I-81 C ORRIDOR F REIGHT I NFORMATION S YSTEM (CFIS) P ILOT P ROJECT Paul A. Belella Parsons Corporation Annual Meeting March 23, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Smart Park: Real-Time Truck Parking Information Quon Kwan Program Manager FMCSA.
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Freight Advanced Traveler Information Systems and Cross Town Improvement Project Randy Butler January 18, 2012 Freight Dynamic Mobility Applications.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
Commercial Vehicles and Freight Mobility Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Urban landbuilding facilitiestransportation networkssystems technology National and Regional ITS Architectures Bart Cima, IBI Group February 26, 2007.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) AASHTO National Connected.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
Outline Project Background ITS Architecture Overview GVMC ITS Architecture Deployment Plan.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
1 25 th International Conference on IIPS, AMS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ An Update on FHWA Road Weather Management Initiatives Paul Pisano Federal Highway.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
The Crescent Corridor Intermodal Freight Project Improving Lives and Livelihoods IN & AROUND DC Washington, DC December 16,
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
MIT - October 1, 2004Jeffrey D. Ensor 1 RSTP Planning for Operations Jeffrey D. Ensor Malaysia Transport Group M.I.T. October 1, 2004.
Security and the National ITS Architecture ITS America 2003 Session 19: The State of the Practice: ITS and Homeland Security May 19, 2003 Minneapolis,
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
FHWA Office of Freight Management Freight Technology Assessment Tool.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
Project Summary I-95 Corridor Coalition Truck Parking Initiative.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
Congestion Mitigation Through Improved Freight Efficiency: Partnering with Business for a Positive Solution Paul A. Belella Principal Delcan Corporation.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
USDOT’s IntelliDrive Program Smart Roadside Initiative – How it Fits.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
IntegratedCorridorManagement 1 Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Activities Jeff Lindley Director, Office of Transportation Management FHWA February.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
C-TIP Real Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) and Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG) January 20, 2010 Paul Belella In association with:
Performance Measures Planning MAP-21 & the NPRM for System Performance Measures Now what do we do? Enabling Decision Making & Effective Communication Communications.
I-95 Corridor Coalition Truck Parking Initiative ITSVA Meeting Joel Ticatch, Kapsch TrafficCom Transportation May 19, 2016.
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
The Emergence of Megaregions and the Connection to Local Economies
Federal Highway Administration’s Truck Parking Initiatives
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
I-70 DEDICATED TRUCK LANES FEASIBILITY STUDY
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
Presentation transcript:

I-81 C ORRIDOR F REIGHT I NFORMATION S YSTEM (CFIS) P ILOT P ROJECT Paul A. Belella Parsons Corporation Annual Meeting March 23, 2015

GO-81 is an action-oriented project that will use technology to improve the safety and efficiency of freight movement in and around the I-81 Corridor. Interstate 81 Multistate Corridor Study, 2012 FHWA FAF data, 2007

I-81 is Among the Busiest US Freight Corridors  Some notable I-81 facts: Trucks account for as much as 40% of the volume – the road is designed to carry 15% trucks In the last 20 years, traffic has more than doubled, and in urban areas, tripled. Truck traffic on the corridor is growing faster than the national average A poll showed seventy-four percent of truck drivers think additional truck parking is needed New Federal Hours-Of-Service regulations are driving changes in truck travel patterns Approximately 35 percent of I-81 fatal accidents involve a truck 3

The Public is Concerned, and Wants Action 4

The GO-81 vision is to become the national model for applied truck information systems. It will include a pilot project that integrates existing I-81 corridor data on travel times, incidents, and weather and adds real-time information on truck parking. The GO-81 CFIS Will Provide Part of the Solution 5 NeedProject ActivitiesObjective Better truck parking capabilities Examine freight flows Assess facility capacity & location Design system to deliver information Make better information available to truckers for meeting rest requirements and accessing needed services Less congestion and fewer crashes Identify existing traffic information sources Design single interface to access combined data Make better information available to drivers to reduce congestion delays and secondary crashes The GO-81 project team includes:

The GO-81 CFIS Will Provide Part of the Solution 6 CFIS “Cloud”

The GO-81 CFIS Will Provide Part of the Solution 7 Here is a hypothetical GO-81 CFIS User Interaction Sequence: Truck driver launches application to choose destination and route CFIS Application requests travel information from CFIS CFIS CFIS retrieves and returns current information for the driver’s chosen route An event occurs and information is captured by existing systems CFIS continuously polls existing systems and retrieves event information CFIS CFIS evaluates options for diversion/parking and pushes to application Application notifies driver and dispatcher of options/implications

 Phase 1 Analysis is underway Reaching out to State DOTs to gather updated information Defining the geographic footprint for the freight flow analysis Extracting and conducting initial analysis on data Completing design of analytical methodology Conducting initial analytical runs  Phase 2 will begin in April Reaching out to stakeholders to begin gathering user needs Building on the definition of the CFIS Laying out the pieces of an initial Concept of Operations The GO-81 Project Status 8

9 Corridor Geography Shown are zip codes along a band of counties that encompasses the I-81 corridor The band includes: All counties through which I-81 passes All immediately adjacent counties Additional counties with significant commercial activity This footprint can be modified if additional jurisdictions are needed Corridor Geography Shown are zip codes along a band of counties that encompasses the I-81 corridor The band includes: All counties through which I-81 passes All immediately adjacent counties Additional counties with significant commercial activity This footprint can be modified if additional jurisdictions are needed

The GO-81 Project Status 10 Shipment Data Shown are unique origin locations of shipments from 2013 All locations are within band identified previously (outliers will be removed) Shipment Data Shown are unique origin locations of shipments from 2013 All locations are within band identified previously (outliers will be removed)

The GO-81 Project Status 11 Shipment Data High volume origins are identified with larger scale buttons Significant concentration in south central PA Clusters in Central NY Shipment Data High volume origins are identified with larger scale buttons Significant concentration in south central PA Clusters in Central NY

The GO-81 Project Status 12 Shipment Data Shown are unique destination locations of shipments from 2013 All locations are within band identified previously (outliers will be removed) Shipment Data Shown are unique destination locations of shipments from 2013 All locations are within band identified previously (outliers will be removed)

The GO-81 Project Status 13 Shipment Data High volume destinations are identified with larger scale buttons Significant concentration in south central VA, MD, PA and NY Concentrations through VA Shipment Data High volume destinations are identified with larger scale buttons Significant concentration in south central VA, MD, PA and NY Concentrations through VA

The GO-81 Project Status 14 Corridor Analysis Examine high-frequency O/D pairs for: Use of I-81 segments Alignment with high-delay segments Cost patterns by trip type Define correlation between cost and delay Examine location of truck parking Alignment with high-delay segments Alignment with high-frequency incident data Assess location and use levels of existing parking facilities Corridor Analysis Examine high-frequency O/D pairs for: Use of I-81 segments Alignment with high-delay segments Cost patterns by trip type Define correlation between cost and delay Examine location of truck parking Alignment with high-delay segments Alignment with high-frequency incident data Assess location and use levels of existing parking facilities

The GO-81 Project Status 15 The team is assessing the potential to expand the footprint to include the portion of I-40 that runs the width of Tennessee. This will allow for a more complete analysis of parking and information needs and a more extensive analysis of opportunities to divert freight to rail. The team is assessing the potential to expand the footprint to include the portion of I-40 that runs the width of Tennessee. This will allow for a more complete analysis of parking and information needs and a more extensive analysis of opportunities to divert freight to rail.

The first two phases of GO-81 have been funded through a Multi-modal Corridor Operations Management (MCOM) grant from the Federal Highway Administration. Additional funding will be required to complete Phase 3 Implementation. * The GO-81 Project Timetable 16 PhaseProject ActivitiesOutcomes Expected Completion I. Provide a Framework for Freight Planning and Performance Measurement Examine freight flows Assess facility capacity & location Assess initial user needs A comprehensive dataset detailing freight flows An analysis of existing capabilities against documented user needs A review of options for diversion of freight to rail April 2015 II. Develop a Plan for a Corridor Freight Information System Identify existing roadway information sources Define data feeds and user interface characteristics Concept of Operations High-level design and system architecture August 2015 III. Implement a Pilot Project Develop and test a pilot system across the length of the I-81 Corridor A functioning system that can be replicated along any corridor TBD *Some options exist for additional Federal funding

Contact Information 17 Kevin Cole Paul Belella I-81 Corridor Coalition Parsons (540) (571)