Value Difference of Feeder Cattle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Advertisements

When to Market Cows and Bulls Represent 15-20% of Cow-calf income Prices are seasonal Body condition affects price Markets are cyclical Opportunities exist.
R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D Agricultural & Applied Economics UGA-Tifton ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COW CULLING VS. REPLACEMENT HEIFERS.
Feeder Cattle Market Grades
Feeder Calf Grades: Do Better Grades Really Pay? David Gonsoulin USDA.
Overview of APHIS’ Indemnity Calculators
Feeder Cattle Market Outlets Lisa Kriese-Anderson Extension Animal Scientist Auburn University.
Introduction to the Beef Industry. What is the importance of the beef industry? Missouri ranks 2 nd nationally in number of beef cattle – Texas 1 st (larger.
1 GRADING FEEDER CATTLE The process of grading feeder cattle is a projection of maturity based on frame size, muscling, and the sex of the calf.
EVOLUTION of USDA FEEDER GRADES By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Marketing and Evaluating Beef Cattle
MARKETING FEEDLOT CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Sexed Semen and Beef Cattle UW Extension Livestock Team Spring 2010.
Livestock & Poultry Evaluation & Showmanship
Current Economic Climate of the Cattle Business Derrell S. Peel Breedlove Professor of Agribusiness and Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma.
Ron Plain Extension Economist University of Missouri-Columbia Stocker Cattle Outlook February 2009.
Economic Tools to Evaluate Culling Decisions for Breeding Cattle and Replacements.
Marketing Cull Cows. Cattle Cycle & Cull Cows Cattle Cycle –Long as 15 years ~ short as 7 –8-10 years of profitability Counter – Cyclically 1)Cost of.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Ron Plain April 22, 2015 Cattle Outlook (title). Source: USDA/ERS 10 monthly records in 2014.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Producers breed for improved genetics Produce all breeding stock (Bulls and Heifers) Raise purebred or registered cattle Pay close attention to EPD’s.
Beef & Dairy Production. How to decide?? Type of production varies greatly. Depends on: type of animals Location Facilities overall producer goals In.
Show-Me-Select Replacement ™ Heifer Program Dr. Joe Parcell University of Missouri – Columbia.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Grading Slaughter Cattle. Quality Grades: Prime (highest) Choice (most desirable today) Select (good) Standard Determined by the amount of fat.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
USDA Feeder Cattle Grades. Introduction USDA Muscle Score USDA Frame Size.
CATTLENOMICS Derrell S. Peel Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
Feeder Cattle Value Determining Factors
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
1 Unit E Segments of the Animal Industry Lesson 1 Exploring the Cattle Industry.
The Beef Industry. Beef Products What products can you think of? What products can you think of?
The Impact of COOL on Mexican Cattle and Beef Production and Trade Derrell S. Peel Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
2014 Cattle Market Situation and Outlook Derrell S. Peel Breedlove Professor of Agribusiness and Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Jeopardy Feeding & Management of the Cow-Calf Herd Unit 15 Animal Science 1.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Using Santa Gertrudis in a Crossbreeding Program
Introduction to Beef Cattle Bovine Humor Objectives Describe terms commonly used with beef cattle. Learning the language Identify external parts of.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
Introduction to Beef Cattle Student Notes Objectives Describe terms commonly used with __________ __________. ___________ __________ _________of the.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Livestock Evaluation And Selection
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Quality Standards for Beef, Pork, & Poultry
Beef Cattle Market Update
Exploring the Beef Industry
Introduction to Beef Cattle
Value Added Livestock Marketing: Adding Value for Cow-Calf Operators
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Agricultural Marketing
Cattle Marketing: Cash Market Basics
Marketing Cows for Profit. Represent 15-20% of Cow-calf income
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
Exploring the Beef Industry
The Beef Industry.
Agricultural Marketing
Feeder Cattle Price Differences
Feeder Cattle Grading GRADING FEEDER CATTLE
Beef.
Presentation transcript:

Value Difference of Feeder Cattle Michelle F. Elmore Extension Animal Scientist/ Beef Cattle Improvement Alabama Cooperative Extension System

The Average Selling Price for Feeder Cattle Based on Muscle Score Average Selling Pricea (Value/cwt) Discount Compared to No. 1 (Value/cwt) Number 1s $110.82 --- Number 2s $101.88 -$8.94 Number 3s $78.41 -$32.41 Number 4s $53.64 -$57.18 aAverages across muscle scores are different from each other (P<0.0001). Source: “Improving the Value of Feeder Cattle” University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. FSA3056. Based on the Arkansas Livestock Auction Survey 2010 data, this table reflects the value of USDA muscle score on feeder cattle price. Discounts due to lighter muscling can be substantial regardless of weight. The discount between a number 1 muscled calf and a number 2 muscled calf was $8.94/cwt. For a number 3 muscled calf, a discount of $32.41, as compared to a number 1 muscled calf. For a number 4 muscled calf, there is a discount of $53.64 as compared with a number 1 calf. As an example, for 3 calves each weighing 500 lbs, but each having a muscle score of 1, 2 and 3. The number 1 muscle score calf would sell for $44.70 more than the number 2 muscle score calf and $162.05 more than the number 3 muscle score calf.

Alabama Value Difference in Feeder Steers for Muscle Score 1s and 2s Weight Range 2010 Average Price Number 1s ($/cwt.) Average Price Number 2s Difference in 2010 Difference 5 Years Ago 300-400 lbs $133.11 $125.15 $7.96 $8.17 400-500 lbs $120.13 $115.14 $4.99 $6.34 500-600 lbs $111.01 $107.31 $3.70 $4.71 600-700 lbs $104.27 $99.91 $4.36 $4.60 700-800 lbs $97.17 $94.77 $2.40 $4.95 Source: David Garcia, OIT, USDA-Alabama Department of Ag Market News Service. Let’s now review 2010 market price differences due to USDA muscle score in Alabama. This table shows the 2010 average price by weight range for feeder steers with muscle scores 1s and 2s, and the difference between those reported market prices on a per 100 lbs basis. The greatest difference in market price due to muscle score is found in the weight range of 300-400 lbs for a difference of $7.96/cwt. This price difference is also reflected in market prices reported 5 years ago for this weight range with a difference of $8.17/cwt. The smallest price difference is reflected in the 700-800 lb range in 2010 for a market price difference of $2.40/cwt. However, 5 years ago this price difference between muscle score 1 and 2 feeder steers was greater at $4.95/cwt. The average decrease in value for muscle score for steers as reported in 2010 was $4.68/cwt and was $5.75/cwt as reported 5 years ago. At each weight range, the impact of muscle score from a 1 to a 2 is a decrease in market value for feeder steers.

Alabama Value Difference in Feeder Heifers for Muscle Score 1s and 2s Weight Range 2010 Average Price Number 1s ($/cwt) Number 2s ($/cwt.) Difference in 2010 Difference 5 Years Ago 300-400 lbs $112.25 $106.35 $5.90 $6.66 400-500 lbs $105.55 $100.58 $4.97 $6.37 500-600 lbs $100.22 $94.95 $5.27 $5.23 600-700 lbs $94.16 $89.33 $4.83 $4.33 700-800 lbs $88.93 $84.82 $4.11 $5.01 Source: David Garcia, OIT, USDA-Alabama Department of Ag Market News Service. This similar table shows the 2010 average price by weight range for feeder heifers with muscle stores 1s and 2s and the difference between those reported market prices on a per 100 lbs basis. The market price difference for feeder heifers for muscle scores 1s and 2s are more consistent across each weight range, as shown by the reported 2010 average price and the reported market price from 5 years ago. The average decrease in value for muscle score for feeder heifers as reported in 2010 was $5.02/cwt and was $5.52/cwt as reported 5 years ago. Therefore, muscle score also has a direct impact on market value in feeder heifers as well as steers.

The Average Selling Price for Feeder Cattle Based on USDA and BIF Frame Score USDA Frame Size BIF Frame Score Average Selling Price (Value/cwt) Discount compared to Large Frame (Value/cwt) Large Equal to or > 6 $108.81a --- Medium 4 and 5 $108.67a -$0.14 Small < 3 $86.71b -$22.10 a, b Averages without a common superscript differ (P<0.01). Source: “Improving the Value of Feeder Cattle” University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. FSA3056 As Josh has discussed, USDA frame size easily corresponds to the widely known BIF frame scores. USDA large equals BIF frame scores 6 or greater. USDA medium equals to BIF 4 and 5 frame scores, and USDA small equals to BIF frame scores or 3 or less. This table shows the value of frame as USDA and BIF frame sized small framed cattle sold at a discount of $22.10 as compared to large and medium framed calves. The value difference between large and medium framed cattle is low, but small framed cattle are discounted because they will generally have more backfat at slaughter, as compared to large or medium frame cattle. This extra backfat will have a negative affect on yield grade and red meat yield.

Alabama BCIA Records 1982-2010 Herd Size 205 Day Age Avg. Adj. 205 Day Wt Avg. 205 Day BIF Frame No. Wt Records No. of Frame Records Small 5 to 29 cows 210 Days 555 lbs. 5.7 7,749 3,095 Medium 30 to 99 cows 214 Days 549 lbs. 5.6 37,087 10,549 Large 100+ cows 217 Days 533 lbs. 80,652 12,794 Overall 216 Days 539 lbs. 5.69 125,480 26,438 This table represents Alabama BCIA data collected from 1982 to 2010, sorted by herd size, for age at 205 day data collection, average adjusted 205 day weight and average BIF frame score at 205 days of age. Based on this data for the past 28 years, BCIA feeder calves are weighed at 216 days for 205 day data collection and have an average adjusted 205 day weight of 539 lbs with a 5.69 BIF frame score. This data represents 125,480 calves and 26,438 frame scores. Using this average BCIA data from the past 28 years, what would the market value of an average BCIA feeder steer or heifer be? In 2010, the average market price for a 539 lbs large and medium 1 steer was $111.01/cwt for a market price of $598.34. For a large and medium 2 steer, the 2010 market price was $107.31/cwt, so the market price for a 539 lbs steer would be $578.40. For feeder heifers in 2010, the average market price for a 539 lb large and medium 1 heifers was $100.22/cwt for a value of $540.19, and for a large and medium 2 feeder heifer, the average 2010 market price was $94.95/cwt for a value of $511.78.

Relationship of Frame Size to Projected Mature Cow Weight and Slaughter Weight at Choice Quality Grade USDA Frame Size Small Medium Large BIF Frame Score 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Mature cow weight (lbs) 955 1030 1100 1175 1250 1320 1400 1470 Steer slaughter weight (lbs) 850 1350 1450 1500 Heifer slaughter weight (lbs) 700 1000 1150 1200 1300 Source: Boggs, South Dakota State University, 1991. Collecting frame scores can be a valuable tool. Frame scores can help predict performance by projecting mature size, indicating carcass composition, and estimating performance potential and feed requirements. Utilizing the BCIA data from the past 28 years with a average frame score of 5.69 as we just reviewed, BCIA herds will have a mature cow weight of approximately 1200 lbs, produce steers that will be at 1250 lbs at slaughter for a choice quality grade and produce feeder heifers that will reach 1150 lbs at slaughter for a choice quality grade.

Management Factors Affecting Market Price of Feeder Cattle Castration of bull calves Increased value of the calf Steers have higher meat quality and are more docile Sex of the calf Heifers generally sell for $0.05 to $0.10 less per pound than steers, as steers gain faster Fill and Shrink Feeder cattle with excessive fill are discounted because of a greater potential for shrink Several management factors can also affect the market price of feeder cattle. First, castration of bull calves increases the value of the calf. Cow-calf producers and stocker operators benefit from castrating bulls because the market pays a premium for steers. This premium does depend on calf weight and can range from $5 to $12/cwt according to data from the 2010 Arkansas Livestock Auction Survey. Alabama 2010 reported market prices show an average value difference between a large and medium 1 steer and a large and medium 1 bull of $5.55/cwt and a range of $3.99/cwt in 300-400 lbs calves to $8.34/cwt in 700-800 lbs calves. Castration is a management practice that can pay for itself. Steers have higher meat quality as castration improves the color, texture, tenderness, and juiciness of the meat. Steers are also more docile than bulls. Sex of the calf also affects the market price of feeder cattle. Heifers generally sell for $0.05 to $0.10 less per pound than steers, as steers gain faster. The fill (or the contents of the digestive tract) and shrink (or potential loss of weight) of feeder cattle can also have an influence on the market price. Feeder cattle with excessive fill are discounted because of a greater potential for shrink.

Management Factors Affecting Market Price of Feeder Cattle Body condition Over-conditioned feeder cattle will be discounted Horned calves Horned calves will be discounted because of potential bruising and extra processing to remove horns Sickness or Lameness Sick or lame feeder cattle will be discounted Over-conditioned feeder cattle will also be discounted in market price. Feeder cattle with extra body condition will lose more weight than feeder cattle with average body condition through the stress of transit and co-mingling in the next production phase. Buyers are unwilling to pay for this extra weight in “fleshy or fat” feeder cattle. Buyers also prefer animals without horns. Horned calves will be discounted because of potential bruising and the extra processing to remove the horns. Dehorning reduces the possibility of injury and bruising. Cattle without horns also require less space at a feed trough and in transit. Sick or lame feeder cattle will also be discounted in market price. Discounts for unhealthy cattle can be at $60/cwt for sick cattle and $68/cwt for lame cattle. Sick and lame feeder cattle have a much higher risk of not recovering and being unproductive or can result in death loss for a buyer.

Management Factors Affecting Market Price of Feeder Cattle Uniformity Uniform in age, breed type, calf sex, and weight Uniform feeder cattle will gain more predictably in the feedlot Weight range in feeder cattle is described as: Even Uneven Very uneven Uniformity begins with the cow herd and herd sire Uniform feeder cattle frequently receive a premium in market price. Uniform feeder cattle are similar in age, breed type, calf sex and weight. Uniform feeder cattle are favored as cattle will gain more predictably in the feedlot. The terms even, uneven and very uneven are used to describe the weight range in feeder cattle. Calves are considered EVEN when there is less than 100 lbs of variation in weight of calves and less than 150 lbs in variation in yearling cattle. Calves are considered UNEVEN when there is 100 to 150 lbs in variation in weight in calves and 150 lbs to 200 lbs in variation of weight in yearling cattle. Calves are considered VERY UNEVEN when there is over 150 lbs in weight variation in calves and over 250 lbs of variation in yearling cattle. Uniformity begins with the cow herd and the herd sire on the farm or ranch. Having a defined breeding and calving season is a very important step to produce uniform feeder cattle that are similar in age and weight. .

Actual 205 Day Wts by each 21 Days of the Calving Season: Steers Born 2007-2009 A herd within the Alabama BCIA program was selected to illustrate the importance of defined breeding seasons to produce calves that are uniform. This medium size herd is predominately Angus based with a 90 day calving season. Three years of data from 2007-2009 is represented in this chart for a total of 206 calves, 111 steers and 94 heifers. Each year’s calf crop was divided into 21 day groups according to each year’s calving dates. Twenty-one day groups were used as it is the average estrous cycle length for cattle or each time period that a cow would have a chance to conceive a calf. This chart shows the average actual 205 day weights for steers for each 21 days of the calving season across these 3 years. As you can see from the chart, as age decreases, weight also decreases for each 21 day period. Across the entire 3 year period, there is a 163 lb difference in actual 205 day weights across all 21 day groups. For these 3 calf crops, the majority of steer calves (109 out of 111) were born in the first 4 21 day groups, with only a 67 lb difference in actual 205 day weight. This group of feeder steers would be described as even with less than 100 lbs difference in weight. Totals per group: Group 1 = 10 steers; Group 2 = 43 steers; Group 3 = 47; Group 4 = 9; Group 5 = 2.

Actual 205 Day Wts by each 21 Days of the Calving Season: Heifers Born 2007-2009 This chart features the same BCIA herd with the actual 205 day weights for heifers born from 2007-2009. A 95 lb difference in actual 205 day weight across all 21 day groups for 3 years is shown. The majority of the heifers were also born within the first 4 21 day groups, where there is only a 43 lb weight difference across these 3 years of data. A high level of uniformity in age and weight has been accomplished across these 3 calf crops within this herd due to the defined 90 day calving season and similar breed type. Selection of a herd bull is a very vital decision to make as a cow-calf producer and will affect uniformity of feeder calves. Herd bulls will represent half of the genetics of the resulting calf crop. When replacement heifers are retained, the herd’s genetics are further influenced by herd bull selection, up to 87%. Therefore, the importance of selecting genetically superior bulls cannot be overemphasized for quality and uniformity.