From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Advertisements

An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
INITIATIVES & STRATEGIES
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Shaping the future of palliative care leadership: taking the reins Deborah Law Program Manager Workforce Innovation and Reform Health Workforce Australia.
Workforce in Iowa’s Creative Corridor Iowa’s Creative Corridor Regional Workforce Development Plan.
SEM Planning Model.
A Roadmap to Service Excellence – The UW-Madison IT Strategic Plan October 15, 2008.
1 MAIS & ITSS FY09 Priorities Joint UL Meeting October 27, 2008.
EXCELLENCE CANADA UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO LIBRARY PILOT April 22, 2014 Excellence Canada – University of Waterloo Library Pilot.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Family Outreach and Response Program Strategic Plan September 26 th, 2012.
1 Provost’s Report to the Board of Trustees The Pennsylvania State University Strategic Plan: through PRESENTED BY Nicholas P. Jones,
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
May 7, 2012 | 9:00 – 9:30 am | Wasserstein Hall Ivy Plus Opening Remarks.
IT Governance Steering Committee December 2, 2010.
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
Enterprise IT Decision Making
A Roadmap to Service Excellence Information Technology Strategic Plan University of Wisconsin-Madison A report to the ITC
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
UIUC Strategic Plan Melanie Loots Ruth Watkins August 18, 2006.
Technology Leadership
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
Information Technology Master Plan
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology December 9, 2010.
IT ISSUES & TRENDS, 2015 Faculty Technology Day Wednesday, August 19, 2025.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Milking the Model: Getting the most out of integration and centralisation Janice Rickards Pro Vice Chancellor, Information Services Geoffrey Dengate Director,
EDUCAUSE 2014 Top Ten IT Issues. Today’s Agenda Introduction to EDUCAUSE IT Issues History & Methodology 2014 Top Ten IT Issues Selected Issues Reviewed.
Capture the Movement: Banner 7.0 and Beyond Susan LaCour, Senior Vice President, Solutions Development California Community Colleges Banner Group.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
Strategic framework – a framework for change and growth Improve Infrastructure and Organisation Integrated systems and digital capabilities Aligned and.
Creating An Environment for Success…Strategic Alignment Session “Raising the Bar”…Redesigning HBCU Libraries for the 21 st Century Historically Black Colleges.
ANALYTICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: PROGRESS AND PROMISE July 2012 Susan Grajek, PhD Vice President, EDUCAUSE.
CWRU Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology December 9, 2010.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Planning for the Future: Superintendent’s Acceleration Agenda Phase II: Strengthening Operations Presentation to the Boston School Committee May 8, 2008.
1 DUT e-Learning Project Pathfinders Review Symposium 5 March 2015.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Assessment Kirstin Dougan/Tina Chrzastowski Strategic Planning Task Force Open Meeting July 14, 2011.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
UT Arlington Sourcing Opportunities James Bradley, VP of IT & CIO Erin Morgan, Director Strategy & Planning.
Shaftesbury Society Luncheon John Locke Foundation Jamey Falkenbury, Lieutenant Governor’s Office Jeni Corn & Trip Stallings, Friday Institute Prepared.
Public School Forum August 2015 Board Meeting Jeni Corn Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, NC State University Prepared for the NC State Board.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
FY16 End of Year Goals Summary HUIT Top 40 GoalsFY16: Top 40 Goals Assessment Top 40 Goals Status Summary 82% Complete (33 of 40) 18% Incomplete (7 of.
Rob Byrd Chief Enterprise Architect Enterprise Architecture – A Citywide Service Delivery Strategy Aligning Information Technology Services to the Citizen.
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
Capex to Opex: Are You Ready?
Assistant Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap (2011-2014) John T. Harwood ITS

Background Information

Objectives of the IT Strategic Plan Identify and prioritize three-year strategies to address significant gaps in the availability or use of technology to support teaching, research, outreach and the delivery of support services. Establish a roadmap to address known areas of need to modernize ISIS and IBIS and to continue the implementation of the outcomes from the IT Assessment. Lay the groundwork for longer-range strategies to leverage anticipated technology developments and meet emerging needs.

IT Strategic Plan Timeline * A draft plan will be available in early December for comment and refinement. The recommended plan will be presented to the President, Provost and Senior Vice President in January.

Project Framework The scope of planning encompassed five primary domains: Research technology, Instructional technology, University services, Enterprise administrative systems and analysis, and Technology infrastructure, security and services. Two cross-domain groups were established to review key strategic enablers that cut across all domains IT funding practices IT Operational Effectiveness A major theme for all domains was improved GOVERNANCE

What We Did Five planning sub-committees convened in August, 2011. Initial meetings of the committees focused on: Reviewing the current state of technology and technology services Identifying emerging issues and opportunities that will impact the IT plan Identifying critical gaps in how technology supports Penn State’s institutional strategies Refining a set of framing questions that the IT plan will address

Process More than 150 faculty and staff participated in the assessment A university-wide survey of faculty, staff, students, and IT staff was completed to better understand technology usage and pain points

Critical Issues Governance Questions such as who will make decisions, how those decisions will be made, and where decisions should be made going forward have arisen for each group. Fostering greater collaboration and integration. Committees identified a need to review and revise existing policies and structures to create a more collaborative and flexible future state Members suggested seeking opportunities for better use of existing resources, or collaborative development of new resources

Critical Issues (Continued) Scaling technology and services to meet growing needs. There is a need to shift technology and support capabilities focused on research and instructional technology to a scale that meets current and future demand as computational based research and on- line/blended learning have become core activities. The importance of data as an institutional asset.   Principles in enterprise systems are needed to guide more integrated systems and services. Research data is becoming a more complex need to manage, transport, preserve, etc. Data is becoming increasingly vital to assessment and continuous improvement of learning.  

Final Report and Recommendations Final Report https://it.psu.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/itassessmentexecuti vesummary.pdf Process Documents https://wikispaces.psu.edu/display/ITSTRAT/IT+Strategic+Planning University-wide IT Planning gateway: http://it.psu.edu/strategies/strategy.php

Immediate Outcomes The creation of ITLC Provost Pangborn asked ITS to lead a university-wide planning to develop a strategic plan for IT Identification of seven strategic initiatives (https://it.psu.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/itassessmentupd ate_111113_0.pdf) – and progress has been made on many of these.

Summary of the Strategic Plan / Roadmap (2013) Agile, Future Oriented IT Workforce Use technology to extend PSU’s market and student base and diversify access to educational programs. Be a leader in research computing by expanding capability and capacity. Simplify, automate, and enhance administrative services to students, faculty and staff. Improve IT efficiency and effectiveness through consolidation and standardization, multi-sourcing and shared services without hindering innovation. IT Governance

Enhance Support for Research Strategies Changes Create a cultural shift in philosophy regarding research computing. Restructure the organizations that support research computing and institute a faculty led governance model. Significantly increase investment in research computing and data enterprise capabilities. Improve services, expand capacity and align policies with the needs of the research community. Faculty director with reporting line to VP Research and faculty-led governance. Increased investment in advanced research computing capacity and staff. More stability and defined career paths for research support staff. Improved on-boarding support Improved performance and expanded capabilities – networking, user support, storage, server hosting - available to all faculty. More support to make advanced research computing facilities available to unfunded researchers, graduate students and undergraduates.

Enabling Learning Strategies Changes Create a unifying learning strategy supported by technology. Expand instructional design capabilities and capacity. Advance the use of research, data, and assessment to improve pedagogy supported by learning technology. Create innovative learning spaces driven by pedagogy and able to support growing array of devices and content. Support expanded use of digital curricular materials and student created content. More instructional design capacity Learning research informs adoption Laboratory learning spaces created More data and improved tools support learning analytics Best practice models established for course redesign Advanced capabilities to assign learning spaces based on pedagogy, class size, location, and technology Long-term funding model to sustain learning space technology

Enterprise Systems and Services Implement new processes and systems, expand analytics, and align technology infrastructure to facilitate implementation and integration. Adopt principles and architectural standards to guide design, selection and implementation of new administrative environment. Foster data driven decision-making and analytics through improved tools, training and data governance practices. Create the organizational capacity to implement larger-scale change projects, support new technologies, and optimize their use. Buy first, limit modifications philosophy Architecture facilitates integration and enables a best of breed strategy Multi-year program plan establishes implementation priorities Organizational plan to redeploy, retrain and acquire skills to implement and optimize the use of new technologies Recognized structure and principles for decision-making Change leader and project leadership organization Architecture and active data governance to promote effective, secure access to data and analytics