Research in Science Education Richard A. Duschl NSF-EHR & Penn State University BCSSE Denver June 19-20 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
Why are you here? REALLY…...
Chapter 1: Social Studies as a Canadian Discipline
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
Understanding the Research Base Presentation to CSSS October 1, 2011.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
New Vision for Science Education: Inching our Way to National Standards Richard Duschl Penn State University.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Domain 1 – Planning and Preparation
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Australian Curriculum Science K-6
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The Areas of Interaction are…
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
National Math Panel Final report 2008 presented by Stanislaus County Office of Education November 2008.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Key Messages and Implication.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Reviewing Using the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool: Mathematics Module 103: Standards for Mathematical Practice and Access for All Students (AC.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Key Characteristics of Participatory Learning 1. Well Defined Objectives: Participatory learning requires setting, clarifying objectives with the students,
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Housekeeping: Candidate’s Statement
Gearing Up for Implementation of Next Generation Standards:
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Research in Science Education Richard A. Duschl NSF-EHR & Penn State University BCSSE Denver June

What do we need to: Better understand? Explore? Learn/know how to do? 1) Think - Take 3 Post-it Notes and jot down three answers to the above question. 2) Pair – Discuss with ½ of tablemates and place the Notes into common UNIQUE categories. Write a new Post-it Note to label the categories. 3) Share – with All Table Members and coordinate all UNIQUE ideas/categories – display on wall or on table. 4) Think about how and who will get the research done. Voices? Methods? Audiences?

Taking Science to School (TSTS) National Research Council 2007

4 Strands of Scientific Proficiency Know, use and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world. Know, use and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world. Generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations. Generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations. Understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge. Understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge. Participate productively in scientific practices and discourse. Participate productively in scientific practices and discourse.

1-Learning Across the 4 Strands Recommendations 4 Strands of Sci. Proficiency  Know, use and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world.  Generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations.  Understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge.  Participate productively in scientific practices and discourse.  Critical Research  Current focus on domain- general, domain-specific for 1 & 2; need research on Strands 3 & 4. Learning & Mediation Learning & Mediation Instructional Contexts Instructional Contexts  More research on interconnections of all 4 strands to inform instructional models

2-Core Ideas & Learning Progressions  Recommendations  Findings from research about children’s learning and development can be used to map learning progressions (LPs) in science.  Core ideas should be central to a discipline of science, accessible to students in kindergarten, and have potential for sustained exploration across K-8.  Teaching Science Practices during investigations Argumentation and explanation Argumentation and explanation Model building Model building Debate and decision making Debate and decision making  Critical Research  Requires an extensive R&D effort before LPs are well established and tested.  Step 1 - Id the most generative and powerful core ideas for students’ science learning  Step 2 - Develop and test LPs  Step 3 Establish empirical basis for LPs: Focused studies under controlled conditions Focused studies under controlled conditions Small-scale instructional interventions Small-scale instructional interventions Classroom-based studies in a variety of contexts Classroom-based studies in a variety of contexts Longitudinal studies Longitudinal studies

3-Curriculum & Instruction Recommendations The strands emphasize the idea of “knowledge in use” – that is students’ knowledge is not static and proficiency involves deploying knowledge and skills across all four strands. Students are more likely to advance in their understanding of science when classrooms provide learning opportunities that attend to all four strands Science is a social phenomena with unique norms for participation in a community of peers. Critical Research Understand whether and how instruction should change with students’ development Develop clear depictions of scientific practices across K-8 through replication of classroom- based instruction (e.g., design studies). Develop assessment tools to help teachers diagnose students’ understanding Understand characteristics of instruction that best serve diverse student populations Develop curriculum materials studied under varied conditions

Learning & Learners Conclusion 1: The norms of scientific argument, explanation, and the evaluation of evidence differ from those in everyday life. Students need support to learn appropriate norms and language for productive participation in the discourses of science. Conclusion 3: What children are capable of at a particular age is the result of a complex interplay among maturation, experience, and instruction. Thus, what is developmentally appropriate is not a simple function of age or grade. What children can do is in large part contingent on their prior opportunities to learn and not on some fixed sequence of developmental stages.

Learning & Learners Conclusion 4: Students’ knowledge and experience play a critical role in their science learning, influencing all four strands of science understanding. Children’s concepts can be both resources and barriers to emerging understanding. These concepts can be enriched and transformed by appropriate classroom experiences. Science learners require instructional support to engage in scientific practices and to interpret experience and experiments in terms of scientific ideas. Conclusion 6: Race/ethnicity, language, culture, gender, and socioeconomic status are among the factors that influence the knowledge and experience children bring to the classroom. This diversity offers richness and opportunities in the classroom, and it also affects the kinds of support children need to learn science.

Curriculum & Instruction Conclusion 8: Sustained exploration of a focused set of core ideas in a discipline is a promising direction for organizing science instruction and curricula across grades K-8. A research and development program is needed to identify and elaborate the progressions of learning and instruction that can support students’ understanding of these core ideas. The difficult issue is deciding what to emphasize and what to eliminate. Conclusion 9: Students learn science by actively engaging in the practices of science. A classroom environment that provides opportunities for students to participate in scientific practices includes scientific tasks embedded in social interaction using the discourse of science and work with scientific representations and tools. Each of these aspects requires support for student learning of scientific practices.

Curriculum & Instruction Conclusion 10: Frequently, classroom investigations treat data collection and analysis as the end game of science. Instead, science is, and should be presented as, a process of building theories and models, checking them for internal consistency and coherence, and testing them empirically. Method should follow from theory, therefore presentation of scientific methodology should consider a broad range of methods, including acquiring and interpreting observational data and modeling... which should be reflected in the experiences provided in K-8 classrooms. Conclusion 12: Ongoing assessment is an integral part of instruction that can foster student learning when appropriately designed and used regularly. Assessments, whether formative or summative, need to be responsive to the full range of proficiencies that are implied by the strands. Assessment needs to be aligned with the research on students’ thinking as well as informed by the structure of the subject matter.

Teachers & Schools Conclusion 13: To create a successful science classroom, teachers need to modify and adapt curriculum materials so as to design instruction that is appropriate for a particular group of students at a particular time. Making these kinds of modifications to achieve effective instruction requires knowledge of science, knowledge of how students learn science, and knowledge of how to plan effective instruction. Many K-8 teachers have insufficient knowledge in one or all of these areas and need ongoing support to develop it. Conclusion 14: Achieving science proficiency for all students will require a coherent system that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, assessment, teacher preparation, and professional development for teachers across the K-8 years.

Critical Research Question How to organize programs of research so that they explicitly address problems of educational practice in schools while advancing fundamental understanding of children’s learning in science? Two key elements of such a program that need to be thought through are: (1) What is the nature of the teams of individuals who should be brought together to conduct this work? and (2) How can some common intellectual ground be developed so that dialogue can begin across the varied research traditions?

Shifting the Focus From Lessons, Modules Days Weeks Management of Behaviors & Materials Skills for doing experiments Assessment of Learning To Sequences, Units Weeks Months Years Management of Ideas & Information Reasoning about experiments Assessment for Learning

Critical Areas for Research and Development Learning Across the Four Strands Identifying Core Ideas and Developing Learning Progressions Curriculum and Instruction Professional Development and Teacher Learning Evaluation and Scale-Up Diversity and Equity

Ten Years After Advances in basic research on the biological, the neurological, and the cognitive bases of learning. Advances in applied research on the positive influence engagement in participatory practices has on learning. Developments in technology that can enable the study of brain functions, learning and instructional delivery systems, and the assessment of learning. Advances in evidence-centered design methodologies for the comprehensive measurement of learning.

Richer understandings of processes and mechanisms that stimulate motivation, persistence and identity. Characterizations of conceptual and epistemic reasoning and of knowledge building processes from analyses of professional practices. Emergence of design-based implementation methodologies to study institutional learning systems as well as formal and informal learning ecologies.