Ivan Ivanov Head of “NSRF Implementation and Horizontal Issues” Unit Administration of the Council of Ministers 2012 STRATEGIC REPORT EUROPEAN UNION Bulgaria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Advertisements

Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
Revision of the macroeconomic projections for 2011 Dimitar Bogov Governor August, 2011.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Result Oriented Cohesion Policy – Regional Perspective Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Conference Gdansk, July 7th 2011 Mieczysław Struk The Marshal of.
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT P O L A N D Warsaw, June 2, 2007 The European Regions as a Field of Path Dependency.
Economic Turbulence & Employment Trends Dr. Fragouli Evaggelia (HARVARD, COLUMBIA) Lecturer, University of Athens, Dpt. of Economics & Senior R&D Dpt.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Key Policies Improving Business and Investment Climate Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić, MA.
Industrial and Innovation Policy in Austria By Daniel Föger Hong Hai Luong.
АГЕНЦИЯ ПО ЕНЕРГИЙНА ЕФЕКТИВНОСТ Kolio Kolev Director, Directorate Energy Efficiency Control in Buildings and Public Register, Energy Efficiency Agency.
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1 Impact of cohesion policy on the Polish economy. Results of macroeconomic modeling of ex-post impact and forecasts for.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Strategic report 2012 Estonia Miryam Vahtra – State Budget Department Coordinator of evaluations
Kyiv, May 16, 2005 Business Environment in Slovakia and Potential Learnings.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
ICT policy and development trends and challenges in Bulgaria
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
ANNUAL REPORT ON THE ABSORPTION OF THE EU FUNDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA IN 2010 MONIKA PANAYOTOVA, CHAIRWOMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON EUROPEAN AFFAIRS.
Challenges and Opportunities of Georgia’s Economy Mr. Aleksi Aleksishvili ₋ Chairman of Policy and Management Consulting Group (PMCG) ₋
9 th NSRF Monitoring Committee meeting, 11 December 2014 EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Investing in Your Future Operational Programme.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts 1 An assessment of Belgian NRP macroeconomic objectives in a medium term framework Francis Bossier.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
European Social Fund Cohesion Policy EU cohesion policy & social economy Dominique Bé, European Commission Worker ownership: the synthesis between.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Bulgarian Industrial Association Georgi Shivarov, Vice President The 4 th Vienna Economic Forum 5 – 6 November 2007.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Alternative Economic Policies in Europe Pavia Conference 24th – 25th April 2015.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Brussels, October 15th 2008 THE BENEFITS OF NATIONAL REFORM IN SUCCESSFUL MODELS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ANDALUSIA.
Presentation CESAER seminar, Trondheim Eva Camerer Policy Officer, Industrial Innovation Policy Development DG Enterprise and Industry 15 October 2010.
Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism 1 OP Competitiveness Progress of Implementation 2010.
Regional & Urban Policy Investments for growth & jobs Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities 6 th Report on economic, social.
„Impact of the financial crisis on BH economy“ by Kemal Kozarić Governor of the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina January 16, 2012.
1. 2 Overall strategy at national level on the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds, compatible with the Europe 2020 Strategy The document:
Economic Crisis: The Way Out? An Eastern European Perspective Sándor Meisel – Krisztina Vida Institute for World Economics Research Centre for Economic.
Addressing the Medium- and Long- run Challenges: the Overall Policy Framework Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance Republic of Bulgaria May 2007.
Turkish economy Brief economic history Economic policies
The Portuguese NSRF Strategic Report th Meeting of the Coordination Committee of the Funds (COCOF) Brussels, 27 February 2013 Joaquim Bernardo Deputy.
Lecture 11. Assessment of Reforms. Lecture outline Basic macroeconomic indicators –GDP –Unemployment –Productivity –Investment –Inflation Impediments.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Europe Youth Unemployment Portugal Youth Unemployment.
For a better place to live! OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONS IN GROWTH” Investing.
National strategic reference framework Jela Tvrdonova.
CEPS, 1 Place du Congrès, 1000 Brussels, , 1 The Key Role of Education in Employment and Competitiveness THE LISBON STRATEGY.
European Regional Development Fund EUROPEAN UNION Investing in your future Operational programme „Development of the competitiveness of the Bulgarian economy“
Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE ENSURING STABILITY AND GROWTH PLAMEN ORESHARSKI MINISTER OF FINANCE 12 December 2007 Sofia.
Poland’s 10 years in the European Union. Political dimension of Poland’s EU membership: how Poland has changed Europe.
Strategy of economic and social development of St. Petersburg until 2030 Committee for Economic Policy and Strategic Planning of St. Petersburg
ERDF for Education and Science th March 2011.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
European Union support to the Ukraine Bratislava, 3 June 2016 Livia Vasakova, EC Representation in Slovakia.
BULGARIA – ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
BULGARIA – ECONOMIC PROSPECTS
Competitiveness in low income and low growth regions
Key Moments and Forthcoming Activities in 2009
Fourth progress report on cohesion June 2006
Elena Petkova Yasen Andreev 76324
9 February 2006 Brussels The Modernisation of the Bulgarian State Administration in the Context of EU Integration Nikolay Vassilev, CFA Minister of State.
Regional Operational Programme under Objective 1 of Cohesion Policy case of Pomorskie Region in Poland Stanislaw Bienias on behalf of Pomorskie Region.
6th Report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, July 2014
Presentation transcript:

Ivan Ivanov Head of “NSRF Implementation and Horizontal Issues” Unit Administration of the Council of Ministers 2012 STRATEGIC REPORT EUROPEAN UNION Bulgaria

Socio-economic development and the global economic crisis ( ) Decline of GDP, limited private investments, slow economic growth (2011: 1.7%) Significant drop in FDI (€ 1.3 billion in 2011) Restricted budget deficit (2.0% of GDP in 2011), but limited public investments Stable banking system Increased unemployment rate (11.2% in 2011)

Socio-economic development: Main challenges Education and labour market participation: improving situation but still low level of participation in lifelong learning Research, innovations and competitiveness: relatively high rate of innovation system growth but still very limited investments in R&D Infrastructure and IT: developed road network but significant renovation is needed; high level of investments in ICT but still lower internet penetration rates than EU-27 Energy efficiency: highest energy intensity of economy in EU, high dependence on imported energy resources, although slightly decreasing Business and institutional environment: e-government is being introduced but major changes (including development and upgrade of IT infrastructure) are still pending

Physical Progress: Indicators Significant progress against baseline values for most indicators Negative trends in indicators affected by the crisis: GDP growth, FDI, labour market indicators Most target values estimated feasible by the end of 2015 Core indicators: Modest performance against target values, but 60% of all indicators with significant improvement as compared to the 2009 Strategic report Over-achievement of the target values for 2 indicators No progress has been reported yet under 10 indicators, but achievement will be reported based on completed projects Non-core indicators follow similar performance trends

Physical Progress: Achievements 13 km. of metro lines and 13 new metro stations constructed; of Sofia citizens with access to improved public transport 82 km. of new roads and 16,3 km. of new railroads constructed 454 km. of roads and 126 km. of railroads reconstructed additional population served by waste water projects p.e. one regional waste management system constructed 63 investments made for improvement of the cultural infrastructure and 60 other for improvement of the social services’ infrastructure people using the improved small-scale infrastructure people benefitted from the renovated buildings jobs created; investments amounting to € 225 million induced 130 SMEs introducing new technologies/products supported 911 enterprises supported through loan instruments

Physical Progress: Achievements (2) unemployed persons involved in professional trainings; persons employed after training persons involved in measures for prevention of early school leaving 820 forms of social services launched and 256 existing ones supported 146 judiciary bodies have introduced a system for case management 100 administrations with systems for internal flow of documents administrative services being provided online employees of civil society structures trained 174 trainings for local authorities and other structures working under SCF conducted; experts trained 299 experts trained to work with UMIS 28 information centres established and being functional

Financial Progress /million €/ 2009 Strategic Report / / 2012 Strategic report as of as of contracted funds 1 609, , ,02 contracted funds (%) 20,08%65,48%94,62% payments 161, , ,74 payments/ contracted funds (%) 10,04%28,67%32,40% certification 94, , ,98 certification/ payments (%) 58,38% 74,51%81,30% 94,62% of the total OP budget contracted by the end of October ,7% of the funds – paid to beneficiaries Growth in payments rate is lower than the growth in contracting Tranches received by EC (advance and interim) amount to mln. € 78,8% of all contracted funds have been awarded since September 2009 More than 1/3 of all grant contracts signed in January- October 2012

Allocations to operations selected and Lisbon strategy 55,30% 44,70% 53,85% 46,15%

Financial Progress by OPs /million €/

Supported areas and EUROPE 2020 National objectives set in NRP:  Better infrastructure - OPT, OPE and OPRD  Competitive youth - OPHRD  Better business environment - OPC and OPAC  Greater trust in state institutions - OPC and OPAC  Improving the efficiency of public expenses in support of growth - OPHRD and OPRD  Providing institutional and financial support for the enterprises - OPC  Reducing unemployment among the most vulnerable groups of society (youth, low- qualified and discouraged persons and elderly) - OPHRD Complemented by activities focused on:

Net impact of SCF on economic development Growing positive role of SCF for the economic development due to: Higher absorption level Very limited public and private investments caused by the economic crisis Focus of the funds on the growth engines: technological development and human capital and infrastructure Crucial effect on the positive levels of GDP Almost full absorption of SCF is expected to lead to 9.3% higher levels of real GDP by 2015 The impact does not end with the end of the programming period: a positive impact on real GDP is currently estimated up to 11.6% by the end of 2020 Net impact of SCF on real GDP

Net impact of SCF on economic development (2) The net impact of Structural instruments for 2009–2012 on other core macro-economic indicators is as follows: Private consumption is 3.9% higher in real terms compared to the scenario with zero absorption Government consumption is 8.8% higher in real terms Private investments are 5.4% higher in real terms Government investments are 26.3% higher in real terms The number of employees is 4.0% higher (on average for the period employment generated in the economy as a result of funding under the OPs amounts to ) The unemployment rate is 2.4 p.p. lower The average salary in the country is 5.9% higher in nominal terms Inflation is not affected by the funds spentunder SCF The budget balance is improved by 0.8 p.p. The share of public debt in GDP is 1.7 p.p. lower

With a view to next programming period… CHALLENGESLESSONS LEARNT scattering of investments lack of former experience with SCF lack of resources for pre- financing and co-financing project activities heavy procedures and excessive administrative burden for beneficiaries overlapping of controls – both between the MAs and IBs, and between control bodies importance of high-quality strategic planning and programming based on an active dialogue with partners focus on "growth engines" leading to regional convergence importance of measures for strengthening the administrative capacity e-procedures as the most effective tool for reduction of administrative burden balance between sound financial management and efficiency

Conclusions SCF - crucial factor for the economic recovery of the country and the real convergence to EU-27 Contribution of SCF in 2012 GDP growth is 80% net impact on the number of employed people is 4.0% (approximately jobs) and 2.4% lower unemployment Positive impact on incomes - in 2012 it is 5.9% higher in nominal terms due to SCF, and by 2015 this effect is expected to reach 33.6% The results of SCF interventions are now visible Further efforts towards achieving the targets set are still needed, however significant progress has been made since 2009

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!