Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
Advertisements

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Overview of Significant Issues and Identified Alternatives for Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Produce Safety Rule Michael Mahovic, Ph.D. Produce.
EUREPGAP The European Principles of Food Safety. Increasing awareness of food safety in consumers greater variety of foods available for the consumer.
THE F OOD S AFETY M ODERNIZATION A CT P ROPOSED R ULES : M AIN I SSUES FOR F ARMERS OEFFA Webinar, September 2013 Ariane Lotti, National Sustainable Agriculture.
Produce Safety Rule Supplemental Proposal 1
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
China Stakeholder Session China September 24-27, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Food Safety Modernization Act Supplemental Proposed Rules (Commenting period, Round 2 closes December 15, 2014!!)
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
GAP and Its Impact on Us as Growers Rich Bonanno UMass Extension.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Role of Testing to Ensure FSMA and Global Safety Compliance for Functional Food and Dietary Ingredients Douglas L. Marshall, Ph.D., CFS Chief Scientific.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Exporting Food to the United States: What You Need to Know Prepared for Panhellenic Exporters Association Conference December 9, 2014 Erik R. Lieberman.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Food Safety Management Systems
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D says “Preventing problems before they cause harm is not only common sense, it is the key to food safety in the.
Food Safety Modernization Act The U.S. Food Safety Regulatory Revolution David Gombas, Ph.D. United Fresh Produce Association June 23, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
FSMA Proposed Rules for Preventive Controls and Fresh Produce
Apple Cider Food Safety Workshop FDA’s Good Agricultural Practices Dr. Michelle A. Smith July 15, 1999.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
Preventive Controls Rules: Coverage and Farm Definition 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Produce Safety Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) 1.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Final Rule on Produce Safety 1.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food to Wild Bird Feed Industry Annual Meeting 2015 by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. Director, Office of Surveillance.
Overview FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Section 104
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
Produce Safety University Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Good Handling Practices (GHPs) 1.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Primer on Act and the Final Rules June 8, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Final Rule on Produce Safety
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
California Grocers Association and United Fresh Produce Association
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Prerequisite Programs
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013

Five Proposed Rules Establish Food Safety Framework Produce Safety Standards - Published Jan. 16, 2013 Preventive Controls for Human Food - Published Jan. 16, 2013 Foreign Supplier Verification Program Preventive Controls for Animal Food Accredited Third Party Certification

How to Comment on the Proposed Rules Link to rules on Comments are due by May 16, 2013 (120 days) Comment periods on major FSMA proposals will be coordinated to enable comment on how the rules can best work together.

1.FDA proposes rule and requests comments 2.FDA considers comments and considers revising rule 3.FDA issues final rule setting dates for companies to comply We are here Rulemaking Process: It Doesn’t Happen Overnight

Web site: Subscription feature available Send questions to More Information Available

Key Aspects of Proposals Confirm industry’s primary role on food safety Risk-based and flexible –Burden commensurate with risk Address small business issues –Additional time for small farms, businesses, to comply Extensive government, stakeholder Input

FDA Proposed Rule on Produce Safety

Key Principles Considers risk posed by practices, commodities, conditions Science- and Risk-based –Focus on identified routes of microbial contamination –Excludes certain produce rarely consumed raw –Excludes produce to be commercially processed Flexible –Additional time for small farms to comply –Variances –Alternatives for some provisions

Regulatory Framework Framework considers many factors associated with produce farming community –Examples include diversity of operations and broad range of crops and practices Proposing integrated approach that draws on past experiences –Examples include CGMPs, HACCP, shell egg regulation

Who Would be Covered? Farms that grow, harvest, pack or hold most produce in raw or natural state (raw agricultural commodities) Farms and “farm” portions of mixed-type facilities Domestic and imported produce Farms with annual sales > $25,000 per year Limitations on coverage are proposed

Covered Produce “Produce” defined as fruits and vegetables Produce includes mushrooms, sprouts, herbs and tree nuts Produce does not include grains Some limitations on covered produce

Limitations on Coverage Produce for personal or on-farm consumption Produce not a Raw Agricultural Commodity Certain produce rarely consumed raw Produce that will receive commercial processing Farms with sales of ≤ $25,000 per year Qualified exemption and modified requirements

Standards for Produce Safety Focus on 5 identified routes of microbial contamination 1.Agricultural water 2.Biological soil amendments of animal origin 3.Worker health and hygiene 4.Equipment, tools, buildings and sanitation 5.Domesticated and wild animals Sprouts Growing, harvesting, packing and holding activities Other requirements

Agricultural Water Agricultural water must be safe and of adequate sanitary quality for intended use Inspection of water system Reinspect system, make changes, test water OR treat water Specific criteria for quality of water for certain purposes and analytical testing Alternatives permitted that provide same level of public health protection

Agricultural Water-more detail Specific requirements for the quality of water used for specified purposes and follow-up action when water does not meet the quality standards. –235 CFU generic E. coli standard (direct contact with covered produce other than sprouts during growing) –0 detectable generic E. coli standard (highest risk uses)

Biological Soil Amendments of Animal Origin Biological soil amendments of animal origin may contaminate produce with pathogens Requirements include: –Definitions for determining their status as treated or untreated –Standards for handling, conveying and storing –Treatment methods, application methods, and application intervals Alternatives permitted that provide same level of public health protection

Biological Soil Amendments of Animal Origin-more detail Microbial standards for treatment processes –More stringent and less stringent standards Application requirements –Relate to whether there is contact with produce during and after application Minimum application intervals –Time from application to harvest

Worker Health and Hygiene Pathogens may be transmitted from person to food Requirements include: –Training –Preventing contamination by ill persons –Hygienic practices (toilet facilities, hand washing, avoiding contact with non-working animals and minimizing contact with produce when using working animals –Visitors must be aware of policies and have access to toilet and hand washing facilities

Equipment, Tools and Buildings Requirements include: –Equipment/tools must be designed and constructed to allow adequate cleaning and maintenance –Food contact surfaces of equipment and tools must be inspected, maintained, and cleaned and sanitized as necessary –Buildings must be designed and constructed to allow adequate cleaning and reduce potential for contamination –Buildings must have adequate, reasonably accessible toilet and hand washing facilities

Domesticated/Wild Animals Requirements apply if there is a reasonable probability that animals will contaminate covered produce Requirements include: –Wait an adequate amount of time between grazing and harvesting –If working animals are used in a planted growing area, take measures to prevent pathogens from being introduced onto the produce –Monitor for animal intrusion and if observed, evaluate for harvest (no harvesting of visibly contaminated covered produce)

Requirements for Sprouts Warm, moist, and nutrient-rich conditions are ideal conditions for pathogen growth Requirements include: -Building and sanitation requirements -Treating seed before sprouting -Testing spent sprout irrigation water (or sprouts, in some cases) for certain pathogens -Monitoring the growing, harvesting, packing, and holding environment for Listeria species or Listeria monocytogenes

Growing, harvesting, packing and holding activities Proposal includes science-based, minimum standards related to growing, harvesting, packing and holding Requirements include: –Separating covered and excluded produce and sanitizing food contact surfaces as necessary –Not distributing covered produce that drops to the ground before harvest unless it receives commercial processing –Food-packing material must be appropriate for use

Alternatives Permitted Farms may establish alternatives to certain requirements related to water and biological soil amendments of animal origin Alternatives must be scientifically established to provide the same amount of protection as the requirement in the proposed rule without increasing the risk of adulteration

Variances Provide Flexibility A state or foreign country may petition FDA for a variance from some or all provisions if deemed necessary in light of local growing conditions. Practices under the variance would need to provide the same level of public health protection as the proposed rule without increasing the risk of adulteration.

Recordkeeping Required But Not Burdensome The proposed rule would require certain records, for example, to document that certain standards are being met –Agricultural water testing results Records already kept for other purposes need not be duplicated

Qualitative Assessment of Risk Reflects Science Behind Rule Draft qualitative assessment of risk helps to inform proposed rule Provides a scientific evaluation of potential adverse health effects resulting from human exposure to hazards in produce Available for public comment as part of the proposed rule

Compliance Dates Staggered Effective Date: 60 days after final rule is published Compliance Dates Very small farms -Average annual value of food sold >$25,000 and ≤$250,000 -Four years after the effective date to comply -For some water requirements, six years

Compliance Dates Small farms -Average annual value of food sold > $250,000 and ≤ $500,000 -Would have three years after the effective date to comply -Would have five years for some water requirements Other covered farms -Other covered businesses would have to comply two years after the effective date -Would have four years for some water requirements

Preventive Controls for Human Food

Summary of Requirements Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls –Each facility would be required to implement a written food safety plan that focuses on preventing hazards in foods Updated Good Manufacturing Practices

Outreach Will Continue Public meetings Presentations Listening sessions Partnerships will be essential

Technical Assistance Alliances –Produce Safety –Preventive Controls –Sprouts Safety Guidance documents National technical assistance network Partnerships will be essential

Web site: Subscription feature available Send questions to More Information Available