3/20/20071 IT Strategy and Leadership in Higher Education: Two Case Studies Case 1: Roberts Wesleyan College. Presented by Pradeep (Peter) Saxena, CIO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Copyright Computer Lab Solutions All rights reserved. Do you need usage information about your computer labs? Copyright Computer Lab Solutions.
Advertisements

Classroom Integration of a Student Computer Initiative David J. Wright Dir. Curriculum Innovation and E-Learning Karen Bull Dir. Operations, Educational.
Disaster Recovery Planning Because It’s Time! Copyright Columbia University and Bentley College, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Lynn Ray ISO Towson University Strategic Planning for IT Security Copyright Lynn Ray, This work is the intellectual property rights of the author.
Using Value Disciplines in Organizational Change Peter D. Nordgren University of Wisconsin-Superior Educause Midwest Regional Conference March 13 th, 2007.
LiveHelp over the web: a Local Collaborative Approach Rachel Cheng University Librarian Eastern Michigan University Steve Bischof Resource Assessment &
Copyright Sylvia Maxwell and Michael White, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Pam Downs Ajay Gupta The Pennsylvania Prince George’s State University Community College "Copyright Penn State University This work is the intellectual.
"Cyberspace Education: Challenges and Opportunities" Presented by: Bob Diveley Manager of Administrative Systems Columbus State University Copyright Bob.
IT Strategic Planning From Technical Dreams to Institutional Reality
Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
Copyright Anthony K. Holden, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
How Collaboration Created an Online Help Desk and Knowledge Base for the Campus Community EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2008.
Copyright Shanna Smith & Tom Bohman (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Turning Information Into Action: Enterprise Reporting at Columbia University Maria E. Mosca, Director Student Information Systems Columbia University in.
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Why We Need It In a Small Residential College The Plan The Reality What We Hope to Accomplish What We Have Learned So Far Unexpected Benefits Statistics.
So You Want to Switch Course Management Systems? We Have! Come Find Out What We’ve Learned. Copyright University of Okahoma This work is the intellectual.
1©2002 Outsell, Inc. The Voice of the User: Where Students and Faculty Go for Information Leigh Watson Healy Vice President & Chief Analyst October 2,
Copyright - L. Thanasides, 2002 Using the Right FACTS Can Be Informative: Florida’s Statewide Student Information System Linda Thanasides Marsha Stickel.
Center for Instructional Technology James Madison University Strategies for Transitioning to the Age of Digital Media Sarah E. Cheverton James Madison.
Putting the We in… We are Penn State! Copyright [Carol Findley, Lisa Dibert] [2003]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
1 A Change Model for Building and Maintaining a Successful Campus DE Strategy A. Darryl Davis  January 28, 2003 This work is the intellectual property.
Classroom Technologies Re-organization Copyright Kathy Bohnstedt, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for.
The University of South Dakota, PDA Initiative: A Two Year Experiment ? !. Roberta Ambur, CIO Cheryl Tiahrt, Manager of Technology Services Copyright University.
The University of South Dakota, Palm Initiative: A Two Year Experiment ? !. Roberta Ambur, CIO Joe Collette, Manager of Internet Services Cheryl Tiahrt,
A Balanced Scorecard is a Process Not Numbers MID ATLANTIC EDUCAUSE 2005 Saint Michael’s College Bill Anderson – Chief Information Officer Billie Miles.
Technology Support on a University Campus Contingency Theory and Collaboration.
Lynette Olson, Assessment & Effectiveness Director & Gary Langer, Associate Vice Chancellor, Office of the Chancellor, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
Page 1 Copyright Jill M. Forrester This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for.
Please Note: Copyright –David L. Snellman This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.
Serving MERLOT on Your Campus Gerry Hanley California State University and MERLOT Seminars on Academic Computing August 7, 2002 Snowmass CO Copyright Gerard.
Moving Your Paperwork Online University of California, Irvine presents PayQuest Copyright UC,Irvine This work is the.
February 22, Southwest Educause Conference 1 Copyright Rebecca Frost Davis, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Dot.edu: An e-learning Infrastructure for the University of Wisconsin System and Beyond CUMREC 2002 Charlene Douglas – Director Kathryn Gomm – Training.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Middleware 101 Dave Tomcheck UC Irvine. Overview Drivers and Assumptions Objectives The Components of the Business Architecture Implications for Stakeholders.
Value & Excitement University Technology Services Oakland University Information Technology Strategic Planning Theresa Rowe October 2004 Copyright Theresa.
1 Flat Lining Technology Investment Peter Saxena CIO, Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester NY
Ubiquitous Computing at Rensselaer Sharon Roy Director, Academic & Research Computing March 7, 2005.
Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
A Tale of Two Collaborators: Successful Collaboration Between IT and Library Services Pat Kohrman, Deena Morganti, John Shank Copyright Pat Kohrman, Deena.
IT Governance: (Re-)Assembling the Packets Fred Siff Vice-President & Chief Information Officer, Professor of Information Systems University of Cincinnati.
Copyright © 2003, The University of Texas at Austin. This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Tough Times and Hard Decisions – Thinking Strategically About IT The CIO – What Lies Ahead? Gordon Wishon, CIO, University of Notre Dame 2003 SAC Executive.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Cdigix at Yale Chuck Powell Director, Academic Media & Technology, ITS Yale University September 15, 2004 Copyright Charles Powell.
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
1 Top 10 Challenges of the Academic Technology Community John P. Campbell & Dennis A. Trinkle EDUCAUSE Live! Monday, May 21, :00-2:00 PM Copyright.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
Quickly Establishing A Workable IT Security Program EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference January 10-12, 2006 Copyright Robert E. Neale This.
COUNTING NEW FORMS OF SCHOLARSHIP TOWARD TENURE AND PROMOTION Peter Angelos and Linda Deneen University of Minnesota Duluth October 2010 This work is the.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
The Duluth Area CIO’s Consortium Collaborating with Regional IT Organizations Copyright Linda Deneen and Lynne Hamre, This work is the intellectual.
Copyright Michael White and Sylvia Maxwell, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.
Campus Texas STaR Chart Presentation for Los Fresnos HS Technology Leadership EDTC Project 2 Jaime Villarreal.
Systemic Progress in Teaching and Learning Common Elements that Support Campus-Wide Innovation Copyright Andrea Nixon, A. Michael Berman, Christine Haile,
A Collaborative Blueprint for Classroom Design Barbara Brandt, ITD Carole Meyers, Emory College Emory University Copyright Barbara Brandt and Carole Meyers.
SupportU 24x7: Implementing and Maintaining a Co-Managed Help Desk
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
John O’Keefe Director of Academic Technology & Network Services
Decentralization in a Centralized IT Environment
Presentation transcript:

3/20/20071 IT Strategy and Leadership in Higher Education: Two Case Studies Case 1: Roberts Wesleyan College. Presented by Pradeep (Peter) Saxena, CIO Roberts Wesleyan College. Copyright Peter Saxena, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

3/20/20072 RWC What is RWC Type, Size, location, budget, history, endowment Technology Program in 1997 Technology Plan in 2000

3/20/20073 IT Goals: 1. Facilitate Evolutionary Use: Help our Faculty, Staff and Students Discover and Evolve in the appropriate use of Technology in the educational processes. 2. Support the resulting Growth: Know that evolutionary adoption of technology will result in significant growth in Usage over time. Actively Plan to appropriately support technology, faculty, staff and students as they expand their horizons of Technology in the educational processes. 3. How: Provide a Stable Infrastructure Provide High Touch Support Provide Adequate Technology. Allow them to discover and evolve in the use of the Technology.

3/20/20074 Growth Since 2000

3/20/20075 All Elements of Technology

3/20/20076 Computer Hardware and Software support In , we had 520 technology units to support. In we have 1271 units to support, an increase of 2.5 times. Support Hours: In , we were primarily an 8-5 operation, 5 days a week. Now we are increasingly being asked to go to 24/7 support, extended weekends and holidays support.

3/20/20077 Business Applications We have seen a tremendous push towards computer dependant workflows, across the institution. Many business applications are integrating with Academic components to enable Faculty and Students to access and process information online.

3/20/20078 Networks We have moved from a total campus wide storage of approximately 500 GB to a total campus wide storage of 7 terabytes, an increase of 14 times. Each Faculty and Staff have 2GB Network Drives to store RWC related documents. Each student has a 1Gb network drive. This is big enough that an average student can store every paper and assignment in their 4 year stay at RWC on the Network drive.

3/20/20079 Growth in Academic Support We provide comprehensive hand holding support for Microsoft Office and Academic Applications. In , we conducted approximately 45 training sessions for faculty, staff and students. In , we are conducting an estimated 730 such sessions for faculty, staff and students, an increase of 16 times. We also support all our Program students that come to classes at off campus locations or Online.

3/20/ More on Academic Growth : 100% Classrooms are Smart Classrooms 100% Faculty are teaching with Classroom Technology 100% of Courses are on the CMS (Hybrid Courses) 20% of Faculty are heavy CMS users. Discipline Specific Academic Applications have increased 10 times since 2000.

3/20/ IT Investment: The Total IT budget has hovered around $1.2 Million for the last 6 years.

3/20/ How did we do it?

3/20/ The Building Blocks for the Technology Plan

3/20/ Budget Process IT Spending across the Institution Resources Annual Contracts Annual Technology Replacement Cycles Projects Planned growth Protect and perpetually maintain current investment in technology. 80% to 90% Invest in the future. 10% to 20% Budget Adjustments Protect at all cost. Adjust as needed. Prioritize Investment based on current and future value

3/20/ Keys to Success: Technology Plan that allowed to create Compounded Annual Growth Predictability in the budgeting cycle for 95% of the IT Budget. This allowed us to plan for the current year and the future years and execute on the plan without major roadblocks. Strict regeneration policies for all Technology. Strong Faculty Support focus. Strong Staff Support focus. High Touch Technology Staff. Squeeze the vendors through competitive pricing Continually invest in Academic

3/20/ What did we learn?

3/20/ Plan to comprehensively address all major areas of Technology Deployment Across all Divisions and Departments. Maintain parity versus preferential treatment. Technology Network Infrastructure Deployed Hardware Academic Software Academic Hardware Administrative Software Internet Presence Intranet Potrals IT Resources: Single CIO with a delegated organization. Training and Faculty Development Technical Support Help Desk Desktop Support Internet Support Application Support Aim/Plan for Steady rise in all areas over time versus feeding some areas and starving others. y x z

3/20/ What did we learn: IT cannot be “managed from the Hip” at RWC. Road to success has to be defined, communicated, funded, resourced, implemented, supported. All these areas need to be actively managed for success. Plan and Use the Plan. Review the Plan annually and make minor corrections. Stay on course to create a support infrastructure that is designed to Innovate with current and emerging technologies Sustain itself over time i.e. provide relevant technologies and support to faculty and staff and students forever. This implies that the infrastructure will evolve itself as technology and the needs of faculty and students change over time.

3/20/ What did we learn: Plan to stay “slightly” behind the “cutting edge” of the Technology Curve. Take advantage of technologies after they become stable and their viability to Higher Education has already been established by other institutions. These technologies are more affordable at this point, we can learn from their use at other institutions and faculty support is manageable. Plan and support continued innovation From the budget and support perspective Faculty Staff

3/20/ As we look towards the future..

3/20/ A [Changing] Developing Paradigm 2007: IT is the “medium” through which Education is being delivered to the Students. Every institution is impacted, regardless of size or budget.

3/20/ As we look towards the future.. If we go beyond the “hype”, Academically: The change is real but the change is not overnight. We (IT) cannot make the Faculty members change their ways to adopt newer ways of teaching. However, we can make it easier for them to make the change and adopt newer ways of academic delivery. If we successfully do this, we will never fall too far behind the technology curve.

3/20/ As we look towards the future.. If we go beyond the “hype”, Technologically: Demands of the IT Academic Delivery infrastructure are complex and will continue to get more complex. Current Higher Education IT needs demand effective IT Leadership and planning structures. They are essential to managing the IT delivery platform and ensuring success. “Consequences of error” – severe!