Obtaining LiDAR Data, Contracting Considerations Kenny Legleiter Project Manager Merrick & Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data A story of data, more data and some more data.
Advertisements

State of Indiana Orthophotography and LiDAR Program
Large Scale Topographic Mapping in Indonesia
High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,
ASPRS Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data Dr. David Maune (Dewberry) Dr. Qassim Abdullah (Woolpert) Hans Karl.
Evaluation of Lidar for Highway Planning, Location and Design Reginald R. Souleyrette, Shauna Hallmark, David A. Veneziano, and Sitansu Pattnaik Abstract.
Accuracy Assessment of NEXTMap Elevation Data for the State of Alabama M. Lorraine Tighe PhD Candidate Director, Geospatial Solutions - Intermap November.
1 Automated Machine Guidance: Electronic Files and Design Data AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Meeting August 18, 2010 – Burlington, VT Mark Taylor.
Optimizing Laser Scanner Locations using Viewshed Analysis MEA 592 Final Project November 20,2009 Jeff Smith.
Brian S. Keiling Program Head – Forest Management Dabney S.Lancaster Community College.
1 Virginia Geographic Information Network Virginia’s Elevation Framework Layer Upcoming LiDAR Projects and the Elevation FIAT John.
Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote.
GIS In Maryland Ken Miller Director, Watershed Information Services.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
1. LiDAR Mapping Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping provided for the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) – established.
An Introduction to Lidar Mark E. Meade, PE, PLS, CP Photo Science, Inc.
Acquisition and Processing of LiDAR Data
Issues and Answers in Quality Control of LIDAR DEMs for North Carolina DFIRMs Gary W. Thompson, RLS North Carolina Geodetic Survey David F. Maune, Ph.D.,
Data Acquisition Lecture 8. Data Sources  Data Transfer  Getting data from the internet and importing  Data Collection  One of the most expensive.
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps. What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and how do I use it?* A FIRM is a map created by the NFIP for floodplain.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
Geospatial Data Accuracy: Metrics and Assessment Qassim A. Abdullah, Ph.D. Fugro EarthData, Inc. PDAD Special Session 39 : Sensor Calibration.
3001 LiDAR Services VGIN Presentation – December 2007.
Presentation to the WVAGP Writing a Successful GIS RFP Robert A. Rickard – Geospatial PM.
Minnesota Elevation Mapping Project Metro Area Collect 1/13/2011 Tim Loesch Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
January, Seminar Agenda 1.Welcome & Introductions 2.Program history VBMP details 4.Base offerings / Pricing 5.How to order from VGIN & Sanborn.
Viewshed Creation: From Digital Terrain Model to Digital Surface Model Edward Ashton.
Chapter 3 Sections 3.5 – 3.7. Vector Data Representation object-based “discrete objects”
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Center for EROS Remote Sensing Technologies Group The Proposed USGS Plan for Digital.
Accuracy and Maps Mike Ritchie, PE, PLS, PSM, CP President and CEO Photo Science.
Acquiring Aerial Photos Where and how to get aerial photography.
2012 KYTC Transportation-GIS Conference Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Office Building 200 Mero St., Frankfort, KY Thursday March 29, 2012 Pavement.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE.
Understanding LIDAR Technology Brian Mayfield, CP, GISP, GLS Timothy A. Blak, GS, PLS, CFM.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships IGIC.
Managing Contractors & Survey Data Presented by Bruce Carter.
Use of GIS Methodology for Online Urban Traffic Monitoring German Aerospace Center Institute of Transport Research M. Hetscher S. Lehmann I. Ernst A. Lippok.
LiDAR Contour Options Randy Mayden, VP Business Development
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
Airborne Lidar Calibration Approaches Defining calibration techniques and assessing the results JAMIE YOUNG LIDAR SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST.
LIDAR Technology Everett Hinkley USDA Forest Service Geospatial Management Office Prepared for Congressman Allan Mollahan's Office.
Digital Imagery Guideline ASPRS/PDAD Gerald J. Kinn Applanix ISG A Trimble Company 2 Dec 2003.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices ASPRS Annual Conference Thursday.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
Use of Mobile LiDAR in the Louisiana Inch Ortho Program Presented by Hugh Bender Sanborn Map Co. May 3 rd 2011.
Generation of a Digital Elevation Model using high resolution satellite images By Mr. Yottanut Paluang FoS: RS&GIS.
PlanningCollectionProcessingQuality ControlDeliverables Mobile LiDAR Best Practices.
TIMOTHY SERVINSKY PROJECT MANAGER CENTER FOR SURVEY RESEARCH Data Preparation: An Introduction to Getting Data Ready for Analysis.
© 2006, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc. Privileged and confidential information. Distribution or copying prohibited unless approved in writing. 1 CAPCOG.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
SWFWMD LiDAR Specifications – 18 April 2008 LiDAR Specifications at the SWFWMD Ekaterina Fitos & Al Karlin.
E-Education Institute Lidar Technology and Applications Proposal for an elective course to be offered by the Dutton e-Education Institute MGIS Capstone.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
© 2008, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc. Privileged and confidential information. Distribution or copying prohibited unless approved in writing. 1 The Considerations.
SWRCBSWRCBSWRCBSWRCB AB2886 Implementation Sacramento Training Sacramento Training August 13 & 14, 2001 Marilyn R. Arsenault ArsenaultLegg, Inc.
Contour Mapping from LiDAR Presented by: Dave Bullington Surdex Corporation St. Louis, MO
LiDAR – What is it and How is it Used? Presented by John Erickson Project Manager Ayres Associates February 13, 2003 Presented by John Erickson Project.
-National Lidar Initiative- the NDEP Perspective National Lidar Initiative Meeting February 2007 – Reston, VA Presented by Bryon Ellingson Executive Secretary,
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships Current.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Ontario’s Current LiDAR Acquisition Initiative
Mapping Technology Overview
Understanding LIDAR Technology
Washington Geological Survey
Digital Imagery Guideline ASPRS/PDAD Gerald J
Presentation transcript:

Obtaining LiDAR Data, Contracting Considerations Kenny Legleiter Project Manager Merrick & Company

Cost Considerations How much will LiDAR Cost? $$$$

Factors that Affect Price  Contracting mechanism  Writing of the specifications/statement of work  Entity doing the QA/QC of the data  Disk space needs  Client project management  Acquisition parameters  Acquisition sensors (LiDAR, Digital cameras, hyperspectral, thermal)

Factors that Affect Price (cont.)  Square mileage of area (cheaper by the dozen)  Shape of the project area (square or rectangular in shape is best)  Ground Sample Distance (GSD)  <1 meter  1 meter  2 meter  3 meter

Factors that Affect Price (cont.)  Final Product Deliverables  LiDAR only processed to bare earth  LiDAR with breaklines  Contour intervals  Imagery / Digital Orthophotography  Map Accuracy Specifications  ASPRS – Class 1, 2 or 3  National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA)  FEMA  Number of QA/QC Points

LIDAR Cost Examples Area (square miles) LID AR GSD (ft) meet NSSDA specification for contour Interval (ft) LIDAR /Sq. Mile Hydro- enforced Breaklin es/Sq. Mile Total LIDAR w/ Breakline s/Sq. Mile (18.5 cm vertical RMSE) $500$150$650 1, (18.5 cm vertical RMSE) $200$140$340 5, (18.5 cm vertical RMSE) $125$120$245 10, (18.5 cm vertical RMSE) $105$100$205

Contracts/Agreements What factors should be considered when contracting for LiDAR?

The Keys to a Successful LiDAR Project  Understand your mapping requirements and the purpose for completing a LIDAR project prior to signing of the contract.  Utilize a qualification-based selection process to select your LIDAR consultant.  Hire a LiDAR firm that owns a LIDAR sensor.  Ask for quality control plan.  Dedicate the appropriate number of internal resources to the project.  Determine who will lead the effort, act as a Project Manager

Keys to a Successful LiDAR Project (continued)  Know exactly how the quality control is going to be performed by the consultant and internally.  Understand the differences in LIDAR technology. The age of the sensor, pulse rate, roll compensation, field of view are unique to each system.  Determine which accuracy specification is going to be adhered to (i.e. ASPRS, NMAS, NSSDA, etc.).  Hybrid accuracy standards should only be used as long as there is accurate LiDAR specifications and is tailored to the project.

Keys to a Successful LiDAR Project (continued)  Include a ground truth survey component in the project. Best if completed independently of LiDAR contractor.  Request a LIDAR flight plan in the Request For Qualifications that clearly demonstrates the consultants understanding of the acquisition issues. (side overlap percentages, eye safety requirements, flight line breaks due to extreme elevation change, multiple pass areas over very tall buildings, etc.)  Make sure LiDAR specifications are in the RFP or RFQ, don’t use a traditional photogrammetry specification or use a LiDAR specifications that is several years old

Three Types of Contracts  Request for Proposals (RFP)  Price key factor  Common for local governments  Request for Qualifications (RFQ)  Qualifications key factor  Price worked out after award  Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)  Multiple task orders/multiple years  Ex. USGS, Corps of Engineers

QA/QC of Data Exactly how accurate is my data? Allows users to understand “how accurate is accurate”

Sources of Error in LiDAR Data  DGPS, Differential GPS  Position of the plane (lat, long, elevation)  IMU, Inertial Measurement Unit  Attitude of the plane (pitch, roll, heading)  LiDAR Sensor  Accuracy of ranging and trajectories of shots.  Calibration of data  Relative accuracy of data which is typically the greatest source of error.  Ground control survey  Control creates absolute accuracy.  System Installation  System mounting  Flight Acquisition  Proper GPS and IMU collection procedures  Data Processing Problems  GPS processing and LiDAR boresighting  Filtering  Smoothing

Helpful Hints  How is the data going to be QA/QC once it is delivered – BE PREPARED!!  Each delivery should be reviewed and commented on within 30-days of delivery  Software can be used to help with QA/QC the land cover survey points – determine accuracy by land cover  Other review methods to look for artifacts, quality of data, data formatting, flight lines not aligned, etc.  Recommend hiring an experienced company to do the review (ex. Dewberry)

Land Cover Validation Methods QA/QC using survey equipment  Individual check points  Surveyed cross sections  Area surveys  Existing survey points

Ground Truth Surveying Require a digital photograph of the survey shot

Land Cover Ground Truth Surveying  Detailed land-cover and land-use classification survey  Used to determine accuracy in and under vegetation  FEMA guidelines for cover class surveys  Allows users to understand “how accurate is accurate”

Individual Checkpoints  FEMA has general guidelines, but each region of the country will be different  Urban  Bare ground  Short grass  Brush  Forest  20 or more survey points per category, minimum of three land cover types

Area Surveys and Cross-Sections  Verify larger area (compared to single points)  Typically high degree of accuracy  Provides an accuracy assessment for real world applications  High Cost

Existing Control, Utility Contour Databases  Existing databases with elevations attributes (i.e., geodetic, utility surveys)  Depending on vintage, may not truly represent present conditions  Be careful of basis of survey methodology  Wrong projections/datums

Survey Control Report  Works upon analyzing control point elevations compared to their vertical intersection point of the LiDAR TIN, depending on the user defined classes enabled and disabled  Only reports vertical accuracy  Contour Interval Wizard to choose from:  FGDC/NSSDA/FEMA  ASPRS Class 1, 2, or 3  NMAS  RMSEz or Vertical Accuracy requirement can by manually input  Control is analyzed to TIN of DSM surface  Statistics report:  Average Z Error  Median Z Error  Minimum Z Error  Maximum Z Error  Standards report for PASS or FAIL for:  Average Z Error  RMSEz  Vertical Accuracy  Achievable Contour Interval report for:  FGDC/NSSDA/FEMA  ASPRS Class 1, 2, or 3  NMAS  Selectable classes to analyze from  Tabular readout of all control information  Export control report to Excel file  Export DSM data for the 3 points forming the TIN of analysis for each control point

Contour Results Contours without breaklines DEM Contours with breaklines DTM

Visual Inspection Should NOT See Any of These Artifacts

Above Ground Points Not Removed

LiDAR Not Properly Calibrated Flight lines should be within the vertical accuracy specification

QA/QC of LiDAR Data DO NOT TAKE THIS STEP LIGHTLY, PLAN EARLY ON HOW YOU WANT TO DO THIS!!!

Questions Kenny Legleiter Project Manager Merrick & Company