Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 Science & Eng College Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HSE Management Standards Approach
Advertisements

Work Related Stress Frances Bailey HM Inspector of Health and Safety
Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 University Services Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.
Risk Management for Work Stress at COMPUSMART Institute of Work, Health & Organisations (I-WHO) University of Nottingham, UK
Managing the Cost of Workplace Conflict Comcare National Conference October 2007.
HSE Management Standards Janet Heath. What is stress? “the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed upon them”
2003 SOLUTIONS FOR ORGANISATIONAL EXCELLENCE. solutions for organisational excellence 2 Internal Service Quality Source: “Putting the Service Profit Chain.
HSE Stress Piloteers programme and the new “Management Standards for Work Related Stress” Josey Snowden HSE advisor.
Report to Council Staff Opinion Survey HR Director 6 March 2009.
Stress: employee’s training Contents What is the issue? What is the issue in our organisation? Why should we deal with it? What are.
"Prevention is Far Better Than Cure"-Dr Abhimanyu Makane Aditya Birla Memorial Hospital, Pune. Sterling Multispecialty Hospital, Nigdi, Pune Ruby Hall Clinic,
Stress: manager’s training
HSE Management Standards and Stress Risk Assessment Hertfordshire County Council
Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 Social Science College Presentation - Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.
DIT STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010 Dr Rachel O Connor Mark Russell Campus Life & Student Retention Office DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 MVLS College Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.
Being Proactive: An Organisational Approach to Managing Workplace Stress I/O Net Presentation by Dr Hillary Bennett Director, PsychAssessments.
Mind.org.uk Mental Health in the Workplace Costing the Earth Chester Law School 2 nd April, 2014.
The Employer’s Duty of Care Mental Health & How It Impacts on Your Business – A Growing Issue Mr Mark Braithwaite Managing Director Gipping.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Well-Being at Work Partnership Full ASSET Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary.
Recent UCU stress and bullying surveys Stephen Court UCU senior research officer NIACE & UCU conference 1 February
LSE 2009 Staff Survey – Presentation to Staff Briefings 15 th /16 th March 2010.
Proactive Management of Mental Health in the Resources Sector Denise Goldsworthy – Managing Director Rio Tinto Dampier Salt & HIsmelt APOSHO 26 Australasian.
Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 Joint Union Consultative Committee July 12 th 2012 Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.
York St John University Staff Survey Highlights 2010 David Evans Research Consultant October 2010.
Fit for the Future Christine Amyes Executive Director - People New Charter Housing Trust Group.
People Risks – Having meaningful discussions, one conversation at a time Risk Management Forum 2014 Jennie Trinder.
360 Degree Feedback & Performance Appraisal. What is 360 Degree Feedback ?? 360-degree feedback is defined as “The systematic collection and feedback.
WORKFORCE WELL-BEING RESEARCH PROJECT WORK WITH CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE September 2015.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust W&C Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Managing Stress Identifying and Managing Stress Tom Thomson Thomson Associates.
Well-Being at Work Partnership ASSET Pulse Survey 2013 Initial Results Summary Gordon Tinline & Matt Smeed.
Beyond Breaking Point? Key Results Rachael McIlroy.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Facilities Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of.
Are happy employees safe employees? Rick Spencer Leadership Team Member Omega Health Systems Thousand Oaks, CA USA.
UCL – Have your say HR User Group October Background and methodology Survey ran from the 9 – 27 March This was the second UCL employee engagement.
Highlights of the Staff Survey 2011 Cheryl Kershaw Director of Surveys and Research.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust GHH Divisional National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Stress Management Competencies Roadshow Spring Alan Bradshaw Business Psychologist Partner, Work-Life Solutions
Employee Survey 2009 Analysis of results and trends Comparison with the 2007 & 2005 survey July 2009.
The dark side of high-skilled work Assessing work-related stress risk in the Italian National Research Council By Giuseppe Ponzini and Roberto Moccaldi.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Stress Management Competencies Roadshow Alan Bradshaw Business Psychologist Partner, Work-Life Solutions
Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 Arts College Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow.
Improving Employee Health and Wellbeing at the University of Chester Karen Cregan, Assistant Director of HRM Services.
“Employee Survey 2007” Analysis of results and comparison with 2005 survey results May 2007.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust CSS Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Promoting Workplace Well-Being David Craigie Chartered Psychologist supporting
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Directorate National Survey Outcomes, Local Staff Engagement & Stress Audit Report, 2012 Results for:Renal Medicine,
Stressors in Construction Industry : Practical aspects of risk assessment of mitigating stress Peter J Kelly HSE.
Ian Neale, Research Director Race at Work 2015.
Stress Policy Workshop. Aims of Session Understand the need for the Policy Identify causes, effects and management of stress Outline specific roles Outline.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Solihull Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Prepared by: Amjad H. Al Ata What is Stress? Stress is the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed on them.
Stress. Stress is the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed on them. There is a clear distinction between.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
(date) © Copyright 2014.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive HSE update March 2015 Liz Hunter HSE Inspector of Health and Safety
© Copyright  People at Work Project - Overview  People at Work Project - Theoretical Underpinnings  People at.
W o r k i n g f o r S c o t l a n d ’ s C o l l e g e s Self-Preservation and developing resilience Iain Guthrie Advisor – Wider Access.
HSE Management Standards Amanda Stevens Education Personnel Services.
HSE Management Standards and Stress Risk Assessment Hertfordshire County Council
UWE Bristol Welcome from Human Resources Presentation by Pam Fitzsimmons Leadership and Staff Development Manager, HR.
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
Is your workplace making you sick?
Presentation transcript:

Glasgow University Staff Survey 2012 Science & Eng College Presentation Ian Black, HR Director University of Glasgow

Purpose of GU 2012 Staff Survey 1. To measure: – Staff Involvement – Staff Commitment – Staff Wellbeing 2. To determine: – Actions for building on favourable findings – Actions for addressing weaknesses 3. Where possible, to compare with 2009 survey findings – To look for continuous improvement Restructure has limited 2009  2012 comparison Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

GU Response Rates by College/US Population as at March 2012 – Base: 5,144; reduced from 6,056 to exclude: invigilators; adult education lecturers; tutors etc – Response: 1,780 (33%) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College CollegeResponsePopulationResp. Rate 01.Arts % 02.MVLS % 03.Science & Eng % 04.Soc Sc % 05.University Services % 99.Not Disclosed55-- University Total %

GU Response Rates by Gender & Job Family CategoryResponsePopulationResp. Rate Male % Female % Not Disclosed120-- University Total % 1. R&T % 2. MPA % 3. Tech % 4. Ops % 5. Clinical % 99.Not Disclosed55-- University Total % Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

Science & Engineering – Response by School etc. SchoolSample nPopulation N% response School of Chemistry178720% School of Computing Science207925% School of Engineering % School of Geographical & Earth Sciences257533% School of Maths & Stats116716% School of Physics & Astronomy % School of Psychology53415% SUERC117415% Sc & Eng College Admin63020% Not Disclosed45 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

College Response by Gender & Job Family Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College Sc&Eng CollegeResponsePopulationResp. Rate Male % Female % Not Disclosed17-- Sc&Eng Total % R&T % MPA % Tech % Ops0130% Not Disclosed3-- Sc&Eng Total %

10 question items used as GU KPIs Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College KPI Question ItemMeasure (%) KPI 1: Understanding of team aimsVG + Good + Satis KPI 2: Understanding of performance expectationsVG + Good + Satis KPI 3: How often praised for a job well doneAt least 6 monthly KPI 4: How often do you discuss with manager how to improve working practices At least annually KPI 5: How often given performance feedbackat least annually KPI 6: How good are communications within your work teamEx + Good + Satis KPI 7: how good are communications with other teams in School/RI/SEx + Good + Satis KPI 8: How well are GU-wide changes communicated?Ex + Good + Satis KPI 9: I enjoy working in the UniversityStr Agree + Agree KPI 10: I feel loyal and supportive to the UniversityStr Agree + Agree

Average of all GU KPIs 1-10 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College **Heterosexual/straight and LGBT, as worded in the questionnaire *Disability Reported or No Disability Reported

Average of all Sc &Eng College KPIs 1-10 Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 1: Understanding of team aims (VG + G +S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 2: Understanding of performance expectations (VG + G +S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 3: How often praised for a job well done (at least 6-monthly) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 4: How often discuss working practice (at least annually) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 5: How often given performance feedback (at least annually) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 6: How good are communications within work team (Ex + G + Satis) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 7: How good are communications with other School/RIs? (E+G+S) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 8: How well are GU-wide changes communicated? (Ex + G + Satis) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 9: I enjoy working in the University (SA + A) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

KPI 10: I feel loyal and supportive to the University (SA + A) Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College

HSE Stress Measurement Tool - Findings

HSE UK benchmark for work-related stress Classifications are derived from HSE survey of 136 UK organisations ( ), using their methodology – 35 questions measure 7 key work design factors – scored 1-5; 5 is least stress HSE “traffic light” scoring scheme for 7 factors Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College ColourCommentRange of UK benchmark Doing very well - need to maintain performanceAt or above 80 th percentile Good, but need for improvement. 50 th - 80 th percentile Clear need for improvement.20 th – 50 th percentile Urgent action neededBelow 20 th percentile

HSE benchmark factors for work-related stress Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College RedYellowAquaGreen Factor (stressor) Less thanBetween Greater than 1. Demands: workload, work patterns and the work environment Control: how much say staff have in the way they do their work Support: encouragement, sponsorship, resources provided by: a. The organisation and line management b. Colleagues Relationships: promoting positive working to avoid conflict and dealing with unacceptable behaviour Role: whether staff understand role within organisation and whether the organisation ensures they do not have conflicting roles Change: how organisational change (large or small) is managed and communicated in the organisation

HSE Scores: GU2012 by Gender, Job Family Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College Stress FactorGU2012GU MGU F1.R&T2.MPA3.Tech4.Ops5.Clinic 1.Demands Control a.Managers' Support b.Peer Support Relationships Role Change

HSE Scores for Science & Engineering College against All Colleges Stress FactorGGU 2012All Colleges Science & Engineering 1.Demands Control a.Managers' Support b.Peer Support Relationships Role Change Date tbiGU 2012 staff survey - Sc & Eng College