-frame structures Drag coefficients for lattice tower Triangular cross section with flat-sided members CD = 3.5 - 4 (for 0.1< < 0.3) CD = 2.9 – 2 (for 0.3<  < 0.5) (ASCE-7 : CD = 3.42 – 4.7 +3.4 )

Antennas and open-frame structures Drag coefficients for lattice tower Cross section with circular members depends on Reynolds Number for super-critical flow - Cd for cross section ~ 0.5 times that for equivalent sharp-edged tower with same solidity some members may be in super-critical flow - others in sub-critical flow

End of Lecture 23 John Holmes 225-405-3789 JHolmes@lsu.edu