Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employee Benefits BENCHMARKING DATA from 2010 and prior Resource: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (not Kaiser Permanente) discover the DBS difference.
Advertisements

Changes in the U.S. Healthcare System Gary Claxton Vice President and Director of the Health Care Marketplace Project.
Sample insurance constraints
Ana Malinow, MD Associate Professor Pediatrics, BCM Co-founder, Health Care for All Texas September 22, 2009.
Impact of Health Reform Bills on California Families and Employers Charts and Tables from Recent Briefs February 2010.
Overview of Health Care Coverage and Cost Trends in Minnesota Presentation to the State Budget Trends Study Commission April 22, 2008 Julie Sonier Director,
Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Report They Made the Following Changes as a Result of the Economic Downturn, by Firm Size,
Health Benefits 2007: A USA and California Update Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center.
Employer Health Benefits KFF/HRET 2008 Survey Health Benefits in 2008: Premiums Increase Modestly as CDHP Grows and Deductibles Rise Sharply Jon Gabel.
Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage Release Slides Tuesday, September 11, 2012 March 15, 2013.
Employer Health Benefit Survey Release Slides Tuesday, August 20, 2013.
Figure 1 NOTE: Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p
Massachusetts Employers Largely Support Health Care Reform: Few Signs of Crowd-out. Jon Gabel Heidi Whitmore Jeremy Pickreign National Opinion Research.
Evolution of Managed Care. Introduction What is Managed Care? Brief History.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND The Continuing Erosion of Health Benefits Among Workers with Low Wages Sara R. Collins, Ph.D. The Commonwealth Fund National Academy.
Employer Health Benefit Survey 2015
-AND Findings from the Kaiser/HRET and Kaiser/Hewitt Employer Surveys.
Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2011 (1) Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary. Data released.
Chartbook 2005 Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chapter 1: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market.
Employer Health Benefits Survey Release Slides September 10, 2014.
1 Costs Driving Employer Action Against Obesity National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago Jon Gabel, Senior Fellow In conjunction with:
The Kaiser/HRET 2002 National Survey of Employers: What Are Its Implications for Health Insurance? Jon Gabel Vice President, Health System Studies Health.
Employer Health Benefits
Average Annual Premium Increases for Family Coverage,
Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2013 (1) Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary. Data released.
Web Briefing for Media: 2015 Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey Tuesday, September 22, 2015 Presented by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health.
Trends in Employer-Based Health Insurance Jon Gabel Senior Fellow, NORC.
THE NEW YORK HEALTH ACT: Single Payer Health Care for New York State May 2016.
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Employer Health Benefits Survey 2017
Web Briefing for Media: Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey
Employer Health Benefit Survey 2016
Exhibit 1.16 Average Premium Increases for Covered Workers with Family Coverage, * Percentage change in family premium is statistically different.
THE HEALTH REFORM “PARADIGM”
Exhibit 7.22 Among Covered Workers with an Aggregate General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Deductibles, by Plan Type,
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, % 1% *Enrollment in plan type is statistically.
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2012
Average Premium Increases for Covered Workers with Family Coverage,
Exhibit 7.19 Among Covered Workers With a Separate Per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage and a Per Person Limit, Distribution.
Exhibit 7.24 Among Covered Workers with a Separate Per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage and a Per Person Limit, Distribution.
Exhibit 7.17 Among Covered Workers with an Aggregate General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Deductibles, By Plan Type,
Exhibit Among Firms Offering Health Benefits with 50 or More Employees, Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled at a Firm That Offers Benefits Through.
Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution is statistically different.
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2016 *Enrollment in plan type is statistically different.
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution.
Exhibit 7.8 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a High General Annual Deductible for Single Coverage, by Firm Size, 2016 * Estimate is.
Exhibit 8.15 Distribution of Covered Workers with the Following Annual Employer Contributions to Their HRA or HSA, for Family Coverage, 2016 NOTE: For.
Increases in Health Insurance Premiums Compared with Other Indicators, 1988–2007 Percent * Premiums are growing at rates more than twice that of other.
Exhibit 7.12 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single Coverage, by Firm Size,
Exhibit 7.15 Among Covered Workers with an Aggregate General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Deductibles, by Plan Type,
Exhibit 5.1 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, NOTE: Information was not obtained for POS plans in 1988.
Exhibit 7.9 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single Coverage, By Firm Size,
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Exhibit 11.1 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,
Exhibit 11.1 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,
Exhibit E: Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, NOTE: Information was not obtained for POS plans in 1988.
Exhibit 7.21 Among Covered Workers with a Separate Per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Deductibles, by.
Exhibit 7.11 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single Coverage After Any HRA/HSA.
Exhibit 7.23 Among Covered Workers with a Separate Per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Structure of Deductible Limits,
Exhibit 7.13 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single Coverage After Any HRA/HSA.
Exhibit 7.16 Among Covered Workers With a Separate per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Maximum Number.
Exhibit 7.19 Among Covered Workers With a Separate per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Maximum Number.
Exhibit 7.17 Among Covered Workers with an Aggregate General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Distribution of Deductibles, By Plan Type,
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2015 *Distribution.
Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution is statistically different.
Exhibit 7.15 Distribution of General Annual Deductibles for Single Coverage After any HRA/HSA Contributions, By Firm Size, NOTES: Testing found.
Exhibit 7.18 Among Covered Workers With a Separate Per Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Structure of Deductible Limits,
Exhibit 7.18 Among Covered Workers With a Separate per-Person General Annual Health Plan Deductible for Family Coverage, Structure of Deductible Limits,
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2013
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution.
Presentation transcript:

Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago

 To document the state of employer-based health benefits, 2009, in the USA and California  To examine changes in benefits over the last ten years in the USA and California  To compare coverage for large and small employers  To examine the legacy health care system if health reform fails.

 Telephone survey of 2,054 randomly selected public and private employers  National Research conducts interviews with employee benefit managers from Jan to May 2009  Response rate of 47 percent in 2009  Survey conducted by HIAA and KPMG  Use of statistical weights  Employer-based statistics  Employee-based statistics

 Random survey of 827 private employers with 3 or more workers  Questions often identical to national survey  Conducted from April 2009-July 2009  Survey conducted since 2000  Use of statistical weights  Sampling error of 3.4 percent with full sample.

* Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<0.05. No statistical tests were conducted for years prior to † Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<0.1. No statistical tests were conducted for years prior to Note: Data on premium increases reflect the cost of health insurance premiums for a family of four. Source: Authors calculations from KFF/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, ; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1993, 1996; The Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988, 1989, 1990; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index (U.S. City Average of Annual Inflation (April to April), ; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey (April to April), %†

 Health insurance premiums in California grew by 7.5% in 2009, statistically unchanged in recent years.  Premiums continue to rise at much more than the California inflation rate. 6 Sources: CHCF/NORC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; CHCF/HSC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; CHCF/HRET California Employer Health Benefits Survey: 2004; Kaiser/HRET California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; California Division of Labor Statistics and Research, Consumer Price Index, California Average of Annual Inflation (April – April) 1999–2009. * Estimates are statistically different from the previous year shown.

Source: Author’s Calculation of KFF/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, ; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, U.S. City Average of Annual Inflation (April to April), ; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Seasonally Adjusted Data from the Current Employment Statistics Survey (April to April),

* Estimate is statistically different from All Plans estimate by coverage type (p<.05). Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, HDHP/SO HMO PPO POS ALL PLANS $3,986 $13,375 $4,878 $13,470 $4,922 $13,719 $4,835 $13,075 $4,824 $11,083

9 Source: CHCF/NORC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: 2009; Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey: 2009 * Estimates are statistically different between California and US. Premiums for most plan types in California were comparable to premiums nationally. California PPOs were more costly for both single and family coverage than in the rest of the nation. SingleFamily

 California workers have been consistently more likely to enroll in HMOs than covered workers nationally. Conversely, PPOs are more popular in the U.S. than in California.  Enrollment in high deductible plans with a savings option has changed little since California U.S. Sources: CHCF/NORC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; CHCF/HSC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; CHCF/HRET California Employer Health Benefits Survey: 2004; Kaiser/HRET California Employer Health Benefits Survey: ; Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey: Note: Conventional plan enrollment in California in 2001, 2005 and 2007 is less than 1%. Due to the addition of HDHP in 2006, no test was conducted comparing 2006 with * Distribution is statistically different from previous year shown.

* Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<.05. No statistical tests were conducted for years prior to Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, ; Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.

* Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<.05. No statistical tests were conducted for years prior to Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, ; Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA), 1988.

Includes plans with and without deductibles Source: Authors calculations from Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits,

Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<.05. Note: These estimates include workers enrolled in HDHP/SO and other plan types. Because we do not collect information on the attributes of conventional plan types, to be conservative, we concluded that workers in conventional plan types do not have a deductible of $1,000 or more. Because of the low enrollment in conventional plans, the impact of this assumption is minimal. Average annual general health plan deductible for PPOs, POS plans and HDHP/SOs are for in-network services. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits,

* Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown at p<.05. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits,

# Year-to-year estimates are not significantly different at p<.05. However, there is a significant change between 2000 and 2005 for All Firms and All Small Firms at p<.05. Source: KFF/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, 1999–2009.

*Distributions are statistically different between All Small Firms and All Large Firms within category (p<.05). Note: Distributions are among all firms both offering and not offering health benefits. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits, Tighter Managed Care Networks* Higher Employee Cost Sharing* Consumer-Driven Health Plans Disease Management Programs*

 Twenty-one percent of employers in California reported that they are very likely to increase the amount employees pay for health insurance premiums in the coming year. 18 Source: CHCF/NORC California Employer Health Benefits Survey: 2009 Increase the Amount Employees Pay for…

 Premium increases are moderate (five percent) – but six percentage points more than overall inflation.  Average deductible has roughly doubled since  70 percent increase in overall deductibles for small firms since  Some indications that many small employers in California are considering dropping coverage.

 The cost of family coverage should reach $25,000 before the end of the decade.  Reasons to believe higher premium increases are in the near future:  H1NI  FEBHP shows 8.5 percent increase.  Benefit consulting firms forecasting upturn.  Seven year itch.  Urban Institute forecasts 13.2 million persons will lose employer-based insurance and the number of uninsured will rise to 57 million.