RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Use of airborne laser scanning (LIDAR) as a tool for forest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lidar Data Applications for Natural Resource Management
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management EU ReCover project: Remote sensing services to support REDD and sustainable forest management in Fiji.
Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR.
Bob Pliszka, VP- Operations & Forestry, ImageTree Corporation Advisor- Dr. Wayne Myers, Professor of Forest Biometrics; Director, Office for Remote Sensing.
Draft LiDAR Strategy Pacific Northwest Region. Regional Strategy Team Pete Heinzen, DRM Brian Wing, Pacific Southwest Station Tom DeMeo, NR Leah Rathbun,
Modeling Digital Remote Sensing Presented by Rob Snyder.
FOR 474: Forest Inventory Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition Standards.
Remote sensing is up! Inventory & monitoring Inventory – To describe the current status of forest Landcover / landuse classification Forest structure /
Abteilung Biometrie und Informatik SMC Spring Meeting 2007, Vancouver, WA. Mapping Forest Characteristics across the Landscape using Sample Plot and Airborne.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
An Introduction to Lidar Mark E. Meade, PE, PLS, CP Photo Science, Inc.
Adams County Lidar Project
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Lecture 17 – Forest remote sensing  Reading assignment:  Ch 4.7, 8.23,  Kane et al., Interpretation and topographic correction of conifer forest.
The Potential for Integration of Lidar into FIA Operations Joseph E. Means Forest Science Department Oregon State University Kenneth C. Winterberger PNW.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
What is RADAR? What is RADAR? Active detecting and ranging sensor operating in the microwave portion of the EM spectrum Active detecting and ranging sensor.
Thank you 2 3D Elevation Program 3D data include surface elevations and natural and constructed features 3DEP increases the quality level of lidar being.
Landscape-scale forest carbon measurements for reference sites: The role of Remote Sensing Nicholas Skowronski USDA Forest Service Climate, Fire and Carbon.
Mapping Forest Vegetation Structure in the National Capital Region using LiDAR Data and Analysis Geoff Sanders, Data Manager Mark Lehman, GIS Specialist.
An overview of Lidar remote sensing of forests C. Véga French Institute of Pondicherry.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center Forest Inventory and Analysis New Technology How is FIA integrating new technological developments.
2005 USDA Imagery Contracts May 4, 2005 NDOP Steering Committee Meeting Asheville, North Carolina W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Forest Inventory and Analysis USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Remote sensing; The world beyond aerial photos.
Quantitative Estimates of Biomass and Forest Structure in Coastal Temperate Rainforests Derived from Multi-return Airborne Lidar Marc G. Kramer 1 and Michael.
Active Microwave and LIDAR. Three models for remote sensing 1. Passive-Reflective: Sensors that rely on EM energy emitted by the sun to illuminate the.
The US National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Forests: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Christopher W. Woodall with Domke, Smith, Coulston, Healey,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Elevation Data Product Needs and Requirements Larry Sugarbaker Senior Advisor - Geography.
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
LiDAR-based assessment of sunlight distribution in forest ecosystems Demetrios Gatziolis USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station
1 UNFCCC Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries 30/08-01/9/2006, Rome, Italy Overview of scientific, socio- economic,
LIDAR Technology Everett Hinkley USDA Forest Service Geospatial Management Office Prepared for Congressman Allan Mollahan's Office.
RASTERTIN. What is LiDAR? LiDAR = Light Detection And Ranging Active form of remote sensing measuring distance to target surfaces using narrow beams of.
LIDAR – Light Detection And Ranging San Diego State University.
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
DN Ordinate Length DN Difference Estimating forest structure in tropical forested sites.
USA Select Briefing to The Federal Geographic Data Committee November 6, 2001 Glenn Geoghegan SPOT Image Corporation Reston, VA
LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota.
Remote Sensing of Forest Structure Van R. Kane College of Forest Resources.
SWFWMD LiDAR Specifications – 18 April 2008 LiDAR Specifications at the SWFWMD Ekaterina Fitos & Al Karlin.
Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Survey of a Sky.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
A Picture’s Worth a Points: Phodar as an Alternative to LiDAR Peter Gould and Jacob Strunk Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Washtenaw County 2008 LiDAR Project Overview Nate Arnold, GIS Developer Washtenaw County Support Services
U NIVERSITY OF J OENSUU F ACULTY OF F ORESTRY Introduction to Lidar and Airborne Laser Scanning Petteri Packalén Kärkihankkeen ”Multi-scale Geospatial.
Dan Couch Olympia, WA DNR January, Outline Rogue Valley LiDAR Background Stand Metrics Comparison Results:  LiDAR vs Timber Cruise BLM Forest Inventory.
Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Spatial resolution.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Lidar Point Clouds for Developing Canopy Height Models (CHM) for Bankhead National Forest Plots By: Soraya Jean-Pierre REU Program at Alabama A & M University.
Module 2.8 Overview and status of evolving technologies REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module 2.8 Overview.
Forest ecological applications of ALS ALS provide 3D information where each point has height (and intensity) value Even with low pulse density data, say,
IFSAR and terrestrial LIDAR for vegetation study in Sonora, Texas
Factsheet # 17 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Estimating Tree Species Diversity.
Learning Objectives I can compare photographs with other types of remote sensing images. I can describe the uses & importance of the global positioning.
Factsheet # 19 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Urban.
USGS contribution to assessing mangrove conditions using a multidisciplinary approach Elitsa Peneva-Reed 24 October, 2017.
Washington Geological Survey
Bob McGaughey Pacific Northwest Research Station
Big data for Global Change Ecology (Biogeography)
Presentation transcript:

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Use of airborne laser scanning (LIDAR) as a tool for forest measurement and monitoring: use and potential Steve Reutebuch Hans-Erik Andersen Bob McGaughey Demetrios Gatziolis Resource Monitoring & Assessment Program Vegetation Monitoring & Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station LIDAR—what is it?  Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) Uses laser light to measure distance Uses laser light to measure distance  Different detection approaches Time of flight Time of flight Phase difference Phase difference  Hundreds of applications  In natural resources, 3 LIDAR types are widely available

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Widely available LIDAR  Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) Primarily used in engineering Primarily used in engineering Some use in forestry research scanning plots or individual trees and logs Some use in forestry research scanning plots or individual trees and logs

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Widely available LIDAR  NASA IceSAT satellite LIDAR Global- and continental-scale forest canopy height and biomass estimates Global- and continental-scale forest canopy height and biomass estimates  70 m diameter footprint  175 meters spacing Difficult to remove topographic effects on canopy heights Difficult to remove topographic effects on canopy heights Operational Operational IceSAT-2 launch 2016 ??? IceSAT-2 launch 2016 ???

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Widely available LIDAR  Airborne laser scanning (ALS) Routinely flown commercially over large areas Routinely flown commercially over large areas Large vendor pool Large vendor pool Mature mission specs & deliverables Mature mission specs & deliverables Mature software to process data Mature software to process data Many state and federal partners Many state and federal partners

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station ALS LIDAR data uses  Topographic mapping of bare earth surface—primary use Engineering Engineering Flood risk mapping Flood risk mapping Hydrologic modeling Hydrologic modeling Geologic mapping Geologic mapping Landslide mapping Landslide mapping  Infrastructure mapping—still developing  Vegetation measurement and mapping— still developing, with operational uses

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station National review of ALS LIDAR data needs  USGS National Digital Elevation Program: Enhanced Elevation Data Requirements Study Enhanced Elevation Data Requirements Study  Funded: USGS, FEMA, NRCS, NGA (DOD)  FY10-12: Conduct study  FY13: Initiate enhanced elevation data collection  Primary use: update bare earth surface models  USGS study recognizes many other uses  130,000 sq miles of data with ARRA funds

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station USGS recognized uses of LIDAR

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 2010 State LIDAR efforts  8 states have statewide LIDAR programs North Carolina, Louisiana, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa North Carolina, Louisiana, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa  8 states have program initiatives Florida, Texas, New York, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, South Carolina, Mississippi Florida, Texas, New York, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, South Carolina, Mississippi  Many more projects areas have been flown ~25% of the conterminous US already has LIDAR collected ~25% of the conterminous US already has LIDAR collected Unknown amount of private forest coverage Unknown amount of private forest coverage

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 2010 Oregon LIDAR Consortium

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 2010 Puget Sound LIDAR Consortium

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Not all LIDAR data are the same  Things that affect LIDAR data for forest measurements: Mission specs (pulse rate, scan pattern, flying height, airspeed, pulse diameter, etc.) Mission specs (pulse rate, scan pattern, flying height, airspeed, pulse diameter, etc.) Time of year (leaf-off, leaf-on, snow free, etc.) Time of year (leaf-off, leaf-on, snow free, etc.) LIDAR sensor and data processing LIDAR sensor and data processing Experience of LIDAR vendor Experience of LIDAR vendor

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Not all LIDAR data are the same Therefore, don’t expect to get same results when models from one LIDAR dataset are applied to other datasets, even in the same forest type!!!

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station LIDAR used in forest measurement  When only partial LIDAR coverage of an area is possible: Sampling within a multi-stage framework Sampling within a multi-stage framework  Statistical framework has been developed and tested by several researchers  PNW LIDAR trials in Alaska:  Hans Andersen, PI  Kenai Peninsula  Interior Alaska

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Remote sensing Field plots Wall-to-wall low- resolution coverage w/ LANDSAT TM, SPOT, etc. Subsampling with high res. LIDAR, aerial photos Measurements of trees, shrubs, moss, soils, down wood. Example: Multi-level sampling to support forest inventory in remote northern regions Subsampling high res. satellite imagery

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station PNW-RMA (Anchorage) is carrying out a project to test a multi-level approach for biomass estimation in the Tok (1,911 sq km) (1,911 sq km) Multi-level approach will use: Satellite imagery (Landsat, SPOT, PALSAR, Quickbird) Satellite imagery (Landsat, SPOT, PALSAR, Quickbird) 27 High-density LIDAR strip samples 27 High-density LIDAR strip samples Field plot data (80 plots) Field plot data (80 plots)

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station LIDAR used in forest measurement  When “wall-to-wall” LIDAR coverage is available 2 types of measurements can be made: 1.Forest layers computed solely from the LIDAR 2.Inventory layers predicted from regression models or imputation methods using LIDAR and well measured ground plots

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 1– Layers computed solely from the LIDAR point cloud—obvious ones  Canopy surface model  Bare earth model

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 3-ft bare earth model 3-ft canopy surface model 1:12,000 aerial photo

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Layers computed solely from the LIDAR point cloud—obvious ones  Bare earth model  Canopy surface model  Canopy height model (Canopy surface minus ground surface)

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 3-ft resolution canopy height model Buildings

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Layers computed solely from the LIDAR point cloud—obvious ones  Bare earth model  Canopy surface model  Canopy height model  Canopy cover model

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station % Canopy Cover (0.1 acre pixels)

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Layers computed solely from the LIDAR point cloud—obvious ones  Bare earth model  Canopy surface model  Canopy height model  Canopy cover model  Intensity image from 1 st returns

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station 1.5-ft resolution intensity image

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Layers computed solely from the LIDAR point cloud—not so obvious  Variance, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, etc. of the canopy  Mean, min, max, percentile heights of the canopy  Density of the canopy  Forest / non-forest mask

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Standard Deviation of Canopy Height

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station LIDAR used in forest measurement  When “wall-to-wall” coverage is available 2 types of measurements can be made: 1.Forest layers computed solely from the LIDAR 2.Inventory layers predicted from regression models or imputation methods using LIDAR and well measured ground plots

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station WARNINGS !!!  Can’t get species information from the LIDAR data In some cases, can get: In some cases, can get:  Deciduous vs non-deciduous  Live crowns vs dead crowns  Can’t get understory, down wood, etc.  Not all LIDAR is the same: Changes in LIDAR sensors, sensor settings, and flight parameters can change results Changes in LIDAR sensors, sensor settings, and flight parameters can change results

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station MORE WARNINGS !!!!!  Most difficult part of a LIDAR project is: Getting good ground plot data: 1.Matched with regards to geographic position to an accuracy ~ equal to the LIDAR horizontal accuracy (~+/- 1m) 2.Matched with regard to the primary element being measured—large enough to minimize plot edge effect, but small enough to characterize tree size differences within plots (~0.1 – 0.2 ac circular plot)

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station MORE WARNINGS !!!!! (cont.)  Most difficult part of a LIDAR project is: Getting good ground plot data: 3.Matched in time of measurement--generally within 1-2 yrs of LIDAR acquisition 4.Matched in what’s measured by the LIDAR and on the plot—all stems that make up a significant portion of the above ground canopy—generally down to a 7-10 cm DBH lower limit, including all species

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Examples of layers predicted from regression models  Sherman Pass Scenic Byway Colville National Forest Colville National Forest 100,000 acres flown in ,000 acres flown in 2008  74 1/10th acre plots used to develop LIDAR inventory regressions measured in 2008

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Sherman Pass LIDAR Project Forest cover minimum: 10ft ht & 2% cover in 66ft pixel Ground Plots

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Regression models Lorey’s BA-weighted Height ft [LHT_ft] = [ElevP90] *

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Regression models Lorey’s BA-weighted Height ft

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Regression models Live Basal Area sqft/ac [LBA_sqftac] = sqr ( [ElevSD] * [ElevP95] * [PC1stRtsCC] * )

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Regression models Live Basal Area sqft/ac

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Red areas have LIDAR predictor values >+/-10% beyond the range of the ground plots Greater than +/- 10% beyond ground plot LIDAR Metrics

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Example ArcGIS Calculations  Any of the LIDAR layers can be used in GIS to calculate combinations of forest structure variables

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Live Basal Area > 200 sqft/ac

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Canopy Cover 80%+ and Height 100ft+

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Current limitations on using existing LIDAR data  No coordination within natural resource organizations at any level for: 1. LIDAR specifications necessary for forest measurements 2. Ground plot measurements when large, multi-agency LIDAR acquisitions occur Missed opportunity to leverage existing LIDAR Missed opportunity to leverage existing LIDAR

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Possible problems with use of FIA plots for LIDAR projects  Plots not georeferenced well enough  Not enough plots measured in area within 1-2 years of LIDAR acquisition  Plot layout not well designed for use with high-resolution remote sensing data

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station Future for LIDAR in forest measurement?  Faster, cheaper, better LIDAR data, but doesn’t solve ground plot problems  Multi-temporal LIDAR datasets for change analysis  Multispectral LIDAR for species classification  New satellite-based systems for sampling  Beyond LIDAR—other 3D sensors (IFSAR,etc.)

RMA Vegetation Monitoring and Remote Sensing Team USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station LIDAR software DEMO Thurs 2009 Savannah River DOE Site LIDAR Project