Differentiating a Lesson for ELLs using MPIs Urban Literacy Leaders and Urban ELL Directors Network Meeting January 17, 2013 Ely Sena, Office of English.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan R. Easterbrooks Georgia State University
Advertisements

World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
Integrating WIDA ELD Standards to Differentiate Instruction Urban ELL Directors and Literacy Leaders Meeting October 11 th, 2012 Dave Buchanan, Office.
ORGANIZATION OF THE STANDARDS The Standards Matrix.
Teaching & Assessing English Learners on California’s Standards © Northern California Comprehensive Assistance Center, WestEd, 2001 John Carr
Iredell Statesville Schools English as a Second Language Department Fall 2010 WIDA Standards.
WCSD ELL Department
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Overview of WIDA Standards & Assessments
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
WIDA MPIs for Mathematics Instruction
CA 2012 ELD Standards Session 3 ESC North 2/5/15.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Sharon Rodriguez, Coordinator, Elementary Instruction Alicia Bernal, Coordinator, Secondary Instruction Lizza Irizarry, Coordinator, EL Programs September,
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
+ ESL Learning Team June 11, 2012 Allison Balter and Lindsey Mayer An Introduction to WIDA.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
ESOL Update 2014 Van Wert Elementary 2014/2015 School Year.
Integrating the WIDA ELD Standards and the 2011 Math Frameworks
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
Model Performance Indicators.
General Considerations for Implementation
Differentiating for ELLs May 23, 2014 Presenter: Rachel Zalocha, ESL Teacher.
Comprehensible Instruction Extending the Conversation.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
Overview of WIDA Standards & Assessments
ELD Transition Sessions
April 17, 2014 Glenda Harrell, Alesha McCauley, Denise Daniels, Steve West, Laura Cernik, Amanda Miller Transformed ELA MPIs Lesson Planning and Formative.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
© 2012 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Introduction to the WIDA English Language Development.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Session 2: Informational Text Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
English Language Proficiency Standards Language Acquisition is not an event; it is a process. it is a process.
Alabama State ELL PD Maria Coady, Ph.D. November 5, 2009
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
MISD Bilingual/ESL Department
WELCOME TO PIKES PEAK REGIONAL ELD TRAINING: COLORADO ENGLISH LANAGUAGE PROFICIENCY (CELP) STANDARDS Spring 2012 Facilitated by the Pikes Peaks ELD Directors.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Launching.
Collaborative Conversations
Title III Access to Core Professional Development
Integrating Language Development in the Content Areas Kris Nicholls, Ph.D. Director, CABE Professional Development Services.
1 Leticia M. Trower Gaston County Schools Used with permission.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction ELPAC: Ensuring Success for English Learners Lily Roberts,
What to Expect When Expecting ESL Students: Practical Suggestions for Accommodating English Language Learners in the Regular Classroom Created by Jenny.
© 2011 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Introducing the Protocol for Review of Instructional.
Secondary ALP Lead Meeting November 7, 2012 Educational Equity: Charlene Lui Paul Ross Cheryl Pietz Nathan Moore Sara Moore.
Teaching English Language Learners _______________________________ Implementing WIDA and TESOL.
Collaboration & Integrated Content-Based Instruction.
Differentiating for English Learners with the WIDA Standards Department of Educational Equity, Granite School District.
INTRODUCTION TO THE WIDA FRAMEWORK Presenter Affiliation Date.
Pedagogy As it relates to the field of linguistics.
 What to Do with WIDA Robin Nelson November 4 th, 2014.
EL Program in a Nutshell EL Program Flow Chart.
LANGUAGE LITERACY LEARNING MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT CA ELD STANDARDS Session #3.
Colorado Academic Standards Colorado English Language Proficiency (CELP) Standards There are now five English language development standards: Standard.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
© 2012 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium A Custom Design: Integrating the WIDA English.
ELD Standards Framework. Guiding Principles Students’ languages and cultures are valuable resources to be tapped and incorporated into schooling. Students’
COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES
Integrated and Designated ELD –
Using Wordless Picture Books to Teach Pre-reading Skills
Academic Vocabulary Development for English Language Learners
The Scaffolding Framework
Academic Language and the WIDA English Language Proficiency (ELP) Standards
EL (English Language) Students and WIDA Standards
Using the CTE TEKS to Build on Content & Language Objectives
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Differentiating a Lesson for ELLs using MPIs Urban Literacy Leaders and Urban ELL Directors Network Meeting January 17, 2013 Ely Sena, Office of English Language Acquisition and Academic Achievement Dave Buchanan, Office of Literacy and Humanities

ELLs in Massachusetts 2  English language learners (ELLs) are our fastest growing group of students  45,000, or 4.7% of all students, in 2002  70,000, or 7.3% of all students, in 2012  These students speak 127 different languages  Spanish is the most common (53.4%)  Portuguese is second most common (6.1%)  They have the largest proficiency gaps  In 2011, 22 percent of ELLs scored proficient or advanced in ELA; 26 percent in mathematics Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Why Differentiate?  Differentiation is a foundational principle of the WIDA ELD Standards  EQUITY:  To give ELLs access to grade-level content area instruction that is comprehensible and challenging  To tailor instruction in a way that addresses students language needs  To scaffold and support ELLs development of English language proficiency Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 3

What Do We Differentiate? MUST differentiate…  Language-based expectations (language objectives)  Scaffolding and supports  In assignments and assessments Should NOT differentiate…  Content area topic from the standards  Content objectives  Higher order thinking skills 4

How do we Differentiate? StepsTools Select standards-based content or topic (content objective) Curriculum MA Frameworks Identify language-based expectations for students at each level of proficiency (language objectives, language functions) CAN DO Descriptors Model Performance Indicators (MPIs) Rubrics Identify appropriate scaffolds and supports Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5

Grade 7/8 Unit 6  Overview  Opinion-Argument  Proficiency Level – Intermediate  Unit: Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts  Lesson 2: Persuasion in Historical Context: The Gettysburg Address Source: Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Available at Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Sample Lesson 7  Overview Lesson 2  Close reading of Gettysburg Address  Create schema about time, place, political context of speech  Engage with text - macro understanding of message; micro word-level examination  Performance Task - students to translate Gettysburg Address into modern English Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Overview 8  Standards – see list provided  Audience – g. 7, 8  Time frame - One week (5/45 min periods)  Key text - Gettysburg Address Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Sequence – 3 stages/lesson 9 I. Preparing Learners Day One - Era Envelope (Civil War Photos Activity); Clarifying Bookmark; Base Group Share Day Two - Wordle Partner Share with Round Robin; II. Interacting with Text Day Two – continued - Close Reading Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Sequence 10 II. Interacting with Text- continued  Day Three - Reading in Four Voices; Literary Devices Dyad  Day Four - Wordle, Part II; Vocabulary Review Jigsaw; Extending Understanding III. Extending Understanding  Day Five - In Our Own Words Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Differentiation Options 11 1.Minimal scaffolding – some independent work in small groups 2.Moderate scaffolding – small groups, share- jigsaw responses 3.Maximal scaffolding – teacher reads aloud, models writing, work as one group All students experience the assigned texts All students write in response to reading and viewing photos Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Minimal 12 Heterogeneous groups of 3 Intro lesson – establish background knowledge 3 documents/focus questions – Background Reading Focus chart Photos – analyze 1 – Civil War Photos, Photo Response Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Moderate – Base groups/Expert groups 13 Expert groups –by proficiency and reading level o become experts on one aspect of topic, return to base group to share; use Clarifying Bookmark – guide for reading, think aloud o Read in pairs – first part aloud, second silently, take notes on focus area – Background Reading Focus Chart o Round Robin – Share responses, add ideas gained; photo analysis – as group, ea student complete Photo Response Base groups – return to share responses Masssachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Maximal 14 Teacher reads aloud – focus areas on Background Reading Focus Chart as guide Stop at key points, students talk with partner, decide info to enter in Chart as a group Teacher models what to write Select and post photo – complete Photo Response as group, then each student; partners create captions, post Persuasion Across Time and Space: Analyzing and Producing Complex Texts. Understanding Language (ell.stanford.edu) Lesson 2, pp Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Using MPIs to describe scaffolding Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 15  What’s an MPI? Model Performance Indicators (MPIs): provide examples of how teachers can differentiate instruction for students at different proficiency levels in a specific context. MPIs are organized in strands: MPIs for several ELD levels.  You can create MPIs for:  Individual activities  One day of the lesson  Performance Task

What’s an MPI? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16 Components of an MPI Language Function Content StemSupport Language processes used in receiving or conveying a message Derived from state curriculum frameworks Specific scaffolds to ensure students can access content and engage in language function Produce statements about themes related to the main idea using graphic organizers with a partner. ©WIDA Consortium Amplification of the ELD standards K-12. p.89

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 17 Connection: Analyze the main ideas and supporting details presented in diverse media and formats (visually, quantitatively, orally) and explain how the ideas clarify a topic, text or issue under study. (CCSS Speaking and Listening, Gr. 7) Example context for language use: Students discuss main ideas of short stories, novels and essays with partners or in small groups to clarify the thee, topic or issue under study. Listening Level 1: EnteringLevel 3: Developing Level 5: Bridging Produce key words about themes related to the main idea using visual support (e.g., captioned illustrations of plot and main ideas) with a partner. Explain themes related to the main idea using graphic organizers (e.g., story map, plot line) to a partner. Discuss themes related to the main idea using extended discourse. ©WIDA Consortium Amplification of the ELD standards K-12. p.89

Sample MPIs for Lesson 2: Focus on Day One Preparing Learners – Day One  Day One objective: Build background knowledge about the time and place of The Gettysburg Address  Day One activities: Era Envelope (Civil War Photos); Clarifying Bookmark; Base Group Share  Write MPI for Base Group Share: culminating activity Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 18

Writing MPIs for Day One  Think about related content objectives:  USI.3.8. Analyze Abraham Lincoln’s presidency…his views on slavery and the political obstacles he encountered. Seminal Primary Documents to Read: Gettysburg Address  RI7.3. Analyze the interactions between individuals, events, and ideas in a text (e.g., how ideas influence individuals or events, or how individuals influence ideas or events).  Think about the task (Base Group Share):  Read texts about Lincoln, Civil War and Battle of Gettysburg and take notes  Analyze photos of Civil War and write on Response sheet

Writing MPIs for Day One  Think about related language objectives  What language will students produce and/or process?  Reading texts and identifying ideas, drawing conclusions  Sharing information  Summarizing information from a variety of sources  Choose focus – may be different for students at different ELD levels

Writing MPIs for Day One Minimal Scaffolding  Focus language domains: Reading and Writing  Focus language objective: Writing a summary  Write a two paragraph summary about the historical context (time and place) of the Gettysburg Address from related texts and photos in small groups using the Background Reading Focus Chart and Photograph Response handout. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 21

Writing MPIs for Day One Moderate Scaffolding (Levels 3-4)  Focus language domains: Reading and Speaking  Focus language objective: Summarize main ideas orally  Summarize important characteristics of the Gettysburg Address’ historical context (time and place) orally from related texts and photos in small groups using the Clarifying Bookmark I, the Photograph Response handout, Discussion Sentence Starters, and Illustrated Word Bank (Level 3 only). Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 22

Writing MPIs for Day One Maximal Scaffolding (Levels 1-2)  Focus language domains: Reading  Focus language objective: Identifying main ideas in text and images  Identify characteristics of the Gettysburg Address’ historical context (time and place) from a related text and photos with the teacher using the Background Reading Graphic Organizer and the Photo Response II handout.  Additional scaffolding: modified texts Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 23

Time to Practice: Your Turn!  Modify your lesson for ELLs at two different ELD levels  Identify a key task/context for language use and create 2 MPIs (one for each ELD level)  Include the lesson’s content objective, potential language objectives, and necessary supports  If you didn’t bring a lesson – create MPIs for an activity on Lesson 2 Day 3 (Reading in Four Voices)  Use the Lesson Planning Handout Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 24

Reflections  What is something that you learned from this process?  How can you use this process for teacher professional development? 25

Resources 26  Understanding Language site  WIDA 2012 Amplification Standards