Ghadi Sebaali and Brian L. Evans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFDM Transmission over Wideband Channel
Advertisements

Principal Investigator:
MIMO Communication Systems
Modeling and Mitigation of Interference in Multi-Antenna Receivers Aditya Chopra September 16,
Comparison of different MIMO-OFDM signal detectors for LTE
OFDM based for WIFI Ziqi SONG Zhuo ZHANG Supervisor: Prabin.
Noise Cancelation for MIMO System Prepared by: Heba Hamad Rawia Zaid Rua Zaid Supervisor: Dr.Yousef Dama.
1 EQ2430 Project Course in Signal Processing and Digital Communications - Spring 2011 On phase noise and it effect in OFDM communication system School.
1 Mobile Communication Systems 1 Prof. Carlo Regazzoni Prof. Fabio Lavagetto.
Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST Wireless Radio.
APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME CODING TECHNIQUES IN THIRD GENERATION SYSTEMS - A. G. BURR ADAPTIVE SPACE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CODING – A. G. BURR.
Introduction to Cognitive radios Part two HY 539 Presented by: George Fortetsanakis.
#7 1 Victor S. Frost Dan F. Servey Distinguished Professor Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Kansas 2335 Irving Hill Dr. Lawrence,
Space Time Block Codes Poornima Nookala.
Sep 08, 2005CS477: Analog and Digital Communications1 Example Systems, Signals Analog and Digital Communications Autumn
MIMO-OFDM MIMO MIMO High diversity gain (space-time coding) High diversity gain (space-time coding) High multiplexing gain (BLAST) High multiplexing gain.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing Techniques For Smart Grid Heterogeneous Communication Networks Prof. Naofal Al-Dhahir Prof. Brian L. Evans Univ. of.
FPGA Implementation of a Message-Passing OFDM Receiver for Impulsive Noise Channels Prof. Brian L. Evans, Wireless Networking and Communications Group,
Local Utility Smart Grid Communications
ORTHOGONAL FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING(OFDM)
Design of Sparse Filters for Channel Shortening Aditya Chopra and Prof. Brian L. Evans Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
August 4, 2011 Non-Parametric Methods for Mitigating Interference in OFDM Receivers American University of Beirut 1 Prof. Brian L. Evans Department of.
Performance of Energy Detection: A Complementary AUC Approach
A Soft Decision Decoding Scheme for Wireless COFDM with Application to DVB-T Advisor : Yung-An Kao Student : Chi-Ting Wu
Cyclic Spectral Analysis of Power Line Noise in the kHz Band Karl Nieman †, Jing Lin †, Marcel Nassar †, Khurram Waheed ‡, Brian L. Evans † † Department.
 Most previous work that deals with channel tracking assumes that the number K p of pilot subcarriers in each data OFDM symbol is at least as large as.
Channel Estimation 2012/08/13 蒲俊瑋.
Multiuser Detection (MUD) Combined with array signal processing in current wireless communication environments Wed. 박사 3학기 구 정 회.
NTU Confidential Baseband Transceiver Design for the DVB-Terrestrial Standard Baseband Transceiver Design for the DVB-Terrestrial Standard Advisor : Tzi-Dar.
FPGA Implementation of Denoising in OFDM Systems using DSP Design Module Prof. Brian L. Evans PhD Students Jing Lin, Marcel Nassar & Karl Nieman Wireless.
1 Energy Efficiency of MIMO Transmissions in Wireless Sensor Networks with Diversity and Multiplexing Gains Wenyu Liu, Xiaohua (Edward) Li and Mo Chen.
 Task Description: Improve rate, reliability, and energy efficiency of two-way wireless and powerline communications (PLC) between smart meters & data.
2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications
NTUEE Confidential Toward MIMO MC-CDMA Speaker : Pei-Yun Tsai Advisor : Tzi-Dar Chiueh 2004/10/25.
Iterative Multi-user Detection for STBC DS-CDMA Systems in Rayleigh Fading Channels Derrick B. Mashwama And Emmanuel O. Bejide.
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 11 Feb. 19 th, 2014.
Task Description: Increase powerline communication (PLC) data rate for better monitoring/controlling applications for residential and commercial energy.
A Factor-Graph Approach to Joint OFDM Channel Estimation and Decoding in Impulsive Noise Channels Philip Schniter The Ohio State University Marcel Nassar,
Coding Theory. 2 Communication System Channel encoder Source encoder Modulator Demodulator Channel Voice Image Data CRC encoder Interleaver Deinterleaver.
Statistical Modeling of Co-Channel Interference IEEE Globecom 2009 Wireless Networking and Communications Group 1 st December 2009 Kapil Gulati †, Aditya.
Prof. Brian L. Evans PhD Students Karl Nieman, Marcel Nassar, and Jing Lin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at.
Doppler Spread Estimation in Frequency Selective Rayleigh Channels for OFDM Systems Athanasios Doukas, Grigorios Kalivas University of Patras Department.
STATISTICAL MODELING OF ASYNCHRONOUS IMPULSIVE NOISE IN POWERLINE COMMUNICATION NETWORKS Marcel Nassar, Kapil Gulati, Yousof Mortazavi, and Brian L. Evans.
Space Time Codes. 2 Attenuation in Wireless Channels Path loss: Signals attenuate due to distance Shadowing loss : absorption of radio waves by scattering.
OFDM Based WLAN System Song Ziqi Zhang Zhuo.
Marcel Nassar PhD Defense Committee Members: Prof. Gustavo de Veciana
Computer Arch. And Embedded Processors Embedded Real-Time Signal Processing Systems Prof. Brian L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin August 26, 2008.
3: Diversity Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Tse&Viswanath 1 3. Diversity.
A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications -M
November 9th, 2010 Low Complexity EM-based Decoding for OFDM Systems with Impulsive Noise Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. MIMO Receiver Design in Impulsive Noise Aditya Chopra and Kapil Gulati.
Impulsive Noise at Wireless Receivers
Small-Scale Fading Prof. Michael Tsai 2016/04/15.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing Techniques For Smart Grid Heterogeneous Communication Networks Task ID: Prof. Naofal Al-Dhahir, Univ. of Texas.
Task , Brian L. Evans, The University of Texas at Austin
Jinseok Choi, Brian L. Evans and *Alan Gatherer
Diversity and Coexistence within Smart Grid Communications
Power Line Communications for Enabling Smart Grid Applications
Jing Lin and Brian L. Evans
Optimal Receivers in Multipath: Single-Carrier and OFDM
Advanced Wireless Networks
Diversity Lecture 7.
Implementation Platform
ELEG 6203: "Wireles Networks" Wireless Networks December 04,2003
Ian C. Wong, Zukang Shen, Jeffrey G. Andrews, and Brian L. Evans
Error control coding for wireless communication technologies
The University of Texas at Austin
Joint Channel Estimation and Prediction for OFDM Systems
MIMO I: Spatial Diversity
Presentation transcript:

Design Tradeoffs In Joint Powerline and Wireless Transmission For Smart Grid Communications Ghadi Sebaali and Brian L. Evans Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wireless Networking and Communications Group The University of Texas at Austin Collaboration with Prof. Naofal Al-Dhahir and Mr. Mostafa Sayed at UT Dallas  Support from National Instruments, and Semiconductor Research Corporation with liaisons Freescale Semiconductor and Texas Instruments

Smart Grid Communications Impairments Channel distortion and time-varying gain Impulsive and thermal noise, and external interference Goal Increase reliability Approach Jointly transmit over PLC and wireless channels Contributions Review channel modeling Review of noise modeling Explore design tradeoffs Explore noise mitigation techniques \ [MaRS Market Insights, 2012] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

D Joint Transmission M Combiner PLC Link Wireless Link Frequency band Transmitter side: send same info over PLC and wireless links Receiver side: combine received signals into one Combiner D M PLC Link Wireless Link Frequency band 3-500kHz (unlicensed) 902-928MHz Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Narrowband PLC Noise Dominant noise Caused by Modeled by Cyclostationary impulsive noise in time and frequency with T = half AC power cycle Caused by Switching mode power supplies Non-linear electronic devices Broadcast stations Modeled by Linear periodically time-varying system hτ(1) hτ(2) hτ(3) AWGN 60% 30% 10% Cyclo- stationary noise N (0,1) 1 2 3 1 1 1 [Nassar et al., 2012] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Narrowband PLC Channel Multi-path model Parameters: delay, attenuation, total number of paths, etc. Drawback: doesn’t capture topology of channel Transmission-line model Parameters: ABCD parameters Drawback: assumes topology is known Statistical model Extends transmission-line model Accounts for multipath effects due to branches, impedance mismatch [Ferreira, 2010] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Wireless Link Dominant noise Noise sources Noise model Channel Model Uncoordinated impulsive noise Noise sources Uncoordinated transmissions Non interoperable devices Neighboring devices Noise model Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) Channel Model Rayleigh Fading [Interference Mitigation Toolbox, UT Austin] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Combining Reception Combining Schemes Selection Combining Largest SNR Saturated Metric Combining Saturated log likelihood Maximum Ratio Combining Log likelihood ratio [Lai, 2012] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Combining Reception FFT (N) Cyclic Prefix Length Modulation Combining Schemes for a 5-path channel model Combining Schemes for a 20-path channel model FFT (N) Cyclic Prefix Length Modulation Number of Paths Combining Scheme 128 26 BPSK 5,20 Saturated Metric Selection Maximal Ratio Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Wireless Receiver Design Zero Forcing: detects signal by inverting channel matrix Minimum Mean Square Error: ranks received signals based on their SNR Maximum Likelihood: chooses symbol with least Euclidean Distance for decoding and cancellation [Miridakis, 2013] Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Wireless Receiver Design Parameter Value Channel Multipath Channel Model Rayleigh Channel Taps 6 Noise Model AWGN, GMM GMM Parameters 99% σw= 0.001 and 1% σw= 100 Successive Interference Cancellation Techniques Zero Forcing Min. Mean Squared Error Maximum Likelihood Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

Summary Increased reliability via joint PLC/wireless transmission Recommendations Maximal ratio combining for PLC/wireless links Zero-forcing to mitigate wireless interference Future work Coexistence in 900 MHz band between IEEE 802.11ah & 802.15.4g Interferer separation (find critical distance for victim receiver) Link quality indicator for the IEEE 802.15.4g standard Introduction |PLC/Wireless Links| PLC/Wireless Combining| Wireless Receiver| Summary

References [1] M. Sayed and N. Al-Dhahir, “Narrowband-PLC/wireless diversity for smart grid communications,” Proc. IEEE Global Comm. Conf., Dec. 2014. [2] H. Ferreira, Power Line Communications: Theory and Applications for Narrowband and Broadband Communications Over Power Lines, 2010. [3] K. F. Nieman, J. Lin, M. Nassar, K. Waheed, and B. L. Evans, “Cyclic spectral analysis of power line noise in the 3-200 kHz band,” Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. On Power Line Comm. and Its Applications, 2013. [4] M. Nassar, K. Gulati, Y. Mortazavi, and B.L.Evans, “Statistical modeling of asynchronous impulsive noise in powerline communication networks,” Proc. IEEE Global Comm. Conf., Dec. 2011. [5] M. Nassar, B. L. Evans, and P. Schniter, “A factor graph approach to joint OFDM channel estimation and decoding in impulsive noise environments,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., vol. 62, no. 6, Mar. 2014. [6] M. Nassar, A. Dabak, I. H. Kim, T. Pande, and B. L. Evans, “Cyclo- stationary noise modeling in narrowband powerline communication for smart grid applications,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., Mar. 2012. [7] K. Gulati, M. Nassar, A. Chopra, N. B. Okafor, M. DeYoung, and B. L. Evans. (2011, Apr.) UT Austin Interference Modeling and Mitigation Toolbox. [Online]. Available: http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans/projects/rfi/software/ [8] N. Miridakis and D. Vergados, “A survey on the successive interference cancellation performance for single-antenna and multiple-antenna OFDM systems,” IEEE Comm. Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, Feb. 2013. [9] S. W. Lai and G. G. Messier, “Using the wireless and PLC channel for diversity,” IEEE Trans. on Comm., Dec. 2012.