University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 3: Engaging stakeholders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Playing to Our Strengths Engaging the Political System on the Local Level Russell Harrison IEEE-USA.
Advertisements

Stakeholders and the Public
Pursuing Effective Governance in Canada’s National Sport Community June 2011.
Sidney B. Westley East-West Center Let’s Talk about Reaching Wider Audiences with our Research Results.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 1: Getting ready.
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Practicing Community-engaged Research Mary Anne McDonald, MA, Dr PH Duke Center for Community Research Duke Translational Medicine Institute Division of.
Good Participatory Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials Second Edition 2011.
Gathering Credible Data Seattle Indian Health Board Urban Indian Health Institute Shayla R. Compton, MPH University of Washington School of Public Health.
Public Consultation/Participation in an EIA Process EIA requires that, as much as possible, both technical / scientific and value issues be dealt with.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
Decision-Making and Strategic Information Workshop on M&E of PHN Programs July 24-August 11, 2006 Addis Ababa.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
Notes for a presentation to the EEN (Canada) Forum Blair Dimock Director, Research, Evaluation and Knowledge Management October 1, 2010 Sharing Practical.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Negotiating Diverse Contexts and Expectations in Stakeholder Engagement Sue Lin Yee, MA, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Office of.
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Getting started with evaluation.
NH OFFICE OF ENERGY AND PLANNING PLANNING & ZONING CONFERENCE MAY 11, 2013 MOLLY DONOVAN UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Community Outreach.
University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 2: Developing an evaluation plan.
Workshop on Life History Interviews with Students University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,February 2007.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Working with Decision- Makers AAP Pediatric Residency Advocacy Training.
GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results September 23, 2004.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Week 8: Research Methods: Qualitative Research 1.
Geiger Gibson Capstone in Community Health Policy & Leadership Webinar Series 1.Executive Branch Role 2.Legislative Branch Role 3.Judicial Branch Role.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
Stakeholder Analysis.
GOOD INTENTIONS : USING DATA TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE 1 Prepared & Presented By: Renata Cobbs Fletcher Consultant, M.H. West & Co. Persistently Dangerous.
Introduction to Evaluation Tammy Horne, Ph.D. WellQuest Consulting Ltd. (780)
Workshop 6 - How do you measure Outcomes?
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Coalition 101. RESPECT AND VALUE “The group respects my opinion and provides positive ways for me to contribute.” EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS “The roles.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
Cultural Competence & Capacity Building By: Nate Hartman, Chris Hunter, Terry Martin, & Kristin Williams Chapter 9.
E. D. Bell.  Kapp & Anderson (2010) argue that the program evaluation process has eight steps that are fluid, dynamic, and interdependent, i.e., they.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests.
Key Stakeholder Interviews Assessing Effectiveness of Washington State Board of Education Communications with Key Stakeholders.
Overview of Chapters 11 – 13, & 17
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Nuclear Security Culture William Tobey Workshop on Strengthening the Culture of Nuclear Safety and Security, Sao Paulo, Brazil August 25-26, 2014.
Clinical Supervision Foundations Module Seven Counselor Development.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Pennsylvania Libraries. Introduction Many people, offices and governing bodies are involved in creating, maintaining and improving library service in.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Welcome to the IPFS Webinar The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (The National CLAS.
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results October 14, 2004.
Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Planning your evaluation This presentation provides.
Stakeholder Analysis. Why this session? We believe stakeholder participation is useful We hope to strengthen your skill in stakeholder participation How.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
The Power of Parents: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness Family Leadership Training Program It all begins today!
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Contextualizing the Evaluand: Considering Context in Data Collection and Analysis Jamie Weinstein, MPH The MayaTech Corporation, With CDC’s National Center.
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
Better life. Better health. A better North Carolina.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.
A Developmentally Responsive Middle Level Education Kimberly Frazier November 20 th, 2009.
Business Leadership Network: Program Evaluation in Public Health March 28, 2016.
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
 Know how to identify and scrutinise appropriate HR data sources  Be able to conduct small scale research and analyse the findings  Be able to draw.
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC. The Federal Framework.
Project Title: (PEARS Action Plan-Step 1)
Re-Framing Agendas: From the Personal to the Policy Level
Presentation transcript:

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 3: Engaging stakeholders

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Evaluation standard: Utility “Persons involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified, so that their needs can be addressed.” −The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994) Source: The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, Inc. (1994). Summary of the standards. In The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved January 2, 2007, from

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Core issues Who are the stakeholders in your outcome evaluation? How can they be involved? What roles can they play? How can you get them involved?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What are “evaluation stakeholders”? Persons involved in or affected by the evaluation. Individuals and organizations with an investment, interest, or influence (a stake) in the initiative and/or evaluation and evaluation findings. Often referred to as “evaluation users.”

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Who are your evaluation stakeholders? Those who request the evaluation or are in a position to do or decide something with the result of the evaluation  funder, manager, sponsor, partners, staff, community, policy makers Those who may be affected by the evaluation  program participants, community members, elected officials, potential participants Others?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Stakeholders’ involvement can help you. Their perspectives can help strengthen your evaluation design. They might bring resources or influence to help carry out the evaluation and/or act upon the results of the evaluation. They are likely to gain a new appreciation and understanding of the program. They will better understand the results and will be more likely to use them.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Whose interests are represented? Whose are not represented?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation How do you find out who you should involve?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Why worry about stakeholders? Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Evaluation Working Group. (n.d.). Engaging stakeholders. Retrieved August 6, 2008, from Increases chances that evaluation will be useful Improves evaluation’s credibility ClarifiesClarifies roles and responsibilities Enhances cultural competence Helps protect human subjects Helps avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest Shares power

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation “People, not organizations, use evaluation information.” −Patton, 2008, p. 66 Source: Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Roles a stakeholder can play: Member of advisory group Designing the evaluation Constructing the instrument Collecting data: conducting interviews, etc. Involvement in analysis and interpretation Advocate Raising funds Writing press releases….

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation What does “meaningful involvement” mean?

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation How can you get people to be involved? Use the personal touch. Match their interests to the evaluation’s needs. Pay attention to cultural obstacles. Be sensitive to busy schedules and competing priorities. Provide options for individuals to consider and choose from. Express the value their involvement will bring to them, to you, to the program, and to the community. ??????

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Tips for working with stakeholders Involve them early. Focus on a few key stakeholders. Provide options about how they might be involved. Don’t assume that those in leadership or decision- making roles are the most important or the only ones you should include. Avoid giving the impression that the evaluation will answer all their questions. Make certain you are not excluding anyone due to gender, ethnicity, or language. Throughout the evaluation, continue to see if there are new stakeholders who should be involved. Source: Hosley, C. (2005, April). Who wants to know: Tips for involving stakeholders in your program evaluation, Issue 2. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from