1 Interdistrict Magnet Schools in Connecticut Barbara Q. Beaudin, Ed. D. Division of Evaluation and Research Connecticut State Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Six to Six Magnet School
February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE WAXAHACHIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT THE MAGNETISM OF MAGNET PROGRAMS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2014 WAXAHACHIE NINTH GRADE.
Commitment to Community Presented By: Susan K. Hintz, Interim Superintendent Osseo Area Schools - District #279.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Guiding the Way to Higher Education Families, Counselors and Communities Together.
Public and Private School Choice in Greater Hartford: A Brief Overview and Computer Mapping Analysis Jack Dougherty and Naralys Estevez Trinity College,
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
HELPING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES SUCCEED IN SCHOOL AND IN LIFE Grantmakers for Children, Youth & Families 2012 Annual Conference 400 South Zang Blvd.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Data Disaggregation: For Data Driven Decision Making By Ron Grimes: Special Assistant to the Assistant Superintendent Office of Career and Technical Accountability.
Jaffrey Rindge Extended Day Program
Annual Report of Progress The Public Schools of Jersey City Dr. Charles T. Epps, Jr. State District Superintendent of Schools January 4, 2006.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
The School Counseling Program at {Your School Name}
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Portland State University Report to the Oregon State Board of Higher Education.
Overview of Achievement First Providence School Board August 22, 2011.
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting [NAME OF SCHOOL] [DATE][Principal]
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
SCHOOL CONTEXT THE ROLE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION IN ADOLESCENCE.
The Road to College: Rigor, Readiness, and Retention.
The federal “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) law requires that all children be proficient in reading and math by the school year. It places pressure.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
1 Presentation to the ACI on the FY 2013 Budget December 14, 2011.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
EMID Magnet Schools Every Child, Every Day September 21, 2011.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLANNING MEETING GRAVES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JULY 2015.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
ACES OPEN CHOICE. Open Choice Contacts Tim Howes– Assistant Executive Director of Finance & Operations (203) Lynn Bailey.
Ridgeway Elementary Individually Guided Education.
Vernon Public Schools Administrative Vacancy Middle School Assistant Principal.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
 SMCSD Comprehensive Educational Program A Path for Excellence.
Anne Roberts and Casey Catron BACKGROUND Emerged in 1960s to remedy public segregation (DOE, 2004) Written into law: Section 5301 of the Elementary and.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Prince William County Public Schools Strategic Plan “Providing a World-Class Education” Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Instruction November 14, 2013.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
STATE of the STATE Mathematics Education in Florida Debra Willacey Mathematics Program Specialist Phone:
Magnet Review Update January/February HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 Objectives Provide background information about Magnets Review current.
Connecticut’s Schools - PUBLIC, MAGNETS & CHARTERS
The Road to College: test Rigor, Readiness, and Retention
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
A 50 Year Tradition of Excellence
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Interdistrict Magnet Schools in Connecticut Barbara Q. Beaudin, Ed. D. Division of Evaluation and Research Connecticut State Department of Education

2 Mission Reducing racial, ethnic, and economic isolation –Students –Professional Staff Offering high quality and special programs: –Improve student academic performance –Provide innovative, unique curriculum and instruction

3 Magnet School Evaluation Questions 1)What characteristics define interdistrict magnet schools and how do interdistrict magnet schools differ from other public schools? 2)What impact have interdistrict magnet schools had on reducing the racial, ethnic, and economic isolation of CT students?

4 3)What impact have interdistrict magnet schools had on reducing the racial, ethnic, and economic isolation of students within the magnet school itself? 4)How does the performance of interdistrict magnet school students compare with that of public school students state-wide?

5 How consistent are students, parents, and public school professional staff in their perception of the effectiveness of their magnet schools? What characteristics do the highly successful magnet schools share?

6 Data Sources CSDE Staff File Strategic School Profile Data File CMT and CAPT Data Graduate Follow-up Data Magnet School Annual Reports Meetings with Magnet School Personnel Parent, Teacher, and Student Surveys

7 Defining Characteristics/Role of CT Interdistrict Magnet School Programs Interdistrict magnet schools and programs: Reduce racial, ethnic, and economic isolation Offer a special and high quality program Increase student achievement Provide parents and students an educational choice Must restrict enrollment from any participating district to 80% of the total enrollment in the school or program Require students to attend at least half time

8 The Evolution of Interdistrict Magnet Schools and Programs in Connecticut 31 interdistrict magnet schools and programs operated in Connecticut last year, serving 10,700 students, from approximately 100 public school districts. The first interdistrict magnet school program began in 1989, GHAA. 17 interdistrict magnet schools opened during the 1990s. 13 interdistrict magnet schools began operating since 2000.

9 For the school year, approximately 12,000 public school students will be enrolled in 39 interdistrict magnet schools. Students are selected by lottery and wait lists are established to fill vacancies occurring after the beginning of the school year. The typical magnet school drew students from 11 public school districts; the range was from two to 46 districts.

10 Magnet School Size

11 Education Reference Groups Nine clusters (A – I) of public school districts with similar characteristics based on indicators of student need, socio-economic status, and district size. ERG A consists of the state’s most affluent communities, most located in lower Fairfield County. ERG I consists of seven large urban districts. Magnet schools draw students from districts in all nine ERGs.

12 Average Class Size

13 Student to Teacher Ratio Magnet Schools -Elementary: 11.6 to 1 -Middle: 11.3 to 1 -High School: 11.6 to 1 State: 11.8 to 1

14 Instructional Time Magnet school students attend school 184 days; public school student attend 180 days. On average, students in full-day magnet schools receive 14% more instructional time than students in the state’s other public schools.

15 Governance Structure of Connecticut Magnet Schools in Public School Districts New Haven – 8 Hartford – 3 Waterbury – 2 East Hartford – 1 Manchester-1 Norwalk – 1 Regional Education Centers CREC– 8CES – 2 ACES – 4 LEARN – 1

16 A governing board, consisting of representatives from member districts, determines the level of involvement and responsibility in the school’s operation.

17 State Funding of Magnet Schools The state provided $11.9 million in to support the operation of seven interdistrict magnet schools. For the school year, the state provided $44.1 million to support 31 interdistrict magnet schools. The funding per-student is based on a percentage of the ‘foundation’ ($5,891 in ) that is inversely proportional to the percentage of the magnet school enrollment from each feeding district.

18 Funding for Transportation The local district in which the magnet school is located must provide transportation for magnet school students who reside in the district. Districts or schools which provide transportation for out-of-district students are eligible for reimbursement up to $1,200 per student.

19 Funding Capital Costs State school construction aid at 100% (95% beginning in 2003) was available to fund building construction or renovation. About 75% of construction funds would have been allocated to the same districts for public school building projects

20 Reducing Racial, Ethnic, and Economic Isolation

21 Connecticut’s Dichotomy Poverty-ridden cities lie in close proximity to affluent suburbs. Segregation in Connecticut is not as much within districts, as it is between districts that vary in the racial, ethnic, and economic composition of the students they enroll. Nearly 600,000 students currently are enrolled in Connecticut public schools. Composition of Connecticut public schools: 30% of the students and 7% of the teachers are racial or ethnic minorities.

22 Racial and Ethnic Composition of Students

23 The Economic Composition of Students

24 Racial and Ethnic Composition of Teachers and Professional Staff

25 Perceptions of Diversity in Magnet Schools 95% of parents and teachers, and 93% of the students, believe their magnet schools and programs are diverse learning communities. 87% of the parents, 98% of the teachers, and 85% of the students agree that students from different backgrounds work together on academic projects in school. 97% of the teachers believe that the school provides appropriate educational opportunities for all students, regardless of background.

26 Student Academic Performance Elementary and Middle Schools

27 CMT Mathematics 2001

28 CMT Reading 2001

29 CMT Writing 2001

30 Perceptions of Academic Program Quality: Elementary and Middle Magnet Schools 90% of the parents and teachers believe that their magnet schools have high expectations for students’ academic performance. Over 90% of the parents selected the magnet school because of its challenging academic program, quality teachers, and quality administrators. At least 95% of the students agree that teachers expect them to do their best work.

31 Student Academic Performance High Schools

32 Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT): Grade 10 Since 1998, no more than 15% of IDMHS students met the state goal in mathematics, compared with 45% statewide Since 1998, no more than 18% of IDMHS students met the state goal in language arts, compared with 45% statewide Results are similar for science and writing Large proportions of IDMHS students are academically at-risk in grade 10.

33 Four-Year Drop-Out Rates

Graduates Who Have Taken College Prep Courses

35 SAT Participation

36 Total Average SAT

37 Graduates Entering Four-Year Colleges

38 High School Students’ Comments “I like the unlimited opportunities of there being something more challenging in this school, for example college classes” “This school gives students that little extra help they need to be successful and proud of the work they do.”

39 Interdistrict Magnets Offer Special Programs

40 Magnet Themes – Academic Choices Science, mathematics, and technology Global studies Anti-bias education Multicultural education The arts Alternative high school education Service learning and community involvement Career exploration Character education

41 Innovative Models and Pedagogy Montessori Developmental Model Responsive Classroom Model Comer-Zigler Model Whole Child Education Model Flexible Multi-age Grouping Multiple Intelligence Curriculum Middle College Model International Baccalaureate Model

42 What Makes a Difference? Teacher Survey Results At least 90% of teachers agreeing: their schools provide safe and secure environments that foster learning, their schools promote innovation, their principal is an effective instructional leader, teachers and administrators share a common mission, and they are satisfied with their magnet school position.

43 A Teacher’s Comment “ I selected this magnet school– and have wished to remain here– not because its location is convenient or its compensation is competitive, but because I feel that the school has the best opportunity to offer students a well- rounded education.”

44 Common Characteristics of the Most Successful Interdistrict Magnet Schools Principal Who Is a Strong Instructional Leader Shared Understanding of Mission Data-driven Instructional Decision-making Active Parental Involvement High Expectations for All Students Shared Accountability for Improving Student Academic Performance

45 What Have Interdistrict Magnet Schools Accomplished in CT? Created school communities with diverse student and professional staff populations Reduced the gap in elementary and middle school CMT performance for students in progressively higher grades Low four-year high school drop-out rates, high participation in college-preparation courses and SAT, high entrance into four year colleges for students who were academically high-risk in grade 10 High constituent satisfaction with school diversity and academic programs Model thematic and pedagogical programs that merit replication

46 The End