Options for Evaluating the Performance of a Tax Administration Agency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

By V Misser. INTRODUCTION financial record management; financial record management; monitoring and evaluating spending trends; monitoring and evaluating.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
User Satisfaction Why? User Satisfaction Surveys are conducted to ensure we receive feedback from our customers in order to gauge.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
New Models for Sustainability Directed Care environment Australian Multicultural Community Services approach to financial tracking in a Client Directed.
Stephen A. Wandner Senior Economist U.S. Department of Labor Michael Wiseman Research Professor George Washington University.
World Bank Discussion Panel: Tax for Development April 11, 2011 Commissioner Juan Ricardo Ortega Lopez DIAN (Colombian Customs and Tax Administration)
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
CEET Conference 2008 Is Quality Assurance Improving? Rob Fearnside, Deputy Director VRQA.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
13 Management Control Systems, The Balanced Scorecard, and Responsibility Accounting.
GROUP I PRESENTATION Visit to Ministry of Finance and Zambia Revenue Authority.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Data Mining Compliance Initiatives Iowa Department of Revenue Tax Gap Compliance Program MSATA Annual Conference Traverse City, Michigan August 22, 2006.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
Improving Government Effectiveness Tracy Gallo – State of Vermont June Sweeney - Office of the State Auditor.
1 Performance Measures Rebecca Stark, Court Administrator Austin Municipal Court.
Governor Visits PaJeS Richard Tyndall NGA Consultant 10 th february 2015 © NGA
Presented by Linda Martin
System Establishing Your Management Reporting System.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy Briefing: Strategic Plans for UBO Date: 24 March 2010 Time: 0800–0850.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
STATE TREASORY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Ministry of Finance Republic of Croatia.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Monitoring & Evaluation. Objective Learn the why, what and how-to approach to monitoring Review monitoring techniques and define the roles monitoring.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
1. 2 Project Development Objective Implement an EU-compliant, efficient, and sustainable revenue collection system that facilitates private sector development.
Revenue Administration Reform Project and Further Revenue Administration Reform Project and Further Restructuring for Higher Efficiency and Effectiveness.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part IV Control Processes in Police Management Chapter 12 Control and Productivity in the Police Setting.
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON KEY NATIONAL INDICATORS Audit on Social Protection of Vulnerable Groups Mrs Ivanka Kesyakova, SAI Bulgaria Sofia, March.
Maximizing the Value of Investments in Tax Administration Terry Lutes Principal, M Group.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
Strategic Plan Development Using KPIs to Develop the Strategic Plan.
Public Presentation to the Board of Directors Ontario Works February 14, 2007.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l POA 3: SUPPORTING VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.
Census Processing Baku Training Module.  Discuss:  Processing Strategies  Processing operations  Quality Assurance for processing  Technology Issues.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
Forum on National Plans and PRSPs IN EAST ASIA Forum on National Plans and PRSPs IN EAST ASIA April 4 - 6, 2006, Vientiane, LAO PDR By Ms. Heang Siek Ly.
Quality Standard Quality standards provide a set of criteria that can be used to monitor the management and provision of services, the quality of services.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT STATISTICAL SYSTEM Lidia Bratanova, Statistical.
Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
1 Measuring Impact Guide This guide is an introduction to assessing the impact and spending effectiveness of your district’s initiatives and the resources.
Neeraj Kumar Negi Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office March 11 th 2015 Performance Measurement in GEF.
Work shop on Procurement Key-performance indicators with selected implementing entities Public procurement and property administration agency August 2016.
Developing a Compliance Strategy
Key features of an effective Compliance Strategy
The Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool (TADAT)
Country Level Programs
SCOA for Municipalities:
SCOA for Municipalities:
Valvira The National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Roles and Responsibilities
Financial Control Measures
ESF evaluation partnership
Financial Control Measures
Co-Curricular Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Options for Evaluating the Performance of a Tax Administration Agency Presented by Denise Edwards-Dowe Inland Revenue Dominica

Reasons for Evaluating Performance Private and Public Sector organizations require information on performance:- For decision making For development of strategic plans To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their organization

Regional Tax Administration Agencies and Performance Evaluation With support from the ministries of finance, most tax administration agencies within the region have attempted to reform and modernize their agencies The aim of the modernization, from the point of view of the ministries of finance has been:- to maximize collection of revenue For the most part, the attempts at modernization has taken place through the development of information technology systems and restructuring the tax agency along functional lines Ministries of finance throughout the region use the annual revenue collections to measure the performance of their tax administration agency

Regional Tax Administration Agencies and Performance Evaluation For tax administrators in the region, the main focus is on performance in auditing, processing of returns, compliance and taxpayer education in order to satisfy the expectations of the ministries of finance – maximum revenue collection

Options used to Evaluating the Performance of Tax Administration Agencies Three options used by modern tax administration agencies to measure performance Performance measurement system Benchmarking Performance standards

Performance Measurement System Measuring is the act of assigning numbers to properties and characteristics The purpose of a measurement system is to:- provide information / feedback relative to the goals of the organization and its programs enable the organization to identify areas requiring attention to perform better in the future

Performance Measurement System A good performance measurement system has the following characteristics: a plan identifying a set of objectives to be achieved the activities and resources needed to accomplish those objectives a process (IT) for capturing, identifying, collecting and analyzing information on how well the plan’s objectives are being met a process for making decisions concerning activities undertaken in pursuit of the stated objectives the corresponding allocation of resources

Performance Measurement System The performance process: Step 1: Define the tax administration agency’s objectives, and the strategies and resources to be employed to meet those objectives. That key step includes a determination of what should be measured. Step 2: Identify measurable indicators of the agency’s activities, output, and outcomes. In some instances, measures are more direct than others. For example, a tax administration agency that may want to improve its collections of arrears by 5% can measure its performance directly. However, that tax administration agency would find it difficult to measure improvements in the quality of audits. The agency may be better off measuring its efforts at improving the quality of the audits. It is important therefore, that measurement be as direct as possible

Performance Measurement System The performance process: Step 3: Define exactly how to collect and verify the data for the indicator - it is imperative that everyone understands the process. Step 4: Analyze the data Step 5: Forward data to management. Data is to be used to adjust strategies and reallocate resources

Performance Measurement System Examples of performance measurement used by tax administration agencies Percent of data entry errors Length of time to process a filed return Length of time to process a VAT refund Percent of complaints about client service Length of time to process a VAT registration application

Benchmarking Benchmarking is the process of determining who is the very best, who sets the standard, and what that standard is. To benchmark, one first has to determine what has to be benchmarked and how to measure it. Most importantly, the object is to figure out how the winner got to be the best and determine what has to be done to become a winner as well.

Benchmarking in Tax Administration Benchmarking in tax administration involves learning, sharing information and adopting best practices to bring about changes in performance. It allows an agency to improve on its performance by learning from others.

Benchmarking in Tax Administration Benchmarking encompasses: Regularly comparing aspects of performance with best practices and regional and national standards; Identifying gaps in performance; Seeking fresh approaches to bring about improvements in performance; Following through with implementing improvements; and Following up by monitoring progress and reviewing the benefits.

Benchmarking in Tax Administration Some of the international benchmarks used in tax administration: VAT rate: The international benchmark is for a single rate of VAT at about 16% Structure of a tax administration: The international norm is to have tax administrations organized based on functions as opposed to tax types. Auditors as percent of administrative staff: The international benchmark indicated that about 30% of professional, administrative staff of the tax administration should be dedicated to audit.

Performance Standards Generally, performance standards indicate what an organization should do and how the work of the organization is to be carried out. These standards are based on the strategies contained within the organization’s annual plan and will measure different aspects of the organization’s operations.

Developing Performance Standards for Tax Administration Agencies In developing performance standards, administrators should ensure that: The performance standard is uniformly applied across the whole organization. Every section should be required to meet the same basic standard. The standards should be developed in such a way that the impact of extraneous factors such as change in the tax roll will not result their modification. The performance data should be collected as part of the day to day activities of the organization, with information recorded and generated by computers. This will assist the organization in keep its time and cost of collecting performance data at a minimum.

Developing Performance Standards for Tax Administration Agencies In developing performance standards, administrators should ensure that: Performance standards set in one part of the tax administration should not conflict with those set in another part of the administration. The frequency and timeliness of performance information should be linked to management information requirements. When performance standards are being developed, managers and staff should be consulted.

Developing Performance Standards for Tax Administration Agencies For tax administrations, the number one priority is the collection of revenue. To meet this objective, standards are set to increase voluntary compliance by taxpayers, increase productivity in the audit and collection sections, and improve quality of client service. The functional sections within the tax administration should be assigned the responsibility of setting and monitoring these performance standards. The role of management is to approve of those standards.

Examples of Performance Standards for a Modern Tax Administration Agency Taxpayer registration All taxpayer numbers to be issued with three days of receipt of applications for registration. Collections Revenue targets, by month, tax type and age of arrears. Return processing Percentage of filed income tax returns to be processed within a month of receipt

Examples of Performance Standards for a Modern Tax Administration Agency Non-filers All non-filers for VAT to be contacted within five days of monthly return filing date. Arrears Collection All PAYE taxpayers should be contacted within 10 days of the monthly payment date to collect outstanding payments

Examples of Performance Standards for a Modern Tax Administration Agency Auditing Number of audits completed per person year, dollars re-assessed per case, hours per file. Client Service Number of tax inquiries handled per person years by telephone, office interview and letter.

Thank you