1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.
Advertisements

Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.
Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
GRADUATION RATE Timelines and Business Rules for High School Graduation Calculations.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
SO YOU WANT TO PLAY SPORTS IN COLLEGE IT’S NOT AS EASY AS YOU THINK NO MATTER HOW GOOD YOU ARE.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Graduation Requirements College and Career Readiness Working Group.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
ASEE ENGINEERING DEANS INSTITUTE 1 Josh Thomases Deputy Chief Academic Officer for Instruction NYC Department of Education.
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
NYS/FEHB Regional Data-Graduation Rate 2001 – 2003 Cohort.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Data for the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts February 2006.
Operation Inform Tests and Testing The State University of New York
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
OAEP Conference – Prepared for Success Component Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability May 8, 2017.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Driving Through the California Dashboard
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Student Homelessness in NYC
Graduation Requirements (as of the start of the school year)
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006

22 The Bottom Line Statewide graduation rates are increasing slowly, but are still too low. Results are uneven among school districts. Graduation rates for English Language Learners are far too low. The Achievement Gap persists. Graduation rates for Students with Disabilities are far too low. Aspirational Performance Measures, newly reported this year, tell more about high school outcomes and will inform Regents decisions on graduation requirements.

333 Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years Results Through June, All Students Graduation rates reported by Big 5 city school districts have increased overall during the past six years. *Large City N/RC = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.

444 Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years Results Through June, 2010 All Students Outside of the Big 5, graduation rates for high need urban/suburban and rural districts have increased by 4 to 5 percentage points over the past six years. Average and low need districts have the highest graduation rates.

55 Although more students statewide are earning diplomas after five and six years in high school, many of these are Local Diplomas. The percentage of students earning Regents Diplomas with Advanced Designation remains relatively flat over time. Four YearsFive YearsSix Years 71.8% 77.4%77.0% 69.3% 70.9% 75.6% 73.4% 78.3%78.9% Cohort Membership , , , ,744 For the next 10 slides, the cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of the columns. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding. Statewide, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma

66 The graduation rate for New York City has risen steadily. Many graduates earn a Local Diploma after five and six years. Four YearsFive YearsSix Years 61.0% 67.8%69.2% 52.8% 56.4% 59.0% 62.6% 66.1% 65.6% NYC, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma Cohort Membership , , , ,346

7 The Achievement Gap Persists The overall graduation rate achievement gap is narrowing, but only for the local diploma. The gap is widest for the Advanced Designation diploma. As a percentage of the cohort, more black and Hispanic students earn local diplomas than white students. 5 th and 6 th year graduates are predominantly black and Hispanic. The gap is narrower in NYC and the 4 than statewide for overall graduation rate and for Advanced Designation

88 Statewide, the graduation rate achievement gap has declined. The gap is larger and has increased slightly, however, based on the percent of the cohort that earned a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation. As a percent of the cohort, more Black and Hispanic students earned Local Diplomas than do White students. Black v. WhiteHispanic v. White Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years Positive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students

99 Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools % 57.7% 84.1% 54.2% 52.2% 82.0% 54.8% 82.7% 57.3% the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column, the overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

10 Beyond Graduation Rates: Aspirational Performance Measures The Local Diploma will no longer be an option for most general education students who begin grade 9 in September 2008 or later. The Board of Regents is considering new student graduation requirements that are aligned with college- and career-readiness. Last year, based on research, 3-8 English and Math assessment scoring was aligned with high school performance. The Department will implement changes to the assessment program to better support the determination of college- and career-readiness. The Regents are establishing Aspirational Performance targets to be used by schools and districts to measure progress.

Cohort Outcomes on two Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) are reported this year for all Districts and High Schools 1. Advanced Regents Diploma Percentage APM The percentage of cohort students who earned a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation (22 units of credit, 7-9 Regents examinations at 65 or above, and advanced course sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts); 2. ELA/Math APM The percentage of cohort students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and earned a 75 or greater on their English Regents examination and earned a 80 or greater on a math Regents examination Outcomes on APMs are significantly lower than the overall graduation rates. We will report APMs for schools and districts while college and career-ready graduation requirements are phased in for students.

12 All Students After 4 Years Results Through June Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students who started 9th grade in 2006 for the Big 5 City School Districts *Large City N/RC = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.

13 All Students After 4 Years Results Through June Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students who started 9th grade in 2006 by Racial/Ethnic Group

14 English Language Learners, Students with Disabilities, General Education Students, and All Students After 4 Years Results Through June Statewide Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students who started 9th grade in 2006

15 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006

16 Graduation Rate Release: 2006 Cohort through June/August 2010 Students excluded from a school/district cohort: Transferred to a different New York public school, nonpublic school, or a school outside New York Transferred to home-schooling Transferred to a postsecondary school prior to earning a diploma Transferred outside district by court order * Left the United States Deceased * Will change with implementation of USDOE cohort rules, which are summarized at

17 Graduation Rate Release: 2006 Cohort through June/August 2010 Graduation Rate equals the number of students in the 2006 cohort who earned a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma divided by the total number of students in the 2006 cohort Students who earn GED or IEP diplomas cannot be included as graduates for graduation rate reporting purposes* Students who are enrolled in, earned a credential from, or dropped out of a New York school or approved GED program, but who are not included in any school or district’s cohort (e.g., the student’s last regular enrollment record was fewer than five months), are included in the statewide and New York City cohort for graduation rate reporting. * See federal guidance at

18 Required Documentation for Removal from the Cohort Transfer: Written request for a transcript from the receiving school, a record of sending a transcript to the receiving school, written acknowledgement from the receiving school that the student has registered, written notice of the intent to instruct at home, copy of post-secondary admission notification and schedule of courses taken, or a copy of the court order placing student out of district. Left the United States: Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the student’s parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator includes in the student’s file. See federal guidance at

19 Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) were calculated based on the total number of students in the 2006 cohort as of June 2010 (including students who dropped out or transferred to an approved GED program). Graduation rate is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma. Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation requires 22 units of credit, passing 7 to 9 Regents examinations with 65 or above, and advanced course sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts. ELA/Math APM is the percentage of these students* who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and scored**: 75 or higher on the English Regents examination, and 80 or higher on a mathematics Regents examination * Students who were enrolled in New York Performance Standards Consortium schools who have been approved to use a portfolio assessment to meet the mathematics assessment requirement for graduation have been excluded from the cohort for this analysis. ** Or who achieved the minimum score accepted by the Department on an approved alternative to a Regents examination. Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs)

20 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006