Higher Education Longitudinal Data System in New York State 26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS] Conference February 14, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

College 101. Advisory Development Table of Contents DateTitle Page # 11/17/11Resolving Conflicts Wisely16 11/28/11Mini Math Lesson17 12/01/11Learning.
Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
Dual Credit Opportunities Overview Governor’s Workforce Development Council February 12, 2009.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Indiana Financial Aid Information & Changes Division of Student Financial Aid (SFA) Indiana Commission for Higher Education.
Our Commitment to Student Completion & Success Elizabeth L. Bringsjord Interim Provost and Vice Chancellor University Faculty Senate October 25, 2013.
High Risk Factors for Retention Freshman Year Experience Review of the Literature Review of Preliminary Data.
SMS Vendor Meeting January 19, 2010 (revised February 19, 2010) New York State Education Department.
Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Presentation G. Holmes Braddock Sr. High School Mrs. Gomez, Counselor.
The ADE-Post- Secondary SLDS Project Presented to: CTE Administrators Meeting February 7, 2013 Mark T. Masterson Chief Information Officer.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
1 New York State Trends in Student Financial Aid and Cost of Attendance Presented to the Higher Education Committee of the New York State Board of Regents.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SUMMIT PATHWAYS TO COLLEGE AND BEYOND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION BETH BEAN New Colorado Data Systems.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Innovations Conference Philadelphia, PA March 6, 2012.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
AB 86 Adult Education Regional Planning. What is AB86 ? $25 Million Statewide for Planning AB 86, Section 76, Article 3 The purpose is develop regional.
Early College Partnerships July 12, 2012 Jill Regen – Chicago Public Schools Mike Davis – City Colleges of Chicago.
Florida Department of Education Office of Student Financial Assistance 1.
Step Into Your Future: Understanding College Fit.
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
New State Grant and Scholarship Programs
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Data Warehouse New Data Administrator Training October 3, 2014 Data Coordinators: Larry Hunt & Angie Russell.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Tab 6, Page 11 Creating the Future of Public Education: Graduation Requirements in New York State NYS Board of Regents Regional Forum January 2011.
Presented by: Andrew Setzer Project Manager, NYSED Higher Education Longitudinal Data Warehouse Ellen Moore Administrative Coordinator, Student Data Services.
Marshall W. Garland Deborah L. Jonas. Ph.D. Chrys Dougherty, Ph.D. Anne Ware, Ph.D. Presentation at the 24th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS)
The Different Types of Colleges/Universities
Education Research & Data Center Spring 2014 Conference Carol Jenner, ERDC.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Research and Planning Commission 2012Conference November 9, 2012 Katie Weaver Randall Education Research and Data Center Office of Financial Management.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Update on Data Reporting September Repository System Goal To consolidate the Department’s collection of individual student data in the repository.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
The University of North Carolina Office of the President State Higher Education Executive Officers The University of North Carolina Office of the President.
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
Date:February 24, 2012 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
Date:August 22, 2012 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
A Call to Action for 2016 Student Success Anson Green Director Texas Workforce Commission November 17, 2016 WIOA UPDATE NOVEMBER 17,
White Knoll High School Junior Family Meeting October 2015.
Bright Futures Scholarship Program and Florida PrePaid College Plan ( )
College: Making it Happen Source: College - Making it Happen A Guide for California Middle School Families and Educators.
Margaret Ayanian and Cynthia Hammond| Dec U.S. Department of Education 2015 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Gainful Employment.
Xenia Christian School David Bryant, Guidance Counselor.
Crafting a Quality Grant Proposal March, 2016 ACCELERATED COLLEGE CREDIT GRANT.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
September 2006NYS Education Department1 A Review of Higher Education Data Comparison of the Four Sectors of Higher Education New York State Education Department.
Admissions & Financial STC. Strategic Directions …proudly provides opportunities to all students with high expectations for their success.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Developmental Education Accountability Connections Conference 2015 Division.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.
David Bryant, Guidance Counselor
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
David Bryant, Guidance Counselor
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
kctcs action plan.
The Importance of Advocacy at the Legislative Level
Presentation transcript:

Higher Education Longitudinal Data System in New York State 26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS] Conference February 14,

How many of your state’s high school graduates need to take remedial courses in college? How do your state’s high school graduates perform in their college courses? How do teacher prep program course grades equate with student performance on state tests? 2

Does success on state exams in high school translate to success in college? What college courses/programs lead to successful employment? What are some questions being asked in your state? 3

Charlene Swanson, Program Research Specialist, NYSED Russ Redgate, Product Manager, eScholar Andrew K. Setzer, Project Manger, P-16 Data Warehouse Project The linking of the P-12 and higher education data systems will allow for richer longitudinal analyses and the identification of additional opportunities to improve educational programs and prepare students for college and careers. 4

Background NYS P-12 Data Warehouse New York State Student Identification System (NYSSIS) State University of New York (SUNY) City University of New York (CUNY) Project Funding, Goals, Challenges, Buy- in and Resources needed 5

NYS P-12 Data Warehouse Started in 1999 with public schools grades 4 and 8 students Now contains all P-12 public and charter school students, and most non-public school students Scores, grades, attendance, teacher linkages, enrollments, and more… 6

New York State Student Identification System (NYSSIS) The New York State Student Identification System (NYSSIS) is a key element of New York State Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State Education Department (NYSED) developed NYSSIS to assign a stable, unique student identifier to every pre-kindergarten through grade 12 student in New York State. Unique identifiers enhance student data reporting, improve data quality and ensure that important educational records are associated with the correct students as they transfer between local educational agencies (LEAs). In SIRS, each student record is uniquely identified with a 10-digit number assigned when the student first enters a State public school or participating nonpublic school. 7

State University of New York (SUNY) The State University of New York is the largest comprehensive system of universities, colleges, and community colleges in the United States, with a total enrollment of 480,000 students, spanning 59 campuses across the state. The SUNY system has 88,000 faculty members, 7,660 degree and certificate programs overall, and a $10.7 billion budget. SUNY and CUNY are separate and independent university systems, although both are public institutions that receive funding from New York State. CUNY, however, is additionally funded by the City of New York. 8

City University of New York (CUNY) The City University of New York is the public university system of New York City. It is the largest urban university in the United States, consisting of 24 institutions: 11 senior colleges, seven community colleges, and various other centers. More than 235,000 degree-credit students from 205 countries. The Black, White and Hispanic undergraduate populations each comprise more than a quarter of the student body, and Asian undergraduates make up more than 15 percent. Nearly 60 percent are female, and 29 percent are 25 or older. CUNY graduates include 12 Nobel laureates, a U.S. Secretary of State, a Supreme Court Justice, several mayors, members of Congress, state legislators, scientists and artists. CUNY is the third-largest university system in the United States, in terms of enrollment, behind the State University of New York (SUNY), and the California State University system. 9

Project Funding, Goals, Challenges, and Buy-in RTTT, 2 IES grants, Capital Funds from NYS Legislature FERPA and related privacy concerns Technology and resource challenges Importance of research and data 10

HE LDS Goals Create and Implement a System with Interactive Links to the expanded P-12 system –Expand the Architecture and Functionality of the P-12 Module and Implement a Higher Education LDS –Plan and Implement Standardized Higher Education Course Information –Identify "gatekeeper" and teacher preparation courses with SUNY/CUNY –Standardize course codes with SUNY/CUNY –Implement collection in SUNY/CUNY –Implement collection in private universities –Plan the Linkages to Health/Human Services/Workforce and other Data –Expand comprehensive student identifier system –Implement reporting linkages across four State agencies Create and Implement an Instructional Support System –Design the Reports for a P-16 Comprehensive Instructional Support System 11

Resources Needed to Make HE LDS Happen Funding! SED project manager SED project team –HE staff –IRS staff (including NYSSIS Team) –Researchers (SED and RRF) SUNY and CUNY project teams –IT staff –IR Staff SED hardware, software, data model, and IT Staff eScholar Support 12

eScholar CDW-PS™ What is the value of a data warehouse? -Unlock the value of siloed information -Siloed information becomes integrated -Analyze information across many functional areas -Gain insight into historical patterns, trends, factors affecting operational performance over time -Predict future operational performance -Inform decisions to effect improvement in operational processes and performance 13

eScholar CDW-PS™ eScholar Complete Data Warehouse® for Postsecondary –Enables state education agencies to gather, integrate and manage key postsecondary education-related data from a wide variety of operational systems and data sources –Stand-alone data warehouse platform can be integrated with CDW- PK12™ for a complete P-20 data warehouse solution –Incorporates configurable data collection, data quality, data transformation, data loading, and data error reporting layers –Track critical data such as institution and campus attributes, facts and history, student and staff demographics, qualifications, student educational background, courses, course enrollment, degrees earned, financial aid and transfer information, and more –Enables education agencies to accelerate implementation time and reduce implementation risk and cost 14

Benefits The eScholar CDW integrates data across functional areas, allowing educators and state leaders to analyze the data to investigate critical questions such as: What does the overall flow of students through the educational pipeline look like? What experiences (curricular or environmental) affect student success in making progress through the educational pipeline? What facilitates successful student transitions across specific boundaries—for example from high school to college, from two-year colleges to four-year colleges, or from either of these to and/or from the workplace? How are these transitions different for different types of students? What role does geographic mobility (e.g., transfer) play in inhibiting or enhancing educational credentialing or attainment? Questions taken from the NCHEMS/SHEEO “The Ideal State Postsecondary Data System 15 Essential Characteristics and Required Functionality.” 15

Benefits One of the primary uses of a P-20 unit record data system is to monitor, evaluate, and report education pipeline issues. Pipeline questions might include: How many students are we actually losing at each key transition point? How many students, and what percentage, that graduate from high school actually go on to college and ultimately graduate? How many students decide not to pursue a postsecondary degree immediately following high school but years later decide to enroll in college? What factors help students move successfully through key transition points in the education career, such as enrolling in college, transferring from two- to four-year colleges, or entering the workforce? 16

Original Goals of the NYS HE LDS Project For the school year, SUNY and CUNY will provide end-of-term student-level data to the Department’s P-20 data system. This information will include the student’s institution of higher education enrollment, full/part-time enrollment status, academic program of study, credit hours earned, participation in remedial coursework, and completed degrees. In addition, SUNY and CUNY will begin to integrate the statewide P-12 unique student identifier into their campus systems and processes. At the conclusion of the school year, these higher education data will allow the Department to evaluate career- and college-ready metrics (e.g., students who graduate from high school with a 75 or greater on the English language arts Regents and a 80 or greater on a math Regents) as a predictor of whether a student is required to enroll in a college remediation program across both CUNY and SUNY campuses. Beginning with the school year, NYSED will begin to collect student enrollment and performance in key courses from SUNY and CUNY, including teacher preparation coursework, “gatekeeper” courses (e.g., freshman English and math), and enrollment in courses designed to support the needs of students with disabilities and English language learners. At the conclusion of the school year, NYSED will also be able to evaluate career- and college-ready standards as a predictor of grades earned in key college courses (e.g., freshman English) across both CUNY and SUNY campuses. 17

Our Progress to Date SUNY, CUNY, Level 2, eScholar, NYSED (HE and IRS), Regents Research Fellow and a Project Manager –‘phases’ and timelines –Start with Fall 2011 data Possible future project improvements Your feedback and suggestions 18

NYSSIS Matching Received files for Fall 2011 from CUNY (236,899 records) and SUNY (482,984 records) There is no ‘hold queue’ for manual review Both will also submit Summer 2011 Both will also submit

NYSSIS Matching If there is a P-12 candidate with a match percentage of 90% or greater for a Higher Ed. record, it is automatically matched. Normally records with candidates who have a match percentage less than 90% and greater than 35% would end up in the hold queue. NYSSIS has the business rule coded that will not allow Higher Ed. records to go to the hold queue for a user to resolve. Instead NYSSIS will "try again" to match a P12 record that is reasonable or NYSSIS will assign a new NYSSIS ID. 20

NYSSIS Matching – some stats SUNY file: NYSSIS found a match for about two- thirds of initially submitted records ‘Older’ students, non-NYS residents, and non- public students (~14.3%) may not get NYSSIS IDs Test files (2 campuses) –Focus on students with NYS HS CEEB codes born in 1990 or later –93.62% and 97.90% respectively; 95.25% overall All SUNY = 95.92% 21

NYSSIS Matching – some stats Local HS S to Suffolk CCC – 245/247 = 99.19% Local HS N to Nassau CCC – 383/384 = 99.74% Local HS O to Onondaga CCC – 239/240 = 99.58% Local HS D to Dutchess CCC – 336/338 = 99.41% Local HS B to Broome CCC – 334/337 = 99.11% Local HS S to All SUNY - 509/513 = 99.22% Summary of above*: 1801/1812 = 99.39% Future issues: –Is 99.39% good enough? –Correcting mistakes? –Using a manual hold queue? –Other ? 22

Original P-16 Submission Calendar All campuses will be required to submit data two times per year: March 1 st For data from the Summer and Fall Terms (All terms ending between July 1 and December 31) and Annual Data for the preceding year August 1 st For data from the Winter and Spring Terms (All terms ending between January 1 and June 30) *NYSSIS ID File Submissions can be submitted at any time, but please avoid submitting files from September 1 to November 15. Thank you. 23

Phase 1 (4 templates) PS Student Institution –Name, DOB, ethnicity/race, gender, citizenship, etc. PS Student Enrollment –Information about student enrollment, majors, minors, degree seeking, dual enrollment, graduation, etc. Campus Student Fact Template –Information about remedial enrollment, hours, completion, etc. Campus Student Program Fact Template –Student support services participation 24

Phase 2 (6 templates) PS Student Credit GPA –Term GPA and credits and cumulative GPA and credits PS Student Transfer Fact –Information on transfer students Student Educational Background –High School graduation and GPA info Student Qualification –Exams and scores for entrance, placement, etc. PS Course Campus –Course codes, titles, descriptions, subject, credit, etc. PS Student Class Detail –Student class grades, credits, outcomes, etc. 25

Phase 2 Student Educational Background Student Qualification PS Student Transfer Fact PS Student Credit GPA PS Course Campus PS Student Class Detail 26

Phase 2 Student Educational Background Student Qualification PS Student Transfer Fact PS Student Credit GPA PS Course Campus PS Student Class Detail 27

Phase 3 (planned summer 2013) Student Award –Degrees, diplomas, certificates, etc. Student Campus Expense –Tuition, room and board, books, etc. Student Campus Financial Aid –Federal grants, state loans, etc. 28

Phase 4 (planning not finalized) PS Student Admissions ? 29

Future Project Improvements? Collect other/different/new templates Product enhancements Project Steering Committee Report Writing Getting NYSSIS matching to 100% Adding non-public colleges? NYSSIS ID in TEACH System? What else might we want to do? 30

Andy’s Analogy: Building a data warehouse is like saving for retirement. It is a long-term project. It does require a great deal of time, patience, steady investment, and adjustment. There will be a great payoff. 31

Feedback/Questions Andy Russ Charlene THANK YOU! 32