Federal Aviation Administration 1 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives February 2013 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May The Evolving Federal Perspective on Airport and System Planning Federal Aviation Administration Prepared for:National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium Charleston, South Carolina Presented by:Elliott Black Director Office of Airport Planning and Programming Federal Aviation Administration Date: May 18, 2015

Federal Aviation Administration 2 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 From Subtitle VII of title 49, United States Code, Chapter 471 (“Airport Development”), §47103: The Secretary of Transportation shall maintain the plan for developing public- use airports in the United States, named ‘‘the national plan of integrated airport systems.” The plan shall include the kind and estimated cost of eligible airport development the Secretary of Transportation considers necessary to provide a safe, efficient, and integrated system of public-use airports adequate to anticipate and meet the needs of civil aeronautics, to meet the national defense requirements of the Secretary of Defense, and to meet identified needs of the United States Postal Service. Airport development included in the plan may not be limited to meeting the needs of any particular classes or categories of public-use airports. In maintaining the plan, the Secretary of Transportation shall consider the needs of each segment of civil aviation and the relationship of each airport to— (1) the rest of the transportation system in the particular area; (2) forecasted technological developments in aeronautics; and (3) forecasted developments in other modes of intercity transportation. Statutory Basis

Federal Aviation Administration 3 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 From Subtitle VII of title 49, United States Code, Chapter 471 (“Airport Development”), §47101(a)(7): It is the policy of the United States.... that airport construction and improvement projects that increase the capacity of facilities to accommodate passenger and cargo traffic be undertaken to the maximum feasible extent so that safety and efficiency increase and delays decrease. Statutory Basis

Federal Aviation Administration 4 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 The U.S. system of airports as of October 1, ,360 airports overall 14,212 airports designated as private-use 5,148 airports open to the public 3,333 existing airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (“NPIAS”) 544 airports certificated under Part 139 (commercial service by aircraft with 9 or more seats) 395 primary airports (scheduled commercial service with at least 10,000 annual enplanements)

Federal Aviation Administration 5 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) Airport Type Number of Airports % of U.S. EnplanementsExamples Large Hub (>1.0% of all enplanements) % Atlanta, DFW, Houston, LAX, Miami, Denver, etc. Medium Hub ( % of all enplanements) % Anchorage, Omaha, Memphis, Burbank, etc. Small Hub ( % of all enplanements) 718.3% Atlantic City, Fresno, Little Rock, etc. Non-Hub (>10,000 enplanements, but less than 0.05% of all enplanements) % Topeka, Hyannis, Missoula, Roswell, Monterey, etc. Subtotal—Primary airports395 General Aviation—National81 Van Nuys, Teterboro General Aviation—Regional458 Frederick, MD General Aviation—Local1,267 Ocean City, MD General Aviation—Basic880 Luray, VA General Aviation—Unclassified252 Everglades Airpark Subtotal—Nonprimary airports 2,9380.1% Total—existing NPIAS airports 3,333 As of October 1, 2014 Nonprimary Primary

Federal Aviation Administration 6 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Why we need an “integrated” system of airports Emergency diversions —Illness or injury (passengers, flight crew, cabin crew) —Weather —Mechanical issues —Security issues Varying aviation functions —Flight training versus commercial operations —Smaller, slower propeller aircraft versus larger, high-speed jet aircraft —Congestion management Community access

Federal Aviation Administration 7 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives February 2013 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems

Federal Aviation Administration 8 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Core Airport Operations (2014 versus 2005) Source: FAA Aerospace Forecast, 2015

Federal Aviation Administration 9 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May Days (July 2 to August 2, 2014) u Bozeman u Pensacola u Pittsburgh u Knoxville u St. Louis u Tulsa u Nashville u Fargo u Buffalo u Midland u Norfolk u Lubbock u Houston Hobby u Myrtle Beach u Albuquerque u Columbus u Syracuse u Indianapolis u Birmingham u Milwaukee u Klamath Falls u Grand Rapids u Des Moines

Federal Aviation Administration 10 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May 2015 Congressional Representatives March 2014 National Airport System Planning (NASP) Symposium May more days (Jan. 6 to Feb. 6, 2015) u Bozeman u Pensacola u Pittsburgh u Knoxville u St. Louis u Tulsa u Nashville u Fargo u Buffalo u Midland u Norfolk u Lubbock u Houston Hobby u Myrtle Beach u Albuquerque u Columbus u Syracuse u Indianapolis u Birmingham u Milwaukee u Klamath Falls u Grand Rapids u Eugene u Grand Junction u Little Rock u Savannah u Charleston u Des Moines u Waterloo u Ontario u Columbia, SC u Richmond u San Jose u Wilkes-Barre u Prescott u Fresno u Raleigh-Durham

Challenges of a Growing Aviation System Presentation to: Name: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Questions? Elliott Black Director Office of Airport Planning and Programming (202)