Using Rigorous & Relevant Standard Based Assessments to Evaluate Student Learning Kharma Banks Torrieann Dooley David Cox Road Elementary Drew Polly UNC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Advertisements

Number Talks Presented by: Kim Mott, Instructional Coach Beechgrove
Designing Instruction Objectives, Indirect Instruction, and Differentiation Adapted from required text: Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice.
The Big Picture of Numeracy. Numeracy Project Goal “To be numerate is to have the ability and inclination to use mathematics effectively – at home, at.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Dallas Independent School District Conrad High School August 2013.
Presented by Diane Burtchin Adapted from the book “Math Intervention: Building Number Power with Formative Assessments, Differentiation, and Games” by.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Dr. Derek Webb Dr. Heidi Hansen Bemidji State University Faculty.bemidjistate.edu/dwebb.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Applying Basic Facts Unit of Study 3: Basic Facts and Relationships Global Concept Guide: 4 of 4.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Grade 4 – Module 3 – Second Half.
Grade 4 – Module 5 Module Focus Session
Differentiating teaching to meet the needs of all students.
Unwrapping Standards.
Math Assessments: Creating Technology Enhanced Items and Adding Rigor Henrico County Public Schools August 2012.
Incorporating the process standards into the daily rigor Incorporating the process standards into the daily rigor.
Year 3 Number Concepts and Guided Writing April 2008.
Teaching and Learning Plymouth Church. MATH DATA TEAMS MODEL.
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Framework for Diagnostic Teaching. Framework The framework for diagnostic teaching places a premium on tailoring programs that specifically fit all readers.
BF PTA Mtg Math An Overview to Guide Parents about the Common Core, Math Expressions, and your student’s math experiences.
Parent Math Information Night December 6, 2011 Rebecca Fleming & Noreen Haus.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 5 Module 2.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
SOL Changes and Preparation A parent presentation.
Modeling Addition and Subtraction Unit of Study: Strengthening Critical Area: Understanding Place Value to Add and Subtract Global Concept Guide: 1 of.
Module 4 Shift of Application Sunnyside School District.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Kindergarten Research Presentation Brianne Ciarlo Karly Millar Amanda Todd.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Session 1: What’s The Big Idea? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Presented by the SRHS Literacy Team.  Recap Last Meeting  Focus For Today - Steps 1 And 2  Activity  Homework.
1 Overview of Class #7 Teaching Segment #3: Warm-up problem Introduction to base-ten blocks Analysis of student thinking using samples of students’ written.
SW1 FOS Networking Session Dec. 16, 2011 David Hornell Junior School.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
What does alignment look like? CurriculumAssessmentInstruction  Instructional tasks are connected to curriculum expectations  Assessment tasks are similar.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Designing Your Selected Response Assessment. Create a Cover Page Include: 1.A statement of purpose Is this an assessment FOR or OF learning (formative.
Eureka Math Parent Workshop Kindergarten Presented By: Ms. Vereen Instructional Lead Teacher.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
Daily Math Review 2 nd Grade February 6, :30 – 3:45pm.
Welcome to QualityCore ® Professional Development.
Differentiating Your Instruction Through Guided Reading.
1 Working Smarter, Not Harder: Pat Holliday Angela Szakasits Differentiating Instruction.
n Taking Notes and Keeping a Journal n Listening Skills n Working Together n Managing Your Time.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Student Growth Goals Work Session. Goals for the day 1.Develop questions to ask teachers to determine if the SGG meets the criteria established in the.
Navigating Standards: Teacher and Student Learning through Different Standards Paths Mathematical Science Research Institute The Mathematical Education.
For Elementary Schools.  The structure of the new assessment  How does it inform instruction?  What the data tells us  Where are we now?  How do.
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Grade 2 Back to School Night
Grade 3 Back to School Night
Strong Start Math Project October 6, 2016
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
Grade 5 Back to School Night
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Masterminding Math Instruction
A Systemic Approach to Basic Facts
Prepared by: Toni Joy Thurs Atayoc, RMT
Differentiated Instruction for Math III Day 1
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Addition and Subtraction Strategies for addition and subtraction
Presentation transcript:

Using Rigorous & Relevant Standard Based Assessments to Evaluate Student Learning Kharma Banks Torrieann Dooley David Cox Road Elementary Drew Polly UNC Charlotte

We’ll share our school’s efforts of choosing essential NCSCOS standards and creating rigorous assessments to evaluate mastery. Teachers will examine work and create an assessment.

Goal Share our school’s efforts –Choose which NCSCOS standards are essential (primary) –Creating rigorous assessments –Examining student work

Rigor in Mathematics Challenge students Inquiry-based learning Encourages higher-order thinking Promotes problem solving skills Involves open ended activities Allows for a variety of strategies (open- middle or open-ended tasks) Provides multiple entry points for differentiation

Rigorous Assessments Guides teacher’s instructional decisions Desired performance NCSCOS Higher-level thinking (Bloom’s Revised) Assessed performance Instruction

Essential Standards “Umbrella” Standards The standards that cover other standards Main standards that encompass other objectives Our school chooses 7-8 objectives First we chose standards and then sequenced them

Choosing Essential Standards By the end of the school year, if you’ve chosen essential standards then, more than likely, you’ve met grade level goals as set by the standard course of study Students master content objectives

Choosing Essential Standards Prioritize on the NCSCOS that address major mathematics concepts Student work has been focused on major mathematical ideas

Steps to creating rigorous assessments 1.Identify which standard you will be teaching 2.Team members bring assessment ideas to begin the dialogue 3.As a team define the expectation for mastery of the standard 4.Create assessment 5.Create rubric/common scoring system 6.Use common assessment 7.Evaluate student learning 8.Evaluate effectiveness of common assessment

1. Identify which standard you will be teaching At our school we prepared assessments at least two weeks in advance Reference the sequenced order of the essential standards

2. Team members bring assessment ideas to begin the dialogue Each person is responsible for at least one idea We share ideas to help guide us to defining mastery for the standard

3. As a team define the expectation for mastery of the standard Each person’s interpretation of the standard is used to help create a common definition of the standard –In our school we have grade level norms established by team members in order to promote a collaborative working environment

4. Create assessment Needs to challenge students: –it should be greater than their current level of knowledge –It should be indicative of the expectation post teaching Should be rigorous Should not be time consuming to grade

VIDEO

fish lamb lion monkey eagle bat dragonfly Directions: 1.) In the empty box write a rule for each circle. 2.) Write a title for the graph: Write why the fish is outside the graph. Think of an animal. Write its name and draw its picture in the correct place on the graph. Write why you put it there.

5. Create rubric/common scoring system Create an answer key for acceptable responses Assign points or criteria for scoring the assessment

Assessment Scoring For teacher use only /7 classified shapes (2,4,5,6) /3 classified angles (1) /3 congruent & similar shapes (3,7)

6. Use common assessment Pretest students & discuss results in team planning –Look for common mistakes/errors among students –Bring questions about particular student assessment to the planning session Plan instruction based on students’ results –What does the child know? –What does the child need to know? –Where will you go next with this child? Teach unit & share techniques

7. Evaluate Student Learning Give post test and discuss results in team planning –What does the child know? –What does the child need to know? –Where will you go next with this child? Make a plan for students who did not master the objective

Looking at Student Work Examine the strategies students use in addition to solutions –Student process are at times more important than solutions in order to figure out how to further students’ learning

8. Evaluate effectiveness of common assessment Reflect on assessment and students’ results –Was it too hard? Too easy? –If many students are not mastering, does the assessment or expectation for mastery need to change? Document suggested changes to improve assessment

Activity Directions: 1.Look at an assessment 2.Edit the assessment to make sure it is relevant, rigorous, and matches the standard

Standards 2.N.1.1 Illustrate whole numbers to 1,000 in groups of ones, tens, hundreds, and thousands by composing and decomposing flexible groups 2.N.1.4 Understand counting by 10s, and 100s on and off the decade 2.N.1.5 Compare whole numbers less than 1,000 with symbols and words 2.N.2.1 Remember addition and related subtraction facts (sums to 20) to develop fluency 2.N.2.2 Use properties of addition to solve multi-step, two-digit story problems 2.N.2.4 Apply strategies to compose and decompose when adding and subtracting whole numbers less than A.3.1 Understand that patterns grow or repeat

Solve the problems. 1. _______ + ________ = ______ + _________ = Which number string equals 12 ____ + ___ + _____ = 12 A B C = _________ = ________ = ________ = ________ 8. Show two different ways to get the answer = _____

9. Circle all that equal = 12+ 4= nineteen 10. Write these numbers A. 16 __________________________________ B. 8 ___________________________________ C. 11 _________________________________ 11. Fill in the blanks A _________ = 8 B ________ = Finish the patterns: A. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, _______, __________, __________ B. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, _______. __________, __________ C. 10, 20, 30, 40, _________, __________, __________ D. 80, 70, 60, 50, _________, __________, ___________

Contact Information Kharma Banks Torrieann Dooley Drew Polly –