The Value of Systems Integration Johnson Controls, Inc Pulse 2008 Conference

2 Value of Integration Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms Knowledge of developing operational Issues Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt. Identify root cause & effect Automate - On-condition tasking, facility org. Remediate issues before they become alarms Sustaining energy efficiency targets Actual cost allocations based on data.

3 Today’s Issues Hidden Issues w/ financial & Ops consequences Little knowledge of cause and effect No reliable tie to energy benchmarks Inconsistent condition validation Inconsistent operational efficiency Manual Method of information transfer to the maintenance organization Limited use of technology for cost allocation.

4 Integration of Information Metasys Tivoli Maximo Integrator Solution Team Process Technology People

5 Case Study – Value of Integration Value of system data for cause & effect Value of condition indicators Energy as a “Sentinel” indicator Automated “Conditional” work order generation Optimization of energy usage Discovery of “hidden” functional failures.

6 Background Information Problem – Spot Capacity Issue 60K Sq ft of Raised Floor 2 floors 30K sq. ft. each Chilled water loop, 60 CRAC Units (Total) 50% of CRAC Units fully configured

7 Defining the Scope & Scale of the Issue BAS NMS Manual Data collection Source:

8 Integration of System Data Integration of: IT System Information Source: NMS

9 Integration of Configuration Data Integration of: Configuration Drawings Source: CMMS

10 Quantify Performance via Energy usage Measure Operational Efficiency against baseline Source: BAS/CMMS

11 Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Data CenterD/C EE Ratio (Energy Efficiency Index) (Support Sys. vs. Critical Load Ratio) Baseline Ratio Current Ratio.600 Source: CMMS (Historical)

12 Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Data CenterD/C EE Ratio (Energy Efficiency Index) (Support Sys. vs. Critical Load Ratio) Baseline Ratio Current Ratio Source: BAS (Current)

13 CMMS - Job Plan Auto Generation FREQ TYP E TASKING R& RPM PD M PA M On Condition TasksR&R10 CHECK ADJACENT UNITS FOR STANDARDIZED OPERATIONAL SETTINGS AND SIGNATURE – Affected areas R&R20 CHECK CONDENSTATE ON ADJACENT UNITS, IF YES, CHECK OPERATION OF VALVE 0.10 PAM30 LOG OPERATION PARAMETERS DURING THIS TASK R&R40 CHECK POSITION OF CW VALVE AGAINST CURRENT % COOLING ON PANEL 0.20 Total

14 CRAC Unit Operating Signatures Integration of IT System Information Drawings BAS Manual Data Verification of Performance

15 CRAC Unit – Poor Operating Signature

16 CMMS - Job Plan Execution FREQ TYP E TASKING R& RPM PD M PA M On Condition TasksR&R10 CHECK ADJACENT UNITS FOR STANDARDIZED OPERATIONAL SETTINGS AND SIGNATURE – Affected areas R&R20 CHECK CONDENSTATE ON ADJACENT UNITS, IF YES, CHECK OPERATION OF VALVE 0.10 PAM30 LOG OPERATION PARAMETERS DURING THIS TASK R&R40 CHECK POSITION OF CW VALVE AGAINST CURRENT % COOLING ON PANEL 0.20 Total

17 CRAC Unit – Good Operating Signature

18 Review - (Signature Before)

19 Validation of Results - (After) Validate Results of Remediation Activities IT NMS BAS

20 Case Study Results Temperature variances mitigated Gain back of 68 tons of cooling Decrease of 280 KW of energy consumption IT server performance: extended MTBF Process used to adjust maintenance plans On condition tasking Continuous verification of performance vs. baseline Validation effect of maintenance with energy usage Financial gain - $97.5K/year, 1 location

21 Summary – Process Automation Metasys Tivoli Maximo Integrator Solution Team Process Technology People

22 Summary - Value of Integration ID of Hidden functional failures – No alarms present Knowledge of developing operational Issues Automation of on-condition tasking for facility org. Identification of root cause & effect Mgmt of load to available resources (Capacity Mgmt) Record of asset/system information & trends (CMMS) Sustaining energy efficiency targets Optimized operating costs & allocations. Installation Management

23 Thank You!