Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention 1 Getting Ready for SIP: Developing the Action Sequences FALL 2006.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Values (How must we behave to reach our vision?) Mission ( Why do we exist?) Vision (What must our school become ?)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Educational Psychology/ Special Education Class #2 Agenda 1. Ministry document: Education for All 2. Group work: Chapters 2 and 3 of Education for All.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Principal Professional Development Summer 2005 Getting Ready for School Improvement Planning Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
Timberlane Regional School District
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
North Side Elementary School Dr. Mary Nardo, Principal North Side is making AYP. In addition to making Adequate Yearly Progress for the year, North.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase II: Diagnosis AEA 267 September 2011.
Introduction to School-based Decision Making A 6-hour training for new SBDM Council members.
Leadership In Support of English Learners Merle Price January 18, 2005.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
A Guide for Professional Development Planning for Implementation of the CCSS November 2011 Updated February 2012
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
NC Department of Public Instruction: Future-Ready Core NC Department of Public Instruction Academic Services and Instructional Support Curriculum, Instruction,
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
The School Counseling Program
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Office of Service Quality
Mission The Kentucky Department of Education’s mission is to prepare all Kentucky students for next-generation learning, work and citizenship by engaging.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
February 6,  General Information – Creative Explorations, Director’s Meeting, Identification, Budget, Summer Programs  Unified Improvement Planning.
Eight-Step Problem Solving for School Improvement Planning Presented by Region IV Differentiated Accountability.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Targeted District Review Report
Targeted District Review Report
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability, Assessment, & Intervention

Goals Participants will gain skills for their use of the Getting Results! frameworks. Participants will: review all of the steps in School Improvement Planning including analyzing data and synthesizing findings from multiple sources of data review all of the steps in School Improvement Planning including analyzing data and synthesizing findings from multiple sources of data engage in discussion of “root causes” engage in discussion of “root causes”

What is Getting Results! ? Framework for school improvement planning developed by PDE that the School District of Philadelphia has adapted. Framework for school improvement planning developed by PDE that the School District of Philadelphia has adapted. Access through the School District of Philadelphia homepage. Access through the School District of Philadelphia homepage.

Keep In Mind… AYP - Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 AYP - Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 Reported Results - Assessment Anchors Reported Results - Assessment Anchors Parent Involvement Action Sequence SIP is online Review of SIPs PDE Review of SIPs Science Action Sequence Science Action Sequence

PSSA Reading Reporting Categories

Reporting Category Standard A. Numbers & Operations2.1 Numbers 2.2 Computation B. Measurement2.3 Measurement C. Geometry2.9 Geometry 2.10 Trigonometry D. Algebraic Concepts2.8 Algebra E. Data Analysis & Probability 2.6 Statistics & Data 2.7 Probability Standards assessed over the five reporting categories 2.4 Mathematical Reasoning 2.5 Problem Solving Not Assessed/Integrated in others2.11 Concepts of Calculus PSSA Mathematics Reporting Categories

Getting Results! School District of Philadelphia School Improvement Planning Process School District of Philadelphia School Improvement Planning Process PD Calendar Milestones of Progress Executive Summary PD Calendar Milestones of Progress Executive Summary Step 2: Design Step 2: Design Step 4: Development of People Step 4: Development of People Step 3: Delivery Step 3: Delivery Summary of Shared Values Prioritize Improvement Targets Prioritize Improvement Targets Step 1: Summarize Data Identify Root Causes Step 1: Summarize Data Identify Root Causes Step 5: Documentation Step 5: Documentation A 5 Step Process

1. READING At least 54% of all students will be proficient in Reading, as measured by the annual state-wide PSSA assessments. 2. MATHEMATICS At least 45% of all students will be proficient in Mathematics, as measured by the annual state-wide PSSA assessments. 3. STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN STATE ASSESSMENTS At least 95% of eligible students will participate in required state-wide assessments. 4. STUDENT ATTENDANCE Student attendance in school will improve continuously (to an average of at least 90% by 2014). 5. FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION RATE (high schools only) The 4-year graduation rate for high school students will increase consistently (to at least 80% by 2014) Student Achievement Improvement Targets * * If your school has already met these targets for all students and student groups, consider setting your own challenging, ‘stretch’ targets that will ensure continuous improvement of instructional practices and student achievement. Every school improvement plan must address the following areas of student success:

Achievement School Profile SAT Team Walk Through Student Performance Goals Strategies & Interventions Monitoring Of Evidence Evaluating Task Reporting Professional Development Getting Results Process Flow DATA SOURCES Data Summary Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Repeat Steps 1 through 5 for each component of the SIP. TARGETSACTION SEQUENCES DOCUMENTATION

Summarize the Shared Values Summary includes the shared values, mission, core beliefs, and vision of the school community Summary includes the shared values, mission, core beliefs, and vision of the school community

Data Collect, Synthesize, Prioritize and Summarize Data Collect, Synthesize, Prioritize and Summarize analyze student data identify most significant weaknesses/gaps prioritize weaknesses/gaps

Data Analysis Guide Worksheets to Assist in Analysis of Multiple Data Sources for School Improvement Planning

Step 1: Data Where are we now? Step 1: Data Where are we now? Summary – includes highlights of the analyses of student data Summary – includes highlights of the analyses of student data Identification of root causes that prevent or promote student achievement Identification of root causes that prevent or promote student achievement

Step 2: Design Where do we want to go next? Step 2: Design Where do we want to go next? Select research based, high leverage strategies that address the root causes Select research based, high leverage strategies that address the root causes Action sequence for reading, mathematics and science is required Action sequence for reading, mathematics and science is required Thematic schools may select a strategy to support their theme Thematic schools may select a strategy to support their theme

Step 3: Delivery How are we going to get there? Step 3: Delivery How are we going to get there? Same process Same process Importance of building capacity of staff Importance of building capacity of staff Maximum use of resources (human and financial) Maximum use of resources (human and financial)

Step 4: Development of People What additional skills do we need? Step 4: Development of People What additional skills do we need? Determine training and skills needed by staff Determine training and skills needed by staff Professional development calendar aligns to address root causes/student needs Professional development calendar aligns to address root causes/student needs

Step 5: Documentation How do we track our progress? Step 5: Documentation How do we track our progress? Effectiveness of strategies Effectiveness of strategies Documentation process (time intervals) Documentation process (time intervals)

Milestones of Progress Quality of Teaching Quality of Teaching Quality Leadership Quality Leadership Artful Use of Infrastructure Artful Use of Infrastructure Continuous Learning Ethic Continuous Learning Ethic

Checking for Understanding What are your questions about the action sequence?

Root Causes Introduction & Exercises

Root Causes A Root Cause is the deepest underlying cause or causes of positive or negative symptoms within any process, which if removed, would result in elimination, or substantial reduction, of the symptom.

Why Root Cause Analysis ? Root Cause Analysis: helps to eliminate the problem, not just the symptom conserves scarce resources promotes discussion and reflection provides rationale for strategy selection

Determining Root Causes Will correcting or eliminating this root cause result in success? If yes, then it is a root cause. If no, then it is a contributing factor.

Problem, Root Cause, Solution Problem/Symptom: Your water bill is extremely high! Possible Root Causes:

A Guide for Identifying Root Causes “We can talk or dream about the glorious schools of the future or we can create them.” Marilyn Ferguson

Dimensions of School Improvement SUPPORTING REALM parents governance personnel ENABLING REALM materials schedules professional development organizational structures CORE REALM instruction curriculum assessments school leadership monitoring staff accountability for performance others identified by the school funding student readiness to learn others identified by the school

Checking for Understanding What are your questions about analyzing data and identifying root causes?

What can you expect for September?